Dinner, but any case all of this russian narrative has changed the rules here in washington maybe forever. The russians are now our chief enemy. Americans who have contact with them, any contact at all are committing treason. Thats the subtext. Here it is expressly stated. This is congressman mike quigley, democrat from illinois explaining the new rules. What were learning with the trump junior meeting is when you meet with any russians, you are meeting with russian intelligence and therefore president putin. Tucker in other words, there is no innocent contact with russia. It doesnt exist. Any meeting with any russian is a meeting with putin himself. Okay. What does that mean for Hillary Clinton . In 2010, while she was secretary of state, she publicly put sanctions on the russian government. At the very same time her husband bill clinton was paid half a Million Dollars to deliver a speech in moscow to Financial Firms set to benefit from the removal of the sanctions his wife opposed. The clinton was even thanked later by Vladimir Putin for that speech. Since were doing the math, the clintons payday was ten times greater than what general Michael Flynn received for speech in 2015. Does that mean that bill clinton colluded ten times as much as general flynn colluded . Maybe well find out at his treason trial presided over by Maxine Waters and the rest of washingtons new red raiders. Maybe Michael Hopkins will be there, too. Hes a democratic strategist. Mr. Hopkins, thanks for coming on. By the new standards, which i should just say in case our viewers are not detecting sarcasm in my voice, i think are appalling and stupid. But those of the standards. I dont make the rules. Democratic rules stomach members of congress stupid any contact with russias contact with Vladimir Putin himself and therefore treason. What do you make of Hillary Clinton and her contact with the russians . I dont think was problematic at all. Its look at this an honest way. Its not the contact itself that was problematic. Its the fact that he lied. Bill clinton gave a speech in moscow, that in and of itself isnt illegal. Its the fact that Michael Flynn lied. Bill clinton admitted that he gave that speech. Hillary Clinton Tucker i appreciate that, it was a game effort. But mike flynn lied to members of the administration who then told the truth to the american public. And the security clearance tucker there was innately rectified by the administration you think should be driven from office because they are contacting russia. It was only after he was confronted with lying. Tucker confronted by the people he worked for in the Trump Administration. Im not defending trump, im just saying that by the standards youve set up just a second to go that doesnt make any sense. Lets get to the core of it, not who lied or who told the truth or who who did what. The meetings with the russian government, in a public position against sanctions, evidence of disloyalty. Thats what democrats are sayin saying. What are they sing . She was secretary of state, and on multiple occurrences she met with the russian government. That in and of itself is not a crime. She was a public government official. Tucker its her job to do that. It becomes problematic when you have donald trump junior meeting with the russians, or plan a fork to my stomach or Paul Manafort tucker any meeting with russians is in fact in betrayal of your country, but what thats not specifically what he said, but i get your point. Tucker i can read a quote. Meeting with russians is meeting with russian intelligence. I think there were a few more words in there. Democrats should be careful when they are talking about meeting with russians and aligning that with the crime. Im a criminal defense attorney by nature, and crimes are very specific. Tucker how about this, an immoral act. That is a textbook of mccarthyism . This president has been pushing for at least the last 18 months this idea that we can demagogue all different kinds of groups and that that somehow makes it legitimate just by the action of our president tucker when the ranking democrat in the house, nancy pelosi, makes that case. When Maxine Waters of los angeles makes the case between mike quigley of illinois makes that case. Somehow its the Trump Administration. Okay. Leslie partisanship hundred how to get to the core story. What do you make of that . A sitting secretary of state is married to a man, himself a former president , who was soliciting money from foreign governments within the United States has contentious relationship. Would you have felt comfortable if Donald Rumsfelds wife was taking money from foreign governments, or would you be happy now if the secretary of state Rex Tillersons wife were taking money from russia . When she said its all over the top . Lets make sure we get this right. Bill clinton himself is not taking money from rush to the government. He gave a private speech in russia. I will acknowledge what you say. I dont like the idea of politicians whether they be emigrants or public giving speeches in russia. Tucker i dont either, and i didnt like what mike flynn did it. I guess you are conceding something that kind of blows up the entire story. Not every person with cyrillic letters is working for Vladimir Putin. Went democrats have gone to russia or given speeches in russia, had conversation with us with russians, we are honest. If republicans would stop lying. If Paul Manafort, donald trump, jr. , would stop lying, then maybe we can credit situation where he would have a reason to trust that there is discourse going on. Tucker i mean, im not going to contest that, i think its a silly point. That matters though. When you have the Senior Member of the campaign lying about meeting with russia. Tucker im less interested in the Trump Administration and much more interested in russia the country, which has a ton of Nuclear Weapons and our relationship with them. I just want to establish and we want it quick, that it is okay as an american citizen, a faithful american, to talk to russians and have opinions that may be the same opinions as the majority. You can be against sanctions as hillary was, you can meet with them as her husband did, even if ties to vladimir poon, and that doesnt make you a disloyal american. Is that what youre saying . You can meet with them and have conversations, former president or secretary of state, as long as you are honest. We can pretend that the Trump Administration has done. Tucker what theyve done is totally different. [laughs] obstruction of justice, foreign donations, soliciting foreign donations, those are real things. Tucker it is groundhogs day on the show. Im glad we got to that, michael, thanks for joining. For more on the clinton familys interaction with russia, big deal or not, we are joined by flexing your political analyst brit hume. Britt, is this a big deal. We knew about this. I think its fair to suggest that when this came out along with so much else about hillary and bill clinton in the way that they raised money, and all the problems of the Clinton Foundation that those things went into the mix of public opinion. The result was that Hillary Clinton lost the election. We cant draw a straight line, they fit but that was out there. It may have helped prevent her from becoming president. I think the fact that it was out there is probably a good thing, obviously there wasnt a to do made about that at the time that there is about these russia contacts. And it is just the fact that the trump team didnt come out and form the country of all these things right away, that always creates a bad story and an appearance of something being covered up. But its also as you pointed out, he or she is making policy decisions, and here he is being paid extravagantly by people who have an interest in those decisions. That is a conflict of interest. That is a howling conflict of interest. And that was eightpoint against her in the election. Tucker what you make of the fact that this is being reported by the Washington Post tonight that our president may have betrayed his country by sitting next to come in close physical proximity, vladimir put himself at a multilateral affair. Its perfectly fine. What i object to at the time is the breathless and extravagant coverage that these events get. I find myself repeatedly thats interesting, but its not that big a deal. Time and time again that is my reaction. I think we have is a story that has been interesting, worth reporting, worth investigating. But to date, hopelessly overblown. Tucker the second someone can explain what the crime is i will be really interested in this story. Because they Start Talking about a cover up you have to have a coverup, collusion tucker im willing to believe anything. I dont work for the administration. If you tell me what the allegation obstruction of justice your previous guests, ethic we are a long way from being able to say that. Tucker one more thing. The Republicancontrolled Senate apparently failed to repeal obamacare, and the president has signaled his time to sit back and let that law fail on its own. Heres what he said. Ive certainly disappointed. For seven years ive heard repeal her place in congress and ive been hearing it loud and strong, and when we finally have a chance to repeal and replace they dont take advantage of it. I think we are probably in that position where we will just obamacare fail. We are going to own it. I can tie the the republicans are going to own it well let it fail and then the democrats will come to us and they will say how do we fix that, how do we fix it. Out of think thats a realistic scenario. If you have both houses in the congress and the white house and your party has been elected on a promise to fix this law, this law which was so unpopular, and you dont do that, and the negative consequences of that law take full effect, that the deal they can escape responsibility is nuts. Tucker what would that look like . The white house and the congress to sit back and watch and watch the continuing collapse of choice in the exchanges. People unable to get premiums rising to astronomical levels, continuing growth in the copayments and minimums. And the thing unraveling. I dont think its politically tenable, particularly if you have control of all parts of the government, to let that happen and pretend you can blame some details. The other thing is, who would you them blame . People in charge in the past . Seems to me theyve already gotten blamed. They got turned out of power. Their party got turned out of power, they lost control of first the house and then the senate. Now these people can turn her and say look, this was their problem, we didnt fix it so dont blame us . It doesnt work that way. And it wont. Tucker, make no mistake about that. If they dont find a way somehow, i dont know what it would be at the stage, to turn this around and get something done on this, this will be a colossal failure, historic failure. The reasons that are being given by these members for not being able to vote for this, we have members of the senate now who are prepared to keep the vote to repeal obamacare from even coming to the floor. They are free to vote against it, but they want to block its consideration. These people in some instances who voted for that very repeal within the last two years. I dont see how this is politically defensible. Tucker i dont either. Thanks. Thanks, tucker. Tucker a minneapolis woman called the police to report a crime and somehow wound up dead herself get shot by a Police Officer. What happened . We got some breaking news on that we will tell you in a minute. Plus a man who murdered a u. S. Soldier has become a multimillionaire courtesy of the trudeau government in canada. Just that we will talk about a soldier who was gravely wounded while fighting that man. Stay Liberty Mutual stood with me when this guy got a flat tire in the middle of the night. Hold on dad. Liberty did what . Yeah, Liberty Mutual 24hour roadside assistance helped him to fix his flat so he could get home safely. My dad says our insurance doesnt have that. Dont worry i know what a lug wrench is, dad. Is this a lug wrench . Maybe . You can leave worry behind when liberty stands with you™. Liberty stands with you™. Liberty mutual insurance. Hey youve gotta see this. Cno. N. Alright, see you down there. Mmm, fine. Okay, what do we got . Okay, watch this. Do the thing we talked about. What do we say . Its going to be great. Watch. Remember what we were just saying . Go irish see that . Yes im gonna just go back to doing what i was doing. Find your awesome with the xfinity x1 voice remote. Tucker this is a fox news alert, theres breaking news in the case of the australian woman shot to death by a Police Officer in minneapolis after calling 911 to report a crime. Foxman apples reporter Christina Paladino joins us with details. Christina. Tucker, this is the alleyway here in southwest minneapolis where 40yearold Justine Ruszczyk was shot and killed by a minneapolis Police Officer. She was shot just a few doors down from her home on saturday night. We understand that she was calling to report a possible assault happening in this alleyway. We discussed an update from the state agency investigating. They tell us that the two officers were patrolling in their car with their lights off when she came out of nowhere and startled both of them. We understand that 31yearold officer mohamed was in the passenger seat, he is the one who shot her in the abdomen. She died on scene. Investigator say she did not have a weapon on her. The body cameras on the Police Officers as well as their squad camera video were not turned on. She moved here from sydney, australia, three years ago to be with her fiance. She was set to marry him next month in hawaii. Weve lost the dearest of people, and we are desperate for information. Piecing together justines last moment before the homicide would be a small comfort as we grieve this tragedy. The death of justine is a loss to everyone who knew her. She touched so many people. With her loving, and generous heart. He has refused to be interviewed by state investigator. The other officer has already sat down with detectives. Hes been on the force for about two years but he is the first somali american Police Officer to be in this precinct, but he already has three citizen complaints filed against him. One was closed without discipline, the other two remain open. And we are attending a press conference in the next few minutes to hear from the assistant chief, the mayor, and other Council Members as well. Tucker. Tucker thank you, christine, we appreciate it. Theres a lot going on in this story. And a lot we dont know. Mohammed was an immigrant from somalia. Is that a relevant fact . We dont know. But its being treated as one by many news organizations. How do you know that . Because that reporting. The Washington Post did a long piece on this shooting and made no mention of his nationality, they didnt even mention his name. There are an entire story about this and didnt mention the cops name. Why is that . We have former Nashville Police up there. Mr. Hill, thanks for coming on site. It seems odd a bunch of things seem odd to me, but maybe they are not. First, how common is it for Police Officers to shoot someone through the door of a vehicle . Tucker, things or have me on. Its very uncommon for a Police Officer to shoot outside of a vehicle from the inside. Most departments forbid it. So i question what made this officer, officer noor, believe there is an eminent threat against either his life or his Partners Life to shoot three times inside the vehicle and strike her. I really question that. Tucker the second notable fact that seems to me is the body cams in the dash cams. At least three cameras present and none of them on. Before, during, and after the shooting. Why would that be . I dont want to speculate, there could be several reasons. Of course, body cams in general are very new to most Police Departments across this country. I believe minneapolis has only been using body cams for about a year. So when officers are approaching a scene of a call, they have a lot that they are thinking about. It could be that the body cam was not one of those. I dont know why the dash cam, if it was available, was it on, because of course youre responding to a crime or reports of a crime. At least the dash cam should have been on. Tucker i always give cops the benefit of the doubt, because its a really hard job in a dangerous job. So maybe this isnt meaningful, but you tell me what you think. This guys been on the force for two years, three complaints against them. Does that seem like a lot . For someone to have only been on for two years, it definitely seems like a lot. Especially the last one i believe was this past may. Here we are, just two months removed from that, and he now a young lady is dead and is very tragic. So i really question what those reports actually said. Was it something that apartment shouldve said, hey, maybe hes not fit for duty. Yet the question that. Tucker you certainly do. Theres a lot we dont know, and i cant stand it when people speculate irresponsibly. But since youve done this job, can you think of a scenario in which would happen, what we know happened, makes sense . Ive thought about this all day, and the only thing i can speculate from an officer point of view is there was something that made that officer believed there was an imminent threat against his life. I think theres reports now that there may have been allowed noise by the vehicle. Theres reports that she startled these officers. But we have to take into account they receive the call that the female was being sexually assaulted, so common sense should kick in and say, it is possibly the victim, or is this the 911 caller. I know when ive answered 911 calls, i always wanted to speak to the color to get their perspective and see if there is a suspect, to see if we need that set up a perimeter. I dont understand what led this officer to believe, not only did he have to take her life, but if you think about it, he put his Partners Life in jeopardy by shooting across him. Tucker its unbelievable. Whatever he thought, he could not imagine this was the perpetrator in a sexual assault, you wouldnt think. Vincent, thanks a lot. It was really helpful. Thank you so much. Tucker canada has made a convicted terrorist a very rich man. Will they ever spare a penny for his victims . We are going to talk to Sergeant Leigh morris was gravely wounded in the battle against omar, a man who does receive more than 10 million canadian dollars. Stay you wont see these folks at the post office. They have businesses to run. They have passions to pursue. How do they avoid trips to the post office . Stamps. Com mail letters, ship packages, all the services of the post office right on your computer. Get a 4 week trial, plus 100 in extras including postage and a digital scale. Go to stamps. Com tv and never go to the post office again. Tucker last night told you how canadas government awarded 10 million to omar khadr after giving this man them money, Justin Trudeau admitted that he didnt even bother calling the widow of christopher, the delta force medic who was murdered by khadr in 2002 and a grenade blast. Meanwhile, he says everybody should move on and forget what he did. Hopefully not forgetting, but moving on and healing. I was angry, upset about what happened. Its been hard finding jobs, school, my best reputation. This is going to help me move forward. Tucker tend to have Million Dollars from canadian taxpayers. That will help me move forward. One man who cant move on quite so easily or seamlessly is sergeant morris, he was blinded in one eye during the same firefight that killed christopher speer. Sergeant morris joins us tonight. Sergeant, thanks for coming on tonight. What do you make of this . Whats your response to this . I think ive said this before. What kind of sick and twisted ivory tower do you have to live in as a Prime Minister of canada to decide to award this man 10. 5 million, good, hardworking canadian folks his dollars that equals justice. It makes no sense. Tucker it doesnt, and its more a statement about the decadence of the west than it is about the men who perpetrated this crime. Its all most a rhetorical question, but did the Prime Minister contact you the settlement . No, he did not. First i heard about it was when my phone started ringing from canada. Former Prime Minister Stephen Harper contacted me to apologize on behalf of canadians in general, and the military folks up there. I thought that was nice of him. Tucker out think theres any evidence that most canadians agree with this or are for it. At all. Is that your sense . It is. That makes perfect sense. I dont get to be canadian or american to say, okay, theres a guy out there who killed a u. S. Soldier, and now youre going to give him 10. 5 million because he had he was lonely at guantanamo. Or he didnt have a shoulder to cry on. How that balances out is justice, its just beyond me. And obviously canadians. I think that theres a poll that 70, 71 of canadians are outraged by this action. Tucker its the definition of decadent atomic decadence tells about the day this happened. Come i dont have a problem talk about it. We were after omar khadrs father who was in londons finance guy. The compound, i slid a compound we went to, his father was gone, omar was there with four or five other guys, we surrounded that complex myself and for other soldiers, we waited for 45 minutes and they wouldnt come out and talk to us. When we finally got the rest of my team there as well as some afghans that we were working with, one of our interpreters when and to try to make contact. The gazans had that compound just popped up over a low rise inside the compound and executed them point light, and through hand grenades at the rest was paid we shot two or three of them at the gate, and as the others ran to the back of the compound throwing hand grenades as they went, i popped up to shoot a couple of guys with my rifle. Got up. 203 and a grenade launcher the bottom, and as i pulled the trigger on the grenade launcher i felt something smack me in the right side. It turns out a hand grenade they had their own, i hadnt seen, went off in a piece of shrapnel hit me in the right eye. Tucker and that ended your Service Career . It did. You know, i am a shooter. The military wouldve let me stay in as a trainer or Something Like that, but having to shoot lefthanded, id be a liability to in 18. And so i put in 21 years. I took my retirement, and got out. Tucker how bitter this must be for you. In addition to all of that, to watch the man who did it become rich, and apparently unrepentant. Im really sorry for you. Well, it is. Its bitter to see a man who in the canadian government, in particular, not just remain neutral in the matter, they went out of their way mr. Trudeau had to go out of his way to get omar this money, to cut short any negotiation, and just say lets give him 10. 5, make sure we get that done before the americans have any chance of going after that money. To protect this man. Boy, thats really reopening a wound. I feel bad for chris speer, his wife, she is a great lady. Its gonna be tough for her to see the canadian government open that one. And i feel bad for canadian military. I served over there with those guys. Theyve got to be feeling pretty bad about their government rewarding a man who did his very best to kill them. Tucker im sure trudeau did this as an expression of how but he undermines his own society by doing it. Sergeant morris, thanks for tha that. No problem. Thanks for having me, tucker. Tucker appreciate it. An article on Huffington Post challenged us to an immigration debate, and of course he couldnt turn that down. Up next, meet the challenges. Tucker Pablo Manriquez is the cofounder at k street media here in washington. He wrote a piece for Huffington Post. Why tucker should debate man immigration. We want to forfeit our honor by turning down such a gentlemanly challenge from such a gentleman. So we have picked up the gauntlet pablo threw down. The distance will be the width of the table. Pablo manriquez joins us. Thanks regina spit and honor to be here. Tucker im glad to have you. I stipulate it by saying that im totally for immigration and for immigrants. But i want to know what the parameters are. You may ask you a simple question. Weve got 330 Million People in the country. If immigration rates stay at the current level, 1. 2 per year, were going to have about half a billion people by the end of the century. If we follow the u. N. s lead we would have 1. 5 billion people in america by the end of this century. Those are estimates. What do you think the right level of immigration is . I think that the right level immigration has always been in this country, the level it is going to build the country and not detract from it. I think obviously, the immigration of the last several waves that come through, mostly from europe, obviously the chinese as well, help this country both in for structurally, culturally, and in a lot of different ways. The current hispanic immigration wave which is been so controversial politically lately, is having the same effect. We are going through the hunger throws, that cultural assimilation which i think is happening. Tucker i guess i would call your assumption into question. I dont think its hispanic immigration that is controversial. I think we are seeing immigration from all over the world. Its a question of a lot of things. With the economic effect, the cultural effect. Whats the idea level . Lets be more specific than that. How would people should live in this country . If you had a country of half a billion people, would be a better country than it is now or he was country . Not if its not sustainable. I think that we currently have a level of immigration that in some ways is meritbased, but is often not. We also have a lot of unaccounted for immigrants that are costing the border. The levels of immigration specifically at 1. 2 million, seemed to be it seems to be a number that has worked for us up to a point. It works up to a point when we were still building, the housing boom when there are still jobs to sustain them. That number at least in terms of border apprehension as we saw today just be on this illegal immigration, so basically what youre proving as you have no idea and neither does anybody else. People tell me that they are for more immigration, but to what level . Nobody has thought this through because they dont care. And they should cap in the global flow of immigration, theyre going to change things. Its hard to say what the numbers should be now and into the future. And that something that people discuss b only flip it on its head, so the leftwing assumption and this has changed a lot in the past ten years, but as of today it appears to be that its racist to exclude anyone from the country whether you are here legally or illegally. That is an assumption. Tucker what are the limits . Who should be able who should we be able to exclude, and on what basis . People who are a danger should be excluded first. The president has done a good job of attracting that kind of enforcement First Priority against people who are criminal aliens or criminal immigrants or whatever you want to call them. I think the president has also said, and this often gets lost in the debate, that there should be exceptions and that deportation shouldnt necessarily be the only punishment for people come here illegally. Is that fair . Tucker i disagree with it, but you wanted to come on in debate this. Debate me. Tell me where im wrong. I think that if you think deportation is the only penalty that should be upheld for eminence, i think thats wrong. Thats never been the case in previous immigration waves. Most of the time when we do have extraordinarily were too harsh penalties, it becomes an embarrassment of history. I think we have within the Trump Administration a very robust conversation going on, and the turnkey of that conversation is general kelley. General kelly is obviously someone who knows a lot about the immigration situation, especially in Central America when he was commanding tucker and i dont doubt any of that. But lets to the principle here really quickly. What youre saying is we have laws in the books, we should ignore. My question always is if you believe that, then why not make a sincere effort to change the law . I couldnt agree more. Tucker all the rich people, welleducated people are for ignoring immigration laws, all that i know. But i dont hear anybody announcing a campaigning congress to change the law. Lets make it the law, if you sneak in and we think you are great or you work for me to low, you can stay. Why ignore laws on the books . Thats corrosive, corrosive of the rulebook. I wouldnt agree i think the president has the unique opportunity to do something unprecedented in the way that only he could i think the first thing that needs to change the way that we evaluate dreamers. We should let them stay. I hate to say it, and i dont tucker to meet specific criteria. I think if we have the specific criteria, we can evaluate them substantially. Tucker you are here illegally, he should be allowed to stay if you plank. If you want . I think if you came here at a certain age, that was too young to be able to decide on your own whether or not you came here. I think that tucker should the parents be able to stay, to . And many cases they should. Tucker so anybody with a child in tow can stay. No, not with the child in tow necessarily paid there was a guy deported today that had four u. S. Citizen children that were going to be tucker is there anybody that comes in with a child, you can support the parents, what about grandparents and cousins . It gets complicated. But we have to have a humane approach to this. Tucker them when we quantified instead of degraded. We should, and i see nothing but the cowardice from both the democrats and the republican side. Tucker boy, i am there with you there. We kind of agreed a lot, it was great to see. Thanks again and all your success, congrats. Tucker how should we fix it . If it all the power, we will ask we always were told we were german. We were in a german dance group. I wore lederhosen. So i just started poking around on ancestry. Then, i decided to have my dna tested through ancestry dna. It turns out im scottish. So, i traded in my lederhosen for a kilt. Tech when you schedule with safelite autoglass, you get a text when were on our way. You can see exactly when well arrive. Im micah with safelite. Customer thanks for coming, its right over here. Tech giving you a few more minutes for what matters most. Take care. Kids singing safelite® repair, safelite® replace. Tucker we spent some time this show following the drama of the Republican Health care bill. We talk with secretary of hhs last night asking questions like will it pass, what senators are defecting, what demands are being made, how many people lose insurance coverage. Those are all important questions. Once an amount important to take a step back and remember the point of all of this. Fixing a Health Care System that is deeply broken for tens of millions of americans. If you had absolute power, what would you do to improve American Health care . Charles krauthammer is the perfect menace that question. Hes not there and a column is, hes also a physician. He went to Harvard Medical School that he will explain what to do in a perfect world. The first thing is to recognize a mistake that obama made. And others have made. And thinking that you can revolutionize a system thats unbelievably complex and interlinked, onesixth of the economy. There was a mistake because whenever you change one thing, it changes 80 other things, and other youre changing everything at once you have no idea what the outcome is going to be and you get all of these unintended side effects. I think what you need first of all is modesty. And i think tucker modesty . Thats a commodity you can even relay purchase, and washington, but it is available in other parts of the world. Monasteries, for example. Where was i . Okay, the first thing you do is to say youre going to go with this this piece by piece. The first one that is the biggest, lowest hanging fruit, that was not even touched by obamacare, scandalously, his reform. The medical malpractice is totally out of control. Everybody in the system knows it. And its not just of the outrageous judgments, its not just the fact that some people get millions of dollars, others get nothing, and the people that get rich are lawyered, its just that it causes doctors to practice defensive medicine. It was a survey done by the Massachusetts Medical Society that found that doctors admitted that about one quarter of all procedures, examinations, hospitalizations, and tests were done to fend off the lawyers, not for medical reasons. I know that, i was there. I did the same thing. We had to do it. If you are working in a hospital, somebody said just in passing that he had some pain near his chest, you kept him overnight because otherwise the lawyers would kill you if something happened. Whereas if you are doing it for medical reasons he might observe him for a couple of hours and sent him home. Tucker because theres a cost of staying overnight. Not just economic the causes are massive. If one quarter of tests and procedures are done for legal reasons and not medical reasons, we are talking hundreds of billions of dollars a year. It could be up to half a trillion dollars a year. Imagine if you cut that in half with a rational reform system, you could use that money to subsidize the Health Insurance for every poor person in america. This is just one of and the only reason the democrats did not included in a bill of 2,000 pages was because they are owned by the trial lawyers. Tucker there biggest donors go to any yacht basin, and and a lot of that is sucked out of medicine. When i went to school, the smart kids at the went to medicine or law. The smartest of the ones who went into law, because they made the laws that have essentially taxed and stolen the income of the doctors that ends up in the legal profession. Thats number one. It can be done as a piece. It doesnt have to be done as part of something copper hansen. Second, this is obviously easier and shorter, is allow people to buy Health Insurance across state lines. Its not a station, its not rational. You can buy Auto Insurance across state lines. Beyond whats the opposition to that rooted in . I really i had never heard it very good argument. It could be that the legal structure right now is that Health Insurance is the province of each state. So that if you look, im making a case for something i dont believe, if you opened it up there would be what they call a race to the bottom. People would want the cheapest insurance. I would say, what the hell, why not allow them to buy the insurance they want . Isnt as a free country with Auto Insurance, you buy whatever level of insurance you want. There would be the obvious and second one. The other thing i would do, its a little complicated. Im about to go into governor perry territory where i forget the third and then i do remember the third, and that is youve got to recognize that you cant make the young and the healthy subsidize the rich by step. Thats what obamacare did. They hyped up the premiums for the young and the healthy, which by the normal tables, they pay about a sixth of what the elderly do. The democrats to create it should be a third. They were paying twice with the beginning. So what does a rational young person do opt out, exactly. Whats left, only the sink of the pool, the government has to say we are going to take care of the very sick, establish an open transparent government, and then have the rest of the market open to the healthier people and their premiums will be kept low. Thats the way to do it. Nobody want to do. Obama wanted to hide it. Hide the costs. The young people arent stupid and they didnt buy it. Tucker and acted rationally. Charles krauthammer. I wish you were in charge of the spirit i wish i wasnt. Im really happy to be outside of it. Look at the carnage thats going on now. Tucker something awful happened on cnn again. Happened on cnn again. We will have it for yourays al. Last year, he said he was going to dig a hole to china. At t is working with farmers to improve irrigation techniques. Remote moisture sensors use a Reliable Network to tell them when and where to water. So that farmers like ray can compete in big ways. China. Oh. He got there. Thats the power of and. Tucker here is a weird story. She doesnt have the same chief executive is every other american. Trump is simply the president for other people, she says. He went into a press conference during the summer asking russia to find the other 30,000 emails. Theres a lot of things that your president has done to defy logic. Your president too. Hes your president. Hes your president. The president of the United States. Tucker she has tweeted my president left january 20th. You can watch movies or books on someone elses president but alas, that wont change the reality. Its important to acknowledge this. Every person simply picks their own president . Theres no president at all. Goo. The five is to next. See you tomorrow. Greg hi it, i am greg gutfeld. She runs laps on a close and play. Youre watching the five. How come health care is a disaster . Heres why. This is a remote. It has a hundred buttons but i only use the power and channel. I dont know what the other buttons do. If i hit the other one, its all over. Thats health care. Its really designed and overly complicated. So convoluted. If i hit other one, its all