political left and the justice department got their gears mushing for that reason. that is an inescapable reason here. you made this point well, harris. everyone here, every person on the virtual couch is opposed to violence or threats of violence. there's no place for that in our society. we all agree that that's not rocket science here. that is a point of broad agreement and consensus. why some scatter shot examples of people going too far, throwing a threat and it has been condemned, when that happens, there are state officials and local officials that deal with it, the federalizing of that so-called problem or epidemic or whatever, there's no actual underlying justification that i have seen for that beyond the politics of it and the coordination that i mentioned a moment ago. that ultimately is the crux of the problem here and garland doesn't have a good answer for