comparemela.com

Nick this is an unmitigated disaster, will set the stage for a Nuclear Holocaust in the middle east egypt, saudi arabia and turkey have indicated theyre going to go with their own Nuclear Programs. Its very simple either you have a Nuclear Program or you dont. The iranians have trk theyre going to continue with it. One detail we know, not one Nuclear Facility has to be closed down and they can enrich uranium until their heart is content. This is bad all around. Bruce i know the old phrase trust and verify that was a reagan phrase when dealing with the soviets, look at what past inspectors have said about their attempts to get iranians to open up their doors. Were still not in a position to conclude that all Nuclear Material in iran is in a peaceful purpose another one, Nuclear Material declared by iran was not being diverted for peaceful purposes. That was in 2014. Does it make sense to lift sanctions against iran before it satisfies the inspectors is this and theres some question about whether that will be the case this time, bruce. Well, i think that certainly theres a lot of politics would have to play out in this country. If you go back to that clip and you see the clearing, there were also a lot of hard liners coming out of iran that did not like the deal, they thought that the west got too much. I think thats a good thing because it marge in a lies these hard liners in iran and in they dont like it thats a good thing and mabs them less important over there. I agree if they dont like it would be a good thing but i saw a lot of clearing and a lot of bragging on the part of the foreign minister, chief negotiator. When they let them step over theres some of the clearing that took place, very much government orchestrated for a lot of it, but when we let the socalled deadline pass, when we let that pass thats when i started to worry that, swreez, were showing them a lot of weaken here. You know, i have mixed feelings about it. I think its only concerning when you miss a deadline if your end goals arent clear. I think thats what were picking up on, this is an administration that hasnt been clear about what its end goals are. It has been clear that its reluctant to use any force, even when were seeing violence erupting all over the middle east. I think something to keep in mind is that Foreign Policy and diplomacy is nuanced we have to consider ourself interest financial interest, military interest, theres a lot of egos going on. Is john kerry really there thinking about the United States . Or is he looking to get a Nobel Peace Prize . All of this goes into whats coming out of this deal and thats where i think its still unclear. Well its not unclear to the chief negotiator for the iranians and, rich here is what he had to say he said iran will participate this all the decisions regarding the Nuclear Planning and the United States will lift all the sanctions. Its absolutely clear to him who is right, him or us . Well obviously if he said that and he feels that then its probably been signaled to him that thats whats going to happen by john kerry or somebody else. I think sabrina said something really, really wise here and that is that john kerry and president obama seem to be driven for very personal reasons, for personal glory. Howard fine man had a piece on friday in the Huffington Post talking about obamas legacy. How narcissistic do you have to be to put the whole world in danger for your legacy. Its not about leg eights its about whats good for the American Public for us for so you are aeft and economy. And americans do not trust the iranians by a large majority, 55 say you cant trust anything, 28 say you can only trust a little of what they say. Theres a good reason that americans smartly understand whats going on as indicated by the poll. Listen, the iranians have cheated and lied. No deal is better than this bad deal. They can make these existing centrifuges 20 times faster which is the aim right now and basically have smaller enrichment facilities that they could hide. So the iaea is already saying they only answered one of those questions right now what is regular mean does that mean unfettered access to inspect their enrichment facilities . And russia and china could veto any snap back restrictions that the administration is touting. The Administration Says this is going to be good for the economy because oil prices will come down. All that extra oil from the iranians will come online, when the deal was first announced oil did drop about a buck but then it came right back up again when people looked to the details of plan. Im wondering if the oil market has any trust in this. Well you know, the oil is going to flow into the u. S. Regardless. This only becomes an oil story if the u. S. Intervenes because that would be negative for the dollar. I guess my problem is once again why are we negotiating . I keep hearing that iran is a rogue state so any agreement whether strong or weak is not worth the paper its printed on. At some point do we say that we needlessly elevate these countries, cuba north korea now iran by negotiating with them in the first place. What do you think about that, steve . You dont negotiate with iran because its going to get the bomb which has huge implications for the middle east, barack obama has this strange fantasy that iran should be allowed to dominate the middle east, recreate the part of the persian empire and it will work well with the u. S. Its crazy, but thats his vision. Its not ego so much as this is what he think the world ought to do. David, say it again if iran looks like its going to get the bomb, others in that neighborhood will get it and the whole world will suffer for it. Bruce to emacs point about legacy, it does appear that president obama has this idea that he could be like chris i thinker and nixon did with china, that he could bring iran into the real world, but arent the situations completely different . Well, i think they are different but im of the thought that nothing is lost until you give up and i think that what is shown here is that youre shining for light on the teal, moving ahead. I think one thing that i am really dis a incompetent poed in is there was a pugh poll out in the last week that said only 27 of americans were even paying attention and knew these talks were going on which i think is really unfortunate for anybody who is declaring victory. Ive got to say, emac, one of the reasons americans dont care theyre more worried about their jobs, we had that terrible jobs figure, were going to talk more about that later in the show. There are other things on peoples mind, maybe they just dont give that much credence to this deal. I do think people are watching in america. I really do. Listen, no agreement until everybody is in agreement. How about that. The economist magazine is saying, that too. By the way iran has cheated and lied all this time, other countries seeking the bomb could also cheat and lie, too, to International Inspectors as Katie Mcfarland has said 70 of the population in iran is under 30. There was an up rising there that we ignored. Why not toughen it out and wait out the mulas until they get out. Sabrina, the way the president puts it theres no alternative between either a deal or war either now or later. There is another alternative, as we mentioned before, Ronald Reagan turned around the soviet empire by empowering the people that were for freedom within that empire. We have done nothing of the same sort in iran, have we . No and i think what we really would like to see obviously sort of a gradual overturning of the regime rather than some kind of immediate revolution. Part of that goes to the reason why we may in the best Case Scenario why we would, fact, negotiate with iran its not because we believe theyre negotiating in any good faith its simply that we think we could work with them for our own best self interest. If theyre able to put isis at bay or help keep syria at check this is good for us. This is this is where is becomes so complicated as to whether or not you go to the table. Quickly, steve. They say its deal a deal and war, they got the deal theyre going to get war. Coming up next, doubling down on being green. The white house promising to cut our Carbon Pollution by nearly 30 in only ten years. Some here say that will gut our economy way before then. Are they right . u. unnnnnnonn 2 30 eastern with julie banderas. Now back to forbes on fox. The green crowd is going to love this one, but a lot of businesses may not. The exhaust just unveiling new regulation intended to slash Carbon Emissions in the u. S. By up to 28 over the next ten years. Sabrina what would these new regs do to the committee . It would undoubtedly hurt the economy by driving up costs for americans at home as well as for businesses businesses. This is not the first time that the epa has suggested that they could do Something Like this without driving up wost costs but theyre wrong. The Clean Power Plan which we found from an independent Research Association said it was going to be seven times for expensive than the epa wanted people to believe. This would definitely be a slap in the face to the economy. And bruce, we got those lousy job numbers on friday, at loi of that has to do with loss of jobs in the energy sector. Well, i think go bold and go big here. We always here that this is going to kill jobs and going to do this and pain the jobs report wasnt so great, but were still creating jobs and we have for months and months now. I just dont see it. Well i think you can take out the word maybe, the jobs report was awful on friday. Emac, look at whats happened to cold stocks by the way since the president has come in. The three cole companies, arch coal alpha, walter down over 90 since 2009. Here is why, this is what epa chief Gina Mccarthy said about these new rules, if you add up what we will avoid between now and 2030 its more than double the pollution of every power plant in america from 2012. That puts it in perspective. She said it would be equivalent of canceling out twothirds of all the cars and trucks on the road. Is this going to hurt the economy or not. Of course its going to hurt the economy but thats precisely why its not going to. Had a. The Obama Administration is over with, its been over with since the end of 2012 so no future president or congress is going to abide such a lousy deal. Markets realize that and thats why theyre rallying. No one takes this seriously. Steve, i dont know. I think with the execution stuff going on theres a lot that can be going on in the neck two years. Even though you can undo it after two years, in two years you can do a lot of harm. This is part of obamas war against prosperity putting on these extra costs on the economy is going to slow it down. We are the one big country where emissions have gone down. Whats the problem . How many times have we finally begun to get back on our feet only to slip again like we did on friday is this this. Okay. We might slip, but this is going to boost the economy. How . If you make the mistake of counting only gdp not whether were better on. World war ii boosted gdp because it kept people busy building bonds. The war on carbons is going to keep people busy tearing down power plants i think even bruce and steve agree on this one. Its not going to make us better off thats what matters. History lesson bill, about world war ii. Were making bombs you couldnt buy cars, were restricted on food, shoes, clothes. You got a piece of paper but nothing to buy it with and killing millions of people around the world thank you i think theres a better way to rev up the economy. Sabrina go ahead. This is sort of a failed ideology but i absolutely think that there could be a lot of damage still done in the next two years. This is an administration who sort of is wetted to the regulations whether were talking about healthcare mandates or workplace mandates or epa regulation. Every single time it hurts the economy, hurts American Families and hurts businesses and for what . We might say is it justifiable if were going to help the earth and preserve the environment. If you look at the numbers were going to see maybe an 18,000 sandth of a change in temperature in 100 years. Bruce, do you think hat president cares enough about it and is appealing to his base enough so he might find some executive action to get this rammed through is this. I dont think so. I think this is more of a way to get more countries more of a global play here. I do think that jobs some of these states in the United States need to look at this and stay its not going away and diversify their work force and diversify away from cole even if its a small amount and i dont think thats a bad thing. John, it is true that companies on their own were diversifying away from coal or at least the dirty coal. Government intervention in the economy is always going to slow it. Beyond that the world war ii notion, the idea that that ended the grags depression or boosted the economy is easily the biggest indictment of the modern economics programs profession. Its not true. I want to make it clear that i kind of agree with steve, i dont think world war ii made People Better on. No they couldnt live well and i dont think the war on carbon is going to make them better off. You know, here is the way i think the epa could get to that 28 cap. Cap all the rhetoric coming off of congress over this rule. The cashin in gang getting ready to roll at the bottom of the hour eric, what do you got . A firestorm over freedom of religion laws for businesses, is this new culture clash taking away the rights of Business Owners . And if you think letting illegals stay is a crime, wait until you hear this, we may be teaching illegals how to unionize when they arrive. See you at the bottom of the hour. Well be watching, eric. Thank you. Up here coming next, california taking drastic steps to cope with its water crisises, the one big group left out of that drastic plan may be proving crony around here, were all about fast. Thats why xfinity is perfect for me. With millions of wifi hotspots all over the place including one right here at the shop now we can stream all things fast and furious. Youve done it again, carlos with the fastest inhome wifi and millions of hotspots xfinity is perfect for people who love fast. Dont miss furious 7 in theaters april 3rd. The golden state is turning brown. Thats why for the first time in californias history it is ordering a mandatory 25 reduction in water usage, but the farming industry, which uses 880 of the states water, getting a pass from the mandate, even though farmer only produces about 2 of californias economic output. Steve, it looks like theres a little crony capitalism going on here. There is indeed. Also shows utter miss bee gotten policies of water. Massive subsidies what they should allow farmers to do if they have excess water sell it on the free market and try to get a real me frarkt in this and the problem would be solved. Right now its all about lobbying and some farmers in california cant get water. Its crazy. And to steve ease point that its all about lobbying there are a number of very wealthy farmers, including one stie Stuart Resnick billionaire gave 569,000 to politicians in the last cycle. A lot of people think connection between their breaks and money given to the politicians. Hollywood and is Silicon Valley give money, too. I think whats happening is this misguided romantic notion about farms and farmers you see it in france an every four years in the United States in the eye with a caucuses when politicians of both parties have to bow to the corn lobby. As you pointed out if you look at 80 of the water 2 of the gdp the numbers are ridiculous. Right, bill. When it combs to crony capitalism i think the farmers have nothing on the greens to did two things, first of all they blocked the construction of if you reservoirs and is secondly they persuaded the government that the natural way to help would be to empty a manmade reservoir into the ocean. Thats where the problem is. Sabrina the point is whatever the cause of it theres so much government involvement in this thing its making the situation worse. Thats exactly it. Its kind of interesting to see the green fighting their own impulses, weve got jefr sewn yan america and they dont want to use any water. The explanation for this is simple. Price controls, massive subsidies for farmers and a shortage of supply as bill is pointing out. The end result is that water is cheap, it makes it easy to waste whether youre a resident or large farm and thats where the real problem lies. Whenever you see government thinking they are smarter than Mother Nature i get concerned and usually the sideways gets worse. I agree with the governor that everyone has got to step up. Im from utah we be i was a kid we had to watch our sprinkler use. But to ignore farmers is to ignore the massive jumbo sized elephant in the room. There was a report from the Pacific Research institute they found that farmers are 22 inefficient. That would solve their drought problem right there. Rich, another thing is what they farm. They farm these products like the miss she owes and almonds which are very water intensive. Maybe we should import them from some other place. Rice and cotton. There is a lot of agriculture in california thats native to california, the ones you mentioned are not. It at that. Coming up forget water. Is this an even bigger emergency . One in three adults have no emergency savings. Our informers and nare names to help boost your emergency funds. Emac you like germany. This is an etf that is a big bet, a good bet on the german stock makt the da x is the best performing stock market beating the s p and also hedges against the particulars strength. Buy german . I like german stocks, dont like the fact that its hedged because the dollar is really too high. Scott here cal grow, why not. Its definitely going to make your garden grow and probably your port noel joe also. Its like watching crab grass grow over the last five years. Gang, have a wonderful easter. Thats it for forbes on fox. Thanks for watching. Here is eric bolling. Buying into a businesss business, religious freedom laws for Companies Creating an uproar across the country. Indiana and arkansas lawmakers adding antidiscrimination protections for the customers after that huge uproar, but should the government be telling Business Owners who they can and cant do business with . Hi everyone, we will come to cashin in. Wayne rogers, jonathan hoe anything, lisa booth and juan williams. Religious freedom laws are meant to prevent the government from infringing on Business Owners ability to exercise their religious believes. Lisa, are you okay with that . I am. Look you know i think, you know, the important point to make here

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.