The Top Republican on the panel, doug collins of georgia and democrat Hakim Jeffries of new york, only on Fox News Sunday. Then very encouraging but well not let it go to our heads. The same answer as always been i dont do polling. Chris buttigieg up, warren down. Well ask our sunday panel about the top tier of 2020 Democratic Candidates getting reshuffled, all right now on Fox News Sunday. Chris hello again from fox news in washington. President trump returns to the white house after a surprise trip to afghanistan and some golf in that. Right away he faces tough choices. He must decide whether to send lawyers to participate in impeachment hearings, conducted by the house jerry committee. Meanwhile democrats on the Intel Committee will deliver their report, making the case to impeach a president for the third time in american history. In a moment well talk with two members of the Judiciary Committee, republican congressman doug collins and democrat Hakim Jeffries but first, lets get the latest from kevin corke live from the president s florida retreat in maralago. Kevin . Reporter for the president there will be scant time to reflect on the thanksgiving holiday as his ad hundred administration braces for the next phase of the impeachment inquiry. Jerry nadler issued a friday deadline whether the white House Counsel will participate in the hearings, and whether counsel will crossexamine witnesses and present evidence. That is after two days of lawmakers will hear four scholars testifying on the constitutional grounds for impeachment. Doug collins wrote the committee asked the witness list to be expanded, less than a quarter of those testified during the clinton impeachment. Collinss letter is the latest example of the political and process tugofwar playing on capitol hill as the inquiry shifts to the Judiciary Committee from the Intelligence Committee. They will review a draft of their impeachment report on monday before voting to ward their findings to chairman nadler on tuesday. For President Trump the resumption of the hearings might seem a cold reality following a warm welcome by u. S. Service personnel following a surprise visit to afghanistan. Brief respite from the war on terror to visit with the commanderinchief, ahead of the nato summit in london where two were killed and three injured in a isis related attack on sunday. President said he will be there representing our country while democrats will be here, quote, the conducting the most ridiculous impeachment in history. Chris . Chris kevin corke, from maralago. Thank you. Joining us the Top Republican on the Judiciary Committee, congressman doug collins. Welcome back, sir to Fox News Sunday. Good morning, chris, good to be with you. Chris as we said the chair of the Judiciary Committee, jerry nadler, asking you whether or not republicans want to subpoena any witnesses to testify on the president s behalf. Will you . Were going to take care of that. Were making sure we get our witness list in but let me just point out something here. Chairman nadler sent a letter asking us by friday to present the list, all the things we would like to do, however well not see the schiff report as it will be known out of committee until tuesday night, possibly wednesday morning before we get to see it. There is a lot of problems we have to investigate here. As an attorney if you have a case Going Forward you want to know exactly what youre facing. Chairman nadler is asking for a arbitrary deadline because weve not seen the schiff report. We have not even heard from him what he wants to have hearings. This is another example of him being told i need to do something and we go from there. This is the problematic part we have to go forward with. Chris i want to be clear in the first part of what you said, will republicans on the Committee Call for subpoenaed witnesses to testify, and if so, who are you going to ask to testify . Oh of course. Well testify. First and foremost the first person that needs to testify, adam schiff. Adam schiff is the author of this report. Adam schiff has been ought are to of many things many found to be false past couple years. He will be the author of this report. He compared himself in the past to a special counsel. This is what he said he was doing. Go back to clinton and nixon, ken starr was special counsel, presented a report. He testified under oath and took questions from all sides including the white house. My first and foremost witness is adam schiff. Chris you want to bring him in before the committee, not just to present a report but to take questions from democrats and to be crossexamined if you will by the republicans . He needs to be. He put himself into that position. If he chooses not to, i really question his veracity, what he is putting in his report. I question his, the motives why he is doing its. It is easy to hide behind a report and hide behind a gavel in Intelligence Committee behind closeddoor hearings. It is another to ends a questions what he knew, his staff knew, interactions with ukraine, other things he had over time with this process and also why he is still not released documents to our committee and reports to our committee that we need to actually proceed in our committee of the Judiciary Committee which is the committee of impeachment. I have a question, why are they hiding this stuff from us . They think they have such a case, give us a all the materials and dont let jerry nadler write a crazy letter on the 6th, we need to know who your witnesses are. This is why this is problematic exercise and madefortv event coming on wednesday. Chris chairman nadler has also written to the white house asking if they want to have a lawyer represent them at wednesdays hearing which will be with constitutional scholars, to actually mount a defense of the president the next week a week from monday. Do you know whether the white house is going to participate . I think were still looking at that, but i have a question for you, chris, why would they want to participate in just another rerun . Were back in rerun season here in the Judiciary Committee he. We had constitutional scholars from the Mueller Report whether this is Impeachable Offense this is waste of time. They have already this in mind. Writing articles of impeachment whether they have fairness in the process at all. Why would white house participate with bunch of constitutional scholars, i wrote a letter to chairman nadler, why do we do it three to one ratio . Why as with clinton, we had four time as many witnesses why dont we get two for two. Chris let me interrupt a minute here. No problem. Chris youre saying three of the four constitutional scholars will be prodemocrat, proimpeachment and one of the four is going to be basically questioning whether or not there are ground for impeachment. That is exactly right. That is what were seeing here. Look, the problem is here, theyre on a time frame. Internal time frame to finish this out by the end of the year because they want to get at this president right now, before everybody completely sees through the process sham of the elections for next year. So were rushing this chris. I dont think the American People, even if they support an impeachment inquiry or try to remove, overturn the votes of 63 Million People for the president. They dont think this is fair. I talk to democrats dont believe it is fair. If the Judiciary Committee has a constitutional scholar hearing and presentation of a report by adam schiff, we go straight to a mark up, that is failure of chairman nadler of ultimate proportions. The committee has to talk to fact witnesses, talk to the people a part of this, have the president viably participate in his own defense which he has not had the opportunity to do now. Go ahead. Chris youre pretty wound up, i got to say. I obviously had turkey this thanks giving. A little bit of cranberries as well. Chris me too. Lets talk about the merits of this. You say there is no basis to impeach the president. I like to play key testimony from Intel Committee basically stating allegations or evidence against the president. Take a look. The meeting president zelensky wanted was conditioned on the investigations of burisma, and alleged ukrainian interference in the 2016 u. S. Elections. It is improper for the president of the United States to demand a Foreign Government investigate a u. S. Citizen and a political opponent. Mr. Giulianis requests were a quid pro quo for arranging a white house visit for president zelensky. Chris congressman collins, before we get to the question whether this is an Impeachable Offense or not, simply, do you see anything wrong with that, that the president conditioning support for ukraine whether it was a meeting, whether with zelensky, whether it is military, conditioning support for ukraine to that country investigating some of the president s political rivals . Well i think it is interesting that the premise of your question is based on witnesses who agree with your premise. I disagree, mr. Volcker, mr. Morrison, even mr. Sondland who presumed it was being conditioned, the president told senator johnson there is no precondition. Nothing to be presumed. If you want to show one side, show the other side as we go along with this. President trump has always been concerned about foreign aid. He is always concerned what ask going on in the ukraine and europe, and are they participating and our tax dollars. The question looking at corruption, does it matter who is involved . That is the problem with the policy issue in intel. He was looking at the corruption part of it, if the bidens were involved they would have been a part of that. The problem there is never a discussion in intel as i pointed out, several key fact witnesses who actually said there was no conditioning of this. You can put chris let me ask you, because were about to run out of time. July 25th, phone call, where between President Trump and president zelensky, he never mentions corruption and ukraine, he never mentions burisma. He said investigate two americans, he names them, joe biden and his son hunter . Again if you look look at thl itself there was overall discussion which had been had previously by others with discussion in ukraine. Go back to the fact that the president looks after our tax dollars, the president is looking out for the fact was there problems there. When we look at this process we do not see a president who conditioned anything. He wants the facts whether 2016 election, what were looking at what was happening, he was looking at the fact is there corruption that i dont spend dollars i need to spend in ukraine because of corruption still there. This is the issue. Chris i have a thought experiment, bear with me a little bit. If you believed the president used his power of his office to try to get ukraine to interfere with our elections, if you believe that, would that be an Impeachable Offense . I do not believe it, so im not going to answer a hypothetical which is designed to simply say the president did something improper proper. He did nothing improper. Nothing problematic giving aid to another country youre talking about corruption which he is required to do by law. President ial candidate son getting massive amount of money from a company under investigation which even other witnesses that have been favorable quote to the democrats in the investigation has said needed to be looked at. This is a problem of overall proportion but there is nothing here that the president did wrong. This is the thing were going to move forward on. Chris i got one last question. I have a minute for it. Okay. Chris u. S. Senate seat in georgia comes open at the end of the year. John sy isaacson, the senator there is retiring. President trump pushed hard for Georgia Governor Brian Kemp to appoint you as the senator but it appears from all reports that the governor is going to go ahead and appoint kelly love loffler big be republican. How will you understand if he appoints her not you . The governor has the appointment to be made. I appreciate the support from the president and many others. As you see from the interview i have a big job to do next three weeks is impeachment. Well see where the governor goes after the pick. My full focus and attention is on impeachment. I look forward what is best for georgia. Those are the things that play in my mind. First thing in my mind is defending faux impeachment on wednesday. Chris if you say you have to make a decision after that if it happens, would you potentially run against her when she is up for reelection . Chris, lets see what the governor does first. He heard from a lot of folks that will be a decision we have to make at that point. Chris congressman collins, thank you. Always good to talk with you. Always good to be with you, chris, take care. Chris well get reaction from the top democrat on the Judiciary Committee as they make their case against the president. Congressman Hakim Jeffries of new york joins us next. It was like that feeling when you go to taco night at your favorite restaurant. And theyre the besttasting tacos in the entire world. And just when you think it couldnt get any better, they bring you out another taco. Cuz they made an extra one. Extra taco geico. Fifteen minutes could save you fifteen percent or more on car insurance. For the holidays you cant beat home sweet home. We go the extra mile to bring your holidays home. I feelbusiness cards. New logo. Outdoor sign. You always get me. Get free next business day shipping or. 1 hour instore pick up. Shopping season solved at office depot officemax. Or officedepot. Com. Same time next week. Yes when it comes to using data, which is why Xfinity Mobile is a different kind of Wireless Network that lets you design your own data. Choose unlimited, shared data, or mix lines of each and switch any line, anytime. Giving you more choice and control compared to other top wireless carriers. And now get 250 off when you buy a new Samsung Phone during Xfinity Mobile beyond black friday. Plus, you can save up to 400 a year. Click, call or visit a store today. Chris House Democrats have invited President Trump to send lawyers to participate in hearings starting this week as the Judiciary Committee decides whether to draft articles of impeachment against him. Joining us now from new york, congressman Hakeem Jeffries, top democrat on that committee. Welcome back. Chris, great to be with you. Chris lets start what President Trump said about the democratic impeachment effort at a rally this past week in florida. Here he is. The failed washington establishment is trying to stop me because im fighting for you and because were winning, very simple. Chris congressman, wouldnt democrats have a stronger case against the president if you hadnt been talking about impeaching almost from the day he took office . Well, chris i disagree with that premise and as it relates to this impeachment inquiry were in right now, we are here reluctantly. The impeachment of a president is not something we came to congress to do. We came to congress to get things done, to work with this president , to drive down the high cost of life saving prescription drugs. We hope to pass a bill in the house over the next three weeks that would do that. We actually indicated we want to work with President Trump to fix our crumbling bridges, roads tunnels, airport and Mass Transportation system and to work with him on the renegotiated nafta agreement. Weve been clear about that from the very beginning. Chris excuse me, congressman, but the fact is, almost since he took office, first it was collusion with the russians. Mueller report said it couldnt make a case there. Obstruction which democrats still believe is the case. Now ukraine, there has been awful lot about investigating the president , impeaching the president , removing the president since he took the oath of office. Well the house is a separate and coequal branch government. We dont work for this president or any president. We work for the American People. We do have a constitutional responsibility to serve as the check and balance on a potentially out of control executive branch. That is not the Democratic Party playbook. That is in fact the James Madison playbook. Madison indicated the house should serve as a rival to the executive branch because the founders didnt want a king, they didnt want a dictator, they didnt want a monarch. They want ad democracy. We have the responsibility to defend our democracy. Were here at this moment right now because the president decided to pressure a Foreign Government to target an american citizen for political gain and at the same time withhold 391 million in military aid from a very vulnerable ukraine which is ally to the United States and is still at war with russianbacked separatist its in crimea. That is why were at this moment. Chris but, congressman, democrats have been making that case, youve been making your best case to the public for two months now. You just finished 30 hours of televised hearings, 12 witnesses and the public apparently isnt buying it at this point. I want to put up a recent poll, back in early october people approved of improving and removing the president by margin of 52 to 46. Now after you presented your evidence it is 48 for and 50 against. You know, you could argue those are well within the margin of error, it is clear there is nonof the birpartisan sport that speaking pelosi said was essential to impeachment . Most recent poll i saw 50 of the American People supporting impeachment inquiry, potential removal, 43 opposed. More than 70 of the American People indicated did something wrong. That said, our job is to follow the facts apply the law, be guided by the use constitution and present the truth to the American People no matter where it leads because no one is above the law. That is what we have been doing. That is what we are doing. That is what were going to continue to do moving forward. Chris all right. I want to get to some of the issues i discussed with congressman collins. Judiciary chair nadler asked the white house whether they want to participate in this first hearing on wednesday, this coming wednesday, with four constitutional scholars. Let me ask you a question first. Who are the witnesses that the democrats are calling . Well that is a question best directed at chairman nadler. The committee hasnt been provided that information yet. I still think they are trying to work out details. Even my good friend congressman collins didnt indicate who the republican witness will be. That remains to be seen chris wait, let me pick up on that. How can you ask the white house to participate in a hearing three days from now when they dont even know who the witnesses are going to be and, by your own admission, three of them will be for you and one of them will be for President Trump . I mean how is that a fair process . Well it is not my understanding three of them will be for me. Were for the truth. Chris when i say you, for impeachment,. Right. Chris side with the democratic view of impeachment. Three witnesses consistent with the congressional rules will be called by the majority on the house Judiciary Committee, then one witness congressman collins will be called by the minority. Chris why three to one . Why not 2 and 2. That is something to be discussed but what is most important is lets have a discussion, chris about the 12 fact witnesses already who testified. All of whom were members of the trump administration. Ambassador volcker, trump appointee, ambassador sondland, trump appointee, ambassador taylor, trump appointee, dr. Fiona hill, trump appointee, Jennifer Williams trump appointee. Lieutenant colonel vindman trump appointee, confirmed the central allegations here of the wrongdoing engaged in by the president with respect to pressuring a Foreign Government to target an american citizen that is the abuse of power were concerned about. That act undermined Americas National security. Chris chairman nadler has also asked the white house, not just for this hearing this week, whether or not they want to participate. They have a deadline of this coming friday on this. Whether they want to participate in hearings starting a week from monday, december 9th, to mount a defense of the president. But, House Democratic leaders are already talking bought, by the end of the 9th, that that week house votes out articles of impeachment, the last week, the before christmas, the full house will vote whether or not to impeach the president. I guess the question is, how fair is that . Looks like a week from monday, mount your defense, by the end of the week well impeach you . No timeline has been set as a member of the House Democratic leadership and member of Judiciary Committee, i can tell you only thing Speaker Pelosi said, set a very solemn, somber, serious tone well proceed expeditiously, because this matter relates to a matter of urgent concern, that was set forth by the Inspector General to the Intelligence Committee, another trump appointee and were going to be guided by the truth. At the same time we want to give the president every opportunity to present exculpatory information. Chris let me pick you up on that, sir. Are you saying if the white house decides to fully participate and they say we want to call half a dozen witnesses we want to take this on to into the past, the first of the year, which is not that long a period of time from now, this has moved at warp speed, are you saying you would personally be okay with that . Well see what happens. We need to be guided by the truth f they come forward with relevant witnesses i think we all may want to hear from john bolton, we all would like to hear from mick mulvaney. Chris how about joe biden and hunter biden, would you like to hear from them . I think if theyre relevant but the reality is, chris, if you look at the testimony from ambassador taylor, for instance, what he said, this is a west point graduate, this is someone who was a vietnam war hero and a Reagan Administration appointee, subsequently appointed by trump, he said there was no legitimate National Security reason for withholding the aid. No legitimate Public Policy reason. No legitimate substantive reason. If the president would like to come for word with actual witness who can provide exculpatory information why the aid was withheld we would welcome that. Chris okay. A couple minutes left. While the Judiciary Committee at the same hour youre holding your hearing this wednesday President Trump will be overseas in london at the nato summit representing this country. Do you have any props with that . Well, again, we have a constitutional responsibility to serve as check and balance. That means we do need to investigate evidence of wrongdoing, much of which is hiding in plain sight. We have the july 25th phone call that the president himself made and pressured the Ukrainian Government with the words, do us a favor though, at the same time withholding 391 million without justification, but we want to continue to work with the administration. You know the American People pay five or six times the amount of other countries who are developed for the same drug, often manufactured in the same location. Thats wrong. The president indicated to give the federal government the power to negotiate. Chris you had a problem with the juxtaposition, youre discussing whether to impeach the president while he is representing the country overseas. Were giving the president every opportunity to participate in the impeachment inquiry in a very fair and balanced way. Chris we like that phrase fair and balanced here at fox. Congressman jeffries, one final question for you. As you mentioned youre a member of the House Democratic leadership. At this point do you know for certain of a single republican who is going to vote to impeach this president . No, we havent had that conversation but ultimately every Single Member of the house of representatives is going to have to decide whether they want to put principle over party, whether they want to put the constitution ahead corruption. This is about abuse of power this is about National Security. This is about the undermining of the integrity of our elections. This is about betrayal. Chris right. This is about the United States constitution. Well see what people decide to do moving forward. Chris congressman jeffries, thank you, thanks for your time. Always good to talk with you, sir . Thank you, chris. Chris up next we bring in our sunday group to discuss what to expect in those big impeachment hearings starting this week. Plus, what would you like to ask the panel whether the white house should send lawyers to participate . Just go to facebook or twitter Fox News Sunday. We may use your question on the air. Going anytime. Rewarded learn more at the explorer card dot com. Why People Choose to support shriners hospitals for children. It might be because shriners hospitals is recognized around the world as the leader in their innovative research. Theyre super smart or it could be the fact that shriners hospitals specializes in giving transformative care so kids can get home quicker and get back to the important stuff, being a kid. Or maybe its the way shriners hospitals is helping more kids in more places through the use of telehealth technology. This gives kids around the world life changing quality care right where they are. Like i said, there are a million reasons to support shriners hospitals every month. But i bet i know the best ones. Me me me and me when you call the number on your screen right now and give as little as 19 a month, just 63 cents a day, youll be making a life changing difference for a child just like sarah. With your monthly gift, well send you this adorable love to the rescue blanket as a thank you and a reminder of all the children who make up your million reasons why you support shriners hospitals for children. Because of your monthly support, i can dance. I can play games with my friends laughs . I can walk. Will today be the day you send your love to the rescue . Please go online right now to loveshriners. Org to give your monthly support so more kids get the care they need to be kids. There are a million reasons to give, and i, i, i, i, i am one of them. [group] thank you [narrator] please call or go online right now. If operators are busy, please call again or go to loveshriners. Org right away to give. Your gift shows you care. [woman] with my shark, i deep clean messes like this, or go to loveshriners. Org right away to give. This, and even this. But i dont have to clean this, because the selfcleaning brush roll removes hair while i clean. [announcer] shark, the vacuum that deep cleans now cleans itself. Now the same maniacs are pushing the deranged, think of this, impeachment. Impeachment. [booing] a witchhunt. The same as before. Chris President Trump blasting the ongoing impeachment hearings and receiving a strong response at a rally this week in florida. It is time for our sunday group. Former republican congressman jason chaffetz. Fox news political analyst juan williams, former Democratic Congresswoman jane harman, director of the wilson center, and rich lowery of National Review and author of the new book, the case for nationalism. We asked you for questions for the panel. On this issue whether the president should send a lawyer to participate in the impeachment hearings, we got this on facebook from greta. She writes, since the president and republicans have consistently expressed concern about due process, doesnt it behoove the president s counsel to attend these hearings and participate to their full ability . Congressman chaffetz, how do you answer greta . Should the president send a lawyer to represent him and the white house at the hearings this week . I do think the president should send and attorney, it is creditlous given the mares are on in wednesday we dont know who the witnesses are going to be. The process from start to finish is a sham but at the same time the president should send counsel. We have no idea how the process will move forward except we know that they will go as fast as they possibly can than get it right. Chris i was going to ask you, Hakeem Jeffries was talking about well follow wherever the truth lieds us but on the other hand, the timeline, president you can mount the defense and then well impeach you. They havent gotten the report out of the Intel Committee and republicans are supposed to name who the witnesses will be. You can guess which direction they will to. Theyre going for speed rather than getting it right. I dont think they should move forward at all. I think its a whole sham. The president is making a good point. They have not convert ad single republican throughout this process. Chris congresswoman, harman, the white house officials said from the very start this is undue process and theyre suggesting this call now, why dont you bring in your lawyer to represent the white house and present a defense is simply to try to add some credibility to an unfair process . Do they have a point . Well i think the process is being rushed at this point. It is a clock. Next year is an Election Year and thats a problem but i think, as Speaker Pelosi said, she was reluctant to do this. It was the facts that drove the democratic majority, whether the rest of you a agree or not to this point. One of the problems there are three committees involved instead of one committee which was the case in both nixon and clinton impeachments. I was a member of the house during the clinton impeachment and its a very tough and miserable process and the people pushing it paid a severe price. So what do i think now . I think names of the democratic witnesses should be public this minute and i think the white house, i agree with jason, should participate participate in. In the clinton case the white house presented a 30page document making its case. Chris they also got to crossexamine ken starr, the independent cocounsel sell. It was different process. There was independent counsel. Chris the argument you could interrogate adam schiff . You could. I think that is an awkward idea but i think his report and the names of the witnesses should be public immediately. Adam schiff he should have to be there, answer questions why were not hearing from the socalled witness, all of these whistleblower . Because the law protects him. Chris let me bring the other half of the panel. Rich, House Democrats really do seem to have a tight timeline. Two weeks of hearings. The end of not this week, the following week, articles of impeachment. There is the final week before christmas. Vote to, impeach. Here is the question i have at this point. Which is a bigger political risk, for democrats . Risk for democrats. To go ahead and vote to impeach or to decide to pull back and go for something lighter like censure. They have crossed the rubicon long ago. They have to impeach. Extremely disspiritting for their base humiliating effect if they didnt do it for some reason of the main process here, chris, they will not take the time to get any firsthand witnesses that have direct knowledge of this matter and the president s statements and state of mind. Mick mulvaney, acting chief of staff, rudy giuliani, any of these people because it might take another two months or so. And i think a lot of the process arguments at the moment will be forgotten in the fullness of time but the fact theyre sending a flagrantly incomplete fact all record to the senate on this most consequential constitutional process that will be remembered and i think that is why history will look dimly on this process. It is just surely because it doesnt work on their political timeline. Chris on thursday President Trump paid a surprise visit to u. S. Troops serving in afghanistan. Here he is. There is nowhere i would rather celebrate this thanksgiving than right here with the toughest, strongest, best and bravest warriors on the face of the earth. You are indeed that. Chris juan, as i was watching that, we were all surprised when suddenly we heard the president was in afghanistan, im sure he genuinely wanted to support u. S. Forces, those wonderful men and women who were defending us on the front lines in afghanistan. On the other hand i also thought, everything is political, doesnt make it a little bit harder to impeach the president when you see him acting there as our commanderinchief. The report is he is emulating bill clinton who stayed busy during the impeachment hearings, did so to his political profit. Remember clintons travels didnt stop Newt Gingrich from impeaching president clinton. It is not determinative. It has a political spin you put to it but the other part of the political spin, with trump it seemed, i think this is why you had the thought, i certainly had it, it looks like a photoop. Remember he hadnt gone to visit any war zone until last year. He was criticized for it. This is the first visit to afghanistan, our longest war, 2,000 plus americans dead. He had no preparation. He talked about a ceasefire but his military people said we know nothing about a ceasefire with the taliban. The taliban said they know nothing about a ceasefire. He then talked about negotiations with the taliban. Again, his own diplomats said we know nothing about any ongoing talks with the taliban. The president canceled talks with the taliban last september if you recall after they were engaged in a violent incident. Seems to me if you come back home and say, because this picks up on what you were talking about with congressman jeffries, why dont we get things done, think about well, why is it that the president hasnt moved on prescription drugs . Why isnt chris why isnt the house moved on usmca . Where i was going. So the big victories for him if he can get a trade deal with usmca or the china trade deal but then, he simply saying, hey, give me this opportunity so i can somehow distract from reality of impeachment hearings. The democrats continue to play into the hands of donald trump. Because no matter what the president does, he visits our troops in afghanistan, he is going to go to the nato meetings next month, then they will complain. Chris not next month. This week. This week. That is so fundamentally wrong. Somehow going into 2020, donald trump looks like the victim. He looks like the washington, d. C. , outsider he will gain more political support. It will chris let congresswoman harman. Rich made the case as well. Oh, it is obstruction but democrats are not bringing forward witnesses. Who is obstructing . Who is keeping mulvaney from testifying . Go to the usmca. Democrats made good points in the house and those changes are being vetted with canada and mexico. I salute President Trump trying to get that done correctly. I think he was right to go to a war theater for a 3 1 2 hour visit. Should have stayed a little longer, maybe worked harder on the taliban negotiations so he knew what he was talking about. Chris no president spends anytime, they will not sit there and negotiate. He should have worked chris did barack obama spend overnight in iraq or afghanistan . He should negotiate with the taliban but im saying he should have known, brought up to date where we were. He called off the negotiations. On nato i think he should go to that. Those talks were set two years ago by theresa may. Hopefully chris not that anybody ever gets the final word. I will try. Fact the matter he will come back home. He will not be above it all. He will live tweet the hearings. He will never fully adopt the bill clinton strategy. On the witnesses, no white house aides in his own impeachment there, is colorful case there are legitimate privilege claim for these witnesses. The courts should decide. Democrats dont want to wait because theyre on a political timetable. They will have partisan Impeachment Vote on a timetable. Chris panel. We have to take a break. When we come back, another terror attack on london bridge. The suspect already convicted on terrorism who was recently released. 2020 politics, Elizabeth Warren dropping sharply in a new National Poll as the democratic race gets another shakeup. Tech dont wait for a chip like this to crack your whole windshield. With safelites exclusive resin, you get a strong repair that you can trust. Plus, with most insurance a safelite repair is no cost to you. Customer really . singers safelite repair, safelite replace. It is the same answer, it always been i dont do polls. Im out here fighting every day on behalf of the working families. Chris 2020 Democratic CandidatesPete Buttigieg and Elizabeth Warren reacting to recent polls showing he is surging and she is dropping. Were back now with the panel. Lets look at the national qunnipiac poll that came out this week. Joe biden is solidly in first place but the news is what happened behind him, buttigieg went from fourth to second in the last month in the National Poll. Warren went from first to third. Went from 28 to 14. Lost fully half of her support. Juan, what happened to warren and how seriously should we take buttigieg as a potential democratic nominee . I think you take him pretty seriously. He has also done very well in fundraising which we didnt mention, he is a leader in fundraising which is a clearly surprising. He is clearly not the leader in the polls but he is rising. Warren came as a shock to me, chris. Losing 50 of her support, principally among white educated democrats who previously were tremendous boosters for her. So the other thing that is strikes me chris let me ask you specifically about that. Dont you think the problem, i dont think it is coincidental, she came out with her medicare for all plan, how much it is going to cost, how she will pay for it. People didnt like it . People did not like it. Prospect of losing your private insurance. I think even more so, her whole sort of reason for her candidacy i have a plan, i have a way to deal with this issue. When people were asking how do you plan to pay for this, people found it unacceptable. They did not like the plan. So i think that undermined her thesis if you will. Chris all right. Then there is former new york city mayor Michael Bloomberg who is now officially in the race. A video surfaced in the last few days of him making a speech last year which he seemed, i dont think seemed, he did favor regressive taxes, taxes that hit poor more harshly especially on things like cigarettes and sugary drinks. Take a look. The problem is in people that dont have a lot of money and so higher taxes should have a bigger impact on their behavior and how they deal with themselves. So i, listened to people saying oh, we dont want to tax the poor. Well, we want the poor to live longer so they can get an education and enjoy life. Chris so, rich, basically, tax the poor so they wont do the things to harm themselves that they would do if they had the money. How do you think that will go over with democrats . I dont think well. This is not a gaffe in the sense of misspeaking this is something he legitimately believes. Rank paternalism. Goes to how there is something to dislike about the bloomberg candidacy for everyone. Republicans dont like taxes. Democrats dont like taxes on the poor and everyone likes soda. The campaign is preposterous. And wait out first four contests and swoop in on 100 milliondollar ad buy i think is ridiculous and going nowhere. Chris lets turn to the terrible scene we saw on friday, holiday weekend, man stabbed several people on london bridge, killing two of them. The man is walking away with the knife. Bystanders sub cued the attacker, when police told him to back off. They flash ad suicide vest, we froze it there, police shot and killed him. There was another attack which a man in the netherlands stabbed three teenagers that will be okay. As this was going on, isis put out photos of new isis recruits. Despite the attack and takedown of their isis leader albaghdadi, isis is not going away. They are not going away. The nonstrategy on syria, the isis will go through the porous border and return to europe. Some are european. These attacks will go up. Kudos to the brave citizens who made this, put the chris they one person had a fire exwisher. Had a narwal tusk. Cops came and took him out he was wearing a suicide vest. Chris we should point out a fake suicide vest. Fake suicide vest. Turned out to be fake, no one thought that was true at time. We need more brain cells focused on isis. I think our policies will make it more likely isis will reemerge in europe. So copycats can happen. Dont denigrate the Intelligence Community trying to get ahead of this. Dont do things with the navy that make the pentagon really question whether the commanderinchief is making good decisions. Lets please, lets please, reinstate our relations with allies who are the ones who will keep us safe. Lets confirm if we can, all these vacancies at the Homeland Security department. Chris congressman, chaffetz, as we saw baghdadi attack, now these attacks, and there is no indication anything other than individual people, were not even sure in the netherlands. That was a homeless person. This fellow no reason to believe at this point he was working under the direct orders of isis but, it is still out there. I keep thinking of, bush 43 who said this is war, war on terror that will last generation. It was terrorism. We need to call it out as terrorism. Chris absolutely. Lets understand, im certainly not blaming democrats in any way, shape or form but, when the house Intelligence Committee spends all their time over here focused on trump, trump, trump, they are not doing their job. What they should be doing and looking at the spread of terrorism and isis and these types of things around the globe. There is an opportunity cost to how the democrats have been spending their time. Theyre not working on these things that will actually cause terror around the world. Former ranking democrat on Intel Committee, is that fair or not . I dont know what theyre doing with a lot of their time because the hearings are classified and closed as they should be not even having hearings. The bigger point is, that we need more brain cells on the terror target. It is coming here too. Isis is not over. To claim that it is over i think will shortchange u. S. Security. Chris rich, do you worry that President Trump, on the trip to afghanistan is talking about making a deal, drawing down troops . We are certainly pulling back from syria, that all of that is creating a breathing space for terrorists . That would be the word. This is a dangerous group, dangerous ideology. We need to keep our boot on its neck in the middle east. Trumps reflex is to liquidate our presence in the broader middle east. Where we actually figured out in recent years with a way of minimal forces to defeat the caliphate and keep isis on the run t would be a mistake to pull out the forces. Chris juan . I think that is exactly right. A rare moment of bipartisanship in washington, what are you doing, why are you doing this . The president s explanation chris, he promised to get us out of these never ending wars. It is pretty popular with the American People but the execution is, where the rubber meets the road so to speak. In the execution he has not been sufficient in saying here is how im not only dealing with isis but im dealing with the russian, larger presence in places like syria. Chris he did deal with isis. He killed baghdadi. No, no. Stopped caliphate. Saying i have eliminated it is a overstatement. That is like Mission Accomplished reiteration, rich. It serves people to think it is done away and it is not done away. I ace cancer that spreads pretty much through social media as they continue to recruit and use incidents like the one in london to somehow say to people, yeah we should be doing this. Next week important meetings with nato should not be overshadowed by a Democratic Congress trying to impeach a president. That was on message this morning. [laughter]. I mean, nato is an important organization. We are a keystone part of it. I hope that President Trump makes that clear when he goes over and that he fully supports article v which is problematic now that he met with erdogan and given erdogan a pass. Chris article v, attack on one country is an attack on all countries. Im proud of myself. See you next sunday. Our power player of the week. Once again i tax with the turkeys. Not whats easy. So when a hailstorm hit, usaa reached out before he could even inspect the damage. Thats how you do it right. Usaa insurance is made just the way martins family needs it with hasslefree claims, he got paid before his neighbor even got started. Because doing right by our members, thats whats right. Usaa. What youre made of, were made for. Usaa theres a company thats talked than me jd power. People 448,134 to be exact. They answered 410 questions in 8 categories about vehicle quality. And when they were done, chevy earned more j. D. Power quality awards across cars, trucks and suvs than any other brand over the last four years. So on behalf of chevrolet, i want to say thank you, real people. Youre welcome. Were gonna need a bigger room. For the holidays you cant beat home sweet home. We go the extra mile to bring your holidays home. Chris here is a holiday riddle we ask every thanksgiving, who founded a huge tech company, created a successful cosmetic business and now raises turkeys like the native americans did . Once again, here is our power player of the week. No your soil, know your weather, know your animals. Chris sandi is talking about sustainable farming, raising livestock and growing vegetables without the chemicals that are so common in what she calls factory farming. Just days before thanksgiving she took with 13th heritage breeds trace to the indians. Gobble, gobble, gobble. Chris 800 acres in upperville, virginia, but interesting as her business is how she got here. She grew up on a farm in california making enough from raising cattle to send herself to college. What i learned was to love work. Im really happy when im engaged and working, striving. Chris she got in computers, in 1984 her then husband started cisco systems, started linking networks to computers to foundation of the internet but 6 years later Venture Capital people were running system. How do you get fired from a company that you started . We just basically got taken to the cleaners, if you dont have an employment contract, i got fired by the guy who fired steve jobs. [laughter] chris started cosmetic companies called urban decay with edgy colors like women like her and she bought farm. Historically people who had disposable income who made strides in farming, look at George Washington and thomas jefferson. Youre such a pretty girl, pretty does chris turkeys taste better because of the lives they lead. Chris how much turkey cost compared to what i get in the Grocery Store . Well, our turkeys, this year 160 to 200. Chris theres question on how to make the farming profitable but while lerner is determined to run solid business, its not just about the bottom line, theres a mansion on the farm. Whats it like living there . I dont know. Chris what do you mean . I live in cabin. Chris do you think youre a bit acentric. I am now that im rich, i used to just be rich. Chris we danced with a turkey, grew up on family farm and wants to see the values live on. Im a cowgirl, i can tell what cows are thinking, its very much my success as a farmer, thats what George Washington was, he wanted to be a good farmer and i think ive become a good farmer. Chris sandy sold 800 turkies this summer and located 200 the local charities, thats it for today, have a great week and we will see you next Fox News Sunday next. Paul welcome to the journal editorial report, im paul gigot, the democratic impeach mint inquiry is set to enter a new phase next week with the house Judiciary Committee scheduled to hold its first public hearing on wednesday as it prepares to draft articles of impeachment against President Trump. Democrats on the house Intelligence Committee say theyll deliver a report to the Judiciary Committee shortly after they return from thanksgiving break following two weeks of their own public hearings that left americans closely divided on the question of impeachment. A new Quinnipiac University poll shows 45 of voters think President Trump should be impeached and removed from