Amazon on the potomac. He visits his new property at the Washington Post and the staff tweets everything he says in realtime. We will look at why he thinks he can revive the paper. New yorks mayoral primary is upon us and the National Press still obsessed with Anthony Wiener despite his flame out. As they say in the city, whats up with that . And digital download, an ambitious profile of melissa mayor. It is time for the buzz. First a few words about this program. We will hold the media accountable in a fair, aggressive and unbiased way. We will look at how stories are covered and framed and not shy about calling people out for mistakes, conflicts, sensationalism or our own errors when they happen. And a guide to cut through the static and fingerpointing and focus on the facts and have fun in the process. Whats more . We will continue the conversation online and we want your feedback. Send me a tweet about our show during this hour. It is at media buzz fnc. Perhaps we will read some of the messages at the end of the program. From the moment prom halted plans on airstrikes for syria to ask congress for a green light he has been getting pounded by the media from the left, from the right and every way in between. You cant leave the region hanging. It looks absolutely as if the United States has chickened out. Do you feel undermind . Do you think the United States has undermind its lempleg in the world . Its leverage in the world . The president is making the case to the congress and the American People for a strike, but no one including me is buying it. We know president obama to be the reluctant warrior. He is coming off now as a reluctant leader. I think the president s press conference was actually embarrassing. It was as muddled and unconvincing as you could possibly imagine. So why has this mounting mediaism cr media criticism cut across the party lines . Joining us now, Lauren AshburnFox News Contributor and david zurich for the washington son and an anchor on the new adventure post tv. Lauren, it seems to be a rare moment when liberal and commentators, left, up, right, down are united in criticism president obama. Nobody wants this war even the public. Look at the polls. 36 are approving of this . That is the lowest number of any of the wars. Iraq, afghanistan. I think in the very beginning when we learned that chemical weapons had been used that people thought, okay, the media thought we are going to war. And then as a couple days moved on and we see a video, videos of the terrible, horrible 400 children who were gassed and killed that everything changed. Pundits started to say, no x we are not going to no, we are not going to do this. Reporters, anchors started to have a skeptical tone. What strikes me is often when it comes to president obama you have the gang at msnbc and they are acting as a cheerleading squad, but on this one, chris matthews, ed schulz and others opposing the president on inter veption in syria and i wonder if that says we reached a moment where obama at least on this issue has no friends in the press . Strange bedfellow here not only in the press, but in congress. You have people like liz cheney and barbara lee agreeing on this that america shouldnt intervene. Some people call it a war and the white house is calling it a military inter veption in limited strikes. When americans hear about this they think of war and they think obviously of iraq and the specter of iraq has determined a lot of the skeptical coverage. And there is the main stroam press. Mainstream press. You saw cnn got some of the videos that were released. Even in releasing some of the videos there was skepticism on the chain of command. Who released the chemical weapons . Was it the rebels or the Syrian Government . There is also a question of why were those video reis leased now . They werent publicly released. They were, quote, obtained by cnn and fox news and then made public. But they are too gruesome to show. Before we get back to that i want to bring david in. The television nature of this debate means that president obama giving the big Oval Office Speech on tuesday evening. Before that, tomorrow he will sit down with wolf blitzer and brian and scott and diane and it seems to me that can that move the needle, the pulling out the stops and sitting with the big anchors . I think president obama knows he is in trouble and he knows this is what he does well. This kind of media blitz is what he does well and so this is his a game and he goes to it. I dont think it can move the dial. In fact, assad as we now know will be on cbs tomorrow in an interview that was taped on sunday with charlie rose. Listen, i wonder what the white house is like today finding that out. Here is part of what i think went wrong with this. President obama and secretary of state kerry talked in this high moral plain of immonic moment and neither of them has that moral authority. I think thats why president obama tried to bring mccain into this because he does. You are saying the president of the United States i want to stay focused on the media. You say he has no moral authority. You are acting as a public dit and saying public dit and saying this guy doesnt have what it takes to persuade the country. But dont people in our business have a lot to do with this . Their tone has consistently been skeptical, aggressive, is this another iraq . Gee, i wonder why after the history of the administration . Thats our job. They come out and sell this and i tell you who has done a good job in the media, cspan with the congressional hearings. Mike mccal from texas when he questioned the nature of the opposition and kerrys facts were all over the place. There is no radical, oh, maybe 20 . They have been telling us a narrative without facts. When the Washington Post describes the evidence of Chemical Attacks by the assad regime as alleged i wonder if he would have seen that in 2002 and 2003 and whether there is such a hangover from the dark shadow of iraq that many in the media feel like they have got to be more cautious and skeptical about this. It is the reason why the media is singing this chorus of caution. You see it everywhere. People remember and journalists remember the iraq war and the mistakes that were made in that war and in reporting that war. Thats right. People lost their jobs, right . Everybody thinks about Judith Millers reporting. At the New York Times. Well she went to jail on an unrelated case, but people lost their reputations and people had to apologize for being too credited you los about the bush administrations claims. Here you have almost a perfect storm. You have the natural skepticism of the press having taken a beating over iraq and you have the fact that there is so little support apparently in the country for this military intervention. It would be different if the president had just done it unilaterally. In a way are the media reflecting public sentiment . They reflected public sentiment back during the iraq war too. The context was we were just hit in september in the public and they very much were wanting blood in someways and believe there is a connection between saddam and alqaeda and i think the press reflected that. I dont think the press should always reflect what the public thinks especially if the public is misinformed. But i think with this it is very very i have had a hard time finding just regular people let alone folks in the press supportive of this war. Most people are skeptical. We talk about the pictures or lack there of since there are few reporters in syria. It is dangerous and risky to go there, but the New York Times ran that and obtained out of syria last year. Talk about that front page picture and what impact it may have had. The 27yearold rebel commander who they call uncle has guns pointed over these seven soldiers. Cap you are tood government soldiers and later executed and that was quite an eye opener. Right. But it also muddles for reporters. While we were thinking that the narrative was the rebels are okay and the assad regime is wrong, but then you look at that and then you think, wait a minute, it is happening on both sides. I have an exit question here having to do with the role of commentators. We saw white house strategy sessions, trying to get everybody on the same talking points and who goes over there but a bunch of former obama aides. Talking about stephanie cuter who is the new host of cross fire and former msn people who are now common commentators. It is outrageous. We talked about that especially with gibbs and axel rod. When i watch them, especially gibbs, he sits there in a coma and somebody says something bad about president obama and he jumps up. They are loyalists. They are hard core loyalists. Thats not what the media should not be one at a time. Thats their job. It is very clear who stephanie cuter is. She worked for obama and she is on a show that is an opinion show. Q. I and thats why she was thats why she was hired. Viewers expect her to have an inside knowledge of how the white house works and a current pipeline. I dont necessarily i dont think anyone thinks Stephanie Gibbs stephanie cuter or robert gibbs are commentators. Of course she will be pro obama. There seems to be a little difference between that stance and going to strategy meetings. By the way yes, so he can craft his message. By the way, when karl rove appears on fox and he is in charge of raising money for public candidates and president ial candidates possibly the last time around Newt Gingrich appearing on fox it was fair to question whether they are pushing an agenda. Lets go to war for moral reasons. Lets convince the country of the moral righteousness of it and not five spin doctors sitting in the white house cooking up a strategy. Im sorry, but that is what the program is. As long as you are transparent to your readers thats the question. Will they be transparent . They know who these people are. We are out of time for this segment. Send a tweet to our show at media buzz fnc. We hope to read some later. When we come back, a billionaire is visiting his new property. And the staff tweets everything about the new founder. Well take you behind the [ villain ] well mr. Baldwin. It appears our journey has come to a delightful end. Then i better use the capital one purchase eraser to redeem my venture miles for this trip. Purchase eraser . Its the easy way to erase any recent travel expense. I just pick a charge, like my flight with a few taps, its taken care of. Impressive baldwin. Does it work for hotels . Absolutely thank goodness. Mrs. Villain and i are planning our. You scare me. And i like it. Lets go whats in your wallet . Boss at the Washington Post with the amazon founder showing up to answer questions. These were no softball questions. Some involved journalistic ethics. You were there and what was the reaction to the new owner who had maintained this extraordinarily low profile before showing up at the the post . Thats right. He had an interview with our reporters there. But he isnt a guy who is very friendly to the press in terms of giving interest you interviews. I will say my whole reaction was sadness and shock. I think that was everyones response initially because there is just such an attachment that folks at the post have to the family. That was my reaction after working there for so long. How can this be happening . What is your second reaction . My second reaction is a lot of hope. Thats where we are more generally. You look at what he said. He is talking about invention. He is focusing on the customer. He is talking about a longterm strategy and this idea that the post cant cut its way to growth which i think a lot of folks want to do. I think in newspaper boardrooms across the country executives were saying what does he know that we dont know . Why would he invest 250 million of his own money . Albeit thats not a lot of money since he is worth 24 billion. Thats a key thing though. He can spend a lot of money on this and not worry about so many acquisitions of struggling newspapers squeezing profits. And your p and l has to of ma. With digital revenue not living up to what print advertising and circulating revenue has to be, you have to invent and you have to find new ways to get that revenue. Let me read some of the tweets that the Washington Post staffers sent out while jeff was still addressing the staff. The first has to do with the question of how can you run a newspaper when at the same time amazon says no comment. I thought that the most powerful minds in the world can hold powerful inconsistencies. Thats a duck. He was worried about any product that was 100 ad supported. Then, says bezos that you are advertisers. Then you are not around. You are a newspaper guy. Can the guy who revolutionized the Book Business in an Online Retailing help reinvent the way the news is delivered . I sat through too many of these owners walking in the newsroom. I have been through too many of them. I have to say for a cynical a lot as we are, we are always incredibly optimistic because now it is our mortgage payment and we want this person to be a genius. We want them to be a genius. I was looking at the tweets as they were coming out and thinking, oh yeah, i have been there. We love them. The number one need the number one rule must be dont be boring. I get that. He said that for 20 years though. Is there a concern that this is a guy who still lives in seattle and keeps his day job at amazon and he will be too handsoff and he has, as he puts it, no magic wand . I think people want him to be handsoff. They have had a great run over the last six months and we have the new editor and i dont think we want him medaling in the editorial part of the paper. We want his business savy. On that point, he says the Washington Post does great investigative reporting, which is true. Then these other sites come along anding a aggregate it for free which takes it away from wanting to say pay for digital subscription. That is a whole newspaper problem right there in a nutshell. No one wants to pay for what is on the internet. Getting Digital Subscribers was very difficult. And it took the New York Times and the Washington Post a long time to make that jump. In fact the Baltimore Sun went digital before the post. There is your mortgage right there. Bottom line, reporting is expensive. Great discussion. Up next, two day days to go before the vote for the new york mayor. And they are still talking about Anthony Wiener mouthing off to a heckler . The National Media couldnt get enough of new yorks mayoral race when the campaign was melting down over yet another sexting scandal. With the democratic primary two days away and Anthony Wiener way down in the polls the press is still on his case. He responded sharply to a heckler who taunted him. Thats very nice. In front of children, that is charming. You are disgusting. It takes one to know one, [bleep]. Why is this man still news . Joining us now is michelle connell, washington correspondent for the daily beast and the digital politics editor and anchor of power play on fox news. Com. Welcome, michelle. My question is this video of Anthony Wiener going on and on and on after this guy verbally accosted him. Why is it big news . Everybody loves a train wreck and Anthony Wiener has been a pretty consistent train wreck for the last several months. While as a congressman he wasnt that great and as a mayoral candidate he is down in the polls, he is a his penis is a national celebrity. I dont want to talk about genitalia anymore. This woman came out and said they were sexting even after he came out. She was on the up and on. Now he is in the Single Digits and he is not going to be the next mayor of new york city and he gets into it with a heckler. I have seen that tape online or on television a hundred times. It is not even about sex. And he was on sundae show today and he is around talking. There is a moment in the wiener campaign when the two things meshed up. One was new york is about to have its first democratic mayor in 20 years. Liberals in new york are tired of authoritarianism. Wiener had sex appeal not appeal, but had sex anyway. And then this political story. The two lived happily in that space. We could talk about a grown up thing which was democrats trending more liberal left and then we can make people it was like a flint stone vitamin. Now the two have decoupled and what are we left with . Chris star says we are not grownups by going with the easy cheesy tabloid sensational and lets kick Anthony Wiener around. Right now the word Anthony Wiener and grown up should never be used in the same sentence. It is sad. Chris, you mentioned a sunday show. I was stunned to learn that meet the press aired an interview conducted by savannah guthrie, the only one to be on that nbc program. Lets look at that. Your wife was part of that piece and she talked about how you changed. At that time she didnt even know that your behavior was continuing, that it was still going on. Doesnt that not show a capacity to look somebody in the eye and lie, not just your wife, but the reporter and the public . Things were a lot better during that People Magazine profile, they were a lot better. Chris . I am agag. A guy accused of internet flashing on a park bench in new york and i dont know if that is the right setting. You had to go there. She went there. Savannah guthrie went there. What about nbcs decision to give this guy air time when , as you point out, bill deblazio is not a household name, but he is in the polls and maybe the next mayor. Kristine quinn are the next candidates back in the pack. Yet the National Coverage not in new york or the city, but the National Coverage is not about them. It is about this guy. This race matters because california and new york could be leading indicators of where the country is going. We see in new york it matters to the rest of america. As they trend new york democrats trend back left and away from the authoritarian stance, thats not good for president obama. That is a sweet approach as to how we cover news. None are electrifing figures and thats all they care about. People watch Anthony Wiener because bill deblazio is not making anybodys heart go pitter pat. She is the council speaker, if i have that right. She would have been or still could be the first woman to lead the city and the first lesbian to lead the city. Why is that not a natural story . Why are we stuck on this wiener story . It is hard to get through a discussion about him without cracking up. He has become a national joke. That is we cant look away. People just cant get their mind around what he did and he nearly won this thing. Speaking of sex in new york politics, why is there sudden interest in the new york city controllers race that happens to include one Elliott Spitzer . You dont find it an inherently fascinating election in itself . It is a come back story, but isnt it spitzer and pat tron niecessing prostitutes . I am talking about what we would be covering otherwise, we would never cover the new york city comptroller. We noticed even client number nine cannot rows interest rouse interest. That is so wrong. Moderately long. The los angeles mayors race before this and the new york city mayors race, two important jobs and the amount of National Attention either one got for nonhijinx related stuff. Thank you for joining us. He is back. Keith olberman has a lot to say. Did you know sports writing could be the worse in enjoy mea buzz with howard and i will see you at noon. This is a fox buzz alert. A new media critic is making waves on television. He is keith olbermann. You remember him with the messy divorces and now he returned to espn and he is securing the press about sports. Here he is slamming cbs columnist for writing while he is sympathetic to Football Players who suffer concussions his selfish view is that his job depends on the nfl. The columnist states, boasts that his journalism is compromised by his conclusion that without the nfl he wouldnt have a job. Olbermann ripped management after they denounced rex ryan for playing a star quarterback who was injured in an exhibition game. Rex ryan took an ep tau tude of incompetence with a bone bone headed move that could conceal his job with the jets. Says who . Who is the source . Who says it could cost his job. Reporting is dead. Long live making something out of nothing. Dead . Well thats a little harsh. Olbermann loves throwing elbows and his style is not for everyone, but it is fun watching him take on the sports writing crowd. I want to correct something one of our guests said about Judith Miller said about leaving the New York Times over her iraq reporting. She resigned from the paper and is now a Fox News Contributor. Send me a tweet. I will read the best one after the program. After the break a veteran journalist has been weighing in on the syria bough date and giving a debate and giving a platform to those people. The syria debate has been echoing across the media landscape and especially on the web which opens the dialogue to far more voices than Television Ever could. The National Correspondent of the atlantic has been a mercinary of the debate. He joins me now. Welcome. Thank you very much. You are skeptical of syria. Talk about the rebuttals on your blog including one case from a military officer and an officers wife. This is a kind of journalism that wasnt possible when you and i started a generation ago which is to have in realtime a range of opinion, and not just the views or the gut viceral expression, but people in realtime are with the military and are in the middle east and this is the affect on our army and this is why they should strike or not and to me it has been an informative realtime debate. Let me play devils advocate. You are opening this up to readers, smart readers, but you are the journalist. You are the expert. You have been a correspondent in china. Why should i as a reader care what your readers think . There is a useful test of the market. One thing i deliberately dont do on my part of the atlantic site and everybody else does is i dont have unmoderated comments. My impression is that is a race to the bottom and people yell at each other. You are not totally opening up. No, but i am able to get probably a couple hundred messages a day from people around the world who have informed views. Enough of them are interesting , but i feel as if this is a new way to add to the debate. What we have done is go out and interview people and you report the things that seem worth while, the significant things representing a range of opinion. This is an easier, higher volume and a potentially more available way of doing the same thing. You pose a series of questions in your writing such as what is the administrations theory of victory . What could go wrong if there were military strikes . Have the media been diligent in posing those questions . It is always a case of the media and we overreact to the last mistake we made. The mistakes about iraq are very much on peoples minds. Are you not minimizing those mistakes. They were disasterous. That was something many people including me ahead of time said, look, we are doing that too rationally. Syria is different from iraq. The media are asking more questions now and the odd thing about the administrations case is it is all saying there is a problem which everyone agrees with. It is the connection between that problem and the proposed solution where the most interesting debate is happening now. A lot of what i read and a lot of the skepticism i read is embedded in the straight president aring. You saw it in the straight reporting. You saw it in the commentary ad, but was this a good or bad move politically . Why did he go to congress . Has there been more about american politics and less about the u. S. Response to what had been seen as a red line in assads use of chemical weapons . Sure, this is a realitybased of dc journalism. Most people here like politics and it is always easier to convert something to its political ramifications than to know about the actual substance. Who is going to win . Who is going to lose . Exactly. I remember back in the reagan days there was a military strike he did and all of the stories the next day was what does this mean foray agains pop for reagans popularity . There was a story the other day when a republican congressman asked secretary of state john kerry about tom freedman of the New York Times who opposed intervention and kerry said i often agree with tom freeman, but not in this case. Showing there is no new data. There is a famous cartoon from the thorker in the 1930s of a congressional hearing saying boying to no one and my respect to walter lipman. So this has been around for a longtime. A plus of this media age is there is a range of opinions. People have the megaphone of a regular column, but now you and i can get messages from people who say i am a serving colonel in the u. S. Marine corp and this is what i see. I am somebody who knows about chemical weapons and this is what i see. It is a bigger range. When president obama pulled back from the brink of ordering airstrikes at the last minute you posted something in the atlantic right away. And then an hour later you read the transcript and you posted again. We get to watch your thought process in a way that would be hard to imagine a decade ago. And realtime anything is messy. That includes the realtime factor and that is our Blog Software crashed and i spent an hour writing something and there is a fiveminute recap. This is good. The transparency has its defects. Your previous segment about Anthony Wiener, but in general the institutions of all kinds cant just assert their authority anymore and it does better to show people show your evidence, show your homework, show them reaching your conclusion. These are tough times for magazines. You were out in sioux falls and you are going to visit small town america. What is that about . A project called american future. My wife and i are flying around the country and seeing economic and cultural stories around the country. And instruct tiff for you . Very much so. We will look for that. Thank you for joining us. Congratulations on your show. I appreciate it. And the media went way over board the other day when president obama greeted Vladimir Putin in the russia. This is how chuck todd let off his piece. Usually in the world of diplomacy a handshake is simply a handshake, but when it comes to watching a handshake between president obama and Vladimir Putin whose differences on syria have completely overshadowed this economic conference. That was fine, but then slate called it the worlds most awkward handshake. A tense handshake said the Washington Post. And then there was a business insider, obama gives putin a death stair. Calm down. Sometimes a handshake is just a handshake. And coming up, stipging criticism and some say even sexist. Well debate that next in digital download. The secretarys Running Mission is all a part of the obama administrations intense lobbying efforts when support for military strike on syria. Lets listen in now. We are live on the ground with a Strong International response for the use of chemical weapons. Our Government Supports the objective of insuring there is no i am punitive use for the warfare in the 21st century. As an International Community we must deter further attacks and hold those responsible accountable. We admire the leadership of president obama in making this case so powerfully for the world. This week the European Union the arab league and many countries of the g20 have called for a Strong International response and it is to the credit of the United States that once again they are prepared to lead such efforts. They have the full diplomatic support of the United Kingdom and i welcome the fact that increasing number of countries that signed up for the joint statement on syria adopted last week during the g20 by 11 countries during the g20 and i urge other countries to do the same. Secretary kerry and i carry the same repulsion and callousness of a regime that resided over the death of over 1,000 people and 2 million become refugees among the million children. Prime minister 52 Million Pounds of humanitarian assistance last week bringing our total to 400 Million Pounds. The United Kingdom will be working intensively over the coming week including the u. N. To try to secure unfettered access for aid inside syria and to address the aid short fall working closely with the United States which is working, leading by example here as in many other areas. I briefed secretary kerry on the talks we held last week with the president and Senior Leadership there cant be leadership if they are allowed to eradicate moderate opposition. We suggested ways in which we will continue to coordinate our assistance to them and reaffirmed our commitment to a geneva peace conference which should lead to leblgss in syria and continuing our diplomacy with russia to try to bring about the necessary break through. In part the u. S. , u. K. Special relationship is an alliance of values, values of freedom and maintaining International Peace and security making sure we live in a rule based world so the United Kingdom will continue to work closely with the United States facing a highly active role in addressing the syria crisis and working with our closest ally over the coming weeks and months. And as well as addressing all of these mimmediate challenges and crises we continue to Work Together on a whole range of issues from the Transatlantic Investment Partnership to somalia as to my work on preventing Sexual Violence and conflict which has strongly supported and of course the economic ties that are indefensible to both nations. John, you are welcome, as always in london here and please will you say a faw words as well. Thank you, william. I would be delighted to. I begin by saying thank you to you for another generous welcome here in london. Very grateful to you and the government for all of your effor efforts, and i am very pleased to be concluding this morning before i go back to brief congress this afternoon to be concluding here in london a very productive fairly quick trip to europe over the last couple of days. Particularly grateful to you, william, always for your great hospitality and your personal friendship. I thank you for that. The relationship let me just say also last knignight i had dr and a long meeting with president nabbas who the secretary will be meeting with shortly. It was a very productive and informative session as part of our ongoing efforts in the milled east peace process. The negotiators are negotiating. We have said we are not going to discuss the substance on an ongoing basis and we are not. But i am encouraged even though there are difficulties on both sides of the country in their territory and in the country nevertheless they are staying at it. They are not allowing what hitscally have been disruptions that might have interrupted them from doing so at this time. That encourages me in terms of the determination and purpose. And so we will continue with this process thoughtfully and hopefully quietly over the course of the next weeks and months. The relationship between the United States and the United Kingdom has often been described as special, essential and it has been described thusly quite simply because it is. It was before a vote the other day in parliament and it will be for long afterwards after that vote. Our bond as william has just said is bigger than one vote, it is bigger than one moment in history. It is about values. It is about rules of the road, rules by which human beings try to organize their societies and offer people maximum freedom and opportunity, respecting rights and finding a balance in a very complicated world. We have no better partner in that effort than great britain. We are grateful for that. Our bond really is the paradigm for international cooperation. Our Work Together in global issues will ensure peace, to ensure stability, to create Economic Activity to help others to share in the value they share to engage in humanitarian initiatives around the world, and sometimes to stand together against the oppressive steps that tyrants take all of those things that would tie us together not just for our two nations but to our entire world. Just a few minutes ago the secretary and i spoke about the importance of our continued cooperation on a full range of issues from Climate Change to the pursuit of peace between the israelis and the palestinians to our counterterrorism efforts to our efforts who promote democracy on a global basis and of course to our efforts to bring an end to the civil war in syria. As i drove in here this morning there were a group of people assembled outside of the building as is their right and as people should assemble. And some of them i heard them saying keep your hands off syria. I certainly appreciate the feelings in our country, too, about people who have strong feelings about war and strong fee feelings about going into some other engagement in another part of the world. I think it would be good to hear people saying to a dictator keep your hands off chemical weapons that kill your own people, protect your own people. It is pofrimportant for us to s up. You were just listening to secretary of state john Kerry Holding a joint conference with u. K. Foreign secretary william hayes. He was making the rounds trying to win support for a military strike on syria. Also working to prevent this side of the world as such warraaction is warranted. I am Marianne Rafferty in new york, Fox Friends First is next. Good morning to you. Today is monday september the 9th. It is the deadly start to the nfl season. A football fan is dead this morning after falling from the ledge of candle stick park. What police say may have gone wrong. Hillary clinton making a come back to weigh on syria. Chaos on the runway for hundreds of passengers as their plain goes skidding into the class. Grass. We will tell you about that Fox Friends First starts right now. It is monday folks, there is a live look at manhattan. Hope you have a good one this morning. You are watching Fox Friends First. I am patti ann browne. I am heather nauert. We have a sad story to start with a football fan dead after falling from a walkway at candle stick park sunday. It happened just after kickoff of the 49ers packers as the season opener. This as a railing collapse injured two fans as the cults games against the raiders in indianapolis. The two were leaning against the barrier when it gave way. Both escaped serious injuryy. A fire forces the evacuation of more than 100 homes in california. The blaze breaking out sunday afternoon in mount dabolio state park and grew to 800 acres. Nearly 200 firefighters are battling those flames. But the fire is still growing in the park which is 15 miles away from san francisco. So far the fire is about 10 percent contained. There is no word yet what sparked that fire. Scary moments for 280 passengers on a thai airway flight. The plane skids off the runway and into the sgragrass