comparemela.com

Executive action. Executive order. I will go as far as i can come even beyond president obama john will the Supreme Court keep these wannabes dictators in check . Who will be on the Supreme Court . This president predicts five Supreme Court justices. John that will shake policy for decades. Are your rights at risk . Thats our show, tonight. And now, john stossel. John our rights are at risk. Its partly because the two leading president ial candidates both want to take away some of your rights and also because Many Americans are confused about what they write is. Bernie sanders said things like this. Health care is a right of all people. John its a right, health care . He also said education, decent housing and childcare our rights. Politicians around the world agree. U. N. Bureaucrats claim plot to things or human rights. Protection from unemployment, rest and leisure, food, clothing, housing, necessary social services, Free Education and periodic holidays with pay. Those are human rights . I guess Mark Zuckerberg abe lincoln and thomas edison, they were deprived of basic human rights. Bernie sanders and the u. N. Busybodies are wrong. Health care, housing and food are not the kinds of rights americas founders wrote about it because he to give one person for housing or education you have to take money from somebody else. Thats a violation of those peoples rights. In our bill of rights every single right is a right not to be meddled with. In other words a right to be free from government, the right not to have your speech abridged or your religion band. Thats a big difference from the uns rights or bernies are hillarys. They would take other peoples stuff and give it to people they say deserve it more. But at least the rights the founders care the most about it have often been protected by the Supreme Court when politicians try to go too far. But will they in the future . Donald trump says, thats why you have got to elect me. This president predicts five Supreme Court justices. If Hillary Clinton gets in she is now so far left that we are never going to have a country again. John while the next president will appoint scalley as replacement and five judges are more than 65 years old with mate mate Stephen Breyer 78 so whats going to happen . Lets ask senior judicial analyst judge andrew napolitano. I think they are both likely to pick people whose views would favor the expansion of the government. John im surprised that this guy obama proposed merrick garland. He has described in the media says popular centrist and yet he is centrist left and right but he is antilibertarian. He always sides with the government, every single case in which he ruled as a federal appellate judge because we did the research, he has sided with the government. Often democratic nominees side with individual liberty when it comes to the fourth amendment, search and seizure. This is a democratic nominee who always, underscore the word john sides side with the police and the government. On twitter and facebook i asked you what rights do you fear the next rights will take away candy posted both president ial candidates have no respect for freedom of speech. The First Amendment would be gutted. I do not think that any significant change will come about during the presidency of donald trump or Hillary Clinton with respect to freedom of speech. I do not understand your viewers apprehension but i would suggest on that line, not on the other spot on that can relax. John look at the candidates. Hillary once tried to ban to be a game sales to minors. They both talked about cutting off parts of the internet. They both want to ban flagburning. Remember the Supreme Court can only hear cases that are properly before it. There are no cases before the Supreme Court right now in which any of those traditional First Amendment liberties are likely to be overturned. John good. Here is one thing Hillary Clinton told the Democratic Convention that she wants her Supreme Court pick. Expand voting rights, not restrict them. John and you are for that . Im for the right of people to vote. I am not in favor of nitpicking requirements at the ballot box. But im also not in favor of voting fraud. She is saying you shouldnt have too have a photo i. D. The requirement for photo i. D. S has an effect on people in inner city who dont have drivers licenses than the laws unconstitutional. I dont accept that but thats what the law is and this court is uniformly enforced it. John in this time i have to show a photo i. D. To buy a cold pill and you have to you have to have to drive, to fly in to get food stamps. Doesnt seem like an unreasonable thing to asks for to prevent voter fraud. On this you and i are in the same page but the court has so elevated the right to vote that you can barely ask the persons name. Heres Something Else that the new Supreme Court may rule on. This year president obamas attorney general made this announcement. Today we are filing a federal civil rights lawsuit against the state of north carolina. This section is about a great deal more than bathrooms. John more than bathrooms but they are going to reach from washington to every bathroom. Show me where the right to use the bathroom is a federally protected right. Its a property right and it should be determined by whoever owns, leases and manages or controls a property and the federal government should have nothing to do with it. John on Facebook Tasha Moore writes she worries clinton and trump will try to use the court to widen government spying eye on private citizens. The scary part is average people will be convinced its okay and its the right thing to do. This i am terrified about. We are one vote away from unleashing the nsa to more unbridled spying than we now have. John why are you terrified . Is much less intrusive than being stopped at the airport. Most of her information is out there anyway. Its true they cant prove they have stop anything from what they have done so far but its logical to think gathering this data might stop the people who want to kill us. Except it doesnt work. When people are afraid its human nature to opt for rather than freedom. Should the government be able to listen to every phonecall and knock on every door and arrest anybody it wants . Who would want to live in that environment . John thats much more intrusive than gathering information quietly. When the government gathers information about acid knows too much about us and it chills our being and it deters us from being free and happy people. John do you worry more about the Clinton Court or a trump court . I worry equally john. John will it be the difference . Theres very little difference between the two. John trump has his list of people who sound pretty good. Air for the most part with the exception of one of them Big Government republicans who would almost always side with the government on issues like surveillance and with the federal government in its disputes with the state. John thank you judge andrew napolitano. If americans have rights i would think one right is the freedom of association which means a right not to do business with people. A couple asked the colorado avery owner Jack Phillips to design a wedding cake for them. Jacket was declined saying he has no problem selling premade cakes but he couldnt do a wedding cake due to his deeply held religious beliefs. The couple complained arguing they had been discriminated against. The state Civil Rights Commission agreed and ordered phillips not only to make cakes for samesex celebrations but to reeducate his staff about colorados antidiscrimination act and to make quarterly compliance reports to confirm he has not turned away customers. John he has to file compliance reports. This reeks of totalitarianism. Its his private business. Some bakers and photographers have been put out of business by these antidiscrimination laws but they are necessary so democratic consultant jessica its an intrusion into it privacy. No its not. At ensuring that people get equal protection under the law. John there are other bakers around. Absolutely and that has become the greatest counter case to this is to say very few towns will only have one baker. The point is the slippery slope argument here. Its not that they are conveying support for samesex marriage. They are just abiding by the law so yes i understand that i feel for him but we have to treat people equally in this country. John so should the black Student Association have to take whites and should the womens club have to take man . Should the jewish baker have to put a swastika on a nazi k. . As a jewish person i would want to make a swastika cake. Yes, you would have to. John is a good thing . Is a good thing we treat everyone equally . We cant make exceptions for people who treat others unfairly on the basis of race gender sexual orientation. John lets go into one other area that you and i will disagree, the hobby lobby case. He was 54 so this could change with the next court. The court says this company did not have to offer insurance. The issue there again is the slippery slope. There was another case that showed the slippery slope where a company privatelyowned, family owned not only did not want to provide contraception or Abortion Related Services but they also want to restrict counseling. They didnt want women to talk to their doctors about their reproductive choices on their health insurance. Come on. John this is where you and the left drive me crazy. They didnt want to restrict it, they didnt want to pay for it. A person was free to get counseling. If you have health care why should your health care cover all aspects of your help Claire Claire care . That saying our reproductive is not part of health care which is categorically wrong. John it doesnt carry your toothpaste or your toothpaste. People go to the doctor for all sorts of reasons. I have to go annually and i will have to go regularly for a mammogram when im older. Those are things that women need to ensure that we are healthy and have a long life. We have a different set of stuff. We have got to go more. John in the hobby lobby case itd want to pay for Birth Control for women. And thats their belief. Why not say okay i will pay for it myself . Some people dont have the money and under the equal protection clause john we went to walmart and they cost 10, 9. 99. Whats your point . It is a right now to have that. John its what the law says and we have to obey. Yeah, think so. John what if the Congress Agrees with a President Trump and he says everybody has to dye their hair orange. I really dont think thats the same thing. I take your point and its important we have these debates but at the end of the day the Supreme Court is there as a National Referee and its important the Supreme Court has the ability to set a standard of civility for the nation. We need to make life as easy as possible for people and thats the job of government to alleviate our anxieties and to make sure that every person has the right we are constitutionally guaranteed. John the governments job is to leave us alone and keep a safe. We have different definitions. John thank you jessica dicarlo. Coming up more arguments about guns come again empower and did you know that president obama has been overturned by the Supreme Court 90 more than any other president . Will that change next term . I doubt it is both leading candidates are eager to overreach. Another great thing about executive orders i dont have to go back to congress. sfx starter pistol shot music we lose our way, we get back up again its never too late to get back up again one day, youre gonna shine again, you may be knocked down, but not out forever tafind stuff under there . D. What about jobs . No . Now try your closet. Still no jobs . Just more. Stuff . Well, you really have both. See, stuff is defined as household articles considered as a group. Sometimes this stuff is no longer needed. Wait, no longer needed . That cant be right. Because remember those jobs you were looking for . Those are really needed and theyre the stuff inside your stuff. Our job is to unlock those jobs. And it starts when you donate your stuff to your local goodwill. Heres how we do it when you donate to goodwill, we sell your stuff to provide job training for people right here in your community. So just by teaming up with goodwill, you help create jobs. And isnt that worth parting with the leftover keytar from your 80s coverband . Goodwill. Donate stuff. Create jobs. John even nbc clueless comedy writers realize something is happening with president obamas executive orders. The presence that i will get benefits like Social Security to some Illegal Immigrants and even the writers understood thats not normally the way laws are made. Legislation is congresss job at the president was doing something different. Theres an easier way to get things done around here. Its called an executive order. John lost every president who issues executive orders that they are not legal if they are just a way to get around congress and thats pretty much the case with president obamas orders. [laughter] wait a second, dont you have to go to congress at some point . Thats adorable. You still think that the government works. John is how government ought to work. There are three branches of government and all must agree before prison gets to impose force on us but often thats not what our president says. I have got a pen and i have got a phone and i can use that 10 to sign executive orders. John are likely next president said she too is going to ignore congress. If Congress Wont ask i will ask the Treasury Department to use its Regulatory Authority if that is what it takes. [applause] john they applaud. People like that. Said they say thats how things get done. There is when Congress Wont act the president gets the powers clause in the constitution. John but theres gridlock. Its a feature. The founding system was not to make government more efficient. It was meant to pass policies that had a large agreement that sustained across time. John and dont infringe upon our rights. They were concerned about charity. John president obama has made two executive orders so far but president bush at the end of his term had more and if we are many more. He issued executive orders that executive orders as a saturday night live clips that can just. In the part. John obama is bigger. If donald trump wins in november its not like the constitution will suddenly be respected. Trump promised to impose the Death Penalty on anyone who kills a Police Officer and of course he said this about supporting Illegal Immigrants. Day one i first our in office those people are gone. [applause] john mackey say one of those is okay and legal. Well the president can reallocate resources and priorities for immigration deportation as he wants. John its already illegal to be here illegally. Thats right and just like the police chief says that go after murders raben jaywalkers the president says we will spend more money and resources on deportation. The executive does not command judges let alone in the state courts where the vast number of death penalties are given. John three years before president obama issued his immigration executive order he spoke at the la raza conference force a member asked why they just legalize us . Thats not how our system works. That is not how our democracy functions. I went to Chicago Law School and he was teaching there and hed knew what they president propose to do. The opposite of what donald trump proposes. He issued a exit border in the Supreme Court stopped it. Takes a lot to change a lot. Here are an affirmative legal status temporarily that triggers all of these benefits, thats what caused the lawsuit. John it takes a lot to change a lot meaning the congress has to pass a law. The president cant just say lets do this. The president has discretion over priorities who to go after rather than someone else and allocate resources to the northern rather than the southern border and things like that. John the Supreme Court rejected the executive order but it was closed so lets say hillary is elected and she gets to appoint and she says. If we cannot get comprehensive immigration rep warm as we need and as we should then i will go as far as i can, even beyond president obama. John beyond president obama. What she means is to give temporary legal status to everyone here regardless of whether you have a child or what have you. Thats astonishing lead alone say giving a permanent status. John the what she said sounds good to people. They applaud and she goes on to say we need to make sure lawabiding decent hardworking people are not ripped away from their families. I agree is a matter policy but when you look at the executive actions many times you have to think what if my biggest enemy was in the white house and have this power . What i want Sarah Palin Donald trump Hillary Clinton bernie sanders, whoever your worst political nightmare might be would you want them to have this awesome power . John they were elected. They were but the purpose of our courts is to check abusive come he cant just have 50 plus one the boat to kill somebody or violate somebodys rights. John thank you ilya shapiro of a cato institute. Next. More handguns in the district of columbia will only lead to more handgun violence. When the Supreme Court forced washington d. C. To end its ban on handguns, what happened and what will happen to gun rights if hillarys elected . Jackie as an 18 year old, i let my mistakes kind of take over my life. I was pointfive credits away from completing high school and i didnt do it. Angela i got pregnant and i was the main one working so, i did what i had to do to survive. Jocelyn sentia que la escuela no era para mi. Karim most of my family they never graduated high school or even let alone go to college so im trying to break that barrier. Jackie my family never stopped pushing for me to be better because they knew what i could become and who i could become as a person. Karim everyday after work i went straight to school, studied hard, and it paid off. Jocelyn sentia como que si Quiero Cambiar el mundo tengo que cambiara mi primero. Group surprise surprise surprise angela i could not have gotten my diploma without my family. Jocelyn mi consejera, ella fue lo maximo para mi porque me ayudo mucho con todo. Jackie ive been given an opportunity and im just thankful for it. Angela yeah its hard, but keep on goingunity and keep on trying. Karim the High School Diploma has just added to the confidence and now i feel unstoppable. Narrator find free Adult Education classes near you at finishyourdiploma. Org. Rock guitar yeah rock music you cant do this, you cant deny they feed us lines, but i wont act and all good things will come to pass but the truth is all you have to have and would you lie for it . Cry for it . Die for it . Would you . I believe believe were still worth the fight youll see theres hope for this world tonight i believe, i believe john eight years ago the Supreme Court ruled narrowly 54 vote the 2nd amendment the right to keep and bear arms applies to individuals, not just militias. While would happen if Hillary Clinton gets to appoint to elect a Supreme Court justice or maybe five justices . Publicly she said she supports the 2nd amendment but we know what she really plans because a private fundraiser she was recorded saying this. The Supreme Court is wrong on the 2nd amendment radio host dana bash follows gun rights closely. Hillary said she supports the 2nd amendment. I suppose she means you have to join a militia. Yeah well thanks for having me. That soundbite that you just played where she thought she was protected by the privacy of a private fundraiser, thats her first goal if she were get to the white house is to overturn heller. On the word militia i think back to what george mason who was one of the founders, he had said i asked where the militia, this is a direct quote and he said its the whole of the people so back in the day when we had our founders who are laying the groundwork for National Rights getting governments recognize them for militias every man and woman. Thereve been so many attempts to bastardize the meaning that they have been six so far unacceptable. Our rights become anachronistic overtime hold no water. John but for justices to the opposite side and among the five, one is gone. You are absolutely right and i think thats the biggest threat to looking at a possible Hillary Clinton Supreme Court. John in the least audio from the Hillary Clinton fundraiser hillary also said this. The ideas you could have been open carry permit with an ak47 over your shoulder walking up and down the aisles of the supermarket is just despicable. John concealed carry could go but i will push back at you. Why do people need to be able to carry ak47s in the aisles of the supermarket . I dont know anybody that carries an ak47 in the iowa supermarket. You have to get your local sheriff to sign off on it and you have to go through these government loopholes. You have to jump through all these loops and get a special license. She is conflating a fully automatic firearm at the semiautomatic firearm. Its very difficult. Nobody goes into supermarket with an ak47. Nobody commits crimes with fully loaded firearms. John i was just in the supermarket the other day picking up dish detergent and i had my glock 19 on my hip concealed carry. I have never taken an ak47 and that i live in texas. We have open carry and we have concealed carry and everyone says when the open carry was passed in texas, its going to be violent chaos. It didnt happen. There was no chaos. The claims they have made about this are wholly unsupported. John will the court be different if trump is the president . I dont know. I have work i hope with trump and his Supreme Court than i do Hillary Clinton. We could see concealing carry go away. With the other candidate we have a hope that wont happen so you have total knowledge on one hand and the hope that the worst wont happen with the other. John you referred to heller. Heller was the decision in washington d. C. Where the Supreme Court said washington had to get rid of its laws that made it impossible for people to get handguns. The mayor said people will die. More handguns in the district of columbia will only lead to more handgun violence. John but there have been less. There were 185 murders in 2008 when that happened, 109 last year. The interesting thing about this crimes committed with illegally used firearms dropped more than just nonfirearm use crimes which i thought was an interesting statistic. When you look at every single instance where this is taking place, crime drops. John thank you dana loesch. Coming up these protesters want more Financial Regulation. Will the Supreme Court give it to them . P . P . H is it a professor who never stops being a student . Is it a caregiver determined to take care of her own . Or is it a lifetime of work that blazes the path to your passions . Your personal success takes a Financial Partner who values it as much as you do. Learn more at tiaa. Org announcer in your new role, we help you help. [airplane sounds] visit aarp. Org caregiving for information on how to provide even better care for the person who once took care of you. My wish for you is that this life becomes all that you want it to your dreams stay big, your worries stay small you never need to carry more than you can hold and while youre out there gettin where youre gettin to and wants the same things too yeah, this is my wish [chanting] john remember them, the occupy wall street protesters . When the housing bubble burst the protesters said the crash could have been prevented if Financial Regulation marks a week. Alexis goldstein participate in those protests and wants more Financial Regulation. A book called over positive which says less relations better. Chair do you say that to people and they say without these rules business would crush the Little People. Spare us critics are living in the old economy. They think consumers have no power. Whats happening with social media and the internet is consumers have power to hold Companies Accountable so human government is not doing the regulating, consumers can keep distances in line. John all right lets take the Financial Sector where you have big banks and Little People and you argue youve got to have more regulation. There were a ton of specs taken by the regulators leading up to the financial crisis to loosen the rules to say that banks can start to interfere and nonbanking activities like buying oil or buying up aluminum miller coors came and tested testified before the senate and said beer drinkers and people who drink soda were paying up to 3 billion more because banks like Goldman Sachs were interfering with the woman in market and these are the rules that regulators relaxed in the leadup to the crisis. John chaired what about this . There was no widespread deregulation. Wall street is one of the most heavily regulated industries in the United States. John its much more regulated now. Regulators have a one track mind. They are looking at what they perceive to be violations when ready consumers are happy with the products they are getting. John not always. Sometimes consumers are unhappy but that thankfully webby of the market and we would love competitors to meet consumers needs but an unfortunate side effect of regulation it hits the small guys the most. Look you at jpmorgan chases Ceo Jamie Dimon said about that frank. Its an 848 page bill. John ive got it here. With all the regulations and came after if we have regulations. John there are more regulations on top of that. This pile behind me by the way is federal regulations in general, 175,000 pages, states and local governments do even more. You say doddfrank is just a good start. Thats right and its important that first of all people like to pull hold that up. John how do you stay in business if you have to obey all of this . You look at just the text of the rule it shorter and i used to work on wall street in least to have to give a. Of papers to our investors to explain the product we sold to them because they were so complicated. Wall street is good at coming up with really complicated products and thats part of the reason the regulations are long. The complicated industry and wall street likes the engineers way around the world. If you have to be thoughtful about the way you regulate thats what comes into the bill. John what is the head of jpmorgan say . We talked to an investors about doddfrank he said it would create a bigger moat around jp morgans business. John bigcompany say protects us, we can handle it. They sure lobbied a lot to get rid of it and got it its absolute and true. All the major banks are part of trade associations which everyday are pounding down the door of Congress Asking them john the Consumer Protection might get crushed. The vast majority of doddfrank rules. John there are a lot of rules that dont apply to the little guy that exempted. I think in certain cases yes. Community banks are often smaller so they dont do the kinds of complicated Financial Transactions of the larger banks do so we dont need rules about them trading crazy derivatives if they dont trade crazy derivatives. John think about the unintended consequences. In france there are twice as many businesses with 49 employees as with 50. What this says is to expand. I think france is one example but in the United States people want to have safeguards. Just like you dont want to drive down the street that doesnt have the speed limit. You dont want to drive drive without speed up on sanika want to have your river full of toys in. You dont want to drink water full of lead. John jared give us last word. You have Congress Pass the laws where they have a goal like clean air or leadfree paint and then they give it to regulators in a few decades later these regulators will take the law and apply to something that was never congresss intent. So we have regulators running wild right now. John thank you jared iyer and alexis goldstein. Next what will the Supreme Court do about Donald Trumps tendency to grab other peoples property . You are pulling these people out. Excuse me thats wrong. Youth using the word bali is really unfair. A john government officials like most people like money but unlike most people, government officials are in the kidney position to take money because they can use force. Listen to this new mexico prosecutor when he thought he was a speaking tour friendly audience. He jokes about how the Police Always tried wrap good cars. There was a stakeout at a stakeout at the bar and this guy drives up in the 2008 verse 80s, brandnew, just so beautiful and the cops werent a cover and thought john whats wrong with that . What is wrong is forfeiture gives police john what is forfeiture . Forfeitures a sneaky trick where government can take your property because they think the property has been involved in a crime that they dont have to convict you or even charged with a crime. John in albuquerque they have seized 8300 cars so you have got to wonder if they are excited over the mercedes. Are they just looking for cars to use on control patrol . They are looking for cars to sell to make money and they can fund all kinds of things like salaries, trips and jackets. John the cops say we are taking cars from criminals. If they were charging people with crimes and convict in them and taking their property thats one thing but they are taking property that gives police the incentive to police forprofit and not for public safety. But the police say is we have taken your car may be her cars worth 5000 maybe its worth 10,000 how about we sell it and we will split it with you or you will get a lawyer and you try to fight us to get it back it for most people they cant do that. John lets consider that the case where government grabs your property. Imminent domain is an absolute necessity for our country. John Eminent Domain is the law that lets government decide the people need your property and it can be useful. Its allowed en route roads and hospitals but it gives a lot of power to politicians. They get to decide what your property is worth. In Donald Trumps casino payday trump wanted more space for limos outside of his casino so he got new jersey officials to use Eminent Domain. He had the right to take this ladies home to build a limo parking lot. At the time i confronted him about that. You are holding these people out. Excuse me thats wrong. Youre using the word holy john is very unfair. This is a government case. This is not donald trump. John its you and your cronies in government working together. To be calling good Public Servants cronies. John thats not whats happening . Thats not whats happening and its a. Sick assumption and. Jaded of you to make it. John in the old days the developers came with guns and thugs and now you use lawyers and force people out. Excuse me maybe people use thugs today. I dont. I have done this very nicely. John mackey did it very nicely and legally. You did it legally entered new jersey law but we went to court and we got a judge to say no and in fact it wasnt legal under new jersey law and we stopped donald trump. John one part of that was come he wasnt compensating the lady properly. Somebody offered her a million book bucks for her house and she turned it down. He says yes he can take it in you only have to pay her 250,000 bucks. This is just a case where your use of crony is exactly right. This is what gives capitalism a bad name as a developer wealthy and politically influential whos able to collude with government to strongarm a little old lady out of her home and its wrong and the constitution makes it clear that its wrong. But the u. S. Supreme court has said that thats okay. One thing we should he afraid of from a President Trump is exactly this kind of disdain for Property Rights but on a national scale. John i assumed after the publicity of cases like that and the Supreme Court decision that the politicians were wary of grabbing peoples land especially in Atlantic City and they wouldnt tried again but as usual im wrong. Now they want to take this piano tuners home. In america no one should lose their home to Eminent Domain for someone elses private use. That is happening to me in Atlantic City. I have an entire block in front of me that will be plowed to the ground for redevelopment. I did note that department of redevelopment would get rid of me first. We were here first. We have a right to be here. John is the ever right to be here . Is your client. Absolutely. Charlie has an absolute right to be there. Entrance casey had this plan to bulldoze this little old lady to build a limousine limousine parking lot. In charlies case they have no plan. John they say they may want to. Lets take a now and maybe one day we would do something with it. The billiondollar casino crust is treated as bankrupt yet they are still going to take this guys house, the house where his mother died and all those his life. John thank you jeff rowes at the institute for justice. Next the president s power grab cheered on by the New York Times. Both hillary Supreme Court stop him . Th and i i will always love you, i i will always love you i hope life treats you kind and i hope you have all youve dreamed of and i wish you joy and happiness but above all this i wish you love and i will always love you i will always love you, i will always love you i, i will always love you, i. John politicians are so arrogant and our current president is no exception. Barack obama says he would save us from climate catastrophe. His sycophants cheer him on them and they ran this front page picture pondering what the times calls this quiet war against Climate Change the terrifying path of Climate Crisis rising seas freak storms dropped, a planet choking on its own fumes. Give me a break come choking on its own fumes . Our air is cleaner now than its been for 100 years. Yes, there are freakish storms and droughts but thats not new. There have always been freakish storms and droughts. There is no proof that Climate Change is increasing it. The seeds have been rising and Global Warming may become a real problem but the world has lots of problems. Malaria, dysentery, unfunded pensions, terrorism. All are bigger threats than Climate Change but the president says there is no greater threat facing the world. Wow, such a crisis. But dont worry our heroic president has the solution. A mayors americas Clean Power Plan a planned two years in the making in the single most important step america has ever taken in the fight against global Climate Change. [applause] john the Clean Power Plan would cut the amount of co2 emitted by power plants. Espn admits that america has strict pollution laws that limit mercury and lead and sulfur dioxide. Thereve never been limits on the amount of we admit the amount of toxic metals like Mercury Software and arsenic and we are better off for it but existing power plants can dump unlimited amounts of harmful solutions into the air. Harmful Carbon Pollution . Its Carbon Dioxide. Its what we. Out. There is some more of it. Its not really a pollutant. In many ways its good for the planet, extra Carbon Dioxide extends growing seasons and makes the earth greener. Thats one Reason Congress would go along with obamas plan. So the president just issued an executive order to reinterpret the 40yearold law that covers actual pollution. The New York Times admits that many see this as messianic and abuse of executive power too burdensome for the economy. Yeah and he might also mention that even if his rules worked they would only have a microscopic effect on climate if any. Fortunately the Supreme Court ruled that the president did not have the right to impose his rules. Poor people were spared life wrecking heritage across in the economy was spared one more destructive hit that the supremes vote was 54. Now scalias gone. Hillarys new court will probably approve those destructive rules and our web site says as president she will implement and extend obamas Clean Power Plan. They are so arrogant. They think they have the power to manipulate women and the moral authority to do it even against the will of congress. Well they dont. We have a system of checks and balances so the presence delusion of grandeur doesnt take away all of our rights. I hope the next Supreme Court will respect that. Thats our show, thanks for watching. See you next week. The fox business network. We thanks for being with us tonight. Join us tomorrow, good night from new york. Kennedy tonight, a bunch of new polls show donald trump appears to be picking up major momentum, hillary is out of bed and back on the trail. Can she stop the trump train . Gary johnson snagged a huge endorsement. The libertarian nominee has the backing of one of the most iconic conservative newspapers in all the land. Nick gillespie is here on that. A daughter is suing parents for posting her pictures on facebook. Put down the camera. Time to get freaky. After hillarys bad week of deplorable pneumonia, the question is how will it affect her in the polls . Delusional hillary surrogates were pushing the narrative the

© 2024 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.