are not unanimous. there is not universal or bipartisan agreement on the facts and what they lead to. especially when there is exculpatory evidence that has been presented not in the schiff report, but in other reports, does that timing bother you from a historical's perspective, not only in the past, but moving forward as well? >> fast and narrow is not a good recipe for impeachment. that was the case with johnson, nero was the case with clinton. they do not survive and they collapse in front of the senate. there is a ratio between your foundation and your height. this is the highest structure you can build under the constitution. want to build an impeachment, you have to have a foundation broad enough to support it. this is the narrowest impeachment in history. you can argue with johnson, johnson it might be the fastest impeachment. johnson actually what happened to him was the fourth impeachment attempt against johnson. and actually the record goes back a year before. they laid that trapdoor a year