and not masked, no difference in transmission. same with the study in spain and it was hypothesis unproven. if doctor fauci and all of those who pushed masks so fervently would simply have done their own randomized controlled study with good methodology, they could have answered th cone controvers two and a half years ago but hal chose to rule by dogma rather than scientific data. i >> i will ask yo'mu the questiou they ask me alesl the time which usually is in a courtroom motive, what would be the motive for propagating misinformation by healthcare professionals, not politicians but healthcare professionals? was the motive in doing so? >> i think with vaccine strategy they wanted a simple message, they didn't want to account for those who had previous infection. let's make it simple, the public is too stupid to understand ath new message. with i a n masks, it's temptingo give somebody something they cao do even when are unsure.