disproportionate impact on that population. it also leads a contradiction of other activities that are not prescribed in this way. two professors recently came out and said that going out in public should now be viewed as a privilege, not a right. and they analogized it to driving where you have to get a license. and that's how far this rhetoric is going. you know, they are ignoring the fact that being in public impacts other rights, religious observation, free speech, right of association. but they want to use this sort of driving model that if you are not vaxxed, if you are not vaccinated then you are sort of like an unlicensed driver who i presume has to stay in your house. lawrence: professor, i have just got get your reaction real quickly. does that scare you because you are a civil libertarian. you have great defense of the constitution, with these laws being implemented in the country and seems like a lot of society is accepting. it is that a chilling affect?