Thats when he was a conservative in the front. David brock from media matters. Thats New York Times magazine two years ago and now this one. Bingo baby picture, total winner. Laura thats 4 years old. I hated crossing my hands. I loved what did you call those things . Pigtails. I love that. Laura tried to get the makeup and hair people to do it tonight. They couldnt get it done. We tried to get it done. All right, you helped me out again. Im taking the pigtail one. Laura great to see you. Great show. Have a good show. Laura thanks so much. Tonight, we have more stunning evidence that the f. B. I. s investigation into Hillary Clint clintons email serve was a total farce. And also, the medias ill informed response to almost every aspect of the Mueller Investigation and finally, a Major Supreme Court win for President Trump. Together, theyre the focus of tonights angle. All right, guys, we are loaded up tonight. You are not going to want to miss one moment of this show. But first were only now learning why former f. B. I. Director jim comey contorted himself to not indict Hillary Clinton regarding her use of a private email server during her time as secretary of state. Tonight, we can tell you that it appears that the f. B. I. s lead investigator and deputy chief of counter intel has been revealed to be just another clinton crony and trump hater. Peter struck was found to have exchanged antitrump texts during the 2016 president ial debates with another colleague at the Justice Department. This according to the New York Times. And get this, he attended hillarys prefourth of july interview that was never transcribed and he reportedly urged comey to strike the phrase grossly negligent to describe Hillary Clintons handling of classified information. He softened it to extremely careless. Although we did not find clear evidence that secretary clinton or her colleagues intended to violate laws governing the handling of classified information, there is evidence that they were extremely careless in their handling of very sensitive highly classified information. Laura unbelievable. And this gets better. This same partisan official was one of the lead investigators assigned to the bureaus trump russia inquiry. He was very busy. And not only that, he was also part of the Interview Team that questioned Trump National security advisor mike flynn on january 24th. Huh. What a coincidence this guy is just everywhere but wait. Theres more. Mr. Struck is a pal of comeys. He wasnt taken off the case by special Counsel Robert Mueller until this past summer in july. So why the heck didnt mueller inform the public given the stakes involved and the need for public trust in this investigation . Why didnt he tell anybody . This guy was writing antitrump texts during the debates. So much for transparency. And, of course, lets not forget we have a gaggle of antitrump, pro hillary prosecutors who are still working for mueller right now. My friends, this is unacceptable. Its disgusting. And its unfair. Tonight, i urge the d. O. J. s Inspector General who seems like a terrific guy, Michael Horowitz to release a full transcript of mr. Strucks text and maybe those of other key clinton and russia investigators. Now, remember, this is the same man who helped lead the investigation into the socalled trumprussia collusion, this mr. Struck character. I have a question how can anyone at this point just learning this fact and the other facts that weve cited on this show trust the Mueller Office at this point . No transparency. Theyre not telling us the truth about this. And were only learning it when the Inspector General somehow releases this information to the public. Since the mike flynn plea deal, just last week, the media experts are predicting, oh, its curtains. Its over for the trump presidency. R. I. P. Donald trumps political life. But ill tell you whats obvious. Here it is. Although flynn did lie, the collusion case died. So now theyre on the socalled obstruction of justice case against President Trump. The experts think its all cut and dried. Public record, theres one piece of evidence for obstruction of justice after another and this seems to be exhibit one. That seems to be in the territory of obstruction of justice. I think that were beginning to see is the putting together of case of obstruction of justice. Laura move over, f. Lee bailey. Now, so how worried should trump be at this point . Time will tell. We dont really know at this point. But consider that the media and legal and political experts who are predicting trumps impeachment, they also predicted this about the president s travel ban. Discriminatory intent here and the discriminatory intent of the Trump Administration is clear. It was premised on religious discrimination. Its very clear that the president is acting unconstitutional. You said we dont want to ban any on the basis of religion. Thats against our constitution. Yes, it is. But thats exactly what theyre doing. Thank you for calling it what it is. Its a muslim ban. Laura today, a refreshingly sane order by the Supreme Court on President Trumps socalled travel ban of six mostly muslim countries. Court declined to halt the ban despite rulings in two different lower courts. This was a preliminary but nevertheless, a major victory for President Trump who always had the constitutional right to determine the classes of people who can and cannot enter the country for security reasons. Now, once again, the experts are wrong. And while the media has a case of the vapors, a total meltdown over flynns cooperation with mueller, the president is racking up win after win. Tax cuts are coming. Retail is soaring this christmas season. The market is way up. And now, a key win at the Supreme Court. And its only monday, my friends and thats the angle. Joining us now, allan dershowitz, professor at Harvard Law School and attorney scott bolden. Lets start with you. This has been a wild day. The information that has come out just on mr. Struck, he was at hillarys questioning. He was at flynns questioning. And now, we find out that he actually had a number now of antitrump tweets, texts, excuse me, that he sent out during the president ial debates. Michael horowitz, the Inspector General at the Justice Department, should he release the texts of those messages that apparently caused so much consternation he was relieved of his duty . Yes, i think he should. And i think that he struck should have recused himself from the very beginning. And i think mueller was right to take him off the case. What im concerned about in your monologue, youre doing to Hillary Clinton exactly what the democrats are trying to do to donald trump. Youre trying to criminalize a political differences. Look, i dont think Hillary Clinton committed any crimes. I think she was extremely careless. I think that was a decision that was ultimately made by comey and not one of his deputies. Maybe the deputy suggested it. But i think we have to stop criminalizing political differences on both sides. Hillary clinton shouldnt be locked up. Donald trump shouldnt be pours prosecuted for any crimes. If you dont like what they did, dont vote for them. I get your point. Heres the problem is we have people in our military who are prosecuted for mishandling classified information fairly regularly. Civil servants who are prosecuted for mishandling classified information. To the regular person watching fox right now, they say ok, why is the clinton dynamic always special . Why do they get special treatment here . I dont think anybody in a position that Hillary Clinton is in has ever been prosecuted for anything like this and thats what was said by comey and i think thats right. When youre in a position like secretary of state and you have a lot of underlings working beneath you, its very different than if you are your own officer in the army and you take things home and clear violation of rules. Thats classified information. On the other side are saying exactly the opposite. That the case against Hillary Clinton is nonexistent and the case against donald trump is very strong. I want to see a ceasefire on both sides. Laura i got it. Then theres nothing you can do as an elected official to mishandle classified information that would actually become a criminal violation. But i get your point. To show specific intent. Laura lets go to you. Deleting a lot of emails shows specific intent. Lets start with struck and reverse the tables here. Lets say in the Hillary Clinton email investigation, we find out one of the main investigators was actual ly someone sending out texts to pals at the Justice Department that were antihillary texts. Would you be on the show now fairly upset about it if it hadnt been at least revealed . My position would be exactly the same. You sound like, laura, that if this is the main investigator, hes making decisions on his own. Laura nobody two guy in counter intel. He may be but there are layers and layers and checks and balances. Laura you wouldnt have a problem with it, scott. You wouldnt have a problem if the shoe were on the other foot. I have a problem with it. He should be removed. Its an appearance issue in connection to this sensitive investigation. But it is not the end all to be all to whether the investigation should go away or whether its been severely tainted. He has been removed. What else would you have mueller do . Laura he was removed in july five months after he was there for the questioning of michael flynn. After we find out only when the i. G. Got the information, we found out about the texts. He was not making the final call. When they found out about the texts he was moved to an h. R. Position. Laura thats ironic. Great. Thats so good. He should have been he should have recused himself and i think he should be severely punished for not recusing himself on his own. He knew that he had a bias. He knew about these emails. Laura alan, the democrats would be going bananas if the shoe were on the other foot. They would be going crazy with you. I agree with you. Laura its not right on either side, its not right. Lets move on to obstruction. Professor dershowitz, your old pal was on special report earlier tonight saying this. Lets watch. Im afraid i have to disagree with my friend alan on that. Ive taken the view that a president could be charged with obstruction. In fairness to alan and mr. Dowd, the president s attorney, this is a good faith question. You know, the professor use this as a parlor game for years of whether a sitting president can be indicted, whether you can self pardon. It happens this administration seems on course to answer all of them. Laura professor dershowitz, back to this question about obstruction and the president. He doesnt have my view correctly. He doesnt have my view correctly. Of course a president can be charged with obstruction of justice. Nixon was. And clinton was. In order to be charged with obstruction of justice, you have to go beyond simply exercising a president ial prerogative under article two of the constitution. If you bribe or take a bribe, if you destroy evidence and do what nixon did which is pay hush money or tell your subordinates to lie, of course, you can be charged with obstruction of justice. But you cannot be and should not be charged with obstruction of justice if you merely pardon people. You merely fire people even if the prosecution believes your intentions are not good. Thats what george h. W. Bush did. He pardoned Caspar Weinberger and five other people, the special prosecutor said the intent was to stop the investigation of irancontra. It succeeded. And nobody suggested that president bush be charged. Back that up for a second. Im glad that professor dershowitz has said that you can be prosecuted because thats what the impeachment process in the constitution talks about. But if the president has corruptible intent, if he fired comey and he asked him to lay off flynn to protect himself, or to do anything that was corruptible intent so he would not be prosecuted or impeached, he certainly can be gone after and prosecuted, be it at the state level and be it the political prosecution of the house of representatives. And then afterwards, he can certainly be prosecuted. But listen, there are a lot of these concepts or precepts that need to be tested in the courts. Theres a great disagreement about it but no one is above the law. And if he took out a gun and murdered somebody or raped or stole from someone, i must tell you its not that far fetched in the sense that he could be prosecuted laura what are you talking about . Lets be clear. Laura what are you talking about, scott . You lost me on that one. Professor, wrap it up. Cant be prosecuted for obstruction of justice. I never have said that a president cant be charged. Laura this is a distinction that professor dershowitz wants to make. Go ahead. I have never said a president cant be charged with obstruction. Hes not above the law. He cant be charged with obstruction merely for exercising his constitutional prerogatives. Thats an important distinction. No president in history has ever been charged for any crime or anything because he exercised his constitutional prerogative. They impeached president johnson for doing that. And the Supreme Court ultimately ruled that that was absolutely wrong. The president had the authority to fire the secretary of the army. He was impeached for that and wrongly impeached. Laura we got to go. Scott, well have you back. You made great points tonight. I really appreciate it. Thank you very much, alan and scott. And coming back, my message to a socalled female comedienne who trashed a female trump official. Dont want to miss it when we come back. Ohhhhhh, ou guess what i just got . Uh i used to be spellbound hello again. I used to be spellbound hi. I used to be spellbound thats a big phone. In your arms. [screams] ah, my phone. You built the flame that warms my heart, but lying and cheating has torn us apart and im moving on. I love hanging out. With my friends. I have a great fit with my dentures. I love kiwis. Ive always had that issue with the seeds getting under my denture. Super poligrip free. It creates a seal of the dentures in my mouth. Even well fitting dentures let in food particles just a few dabs of super poligrip free is clinically proven to seal out more food particles so youre more comfortable and confident while you eat. Super poligrip free made even the kiwi an enjoyable experience try super poligrip free. Of thoughts and dreams that scatter you pull them all together and how, i cant explain oh yeah, well well well youuuu you make my dreams come true well, well, well youuuu topped steak twisted potatoes at applebees. Now thats eatin good in the neighborhood. Witness katy perry. Witness katy perry become a legal witness. Witness katy perry and left shark. Or a card shark. Grandma . Witness katy perry work. Witness katy perry firework. Witness katy perry swish. Witness katy perry. Aaaaaaw look at that dog katy perry with music videos and behind the scenes footage, xfinity lets you witness all things me. Laura President Trump is pulling out all the stops to try to save the g. O. P. s slim majority in the senate and he formally endorsed judge roy moore today who is facing sex assault allegations from a number of women. But will the political gamble pay off for the president . Joining us now with reaction is Monica Crowley and Juan Williams cohost of the five which i just watched. Start with you, monica, is this a gamble for 2018 . Will the women not forget this and hold republicans accountable in the midterm elections given the serious nature of the allegations. There are political calculations going on across the board. I do not think you will have the president of the United States come out with an overt endorsement of roy moore unless you saw internal polling that hes going to pull this race off. Exactly. I think its interesting the Republican Party that disengaged from this race, the r. N. C. Has decided as of tonight, they are back in this race. Theyre going to start reinjecting money to support roy moore because they realized they need a g. O. P. Body in the senate body. Laura juan, this is what mitt romney said, i believe we have a tweet from him. Always a good day when mitt romney is weighing in. He said roy moore in the u. S. Senate would be a stain on the g. O. P. And the nation. No vote, no majority is worth losing our honor and our integrity. Your thoughts on that . Well, i think thats the bigger issue. So i mean, the majority is going to be there. Its one vote. Republicans will still have the majority. Bigger issue is the republican brand. You have people like mitt romney saying its a stain. Laura who lost. You have the other senator from alabama, Richard Shelby saying hes not voting for roy moore and you have more allegations coming out. Real question is lets say he wings it. You two are projecting thats a huge problem for President Trump because then hes going to be attached to roy moore. Everything he says and does, his confrontations with Mitch Mcconnell and already, those two are butting heads. So everything that he does, in addition to the possibility that he would be expelled at the Senate Ethics committee would act, and its the r. N. C. Thats saying theyre going to put money into the campaign tonight because theyre controlled by the president , President Trump. But the Republican Senatorial campaign committee, theyre not. The senator from colorado laura cory gardner is like open borders, free markets. You are so hard on republicans that you dont like. Mitch mcconnell is the Senate Majority leader. Laura ted kennedy and chris dodd who i actually like as a person, i mean, a lot of rolling around on the floor in the restaurant with 20 something lets be honest here. The democrats tethered themselves to democrats who were all over the place morally for years and held them up as the lions of the senate. The great lions. Let alone someone who died in chappaquiddick. Lets not talk about the moral barometer of the country. I cant believe that laura would sit here laura i say prayers there every time i go. Father, son and holy spirit. Was that a 14yearold girl. Laura is it a life . Shes dead. I care to celebrate christmas this year. How about a 16yearold who said come on, laura laura the democrats stood by a kennedy. Right . Dead. Couldnt swim a mile across the chappaquiddick. Is ted kennedy on the ballot . Laura he ran how many times. Did you vote for him when he was running for president . No. Let me tell you my mother who is dead said thats it. Im going to tell you, i cant believe that you and evangeli l evangelicals would now say laura i didnt endorse roy moore. I didnt endorse him. I endorse mo brooks, my man from the beginning. He was my guy. Go ahead. Politics is the art of the possible. And more often than not, purity is not involved in any way, shape or form. Laura purity and politics. Doesnt really exist. So voters have to make a choice, right . And its really a choice between sort of black and white. There are shades of gray and what youre pointing out that the democrats have had this long history of hypocrisy. Thats right. But i think voters in alabama are making a calculation. And their choice does rest with them. Theyre saying wait a minute, al franken is still in the senate. A 14yearold girl thats not what franken is charged with. Im not excusing any kind of bad behavior. Im talking about political calculations in political reality. Laura got to get to something else. Chelsea handler apparently is a comedienne and she says this. Do we have we have the spot . Lets watch. Theyre dressing up and trolloping out every day. One day she has no makeup and the next she has six foot long eyelashes, cleavage and summer lipstick on her face. Laura did she turn the word trollop into a verb . Very nice. Laura liberal women say theyre for women. But theyre really for liberal women. Thats right. Laura they trash conservative women as harlet. Thats a good one, too. But the nastiest, most based comments. Your reaction . Picking on her looks. The way she dresses. Laura never supposed to do that. Her hair, her makeup. Chelsea handler positions herself as some sort of feminist. But thats what she scombrus did to Sarah Huckabee sanders. Laura and did it to paula jones and anita broderick. Shes failed at comedy because netflix canceled her talk show. Rarely, rarely funny. So shes got to try to remain relevant to her leftist peers. Right . So by going after an easy target like somebody in the Trump Administration, thats how she thinks shes going to score. Laura juan . Its tawdry. I like that word. Youre really agitated. Doxy. Laura doxy. Harlet. If you wanted to have issues with sarah sanders, i mean, yeah, go ahead. Laura lot of substantive things to talk about. This is trashy. Laura chelsea not lately. Great to see both of you and you dont want to miss what i have for you on the other side of this break. Leave it to Time Magazine to celebrate some of the worst people in america. And later, my advice to President Trump on how to honor the life and shame the city of San Francisco. Stay right here. Laura goodie, Time Magazine released its 2017 person of the year finalists on the today show. Few on their list well, illegal alien dreamers demanding citizenship. The me, too movement. Not a person by the way, the metoo. And the kneeler in chief, colin kaepernick. The aclu honored him last night with their courageous advocate award. He offered this wisdom. We all have an obligation no matter the risk and regardless of reward to stand up for our fellow men and women who have been oppressed men and women who are being oppressed with the understanding that human rights cannot be compromised. Laura ok . Well, suggestion to the aclu and Time Magazine. I know of some really courageous advocates who never take a knee. Maybe when theyre proposing to their girlfriend or boyfriend. And since this year marks their 242nd birthday, they are the ideal person of the year. Try the marines. It seems all of our institutions are capitulating, though, doesnt it to this toxic culture and, perhaps, even the military. Why am i saying that . Well find out in a moment. Joining us with that are two veterans with different perspectives. Fox news contributor and in atlanta, democrat strategist and im talking like george h. W. Bush, robin. Great to see you. So i goofed a little bit on time person of the year. I think this is long past its usefulness at this point. Remember a few years ago, it was you that was like the winner, you. I think the internet. Wasnt even a person anymore like a hashtag or chair. Like Clint Eastwoods chair at the debate should have been the person of the year. On this question of kaepernick, though, do you do you really buy into that as a real game changer for this year . Well, you know, if you look at the list, theres a lot of people on there that just this is basically some pop culture things. But i do have to say that with kaepernick, i do appreciate that hes standing for his convictions. Anybody that does that, i do respect and appreciate. Ive had to do that. Ive actually had to speak out against some people within the Democratic Party myself. And i had to stand for some convictions that could have caused me some repercussions. And it was uncomfortable but, you know, you do what you feel you have to do morally and at the end of the day, he did that. I respect his reasons. He even had a special forces veteran consult with him on how to respectfully protest which was to take a kneel. Which in the military, as my fellow guest knows, thats a sign that you are injured. May have been the one green beret that got it wrong. Anybody knows who has worn the uniform to stand for the national anthem. He managed to get fired, tanking nfl ratings and maybe extorting the nfl for 90 million is an upside for him. Laura he wants to be playing football. We dont really know what his cause was generally speaking. But when you look at when you look at this entire list, kim jong un is on the list. He should get it this year. He probably will be dead next year. Laura only person that should make it is trump. Trump has turned the media upside down and turned politics upside down whether you like him or not. How can it not be trump . Theyre obsessed with him. Its the person of the year, lawyera. He ran against Political Correctness and part of the reason that he got elected. Lets remember even the name of the award itself is the reason why hes so successful. Laura i have to ask you a question about this and other issue that came up today. We werent going to get into it. I think its interesting. Now, if you smoke pot, it doesnt disqualify you from military service. And i know a lot of the kids have tried pot and im not in favor of it. I know a lot of people have. They recruit about 80,000 people a year, i believe, into all the branches of the armed forces. Do you think this is a good thing that its like a slippery slope, its lowering the standards or aint no big deal as long as youre not toking up now . As a veteran ranger, i surveyed a bunch of my buddies and i did a poll on my Facebook Group of 4,000 people and by and large, overwhelmingly they said as long as you didnt test positive when youre at meps, they didnt see it as a reason to be service disqualifying because a lot of kids do this you have to consider the states that its legalized in and a lot of these guys want to join the military to change their lives and get back to society. I can respect that. So, you know, i understand the need for more waivers. There are so Many High School students who dont qualify by body mass index standards, all of that. Laura you dont think that matters . Were trying to build up our military. Laura theyre building up the wrong way. Theyre building up the wits instead of the strength. Thats the problem. We have a major obesity epidemic. Michelle obama recognized that and unfortunately, its really affecting recruiting. Very much. So the amount of guys laura fat, fat soldiers. Its tough. Its smaller than it used to be. We live in a different culture, though, where marijuana is being legalized. Laura im totally against it. I get that. But if youre some young kid in a state that its legalized and you did it once or twice and cant go to the military. Prior performance is indicative of your future. If youre a pothead and want to get to the military, why are they lowering their standards . Laura whats the status of transgender in military . Its so in the middle of the bureaucracy. Trump wants to do the right thing as for so many things, what will the bureaucracy try to change . Laura what is he afraid of . Social engineering has been ingrained into what our military does. So many great people want to do good things but their incentives for their next promotion gets more political as you get higher to the top means that, you know, you go along to get along. I hope this administration will actually change that trend. Laura like hot potato. Dont want to touch it. Laura quick take, what will happen with mattis . Oh, thats weve been covering that for so long, and thats actually been the most controversial thing ive ever talked about on this network. Ive been on this 200 times and got more flak from that singular issue. Laura ok, ok, ok. Youre cool. Tell us what you think is going to happen. Were out of time. Ok. Got it. Its going were going to vet the ones that are currently in to see if theyre able to serve. And i do believe they may put a ban on maybe the surgical procedure itself. Laura at least we dont pay for surgical procedures maybe. Maybe the v. A. Were on our way. Laura we appreciate both of you. Thank you very much. Man of the year, donald trump. No doubt about it. Im not going to deal with. It you can name me person of the year. To bake or not to bake . For a gay wedding . Thats the question before the court tomorrow. The Supreme Court. So what happens when gays rights clash with religious liberties . That and my memo to the president everybody will be talking about tomorrow. Dont move. Were on a mission to show drip coffee drinkers, its time to wake up to keurig. Wakey wakey rise and shine oh my gosh how are you . Well watch this. I pop that in there. Press brew. Thats it. So rich. I love it. Thats why you should be a keurig man fullbodied. Are you sure youre describing the coffee and not me . Laura the Supreme Court found a right to gay marriage in the constitution a few years back. And now, thats running right into the right of religious freedom and artistic expression. Now, the court will try to figure out how to balance it all out. When it hears a big case tomorrow involving a baker who refused to make a cake for a gay wedding. Joining us now to discuss, jim campbell of the Alliance Defending freedom. And ian milhaiser, senior fellow at the center for american progress. Jim, lets start with you because youre, you know, your association is actually involved in this big case at the court tomorrow. A gay couple says look, we have a right to get married and this is a public establishment. Why cant we go in there and get a cake without being discriminated against . What do you say . Just because you have the right to be married doesnt mean you have the right to force someone else to celebrate it. You can support by same sex marriage and support Jack Phillips because whether youre on the right or left, everyone understands that no artist or creative professional should be forced to celebrate something that conflicts with their deep beliefs whether those beliefs discriminate against someone because theyre racist. Laura my point is you have a First Amendment right as reprehensible as that is and you have the right to exercise it in any way you see fit. And if they want to have hors doeuvres or biscuits or cupcakes made and want to go to an establishment just to force the case or force the issue, you will recognize our right to speak out or to have a rally even if you find it, again, underlying conduct reprehensible. You dont support it. Its a First Amendment right. Thats a fairly absolute right in our constitution, is it not . You have a right, if you want to be a bigot. You have a right to join a white supremacist group. What you dont have is a law protecting you as a white supremacist. Laura you have the constitution protecting you, some people would say unfortunately given whats happened in charlottesville. But you have a constitution protecting you. And jim, lets go to you on this. The problem is, i think, it goes from tolerance to you must agree with what were doing. And thats where i guess the baker said, im happy to make other things or help out but its just i dont want to put i guess he didnt want to put the two male figures on the top of the cake. Thats where he drew the line on the figures which i found kind of interesting. Well, and the fact here are pretty clear. So they came into a shop. They asked if he could make a custom cake. And he said listen, this is not something i can do. But ill sell you anything else in the shop and ill make a different cake for you for a different occasion. But because of my religious beliefs, this is just not something i can do. Thats a very reasonable line. And the law should give him the space to do that. But the other thing i would mention is and you were talking about who else are we going to force to do things . Here in d. C. , one of the laws requires that businesses cant discriminate on the basis of political views. And so are we now going to force a republican speechwriter to write for Hillary Clinton . Or are we going to force a democrat speechwriter to write for donald trump . That doesnt seem like the america that i want to live in. Laura all right. Ian, quickly, wrap it up. Sure. I mean, this issue with civil rights laws has been litigated and decided over and over again. And in the 1960s, you had people who didnt want to serve black people. They claimed First Amendment right. Supreme court said no. Laura well see. In the 1980s laura well see if that court makes the same comparison. That will be the big issue for tomorrow and i appreciate both of you. Unfortunately, were out of time. You wont want to miss my message on President Trump on how to shame San Francisco in the wake of the kate steinle verdict. Yea, so, moms got this cold stuffynose nosleep i got it. Mouthbreather yep, weve got a mouth breather. Well just put on a breathe right strip and. Pow it instantly opens your nose up to 38 more than Cold Medicine alone so you can breathe. And sleep. Go to breatheright. Com today to request a free sample. Laura welcome back. How President Trump can honor kate steinle and shame San Francisco. Thats the topic of tonights bonus angle. President trump has an enormous amount of discretion as chief executive. And one of his many unilateral powers seems small but it actually can be used for Something Big as in sending a message to the cities and states across america who refuse to help the federal government enforce immigration law. Now, by now, youve heard of the travesty of a jury verdict in that kate steinle murder case in which the accused killer, five times deported jose inez garcia was convicted only on a minor gun possession charge. Meaning the guy is likely going to be released soon due to time served. California, is a state that is full on sanctuary status. Thus as in this case, San Francisco did not honor the feds request for an immigration detainer hold and so he was released. Shameful. Now, one of his defense attorneys, francisco iguarta had the gall to say this after his client received that slap on the wrist. This case was used as a means to foment division. To foment a program of mass deportation. It was used to catapult a presidency along that philosophy of hate of others. And i believe today is a vindication for the rights of immigrants. Immigrants to the United States and thats the bonus angle. Up next, my close call with a prominent member of the media. Laura finally tonight, lets face it. Weve all been there, a long bus ride or flight when everyone around you starts getting a little too comfy. Loosening their belts, talking loudly on the phone like its not amplified, brushing their hair. Then you hear the click, click, click and they are clipping their nails across the aisle from you. I kid you not. Ive seen it all. Commuters took matters into their own hands on a bus in india last week on one passenger, 27 years of age, not only took off his shoes but his socks too. According to the bbc, the stench i cant even get through this. The stench emanating from these moist metatarsals was so foul that his fellow passengers asked him to put the dogs back in the kennel or throw away the socks altogether. He declined in the bus diverted to a Police Station where he was promptly arrested. Coincidently shortly after seeing this story, i talked about it on the radio this morning, i ran into a certain very affable, wellknown member of the news media on the train to new york from washington. As he walked past my seat, there you see him, he was happy as a clam. I looked down and i couldnt help but notice this. Ososososos. Youve heard about snakes on a plane. I give you socks on a train. Im happy to report, no derailment or stop at the Police Station. Who do you