Years. What does this mean for a city, when the mayor of that city doesnt have the Police Backing him . Well, i think it shows that people can do whatever they want to do. You talk about the protesters right now. Hes allowed them to protest. Hes allowed them to sit there and say the cops should be killed. Hes lost control of the protests as evidenced by him asking him to suspend the protesters for the time being until after the holidays, until after the assassinated Police Officers are buried. Frankly, frankly, mr. Carver, frankly im less concerned whether he can or cannot control those people as i am whether hes backing the police. A mayor that doesnt support the police is a crippled mayor, and in a city like new york that could become dangerous quickly. Absolute leechl the Police Officers have no faith in what hes doing. Seems like hes siding with the al sharptons of the world instead of the Police Officers. The Police Officers are the good people keeping crime at historic lows right now. And hes trying to blame them for anything thats wrong in society. I have no doubt that al sharpton is anticop. There is a question about the mayor. Do you think the mayor of new york city is anticop . By his actions it appears he is anticop, absolutely. Everything that hes done, stop and frisk, and onto the protests, the reaction he had after the garner decision, and just keeps on coming along, each and every time. All he has to do is looking at statistics, and you can see the thousands of people whose lives have been saved who otherwise would have been statistics, because we had 2,000 murders a year here not long ago, the number surround 400. And most killed were black and hispanic, poor minority people whose lives are saved as a result of Police Actions and policies that he is now trying to overturn. If he said okay, ive looked at the stats, i realize Police Officers save so many more lives than they harm in so many ways, im supporting them 100 , that wouldnt do any good now . What you just talked about, with the amount of homicides decreased over the years, he came in here and tried to fix something that wasnt broken. He should continue to let the new york Police Officers do their jobs, keeping the largest capital of the world as safe as it is where people come in from all over the world to sit and visit. Hes trying to take tools away from the Police Officers and give them back to the criminals. Its amazing, one of the safest place, when i moved here in the 80s, one of the most dangerous places in the world. It did change thanks to Incredible Police work and giving them tools they needed to turn it around. Most new yorkers are thankful for that. Im amazed the mayor is not. We got to leave it at that. James carver, thank you very much. Thank you very much. You know the murders of the officers telegraphed attack on the popular social media site instagram. He wrote and im quoting now im putting wings on pigs tonight. What you may not know over 100 people liked his comment. Risk control strategies ceo paul says authorities should be looking into anyone who supported these killings. And paushlg the question is where do you draw the line between the real threats and the First Amendment. How do you answer . This is the quintessential example of premeditated murder. He broadcasted it. Any person that like it was part of the planning of it, and the lack of disclosure makes them party to it. Clearly they should get a knock on the door from the nice Courteous Police detective and get questions taken. You already have a couple of arrests, if not arrests, people under suspicion, one guy in massachusetts who wrote on facebook he was for putting wings on pigs. This guy hasnt been arrested yet but hes going to be called into atone for what he said and explain to Police Officers. What could happen to him . Look at this way, just because its social media doesnt give you a pass, look at it from the legal side and the prosecutorial side of this. If anyone participated in this then theyre party to it, clearly they go down the road of prosecution, no question about it. The thing to remember, two cops were assassinated. Anybody that participated in the communication of that should be questioned. Says this guy is summons to court for threat to commit a crime. Frankly thats something i hadnt heard of, i dont know if thats a state or federal law. Is that . New york state penal code. This guy is in massachusetts, i imagine its massachusetts penal code, right . Could be. Thats on the books in new york as well. Finally, there is this journal at Brandeis University who wrote she has no sympathy for dead cops. I really dont have sympathy for the cops that were shot. I hate this racist fing countries. Shes complaining, after her remarks were put on tweet, taken down, another person put them back up again. Im wondering as awful as her comments are, does she have a case . Shes threatening to sue people for putting remarks back up on the social media site . This is not a First Amendment issue. She doesnt like the country, there are flights every hour on the hour. Get on a plane and leave. She doesnt like, it leave the country. She doesnt have a right to sue anybody, for what . You put it on social media, its public knowledge. Get off of it if you dont want to be exposed to it. For the record, this is the kind of person that at 2 00 in the morning when someone is breaking into her house, shes dialing 911. Exactly, exactly. I dont know whos paying nar 60,000 a year education. Whoever it is, theyre not getting their moneys worth. Paul, thank you very much. Surely you would think the mayor took some blame for escalating tensions or admit the protesters added to some of the anger that led to the murders. You would be wrong. Take a listen. The vast majority of our citizens are good and decent people who do not say negative things, racist things, nasty things to police, threatening things to pchlts the few who want conflict attempt that, and unfortunately so many times you guys enable that. To our fox biz allstars, veronica dagher, mark serrano and tracy byrnes. Is the media at all to blame . Just like the president on a smaller level. God forbid he take blame for this. Not the protesters who blocked bridges, laid down in the middle of stores so people couldnt shop. Certainly wasnt them or the protesters that called the police, the kkk spat on them. Come on now take responsibility for this. Mark, im sensing panic with the mayor of new york now. Thats the comment when somebody starts pointing fingers, he was shaking answering. That dangerous to have a mayor of new york city panicking like that . Im the son of a retired nypd cop. The outrage in the Police Community is unprecedented. Heres the reason you have the conflict and pointing blame at the media. He used the media to advance the propaganda of the protesters. Now he wants to blame the media for pointing the finger at him. There is outrage in the Police Community over. This a very close colleague of mine said heres why far left democrats have a hard time governing. Their ideology is in conflict with leadership role. So hes looking to blame anybody but himself. A great point. Particularly now, hes in charge of the police. He cant be conflicted with the police. Veronica, tracy alluded to this, how much is president obama to blame for allowing al sharpton into the white house, into the Justice Department to have influence in pick the next attorney general . Could be part of it. To go back to the media issue, you cant blame the media when they are doing their job, theyre reporting the news, showing the protesters, theyre not putting the words in the mouth of the protesters. It would be wrong for the media not to report it. I think thats why the guy is panicking, and thats a dangerous situation. North korea is the one that ticked off sony, but now sony is going after tweeters. And watch what you can treat, you could get a call from sonys lawyer, you can believe it . David so the interview is back on now after the blame game, the backtrack, president obama blamed sony for pulling it, sony blamed theaters for not showing it, and theaters blamed attorneys for not blocking it. Now all backtracking and releasing it. Jonathan hoenig has had enough of it. Are we taking our eyes off the ball, north korea, the hacker . David, north korea was the aggressor in all of this mess. Sony were the victims. All of us americans were victimed. A lot of anger out there and i feel for sony, they were victims here. Billions of dollars of intellectual property was stolen, they along with millions of americans were threatened by who . By north korea. The president whose job it is to keep us safe and protect us david jonathan, you know my wife, my wife always said there are no victims, only volunteer, and to a certain extent, sony, sony just showed so little back bone. I understand that now theyve found that back bone or maybe because of pressure from the white house, well discuss that later. But then there was also the George Clooney deal, he tried to get hollywood executives or anybody in hollywood to sign a paper saying they wouldnt stand for this. He couldnt find one person to sign it. He found out about the zero back bone of hollywood. Back bone . They are physically threatened. Sony doesnt have nuclear bombs. They dont have weapons, they dont have an army. They cant retaliate by force in the same way force has been used against them by north korea. Unfortunately, the president promised to respond not by deleting north koreas book mark but by using force. David i got to push back on one thing, i love you dearly, mostly agree with you. After 9 11, things changed for those of us in the United States who realize you dont have to be in the military to fight a battle. Every one of us, citizens, have to fight for freedom. This is one of the cases in my eyes, am i wrong . You could make the metaphor, if your house is burglarized, you should storm out and try to catch the aggressor . Thats when you rely on force for. Government is force. I applaud sony for standing up for property right, thats the purview of government. David yeah, whenever it is possible. As citizens we have certain responsibility, not all given us to, were not just born with the extra great things of having been an american. You were lucky enough to be born in america, we got to stand for stuff that we do, even if its not in our job description. David you alluded to it before, what if sony opened this movie . They would have been putting their own at risk. The responsibility to retaliate is not up to each of us individually. Our response is so lackadaisical, unbelievably weak. David i think we all have responsibility, we all got to stand up for what we believe in. Jonathan, great to see you, thank you very much. First the media, now twitter. Sony attorney david boies is threatening to sue ordering them to ban the accounts responsible for pay up. Can he do that . Attorney kelly says yes, he can sue, randy says he cannot sue. Why can he not sue . You have legal reasons and practical reason week have the old First Amendment and interesting notion called prior restraint. You cannot restrain people from speaking or printing something before its out there. First amendment says no. Plus the stuff is out there in the public domain, and the law is very clear about things that are in the public domain. Once again, you cant suppress that. It is against the constitution, and goes against everything our country was built on. David calley, sounds reasonable, no . Sounds reasonable, this is a different situation, these are furtherance of libel, slander, disseminating private information, not for great public concern. Knowing its causing damages potentially to individuals and sony and to further that, the law doesnt necessarily keep up, but the lawyer, boies, sent the right letter, stop it right now. Putting twitter on notice. When we are damaged by, this were coming after you. The law may not be the only way, but to stop it. David randy, similar case, what happens if somebody steals a letter from my mailbox, opens that letter and publishes in a newspaper the information that was in the stolen letter. Well, you raise two issues. David federal crime. Is the newspaper liable . No, first of all it is a federal crime to go into the mailbox, that person will be prosecuted for that. I think the easier argument is you have all of the websites that you can go and say all kinds of horrible things about other people. The law says that those websites, so long as they dont edit the content and add to the content and post, theyre immune to liability. David if im a newspaper and publish the information in the stolen letter and i know its a stolen letter, i would not be liable for prosecution as a newspaper . If its truthful, truth is a defense. David if youre a public figure, no. Would i be in trouble if its stolen. Im sorry, i didnt know you were coming to me. Thats the issue, the crux with the law. As long as the information disseminated is truthful, they cannot be held liable. I disagree. I think the law needs to change that they can be held liable, in furtherance of a crime, it could be libelous, slanderous, could be trying to defame someone. They need do more research than publish the information. If you are helping someone perpetrate a crime, absolutely you could be convicted. David david boies is a good attorney. Hes a good attorney, got to make the client happy. In the court of public opinion, the answer is no. David turns out the targeting scandal is. David just when you thought you heard it all about the irs, Darrell Issas last report on the irs is out, this is a doozy. Looks like the tax agency planned a special tax on donations made to political groups specifically conservative once. David french is an attorney who represents groups targeted by the irs and says this time the irs has outdone itself. I agree, david. What do you make of the latest . You know, heres what i make of it. We have a smoking gun admission of constitutional violation called viewpoint discrimination in violation of the First Amendment where they single out groups based on viewpoint about the government saying we shouldnt treat them the way we treat all the other c 4s, and what you hinted at earlier, lets impose a gift tax when you give to the 501 c 4 groups, its like the irs was brainstorming ways to suppress the First Amendment. David gift tax is not a cheap thing. Its gone up to 40 . For every 100,000. You have to give 40,000 to the irs if you want to contribute to one of the groups. Lois lerner is the unnamed official, a lot of people think is responsible for pushing this idea. Do you think it was all lois lerner or was this a conspiracy . Of course, it wasnt all lois lerner, another thing you realize from the report how widespread the discussion of this matter is within the irs, reaching all levels of the irs, multiple offices of the irs. Going coasttocoast, our own offices indicate offices were engaged coasttocoast. This was a systematic problem. David you are finding out information about it, thankfully the wall street journal and a couple, a small handful of organizations are. Are you shocked that more media organizations are not looking into this, that its not a front page story . No, im not shocked at this point. This is a story that the media jumped on initially, but when they began to realize the story was complicated, involved many more than just one fall guy and lois lerner, and involved this irs systematically. It began to lose interest. This is a story, if the roles were reversed, a conservative president , involved with liberal groups or conservative government involved with liberal groups, the meade yald be all over. This instead theyre trying to treat it like the, quote, unquote phony scandal that the white house termed it. David stay with us, the house gop report is blaming the Obama White House for weaponizing the irs. Veronica, first of all, you are from the wall street journal, kudos, the wall street journal first reported that story, irs was thinking of taxing conservative groups. Is there a little more media interest than there was . Could. Be, the fact we reported it, hopefully more outlets will pick it up. David you are on the news side, not the editorial side. The news side. The irs job is to interpret the tax code. People want that done. The irs isnt supposed to be a partisan organization, its supposed to be nonpolitical. And to add the political element for it, thats not what americans want. David its against the law, after nixon used the irs for political purposes, congress changed the law, it was one of the articles of impeachment against richard nixon. He was never impeached. They would have used that as a charge to impeach him. This report makes nixon look like a change. Think of the terms, culture of byes aweaponization of the irs . This is a damning report, and the media is delinquent for not using this as a tool in reporting. If you think about it, the white house, they lay out a timeline. Heres when the president talked about conservative groups. Heres where irs officials talked about fixing the problem with conservative groups. Lay out a timeline. David and of course the time line, tracy, right before the president s reelection. Its clear they wanted to clear the dex of the conservative groups before the president s reelection and, of course thats exactly what happened. Im wondering if these, these reports, these irs reports led to the republicans win in the last election, the midterms . I cant answer that. What i know is what david french said, hes dead on. This is complicated tax code. Thats part of the problem, too. This is gift tax, estate tax, 501 c 4 exempt company, everything rolled into one. Media doesnt necessarily understand it. David spoken like a real accountant. Tracy is the only one who understands it. Reading it, its murky, nothing in the law that says you should or should not. Its interpretation, probably why the media backed away from this. David david, all of us here are discouraged that the media is not more interested in the story. I think it played a role in the midterms in november, dont you . Any question among the conservative base, this issue has made them very angry for a very long time and for very good reason. This was as the report indicates the weaponization of the irs, and i think in the most recent midterms thats one of the reasons you saw the base come out so strong as a symbol they will not be intimidated, the irs cannot suppress an entire political movement. David tracy, you think it gives oomph to the tax code, to get a flat tax or something . If it doesnt, i dont know what does. This is so squishy, the code is a book of political favors, it should be abolished. The only way is start over. The gop is going to take this report and put together a package of reforms for the irs. More layers, more layers. Bipartisan commission, because theyve got to deal with this, and if the president vetoes it, hell be taking accountability. David the horse put together by commission, i dont know if it will simplify it. Theyve got to do something when they take over congress. David 25 states suing over president obamas executive actions, maybe the president should be more worried about this one sheriffs legal campaign. Campaign. I speak of campaign. I speak of the mercedesbenz winter event is back, with the perfect vehicle thats just right for you, no matter which list youre on. [ho, ho, ho, ho] lease the 2015 ml 350 for 579 a month at your local mercedesbenz dealer. David well, this isnt the line for the new iphone. This is actually a long line of dreamers waiting to get their first drivers license. Joe arpaio is suing president obama from stopping this line from forming. What is the charge . What are you charging the president with . Im really not suing at issue. Im suing larry claman is my attorney. He knows how to handle these cases. Were in federal court in washington, dc. Basically, on two issues. The constitutionality of his executive order, but more important is letting felons on the streets of the phoenix area, 4,000 people in my jails here illegally charged with all types of crimes, have been released turned over to ice, and 36 percent keep coming back. So that is the issue. Its a dangerous issue. It has to do with security. And he now is saying, through his executive order, that only the gangbangers or terrorists will be deported. So hes giving amnesty to all these other felons. Thats the issue. David the ice agents arent namsy pamsy guys dont they simthighs with your claims . The bureaucrats in washington david im talking about the ice agents, the folks on the ground. What can they do about it . They take their orders from washington. They cant do anything about it. David what do they tell you . You must have conversations with these guys. What are they saying to you . Well, the border patrol, especially who we work with and the ice agents, theyre not happy. But, you know what, thats the system i cant break this. My hands are tied. So the only way you can do it is to go to court. If the district judge in washington rules against us, then well bring it up to the supreme court. David larry claman will go all the way. We know hes serious. Beyond the Public Safety issue, which is certainly serious to you, there is an issue whether these Illegal Immigrants will now be able to use some of the documents they receive like drivers licenses to vote. Even though theyre not legal. Is that conceivable . You know, 5 million, and after so many years, youre going to get a pass to prove that youve been here those years. I think theyll be using a lot of electric bills and gas bills to show that theyve been here for many years. How will you control this . It will be impossible. They cant even control the felons that i just talked about, being turned over, and they keep coming back. They cant keep track of felons. So this is a big bureaucratic problem too. David youve seen any evidence that some of these illegals are trying to vote . No, i havent come up with that through the thousands and thousands when we had the authority to arrest Illegal Immigrants. I did question many of them that we arrested. But we didnt come up with any concrete proof. David now i ask you about ice agents, what they tell you in private. I wonder about legal immigrants who come here. Do you have any legal immigrants who come to you and say, look, we support you in what youre trying to do. What do they say . I have Illegal Immigrants when i was in the fight against Illegal Immigrants with my hotline, thousands of people have called. And guess what, most of them are Illegal Immigrants that having us the information. But right now, im out of that business on the illegal immigration situation. David all right. Well, sheriff, well be interested in hearing what happens with your lawsuit. Come back and tell us how it turns out. Joe arpaio. We know president obama is a fan of al sharpton, but we had no idea he was this big of a fan. How sharpton has an open invite to the holiday music is playing hey i guess were going to need a new santa the music builds to a climax. more people are coming to audi than ever before. See why now is the best time. Audi will cover your first months payment on select models at the season of audi sales event. Visit audioffers. Com today. David eightyone times. Thats how many times al sharptons name reportedly popped up on a white house guest list. Chairman craig smith is wondering why al sharpton gets to meet behind closed doors, but business guys like him get locked out. Craig, i have to be honest. I think he much more easily identifies with the al sharptons of the world than he does with the craig smiths of the world. No doubt about that, david. We know one thing for sure theyre not doing is creating jobs because Small Businesses create 70 of all the jobs coming out of recessions. You know that. And i suspect and actually, quite frankly, i was shocked to see that al sharpton even went to the white house because after we elected an africanamerican president , quite frankly, david, i thought men like sharpton and Jesse Jackson would be looking for jobs. David have you ever heard of a job being created in the private sector by al sharpton . Never. Quite to the contrary. Ive seen a lot of jobs lost. And, david, i know the nation has to be heartbroken when we hear chants like what do we want . Dead cops. When do we want them . Now. Then to see al sharpton totally silent until he has to say something. The same thing with de blasio, and thats hurting employment in this country. David im wondering what they talk about. Eightyone times. I can understand once or twice. But 81 times. But, of course, whats in my eyes reprehensible because the guy has flouted the law or broken the law and sometimes led to terrible situations in which people, innocent people have died. White housal sharpton was in the white house when the president was announcing the new attorney general. Al sharpton was there. Hes not a symbol of justice. Hes a symbol of a mob. Youre right. A stain on the memory of Martin Luther king. Everything he did was nonviolent. Everything that al sharpton does has a shred of violence. Now, i can speculate on what he may have been talking about. Maybe hes talking about getting a pardon on the 4. 5 million back taxes he owes. Maybe he was looking for a pardon for his 1993 conviction on failure to file his income tax. Or maybe he was in there looking for a favor of how he will square the books away with some of his nonprofit organizations that have come under question. We know one thing for sure, theres a three musketeers. Eric holder, barack obama, and al sharpton, i hate to say this. But i said this in an editorial. Theyve done more to set back Race Relations in this nation than any other group. David even beyond that, the fact is our country, our free market system relies on the rule of law and property rights, things that al sharpton has shown no signs of defending. In fact, sometimes hes trying to break down some of those laws. Youre absolute right. Remember, people have a short memory. Freddie, they destroyed that business. A solid business. They destroyed it. Destroyed peoples lives in the duke lacrosse case. Never anything created by al sharpton other than commotion, chaos, and separation. And thats why he should not have been in the white house one time, no less 81 times. David the president has been asked about this before. First of all, he says ive invited people from the private sector in the white house. A lot of them are these insiders, the heads of multibilliondollar corporations, not so much the small and medium businesses. He says, im too busy solving the problems of the world. Im putting an end to wars. Hes spending time with al sharpton. He has time to see the private sector, doesnt he . He sure does. You know knowing the Business World that its simple how to create jobs. You make a conducive environment for businesses to grow. The president needs to bring confidence to this nation. He needs to bring stability. We need to know where we are on foreign and domestic policies, instead of just kind of shooting from the hip as this president does. And so this president has turned a deaf ear to business. Hes turned a deaf ear to the private sector. And im just literally holding my breath, david, for two more years. We have great plans. Our business is getting ready to expand huge come 2016, once we know where this nation is headed. David well, thats good news. And i think the private sector is ready to take off. Its a shame its had to be held back. Craig smith. Thank you so much. Good to see you. Investors whooping it up for dow 18,000. Next, david its a green christmas for wall street. Dow hits 18,000 for the first time ever. But is christmas really coming early thanks to janet yellen . Back with our fox business allstars. So, tracy, is this just a fed bubble . Theres a lot going on, david. The fed is the point person for why the market goes up. Free money. But consumer story got off their butt and got out there. Thats not to the consumer saying, hey, you know what, im sick of this. Savings has gone down. Good economic data. I think theres a little momentum, it might keep going. David mark, we had a gdp of 5 . Boy, we want to see that going. David that was for one quarter the average was a little over 2 . It is thanks to consumer spending. My concern that it is a bubble. And a year from now when the fed finally starts to raise the Interest Rates, it will burst then. We can enjoy it in equities for a while, but i think its artificial. David veronica, what happens when the fed raises rates . That might be priced already. Were sort of the best place to invest for Global Investors and folks at home. A lot of places having slowing growth. Not so great to invest in china and europe. Investors really like the us right now. I expect that to remain. Probably more volatile lets think about when they raise rates. It will be a decimal of a decimal of a did he decimal. Slow painful rate. David if you look back 40 years at the relationship between Interest Rates and inflation, weve always had inflation above Interest Rates. For the past three or four years, weve had inflation. As low as it is its above Interest Rates. Savers are losing money. Yeah. Two weeks ago, there was this panic. The dow dropped hundreds of points. It goes to show you, you can always you need a longterm strategy. You can count on equities longterm. David people like to gamble. On to issue number two, when you go to bed, leave your ipad in the living room. New study showing using electronics before you go to sleep messes with your sleeping pat rnz. Is our Gadget Addiction getting dangerous . Yeah, it is. Who here doesnt have Electronic Devices on your nightstand. Anybody . David i blame my wife. I do. Shes not here so you can blame her. I think this report wont change any behavior at all. I know there are a lot of busy beleaguered moms. They seek refuge with their tablet reader. They want to dive into their reader. It wont change anything. David it messes up your mind. Maybe the way you think as well. Potentially. Its just one study. I havent seen an actual study about the study. David what do you think . You know people get messed up by this. I could. At the same time, the study talked about, you know, people who read four hours a night on their ipad. Who does that . Who has that time . Id love that kind of time to be leisurely reading. Nobody watches a horror film before bed. I cannot watch a horror film. I have nightmares. Me either. If nothing else, youll find these Tablet Companies will find ways to change the infrared. David seth rogen tweeting today, quote, the people have spoken. Freedom has prevailed. Sony didnt give up. The interview will be shown at the theaters, willing to play it on christmas day. Tracy, im wondering who is responsible for this. The president said sony made a mistake. We have the theaters blaming sony. The lawyers blaming the theaters. Who pushed this issue . I want to say the media, quite frankly, because its about bloody time. Sony, my god, talk about dragging your feet. They should have put this movie out regardless. Took them forever to make a decision. Says nothing about their managerial skills. We should have seen this by now. David who pushed sony to make this decision . I think sonys stockholders had their say. Heres why. When they had to pull this a week ago because the theaters werent going to run it, they had no backup plan. They blew it. This announcement is a week late. They should have made it known, we wont be silenced. Their shareholders have been miserable for years now with this stock. Understood. But thats ultimately after the embarrassment and the pr crisis, there was pressure. In their defense, theyve been in uncharted territory. No company has been on attack like this especially from another company. Maybe we should give them a little leeway. David i dont know. Thats like thats like giving leeway to a snail. I have to say something, we were talking on the break about how when has hollywood had a back bone . There was a time when Jimmy Stewart was fighting in world war ii, a lot of people used to fight in a war and then go back to llyw but haag they put it streaming, if they deliver this through streaming media, it could be the biggest single seller if they do it soon. That would be a nice turn around story. Hopefully what this changes is companys Cyber Security policies. Companies need to get stricter with Cyber Security. Need to take a lot more seriously. The government too. David i hate to ask a question. What happens if something bad happens at a theater . At this point, they have no choice, but to take a shot. Unfortunately. Everyone will be on high alert, no doubt. I for one will walk it at home. You have to back it up. Free speech. David lets us witc wish them e best. The result youve been waiting for. Who wins the cavuto clash in 2014 . We have the answer youve been waiting for after the short break. Stay tuned. Thanks. [ male announcer ] fedex® has solutions to able Global Commerce that can help your company grow steadily and quickly. Great job. mandarin cut it out. See you tomorrow. You dont need to think about the energy that makes our lives possible. Because we do. Were exxonmobil and powering the world responsibly is our job. Because boiling an egg. Isnt as simple as just boiling an egg. Life takes energy. Energy lives here. David neil retorts you decide. We asked you to go on facebook. Com teamcavuto to vote on what you thought was the best cavuto clash on 2014. A lot of heated exchanges on this show. But there are three you guys thought stood out the most. First runnerup. Neil telling Michele Bachmann that republicans are wasting time suing president obama over his executive action. George bush did the same thing. Waste of time. Waste of time. So what we need to do is defund the executive branch, number one. Neil wait. Think about what youre saying. Congresswoman. David next up, the biggest rivalry, cavuto versus imus. Neil blindsided him on the second best clash of 2014. You have an iphone six . Let me see it. Bring it over here or ill beat your fat ass. Come on betelgeuse. Lets get it on. Theres been a new tray of doughnuts out in the greenroom. Theres vials outside. You want me to bring some in for you . Oh. David i would have loved to see that. Here it is the cavuto clash you said was the best of 2014 with the drum roll. Neil clashes way lawyer representing an illegal immigrant drug smuggler who is suing us by getting roughed up by a border dog. If i broke into your house and i tripped and broke my ankle on your stairs on the way up to empty out your wifes jewelry chest, do i have a legal right to sue your ass . No. Of course not because i broke into your house. Of course, i would have said, but instead of thank you for voting. Remember to visit facebook. Com teamcavuto. Please keep your thoughts and comments coming in. Have a wde, whether i go to hell or not, youre all heavenly to me. John maternity care, alcohol care, and more . I will have to raise my rates or lose money unless i can get taxpayers to bail me out. We dont want people to know that we are talking about so we will call it risk corridors. Uncle sam will raise down with lots of your money and give it to companies that the politicians want to please. Have some tax