and so i would say that it's even simpler than that . we're dealing with ournnwe warmongers, unserious people w whose policy prescriptions could have deadlyho serious consequences. the deeper irony is that nato doesn't even wantip ukraine, that it's a corrupt country. it's more ofpt a liability than it wouldli a military asset. and the people who are pushing this simply argue that it needs to happen because russiaav shouldn't have a veto over who's in nato. in other words,ever even when io in our mutual interest tour not have a state in nato, we haveha to insist that there will be added just to spite the russianshe. ng well, that was an interesting conversation. those seem like fair points ifai aheade wrong, go and explain how they're wrong. listen, butterfish, washington is done explaining anything as you may have noticed. so instead the veryy same foreign policy geniuses who brought markets to libyabe went insane with rage. not since we made fun a. of pregnant flight suits have they been this mad fox host unabashedly makes putin's case bachs. cnn's white house correspondentm unabashedly shows how the disinformation successes of russian