a separate vote, two-thirds of the majority. you the separate person conducting the trial and the chief justice sitting. he didn't treat it as just something to do if you don't like a president or you don't agree with the election or maybe he said something you don't like or something like that. this was more than purely a political act. to me if it was purely a political act, the bar wouldn't be set so high and you wouldn't need such a major trial event in the senate. is that right? >> president ford was famous or infamous for saying an imeachable offense is whatever the house of representatives says it is. that's a half truth. yes, all it takes is a majority vote in the house. but as was pointed out in ed's discussion, this is a much more elaborate topic and it's a process designed to make sure that there is a feeling in the country, support in the country of really a ground swell of opinion in the country that