content on the platform. now it's even been made tougher i don't think we want to go for members of the committee to through an instance where we review the transcripts of these have -- allow ago tech company depositions or interviews, to censor any speech whatsoever. whatever they may be. it really runs afoul of a lot of we're not even sure if this has to do with the intelligence first amendment rights. committee or impeachment as we anything that they do with the go through this every day. political ads topic, they have there's a sense of frustration to be very careful that they taking place with members. don't just criticize and target frankly, neil, it should be facebook, that they look at this frustrating democrats being left holistically if they do anything out of the process as well. and make sure that they are following the first amendment >> neil: they say republicans are not left out of that rights and that they do not process. oftentimes you're in on the same infringe on any one's speech. >> neil: he's in a no-win interrogation. normally the lawyer level. situation there as you touched on, francis. you know, it's not as if he said i'm not going to republicans are being blind-sided here. fact-check ads in response to a i don't know what the truth is. democrat saying that he should what do you say? >> let me put it this way. when it comes to republican ads. he should have just added and when we had the russian investigation, we issued the same applies to any ads that subpoenas, they were voted on by you come up with or anyone in the full committee. your party. but they have it out for him. nobody on the democratic said was left out. a lot of people are targeting we haven't been able to select with whom he had dinner. anybody to come in and talk on the other night, it was with this issue. democrats were allowed to do that when we did the russian conservatives. the other night, allegations investigation. from the president of the u agat so the rules have clearly