You can see the field to determine its outcome. Heres mediators succeeded in triggering and. It was the birth of modern diplomacy. Sixteen forty eight. Start october twenty fourth w. If anyone had expected a breakthrough for the moderates in bosnia as latest elections theyve been bitterly disappointed especially in the sort of entity the Republika Srpska my guest this week here in bad youre looking at is right then even h. A veteran politician who lost his seat on the state presidency to a hardline rival is bosnia heading backwards into political deadlock and violence. That didnt even reach welcome to conflict zone thank you its been a rocky election hasnt it Campaign Violations abuse of public funds intimidation whats the matter with your politicians here at the polls to be short of the police they should do speak well calling for Transparency International all seeing ethnic groupings committed violations but things were especially bad here in the republican subsequence but i was the Opposition Candidate for i didnt know this except to the public found obvious use of this and i think that from the opposition side the complaint was moderate correct we did once we could. Tell you werent as corrupt as all the others is that what youre selling me you know i said that really was. Not corrupt and that this was the main issue on which means the risk of
pain unfortunately unsuccessfully why is there so much corruption elections here i mean your president here the man who will be true to the stake presidency hes been fined Six Thousand Euros by the Election Commission for hate speech even threatened workers at least one factory trouble this is a rival him yeah well its also why is this allowed wide but this isnt anything new this is been going on for years why have you stood up to it weve tried colder than we. Could be and whatever record from your position in the british version of the one Single Person who would do all six different Polling Stations and we of course send all these informations to the court and i dont think everything was rejected because majority of the institutional clear im not interested for the fair and correct elections why because the majority of the knowledge into the game
personalities and because of that they feel that the High Representative reported earlier this year in terms of public rhetoric and respect for the rule of law things have seen a notable deterioration my question is why you know that to give you the awful you have to understand that they have both those who didnt do that there was no comment about my speech i didnt think anything would leave the police beach i didnt do the Public Function i didnt threaten the people i tried and succeeded to kill the party in a few occasions to win even without doing like typical politician if you will do but you have held federal office in the state of Bosnia And Herzegovina and even you were incapable or unwilling to persuade the Power Brokers in this country in Republika Srpska in particular to see Bosnia And Herzegovina as a unitary state. Its so difficult to say who bush will be uniquely it is
a unitary state but actually it is a state which consists of the two and which has its constitution and very clear responsibilities during my mandate i tried to protect the i. R. S. But i didnt challenge a fifth of the b. H. The battles one foundation reported this year the current constitutional setup of the country is routinely questioned and undermined by politicians particularly from the republican subscale and the main crowd at polities you saw this going on all around you attempts to decouple the Republika Srpska from Bosnia And Herzegovina but you are either unwilling or unable to do anything about it which was it i will repeat again i did my job will be for you in a way that i tried to protect constitutional right to the proof of god without challenging the b. H. If you should trying to make
a compromise it would in my mind but you failed in the home to me when might that have been true and the only difficulties of this to you would Republika Srpska cause a lot of difficulty of getting rich but then list difficulty of all obstruction intimidation hate speach. Not all the time but yes there was all these cases and the reason why am i position why am i against that approach but you said you seemed to turn your anger against the High Representative you said last year as long as theres a High Representative in bosnia that means the country is neither mature or not capable of working on its own and while thats the case we cant expect any breakthrough on the european part of course its not the problem of having the High Representative the fact that the conditions for getting rid of the High Representative havent been met here i think this is this is the problem to be very fluid for you i think eleven years ago there was a decision to close the door from the kind of quiet go into the full committee
already which means that their conditions for it will have you can see eleven years ago and the conversions went away. In a very different way and. Everything failed. My it turned to be and blame my people obstructing the process is particularly here in the republican serps the look at the look at defense equipment. I really believe that this country can function and that this is a possible under one condition or to one if one condition called accept the question of order of this country so as much as i accept the bosnian conflict my colleague from felt like something if an overprotective first precondition forgot that there is no fight about this second precondition we have to be ready for the compromise i showed that i was the others im not so sure what compromises came
from the republican subsequent thinking of the requirement to transfer all Defense Property into the hands of the state of Bosnia And Herzegovina and this was obstructed and resisted by the republicans subsequent wasnt it to list back so the instruction has been coming from here and approaching the loo has no call to the from the problem this is a legal problem oh so who owned the property. Is it empty. And there is a big discussion because nothing goes. Institutions of the b. H. Go to the proper b. H. Bosnia herzegovina because you have around three have the vote Everything Everything do is basically owned by the n. T. S. B. If the constitutional decision the High Representative says its blocked due to political obstruction of course the could be the result for political reasons you want. Cool the purple thats the main issue but you were great theres obstruction
from the side from the Republika Srpska probably just because opinion that this is the property of the irish theyre ready to give. The youll sell all the property for Michael Knight youth but this is a bit of good political fight these arguments go on and on and on and the essence of it is that republicans. Are being part of a couple no no i dont think so but miller i doubt it go up until hes unseated you was the president of the bosnian serb republic still is today at least he has been questioning the viability of Bosnia Herzegovina for years i can be an advocate for him i wasnt asking you to be an advocate im just saying that its coming from just part of me ive checked because traditional right for the rest but i love the challenge existence of the reeducation and i will not produce any conflict which will have a difficult but i will protect the rest because this is my duty im elected so that
none of this none of this is going to help bosnia join the European Union if thats actually what you want to do. I dont think the bush really is more complicated than any other decentralized country in the europe this is just a month from which is a repeat of the title if you have a readiness. To make agreements there is no problem within the constitutional framework no problem if youre done because of international respect for your time you see if youre done but even if youre going to want to accept. If youre going from to have a compromise you will find. Out even in the most beautiful cause solution for the main problem of this countrys readiness to make compromises its to respect for instance the free press there is no respect for the free press or to be completely im even more critical than you about that because i pay the price ok a lot of action for you so you dont respect your devalued i personally very much respect
a cut you havent managed to have done to instill that regardless of i was not the guest of the public for growth asking service here for fifteen years i was not interviewed by the Public Service for fifteen years so if there is a victim of that approach and for me i am against that approach and doing my best in order to have a normal press like in any other country so no respect for a Free Press Journalists are constantly attacked here you called only e. U. And twenty sixteen to back more projects you said that they should if you like showcase the benefits of membership that membership is worth fighting for it was up to the you to do that it isnt up to the its not a Beauty Contest for the u. S. Its up to you politicians to sell the idea to your people something you need a reason campaigning to get you when you are campaigning to get it of course these
trees over but my very clear message was in order not to spend the money from to you on a lot of different more projects its better to concentrate that to something which is reasonable for people not for the political elite but for the people posing as have hundreds of millions of euros. From the e. U. In a very small different projects which are not directly linked to the people too much to do the. Legal framework and that my message was to send the message to the ordinary people in order to promote that in order to have this press by the people and not by the politicians or with all the problems here with all the intimidation all the corruption all the hate speech with all their anti Press Movements that are taking have been taking place here what if you got to offer me anyway what should be. There is another option i completely forsee in that way
its better to i was always part of the world and to leave it on its own so thats your recommendation damascus is not my recommendation my differently if your your recommendation is to leave this part now rather than up to and trying to tell you that we felt put change before so i think if it was not training you have to understand that this society was in a war so five years ago hundreds of the people of all millions of displaced persons you know you have to understand that this is not the most Beautiful Society we need some sort of the patient and they need some sort of the support and that was my idea from ok from the e. U. Is worried about your connections here with russia and their Growing Influence in this region the European Parliament called on your authority as in april not to pursue an independent foreign or Security Policy which might undermine the State Level Policy while youre on the state level while i think what ways russians are
welcome here there is this friendly relations between the people but i dont think that russia for much Will Russia Doesnt Want Bosnia to join he doesnt know with i know the clear message is here for you is not the problem nato is maybe the problem but not the you as i know that and youre heading towards nato membership you have the. I you have the membership action plan which happened to the city the decision of my predecessor of and but you know like a like a legal legally a person who accepted legal rules there is no way to withdraw that thought membership action plan is a problem so your whole field of hoffa. Have to fulfill all the previous of acacias and i will not to make any affection for that when it comes to Foreign Policy is different to say the final message but my generation will not decide about the membership within the nato that is for some other. Generation if if you didnt join the e. U. You would never support sanctions against russia and japan really. You would be prepared to support sanctions because it was very clear message and if there are other benefits for this country maybe also you can give you would want something in return for no you would stand on principle which is a very of give me the chance to answer. If there is a very clear argument that this is something which is illegal normally based on the argument ok yes if you are to say. If we are the members of the European Union yes but that recently in a recent situations very very clear Political Support for the existence of europe of very little from the russia more than from any other country today to agreement and we have a lot of benefits by opening the market to russia for our products like vegetables
fruit you know and choice you make a choice you have to make the change you cut right to horses at the same time might make you want to leave if you believe that the whole future of europe use the fact that in the rush of European Union i want but i would like not to be in the uk in that situation my question is would you vote to accept sanctions on russia given that it has recently used the chemical weapon on the streets of a member state as part of an Assassination Plot in salzburg in briefly did you vote to sanction russia the of i think all of this is a question which is a very speculative its isnt because its been proved that they did it first of all i dont have any of this i didnt see any documents i didnt have any information so help can expect for me to Say Something about that at least so it first documents and that i was yeah but you wouldnt do it anyway would you i mean its been accepted. People who went to salt spray to actually carry out this
killing of me know that if you dont know me then give me joseph and you will feel you see my decisions i didnt behave in the past on expect that i did all this but i believe its good and all this because they are the ones i made so many difficult decisions in the palace through trial not very much accepted by the people here but if there are. Is the government im ready to take the risk of if you left lets look at the decision in september twenty sixth in the republican subsequent went ahead with a referendum which many people have described as the most serious challenge to the state since the end of the war a referendum on Republican National day the state level Constitutional Court had already ruled your national day constitutional but you went ahead and did it anyway why when you knew how provocative this was going to be. Because i feel that this is
a very stupid challenge for you have. Just exactly got the date of april fifth going to be a challenge. Because its provocative well because a republican serbska was borne out of ethnic cleansing wasnt it for you here there are perfectly good i say nationally by look by laughing and it doesnt matter what i am im simply asking you to place it as another you felt that the statement its not only arguments that are being put forth in that case can you not see why it would be provocative to other people to go ahead serious national couldnt to see that this is also provocative to undermine the right of the sort of people to have a nationally. And we see this national day with somebody or decisions dont matter to you as always you want something a little by little color to see if the Court Official said that this is not to be
revealed Republika Srpska so my proposal my personal proposal to the government here was just to change the law to accept the constitutional. Court decision and to name the game its not the play of the producers get is a deal was published and the liberals. You won so compromising when it came to the attitude toward crimes and War Criminals here in the republicans subsequent the serbs denial here in the republic of srpska of genocide at srebrenica in One Thousand Nine Hundred Ninety Five the infamous systematic murder of up to Eight Thousand bosnian men and boys this is a pitiful attempt to rewrite history on the part of the republicans to pretend that it didnt happen. This is something which i tried not to be involved in the destruction of the charitable not for much i said very clearly this is something for the true story of and not for the current politicians because it is the kind of
politician friends all this is always the political issues of these victims and by not commenting back and trying not to be shoes that is that are not fair what can i do wonder that look at the attitude of the Republika Srpska in Two Thousand And Four to accepted that the genocide had taken place Two Thousand And Seven apologized for earlier this year it remained on that and voted not to accept responsibility for the deaths of up to Eight Thousand people its reprehensible so all of these are political machinations but youre trying to rewrite history this is my point i didnt do that personally on the other hand you have to explain the War Crimes Tribunals this is not your blame the War Crimes Tribunal it was just political it first so much really want you to think the number of years. For the different political groups you will feel. That there is
a huge disproportional even if you disagree on the victims i know there is a version b. In this part of the world believe so i believe that decide was a victim but you ignore the fact the serbs were just sentence because they were also quoted subs who also released early from jail subs also pleaded guilty and. You dont mention the fact that the majority of the civilian casualties by far were bosniak citizens but Bosnian Muslims according to the documentation and Research Center and sorry it was a percent eighty two percent of the civilian casualties what bosniaks ten percent. Reduced was the fusion of the independent commission or Institute Led by the bush people this is an Organization Funded by norway from the uk they led by muslims so youre saying its wrong no i just said that the fear of numbers will be
seen once those in the. Commission believe from three sides and international you want it to be fair i want to be free one to be fair is it fair thing to say that this court was just political to dismiss it that it will be remembered as a political call it will be remembered as political members are called to try to bring justice at the end of a horrible war of course this is your opinion my really different my opinion is if you see how many years of punishment for delivered to the serbs how many to the clubs and kill many to flee a few feet looking to snub him according to the number of the victims even if it include these numbers. Theres a man called Dragon Nichol and she was commander of Potential Camp in the municipality of lasseter he pleaded guilty to personally killing nine detainees
torturing and beating them he doesnt feel the same way as you know he doesnt feel that the even though that he was sentenced what do the five of tribunals doesnt feel simply because in a statement comes to you know color i feel you said it was political you could shut it up my goshen is but the cord was made and i was a little he doesnt believe you because in a statement to the court he said i have admitted my guilt it should be clear to all of us to free up the fact that in this reconciliation this tribunals also plays a part in it is more honest than it was something ok if you shoot from patrol. So every. Two courts decided it was genocide. The International Criminal tribunal for the former yugoslavia the International Court of justice in two thousand you wont accept that i could come from for i want to feel. Pain respect for the victims Two Thousand And Four because basically fourteen years from now. I always try not to be involved in political discussions about the flippant. If this is how he thought i bet i will not repeat everything i can be and being asked are you basically Like Services possible for everything not that i cannot say that i will repeat again i dont think that the politicians have to play the game with the victim since ribbons and lambs are a well good meeting in One Direction or another but i must admit no one instead of rewriting history because this history is going to follow your girlfriend because i dont really believe that this is something which my approach is for the rich or useful for the normal life in this country to forget about the past to me he didnt have no i didnt say that but thats what you say not to file
a politician is to misuse that one side which is obvious insisting youll have to say that you are responsible not of weve trying to say no there was not think this is a lot to get out of my personal approach i dont want to be in that for my personal approach is this is something for the historians and they have to speak about not really the kind of politicians whatever we do its with use of how convenient it is and what a convenient way to get out of it what a convenient way to avoid taking a principled stand lets leave it for other generations who have One Crewmember of course because you have they wont remember i mean my opinion here is but this is exactly for the duration of the future and not for the those who were involved in this. Every few years the victims do expect that the kind of generations who were involved in the war are ready to make
a common approach to this war this is so wrong that you cannot to match it to just reopen all the old differences resave in each the rhetoric is way up in this part of the world people are buying more arms all sides are buying more. Were heading back into political deadlock and supposedly are going backwards into war so what could happen here i dangerous as it was id thought in the past that there is no way for that because i thought that we dont have a politicians who would be so strong that they can. Have the people supporting them so from i thought that if you dont have enough veteran feel free to start a new war and especially are told that the people are tired and out of the war. I still believe just the people of. The first two im not so optimistic but i was
before. Well david thanks very much for the. Thank you. Glad. Glad. That the the the. The the the. The but the but
the. The that the. The but the the the. The the. The the. Yes strangely. The coproduction. Just uses an incubator as a breeding ground. Your robot. Thirty minutes on t w. Theres not going to survive now its night just hide your identity. We are scared we are very scared we have to stoop to move you know to fight for this hard against good or. Bangladesh what is the true face of the country look like. Freedom independence a separation of state and church that used to be important but for decades political infighting here has hindered progress and islamist extremists are gaining more influence democracy and the rule of law are on shaky ground if this could get
worse love issue i mean. Anybody. Can not. Bangladesh The Dawn Of Islamism and exclusive d. W. Report starts october eighteenth. The armed forces are under pressure theyre battling recruiting comes outdated and broken down equipment and limited budgets. And is a huge lesson there is not enough planes or not enough Transport Helicopter or not enough tanks we have ten divisions that dont have tanks. So outsourcing and privatization are the order of the day in all areas but that can post dangers. Every day even a walk on his own private sector businesses making money with everything from reconnaissance drones to Laundry Facilities Firms are infiltrating forces in france