conversation national security. she wrote as history book, this constitutional book and she is wrong about most of the things she said. analogy to a king is utterly inaccurate. >> ed: not surprisingly there are a whole bunch of house democrats who disagree with what you were saying. hear from them and let you rea react. >> judge jackson wrote a really comprehensive and decisive opinion saying that they hav hao cut out immunity and all these totally cooked up, phony doctor ends. >> part of what i would tell my colleagues is, do you want to live in the world where any president has absolute immunity over any congressional oversight? >> they say you're wrong. >> i think you got an a+ spirit >> you may want to go back and look at his paper. >> i also represented his