President obama. Despite all of that, key members of congress will say that they will honor the president s request. We have life fox coverage. Covering the executive order, but we start with chief White House Correspondent john roberts. Good morning to you in the white house, looking to change the news cycle again, citing that the new executive order on the immigration be in about a half an hour from now. If democrats are already lining up to bash him over it. The white house believes that they have thought this one out carefully enough that it will pass legal muster. And most importantly minimize the potential for people to unintentionally get caught up in it. As they did the First Executive order. In meantime, the white house continues to push for a full investigation into the potential that the president was wiretapped at the trump tower during the closing weeks of the campaign. Saying that the Obama Administration ordered that wiretapped. The president waking up on saturday morning to tweet out, how low has president obama gone to tap my phones during the very sacred at the election process . This is nixon and watergate, sick guy. Current and former officials are lining up to push back against the accusation saying that nobody ordered wiretaps. Then donald trump saying that there was no directed from the fisa court to bug trump tower. But there are enough reports in telephone intercept, the trunk Campaign Officials including Michael Flynn, and possibly some other Campaign Officials and advisors. Back in the summer time that people are saying, well, you know, maybe it is possible that they could have bugged trump tower. This morning Kellyanne Conway says that the whole thing should be investigated by the intelligence committees on capitol hill. Listen here. Lets investigate this and see where it leads. Lets have the house and Senate Intelligence committees do their work and think about whether or not to include this. The president has made clear that he would like there to be an investigation of any possible abuses. Hopefully that oversight activity will clarify things. No hard evidence at least at this point that trump tower was a bug the seriousness of this, if it did happen, that is already being articulated by some Senior Republicans on capitol hill. Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina saying, if this is true, this could be the biggest scandal since watergate. Jon wow john roberts at the white house, john, thank you. Jenna we have that going on, and just a few minutes the white house will announce the advised revised order of travel ban. Facing no wave of legal challenges to the expansion by courts in january. The Fox News Team coverage. We have henry who was live in washington. Good to see you. Im in front of the Ronald Reagan building, the white house is not taking the lead on this. They are trying to hand it off to three key cabinet departments who will actually be implementing the executive order. So both in style and substance, they are trying to have some tweets tweaks that to make sure is that it would passes legal muster. If the controversy at airports around the nation when the First Executive order went into effect. At this time they are tweaking the fact that iraq will no longer be a muslim majority country on that list. Also making it much more clear this time thats green card holders will not be affected at all. Kellyanne conway a short time ago giving fox viewers a previe preview. It has an Effective Date marked, and there are the legal permanent residents who were excluded from it, but that is much more clear now. If you have travel documents, and you actually have a visa, if you are a legal permanent resident, you are not covered under this particular executive action. Also iraq is no longer on the list based on their enhanced screening and reporting measures. Also a syrian refugee is treated the way that all refugees are. And noticed that she said that it will take effect middle of the month rather than immediately. Remember that there was a big show ive President Trump himself at the end of week one on the Trump White House signing the First Executive order to put it right there at the white house. But also to send the message that they had to move quickly to prevent terrorists from getting into the country. This time they are letting it breathe. They are saying that it will take a couple of weeks to implement. Clearly trying to show the signal that they are being more careful about implementing in a much different way. That is why you will see Rex Tillerson here at the Ronald Reagan building. Jeff sessions, the attorney general, and secretary kelly from the Homeland Security department. Trying to focus on the idea that they are working out the details much more carefully. Jenna we will be watching, thank you. Jon now to more reaction from the president s wiretapping claims, with white house advisors backing him up. While former Obama Administration and intelligence officials deny those allegations. Lets get to the bottom of it. That is the president s entire point. You have a number, various incredible new sources showing that there was motivated activity during the campaign. In suggesting that there may be more there. The president s entire point is that the people deserve to know. So why not include in the age of 16 investigation into russia this aspect as to whether or not this actually happen . There was no such wiretapped activity mounted against the president elect at that time, the candidates or the campaign. Jon joining us now is bret baier, the anchor of special report, i guess what everybody is looking for is cooperation of what the president is suggesting happen. Do we have it . We do not. It is not definitive. We have what all of these officials have said officially. We have word that the fbi director is saying that there needs to be some pushback internally to the notion that president obama ordered the wiretaps. But what we do not have is definitive proof. We have a call for an investigation. The interesting is is that the president could answer the question very easily by calling up and asking his officials what exactly happened. Deciding whether or not he is going to declassify that or not. What we do have, however, jon, overlooked in the clever interview on meet the press. A staple interview from a former National Intelligence leader that they saw no evidence of pollution on the trump team or any american with the russians. No evidence of collusion. That in the wake of all of these tweets and the wiretaps, did it happen, did it not happen, that has been lost in the shuffle. Jon the suggestion i guess is that not was this a wiretap to find out what the Trump Campaign was up to, it would have been in connection with a criminal investigation or any investigation into any relationship between the Trump Campaign and the russians, right . Yes, we know that there were investigations ongoing. We know that there was some sort of investigation. Could it have been a narrow request to fisa . Maybe asking for a specific computer that they believe was tied to a russian bank . Could it have been . Yes, it could have been. But we have word that thats request happen or that investigation went forward . No. We do not. We have various reports. We have what officials are saying publicly. And we have something that the president could answer himself with a couple of phone calls. Jon there had to been a judge or the pfizer court approving the wiretap order, correct . By law that is exactly what happens. At the request goes to fisa courts. That is sold top secret. Nobody knows where it is in washington, d. C. But they would put the request in, and they would have to be substantial evidence to get to that point that a judge would then say, yes, go ahead and do it. We should point out by the time that you get the request for the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act court, most times i think it is only. 1 or something that get turned down, so you would wonder whether or not they went forward. We do not know the specifics of whether it happened or did not. And we are trying to get to the bottom of it. You know that you have various people saying that some investigation happens, and clearly over the past couple of months there have been many stories that have cited anonymous officials about the lengths to that investigation into the Trump Campaign. Jon we do know that there was surveillance of the Russian Ambassador that apparently snared Michael Flynn, the former National Security advisor, right . Yes, you can go back into the New York Times stories for months that have various elements of intercepts. That has to come from someplace. So we do not know the answer to that he had to. I am guessing that over time we will. That said, you have the white house moving forward. It is calling for an investigation. Now you have the executive order. If that is going to get a lot of attention. You have a rollout on capitol hill of obamacare. So there are big things here. This is besides the tweets that happen over the weekend. There are some democrats and republicans expressing concern about how the president got that message out. Jon again, you are saying that if the president really wants to get to the bottom of it, all he has to do is pick up the phone and call, what . The National Security agency, director of National Intelligence . Director of National Intelligence. Red former nsa mike hayden on the show this morning saying that perhaps he forgot he was president and have that power when he put out those statement statements. I think that there is more into the story. We do not know where it goes. And we independently cannot confirm the request never happened. Jon hard not to get out in front of the actual facts here. Bret baier, looking for more tonight on special report. Jenna as birth was just mentioning, more reports, north korea is one of them. South korea conducting drills. How should this affect the Trump Administration, how should they respond . Also tensions are rising inside the white house in a series of negative headlines. It is the press derailing the Trump Administration . The media panel will take a look at this ahead. We asked people to write down the things they love to do most on these balloons. Travel with my daughter. Roller derby. Now give up half of em. Do i have to . This is a tough financial choice we could face when we retire. But, if we start saving even just 1 more of our annual income. We could keep doing all the things we love. Prudential. Bring your challenges. Jenna this just in, north korea firing missiles off of its coast. South korean and japanese Officials Say that the missiles went just over 600 miles. Three of them landing in waters that japan claims is its exclusive economic zone. The Trump Administration working on the policy likely to see these at the publication. We are going to wait to see what they say. Codirector of the Nuclear Policy program and endowments for use, take a look at the missile test. What do you note about the time of this and the type of missiles used . Well, the timing is significant, it took place during the beginning of the annual exercises that the u. S. And south korea hold. And as a very common for north korea to conduct launches at that time. The big question is you say what type of missile as it did there has been the unverified reports that u. S. Officials have been saying that these are existing scott pilot missiles that north korea has tested many times before. If this is the case, this is a serious provocation. One that we should not overlook. But also less threatening than the development of new capabilities that would bring danger to south korea and the United States. Jenna that is interesting context for us. We wait for a little bit more information on what is happening with the test. If you were speaking to the trump team, what is your best advice about how to react to this sort of provocation . Well, a couple of thoughts. The first thing is that the state department has come out and denied the test. The white house themselves not doing so yet. I think it is important for allies in the region, not only south korea, but also japan to hear the president condemn these tests. Secondly, if a lot is going to depend on what type of missile it was. Assuming that these are packed missiles, i would look at accelerating the deployment of missiles in the region. Japan and the missiles were fired by japan, the japanese have thought about using the different system. This is an important response to the program. I will work with the japanese on speeding up that deployment timeline. Jenna Missile Defense is a big topic, not only overseas, but also here as well in the United States. I know it something that you look into quite a bit. We have some new information coming out of iran, there is a toggle between these two places. And this is just the news that we have breaking from the Pentagon Team that it has been overlooked that iran has actually launched to short range missiles over the weekend. And it looks like they are the type that have not been tested and at least two years. So if this is the case, and the Pentagon Team has confirmed day, what goes through your mind . You hear that north korea is firing missiles, but then iran probably pushing the envelope at the same time. Again, this is, i do not have any information about this iran launched, so all i can talk is in very general terms. Again, what i say is that if we are dealing with shortrange uranium missiles that cannot for example reach israel, then that is something that i would not be inclined to escalate the situation. If we are dealing with longerrange missiles that can reach u. S. Allies in the region including israel, then i would think thats a proportionate response is to have sanctions on iran related specifically to the style program. The Obama Administration did that. This is something that the Trump Administration has done so far. It is important not to let longerrange Iranian Missile tests go unchallenged. Sanctions on entities specifically related to those tests seems to be a reasonable and proportionate response. Jenna why do you think north korea and iran are choosing this time to make these tests . Well, i think they probably have quite different reasons. In the case of north korea, as i have already mentioned, there is a big annual south Korean Military exercise going on. North korea always responds to those tests with missile publications. Or at least they have for the last few years. In the case of iran, iran has been conducting test periodically while it has remain in full compliance with the nuclear deal. As i say, how significant these tests are in iran depends on the range of the missile. If these are short arranged missiles, and we do not have implication for israel or other allies, then while i would not downplay the situation, these tests would not be serious threats. Jenna i know you are just getting this information as our way, but i want to share a little bit from the pentagon. From iran, these are shortrange missiles. But apparently they have a new active seeker helping the missile locate ships at sea. This is an official speaking to lucas tomlinson. Im reading through just some of the editorial that we have. They were test firing in barges. And because the waterways around iran are so crucial, and because the shapes are in the region. Does that change the way that you would feel about a short missile test . Again, it depends on the nature of the uranian technology. Iran is not the first country to try and have the ability to attack u. S. Ships at sea. U. S. Ships at sea are armed with short Missile Defenses such as the standard missile set. Specifically to repel the missile attacks. Again, if they are firing off of barges which are fixed objects. That is a much easier task than firing at a moving ship at sea. Especially defended by pretty advanced Missile Defenses. I would, if i had access to the information on this, which i dont. I would delve into the details. I would want to know what kind of seeker it was but how accurate, how reliable, very, very hard in the abstract to suggest how much of a security risk. Jenna a thought for us as well as we looked through some of the headlines to get to some of the specifics. Good of you to work through some of the news with us as we get it. We look forward to having you back on the program. Thank you. Jon still waiting for the new executive orders on immigration. That should be just a few minutes away. In the meantime, President Trumps headaches are going way, as he looks at sensational accusations that president obama is speaking out about all of this. What Vladimir Putin has to say. I dont know why i didnt get screened a long time ago. I kept putting it off. What was i thinking . Ok, mr. Jones. Were all done. I told you it was easy. With life line screening, getting screened for unknown Health Conditions is so quick, painless and affordable, youll wonder why you hadnt done it before. So if youre over age 50, call now and schedule an appointment near you. For just 149 a savings of over 50 youll receive a package of five screenings that go beyond your doctors annual checkup. Ultrasound technology looks inside your arteries for plaque that builds up as you age and increases your risk of stroke and heart disease. After all, 4 out of 5 people who have a stroke, their first symptom is a stroke. So call today and start with a Free Health Assessment to understand your best plan of action. So why didnt we do this earlier . Life line screening. The power of preventvention. Call now to learn more. I love to see businesses that just started from ground up grow into further success. It just feels good to know that im helping someone else. My first goal is to learn about their business, what theyre currently doing in their advertising. Pull some research, create a great story. Trying to figure out some way of building some kind of trust in a very quick moment. You have to love to work with people. Our goal, without a doubt, is that all customers are satisfied before they leave. Jon the white house sticking to its guns, demanding that congress, already investigating russian interest, also looking at whether former president barack obama abused his powers in connection with the campaign. In the meantime, the Associated Press reporting today that a spokesman for Vladimir Putin says that russia should not be in any way linked to u. S. Domestic issues. So exactly what is russia up to right now . Joining us now to discuss that, aryan conan, a senior fellow at the council. Can we discuss the premise that anything that upends life in the United States, or makes things difficult for the u. S. Government is something that russia likes to see . Absolutely. Russia is not americas friend. I think that we saw very clearly in the munich conference last month that the top tier of our leadership, Vice President penc pence, and the elliott including senator mccain, and to the secretary of defense. Everybody who was there in munich was very clear that we are not buying the russian agenda in Eastern Europe and the ukraine, russia is still looking at aspects in the occupied providence of ukraine, and also in the middle east. We saw that they went above the call of duty by bombing and causing tremendous demonstration. Having said that, i think that President Trump keeps the door open. He keeps it open for cooperation with russia infighting isis, but you areely right. Moscow would love Nothing Better than our executive branch, the intelligence community, the defense department, and the military all engaged in some kind of conflict about what russia did and what they did not do. And i think that we are investigating it. We should be investigating it. And the truth will come out. Whatever that truth is. It is too early to talk about what it is, but as fox news just recently pointed out, there are no incriminating evidence so far. Jon as you well know, President Trump has been accused of being too cozy with the russians, or may be Vladimir Putin specifically. Is that the case in your view . The question is what is too cozy . And we live hopefully in the land of the law. Were any laws broken . And who broke them . If it was not President Trump, if it is somebody on his team, so far we did not see that spread and not even in the case of the National Security adviso advisor, exNational Security advisor, Michael Flynn. So it is how much is it politicized . How much is something really going on . It is not up to me to answer these questions. Edges up to the intelligence community, that counterintelligence divisions of the fbi, et cetera. And to the extent that there is a investigation to the congress. Jon so Vladimir Putin says that they should not be blamed for involvement in a affairs in the u. S. , what are they saying . They are looking at the swirl of accusations. They are looking at politicization. They would like as far as i could tell by visiting russia and talking to the people there, they would like to get to business. They would like to turn the page on the very sour relationship that exists during the Obama Administration era and start doing something more positive that would be in their interest. The russians are all about their interests. For example, lifting distinctions that are economically hurting them. They would love to do that. Finding some kind of arrangement for them to stay in syria, they think that we may be accepting that. Boosting the allies occurrence in the middle east. And generally lifting the russian profile in the middle east to the parity with the United States. They do some nasty things like supplying longrange antiballistic Missile System to iran, and we see them misbehaving again and again in the middle east. Jon we can talk about it all day, im sure that we will have you back to talk about it some more. Fascinating times are now. Atlantic council, thank you. Jenna in the meantime, the trial unfolding in new york cit new york city, accused of planning attacks on the u. S. Military. We are alive with a story on that. Plus President Trump pour with the media, he is on a witch hunt, the media panel weighs in on that ahead. Theres nothing more important than your health. So if youre on medicare or will be soon, you may want more than parts a and b heres why. Medicare only covers about 80 of your part b medical expenses. The rest is up to you. You might want to consider an aarp Medicare Supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. Like any Medicare Supplement insurance plan, these help pick up some of what medicare doesnt pay. And, these plans let you choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. You could stay with the doctor or specialist you trust. Or go with someone new. Youre not stuck in a network. Because there arent any. So dont wait. Call now to request your free decision guide and find the aarp Medicare Supplement plan that works for you. Theres a range to choose from, depending on your needs and your budget. Rates are competitive. And theyre the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. Like any of these types of plans, they let you apply whenever you want. Theres no enrollment window. No waiting to apply. So call now. Remember, Medicare Supplement plans help cover some of what medicare doesnt pay. Youll be able to choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. Whether youre on medicare now or turning 65 soon, its a good time to get your ducks in a row. Duck quack call to request your free decision guide now. Because the time to think about tomorrow is today. Jenna just after 11 30 eastern time, we have news that President Trump has signed the new executive order on immigration. We expected it to happen around this time, and apparently it has behind closed doors. What youre seeing on your screen there, the press room for the u. S. Customs and border protection. That is in the Ronald Reagan building. This is where we expect a few key cabinet members. Rex tillerson, secretary of the department of Homeland Security, kelly coming into general sessions. They will be announcing together as a team the revised executive order. We will be waiting and watching for details on that when they stepped to the podium, we will bring in there. Jon President Trumps temper reportedly rising over some recent leaks, setbacks, and Media Coverage as he unleashes wiretapping allegations against former president obama over the weekend. His surrogates defending him today. Speak of the other thing that is going on here, we have that double standard Anonymous Sources. The media loves to use Anonymous Sources for everything that could be derogatory, and yet they refused to give any credibility to such resources when it may be something positive or expository. The other double standard is on investigations. You have democrats every single day saying investigate, investigate. What are they afraid of here . Lets investigate this. We will see where it leads. Jon the meantime, the Washington Post reports that President Trump has been in a rage lately. Writing that at the center of the turmoil is an impatient president , increasingly frustrated by his administrations inability to erase the impression that his campaign was engaged with russia to extend leaks about National Security matters and internal discord and to implement any signature achievements. This account of the administrations tumultuous days is based on interviews with 17 Top White House officials. Members of congress, and friends with the president. They have requested anonymity to speak candidly. Joining us now, they advisor chief of the washington globe coming into rich lowry, at the National Review and a Fox News Contributor as well. The quote that i just read based on anonymous, 17 Anonymous Sources at the white house and elsewhere, does it seem accurate to you . Yes, i think that trump has had a very good tuesday night in the last week, the rest of the week sort of got taken up by other news stories that i think drew a lot of his frustration. He was unable to control it. He could not control the narrative for the rest of the week. I think that the question is going forward, how here he calibrates. He does have a habit and inability to change what we focus on as we saw with his tweets on saturday morning. But you can only do that for so long when there are still open questions about russia and a variety of agencies and congressional committees who are looking into those. Jon as you well know, no president is happy with the Media Coverage that his administration gets, why is this one any different . Well, i think the level of hostility is no question higher than we have seen with any president ever before. And as matt alludes to, it is understandable that trump is upset, because he has tuesday night, his best moment as president. The only thing that came close was the neil gorsuch nomination, and immediately swallowed up by more contention over russia. There is kind of this love hate going on, because he loves the coverage, he is very good at manipulating the media. So he throws the used tweets out saturday that he knows are going to drive the coverage a way that he thinks is more favorable to him. At the media gets in a tizzy about it. They are upset about it for some understandable reasons. These are allegations that appear to be unfounded, they are searching for the evidence to back them up now. But the media loves it. It drives ratings, conversation, the sunday show debate. So both sides in the war are engaged in the love hate dynamic. Jon the surrogates for the Trump Campaign were staying over the weekend that any time that the administration finds itself on solid footing as rich said it did tuesday night, that all that all of the site and there will come out what the Trump Campaign calls false stories, fake news. Is there anything to that . I think that there is a degree of screwing t of the Trump Administration, but i do not know that any of the things, there is too much evidence of fake news. If you think back to the Michael Flynn situation, the post had nine sources on that. Its resulted, it actually resulted that came from the stories. So the story is one that is still developing. Although you saw again, the Washington Post story on wednesday night which led to Jeff Sessions, the attorney general on friday accusing himself. So if they are truly fake, they are having some real results. I think that there is some truth to the stories. They can complain about the aggressiveness of it, but i do not think, aint you know, he is the president of the United States. You should expect some degree of scrutiny. Jon we are getting some movement in washington where Rex Tillerson is about to announce the new executive order on immigration. Lets listen in. Protecting the nation from terrorist entry into the United States. Of i dont measure for strengthening security. It is the president s solemn duty to protect the American People. And with this order, President Trump is exercising his rightful authority to keep our people safe. His threats to our security continue to evolve and change. Common sense dictates that we continually reevaluate and reassess the systems we rely upon to protect our country. While no system can be made completely infallible, the American People can have high confidence that we are identifying ways to improve the vetting confidence process and keep terrorists from our country. To our allies and partners around the world, please understand that this is part of our ongoing efforts to get rid of vulnerabilities of that radical islamists will employ at destructive ends. The state department will coordinate with other federal agencies and implement these temporary restrictions in an orderly manner. Our embassies and consulates around the world will play an Important Role in making sure that the nation as secure as it can be. And to the state department will implement the provisions in this order that allow for the admissions and refugees when it is determined that they do not pose a risk to the security or welfare of the United States. Upon the president s National Order on january the 27th, the state departments Consulate Affairs and Diplomatic Security officers immediately undertook a review. This was an coordination of the department of Homeland Security to identify additional measures that would strengthen the vetting of those seeking entrance into the United States from seven named countries. These early efforts were concentrated on iraq. Iraq is an important ally in the fight to defeat isis. With their brave soldiers fighting in close coordination with the americas men and women in uniform. This intense review over the past month identified multiple security measures that the state department and the government of iraq will be implementing to achieve our shared objective of preventing those with criminal or terroristic intent from reaching the United States. I want to express my appreciation to Prime Minister of iraq for his positive engagement and implementing these actions. The United States welcomes this kind of close administration with countries throughout the world who share our commitment to National Security. This revised order will bolster the security of the United States and her allies. Now we have spent the morning briefing the congress, the press, and we will continue to talk with Key Stakeholders this afternoon. Experts from the department of Homeland Security, the department of justice, and the state department hosted an hourlong call what the media on this topic this morning. Our collective teams will continue throughout the day to follow up with the congress, the media, and the stakeholders to answer your questions. I will now turn it over to the attorney general for his comments. Thank you, mr. Secretary. Good morning to all of you. One of the justice departments Top Priorities is to protect the United States from threats to our National Security. Therefore i want to discuss two points. First the National Security of this order. And second, the, the department of justices role in defending the lawful orders of the president of the United States. First, as President Trump noted in his address to congress, the majority of people convicted in our courts for terrorism related offenses since 9 11 came here from iran. We also know that many people seeking to support or commit terrorist attacks will try to enter through our refugee program. In fact, today over 300 people according to the fbi, who came here as refugees are under and in fbi investigation today for terrorism activity. Like every nation, the United States has a right to control who enters our country. And to keep out those who would do us harm. This executive order takes to protect the American People as well as lawful immigrants by putting in place and in enhancing the screening and vetting process for visitors from six countries. Three of these nations are state sponsors of terrorism. The other three have served as a safe haven for terrorist countries, countries where governments have lost control of their territory to terrorist groups like al qaeda, and its affiliates. This increases the risk that people are admitted here on these countries, may belong to terrorist groups or may have been radicalized by them. We cannot compromise our Nation Security by allowing visitors entry when their own governments are unable or unwilling to provide the information we need to vet them responsibly. Or when those governments actively support terrorism. This executive o responsibly provides a native pause. This is so that we can carefully review how we scrutinize people coming here from these countries of concern. Second, the department of justice believes that this executive order, just as the First Executive order is a lawful and proper exercise of president ial authority. This department of justice will defend and enforce lawful orders of the president consistent with the Core Principles of our constitution. The executive is empowered, under the constitution, and by congress to make National Security judgments and to enforce our immigration policies in order to safeguard the American People. Terrorism is clearly a danger for america and our people. The president gets briefings on these dangers in emerging threats on a regular basis. The federal investigative agency, the intelligence community, the department of state, the department of Homeland Security, and the United States military report to the president. They know that the president would best possess some information, the founders gave the executive branch the authority and the duty to protect the nation. This executive order is a proper exercise of that power. Now i will turn things over to our able second, john f. Kelly of the department of Homeland Security. Thank you, mr. Attorney general. Well, like the secretary of state and the attorney general, i welcome you here today. My comments will be relatively brief. Last week the department of Homeland Security celebrated its 14th anniversary first opening its doors on one march night in 2003. It was established in response to the devastating attacks on september 11. When former terrorist turned a beautiful and ordinary day into a nightmare. Those attacks caught taught us that we cannot keep the security for granted. Homeland security must be our top priority. We needed to overcome our collective inability to take it, connect the dots of intelligence and arrange them into a more comprehensive picture of the threats posed to america and our way of life. Much has changed over the past 14 years, both in the world that is more dangerous and at dhs, much better. The fact remains that we are not immune to terrorist threats, and our enemies use our freedoms and generously generosity again test. The things signed will make our country more secure. And to protect the immigration system. We must undertake a rigorous review and are undertaking a rigorous review of the vetting programs to increase our confidence in the decisions that we make relative to visitors and immigrants that are in the United States. We cannot take the level using our immigration system to take american lives. This executive order is prospective in nature. Its focus is on rejecting the entry of foreign nationals into the six designated countries. Accordingly, it is important to note that nothing in the existing order exists lawful residence to enter our homeland. Unregulated travel is not a privilege, especially when National Security is at stake. The white house worked closely with the department of Homeland Security, department of justice, department of state to create an order that addresses previous concern, and protects the homeland and every one of our citizens. The men and women of the department of Homeland Security, like their brothers and sisters, look at the Law Enforcement, or descent men and women of character and conscience. They are no less so than the governors of our states and territories. Of our senators and members of congress of our city mayors and advocacy groups, these men and women are sworn to enforce the laws as passed by the United States congress. They would be in violation of the law in their sworn oath if they did not do so. We do not make the law, but we are sworn to enforce it. We have no other option. We are going to work closely to implement and enforce as humanely, respectfully, and with professionalism, but we will enforce the law. I want to think the president for his leadership on this issue and for steadfast support for our Law Enforcement security and counterterrorism mission. Again, as previously mentioned that i have spent most of the day today on the phone with members of congress, leadership explaining the ins and outs of this order. And there should be no surprises whether it is in the media or on capitol hill. Thank you very much. Thank you for your time. Is this an acknowledgment that the first order was flawed in many ways and not thought through . Are christian still given priority to get on the executive order of review . Jon a trio of the power players in the Trump Administration, the Homeland Security director they are, john f. Kelly along with the secretary of state Rex Tillerson, and Jeff Sessions announcing the new travel ban as implemented by the Trump Administration. Lets get back to the panel. Rich, did you hear anything there that gives you confidence that the courts are going to look with a kinder eye on this travel ban . Well, i was struck by a couple of things but having this announced by three cabinet secretary cabinet secretaries reinforces the message that they have their ducks in a row this time. This has been carefully coordinated among all agencies of government. Two, they are exempting the rack, the inclusion of a wreck in the first order did not seem to make a lot of sense given that we are waging a war with iraq against isis. Attorney general sessions made sure that he said that they are investigating 300 refugees for suspicion of terrorist activities which goes to the weak defense that the department of justice mounted and nationally. The First Executive order where the lawyers did not even seem to know what the answer was when judges asked, well, what is the threat that we are addressing . They are still going to have a problem with the courts, and activist courts, but this is much more buttoned up. It should be much more defensible. Spoon into that point, the attorney general gave a pretty good vocal defense of the actions that are being taken here. Saying that the department of justice believes that it is in the president s authority to protect the nation. That is the source of these orders. Yes, and i agree with rich. I think that the rollout of this is far different from the rollout of the initial executive order. You also, as i understand you have a ten day period before a lot of this is implemented. You have time. You heard secretary tillotson implements that they are talking to the public. Members of congress. The media. There is a much different emphasis on how this is rolled out. It is still to be seen, there are surely going to be challenges to this. Whether these changes button up the legal aspect of it. Im not a legal expert, but it seems like they are meant to address some of the shortcomings of the initial executive order. Jon they also took pains to say that they have briefed members of congress. That was something that did not get on the first time around. Yes, they just want everybody to know and to know what the new rules are so that they can be implemented as smoothly as possible. The courts should not be making decisions on the basis of whether a rollout is chaotic or smooth, but unfortunately it does affect the perception of judges command the administration did not help its case with the chaotic first weekend. Now, i thought that the first order was entirely legal and constitutional. It was absurd that the ninth circuit threw it out. But this should, at least at the margins help the administrations case going forward. And it was important to get out of that ninth circuit legal box canyon they are in, and try to reset this and find a going different footing. Jon i guess i am asking you to look in your crystal ball a little bit here, but the administration did not get treated well in the media as a result of that first rollout. There were a lot of editorials and so forth against a. How do you think this one is going to be received . I think it will be a little bit different, they have made pains to respond. The initial one coming also had those images. That was days after of the airports and the protests there. I think that you will not have that the same way this time. I think that the rollout is different here. I think that that changes the Public Perception of some of the things that they are doing, even if it has had some of the same name. Also watch for how they talk about this in the aftermath of that initial one, they were talking about the muslim band. They have taken time to look at that sphere. It is not religious specific that the courts use. I think watch that over the next hours and days too. Jon thank you. Jenna just talked a little bit about the airports, the initial travel ban sparked an outcry, protests rubbing at airports across the country. This is seen right now, developing the International Airport after signed the executive order. Joining us with more. Hello, no sign of disruption or protest here at the dallas International Airport as we saw in the last travel ban, but having been there on that occasion, i can say that the crowds generally start to build later in the afternoon. We will see what happens. There is one small table off in the distance here that the justice Legal Administration offering free legal advice. But really nobody here at this point of time who needs any legal advice. We have to keep in buying that the new executive order does not take effect in a few days. An effective day of march 16th, and there are the legal permanent residents who were excluded from it, but that is made much more clear now. If you have travel documents, if you are if you actually have a visa, you are not covered under this particular executive action. Trumps original order situations from coming into the United States, this now puts iraq into an exempt category. And in the statement earlier, the Conference Call with reporters, they said about that, the a recall increase cooperation on the vetting of its citizens. As a result of the increased information sharing, the iraqi citizens are not affected by the executive order. And in another change, syrian citizens are now having to abide by the same standards as the citizens. Meaning the 120 day vetting period, not the permanent that they based on the original. Jenna thank you very much. We watch the reaction. And be back with more and be back with more happening now. And be back with more happening now so you can travel the world better. We are back here in one hour. Outnumbered starts right now. We begin with fox news alert, just signed a new travel ban, executive order, the new details just laid out by his secretary of state, attorney general pettit iraq is no longer on the list of countries from what citizens are banned to coming into the United States for 90 days. The six nations remain on the list, brand, sudan, and yemen. And hoping that they will stand up to challenges. We will have much more on this as the hour rolls on. In this fox news alert as well, major fallout after this weekend stunning claim. President trump accused his predecessor of ordering a wiretap on his phone during the