Therefore, rightly you are what implementation at the heart of this copy. That is how can we reach these goals and not in a far away future . But in the next, yes, this is why as a result of this, you mark on Climate Conference, we want to see a long term ambitious work program with concrete reduction steps that will lead housing. Once done, id say it off the 9th my to the 1. 00 degree pathway as a Global Community together with my belgian colleague, i am holding talks on behalf of the European Union. Would be a muffin that we are making very clear that for us europeans, it is essential that this work program im, its, you reach is a real new level of ambition and that it is about implementation for far too long since 2015 also asked european states we have discussed goals for the medium tam goes in 20 or 30, if not, it is time, but we know that c o 2 is accumulating in the air and we come get it out of the air in 20 or 30 years time. So it is so important that we have this web program to define concrete goals for the coming years. Yearly reduction steps need to be included in that program. So it was important that we ask the European Union during this call made it very clear again that we are continuously iden and not so nice. Nbc, reviewing our national at tim of contributions and as mr. Tim runs has made clear our own fit for 55 goals has been increased. Yeah, kima at this Climate Conference, as is the case with all Climate Conference is that is not only about concrete texts, but this, this Climate Conference is also always lead to something. And thats why they are an asset in itself. From the day they start, they are from fear lead to new concrete initiatives being promoted, not only bringing together civil society, but also those who must be a good minds on confidence. Im bankin, deborah, he knows we will launch new projects beyond the consensus that we can reach. He and this is especially true for initiatives and partnerships for the Global Energy transition because Renewable Energy sources that is the answer to phasing out fossil fuels. Yeah, and i, we, therefore, all of these are the mar conference and enforce, have not concluded partnerships before this conference. And in the wake of this conference partnerships that will lead countries to the fast lane towards climate neutrality. Because many have understood that this is the decisive moment for who will be an industrial leader in the future. We dont have to wait for the last one to join us in addition to what we have, what we will conclude and what we will agree on here. We can make clear that with others we move forward with our climate goals. In that spirit, we have concluded a partnership with tenure last week that will switch the entire Electricity Sector of kenya to Renewable Energy sources by 2030. Kenya thus can become a shining example in africa. Provides that will, you know, have appeal far beyond the region. If a country is successful in this a country that has as many inhabitants as italy with increasing growth rates and increasing population an increase in population. Other countries well see this as a role model of out of this week we have concluded a Multilateral Partnership with indonesia to help this country to move out of its dependency on cold pastor and incline at time. At conferences. It is also about learning from one another. We know how difficult it is to face alcohol. It has been so difficult in germany because it also has a labor market i mentioned as social policy dimension and our difficulties. And also the solution we found is something that others can learn from. So together with other partners, we are supporting indonesia with 20000000000. 00 do us dollars in public and private funding by helping indonesia to reach it. Emissions peaks 7 years earlier than what had been planned and, and have a seo free by 2 free electricity system by 205010 years earlier than previously planned. Im sure youre still gonna and such a jet. He is also something that we have concluded with south africa during the Climate Conference. We have taken additional concrete steps for implementation and have pledged 300000000. 00 euros even to accelerate the Energy Transition in south africa and design it in a socially viable way. On tuesday, we have presented to new funds. Hi one with 550000000 euros for Hydrogen Projects world wide high mid to accelerate the transformation of the energy sector. Moving it away from my fossil fuel is because in the past we have lost so much time. The other fun is for forest protection. Another very important topic for International Climate protection. We have written by shorts. When i raised our funding for 1st protection from one to 2000000000 euros, we are 1st protecting global forest, free times, the surface of germany. And today i have also announced that we will increase our funding for adaptation to 60000000 euros k. Yeah. Mid idea. Im guessing medical sundays are still i am making this very clear here. All of this i has one clear go away at the end of this cop solar and when must be the winners. And the fossil fossil fuels must be loses. Only this year, way the mac will they be able to manage this Climate Crisis. We can only do this to get them in addition to the negotiations and the practical initiatives and the Climate Conference has also always had a 3rd dimension. It has always been a powerhouse for new ideas. He added, miss moore, these new ideas are not only so naturally copied, talking done, they are bearing fruit. Sometimes it takes a little time. But since we need leap frog innovation in order to be able to reach the 1. 5 degree pathway, it is so important to have this creative space. Oh, to build the future here. And tom ocean debates are taking place that will shape all the world off tomorrow and the day after tomorrow. The heart of this is the readjustment of no Global Financial flows. These must be redirected in a way that they help equally makepeace to effectively contain the Climate Crisis. Public funds and thats part of the truth will not be sufficient. Data was in d b there can mark the fact of the climate prices already to severe. We need trillions, and that means we also need privacy investors. The good thing is, when do you invest as a here we should create the conditions to mobiline funds globally and to do that together. This is why were one to reform International Financial institutions such as the world bank bank, active i one to support this reforms process actively. They need to be given a stronger focus on helping what states fighting client the Climate Crisis and adapting to it. In the end of the puzzle, age state is one by a necessity. Its on our doorstep block now states and the private sector and need to to get that to clear the way and to accelerate the transition then be call haven cost. Paula will be out for we have los angeles. Yes, already. So this years motto of the pavilion you can see right behind me in on clearly illustrates our ambition. Im ambition in solidarity. It is the added diesel t max. We will only be able to master this Climate Crisis together, and we know that the industrialized nation and have a special responsibility to ban disregard dot. Here i have, this is why at this Climate Conference together. Well, we have one talk and presented the global shield on monday, and this global shield can be a Building Block sheet on for us to deal with the topic of loss and damage. We have taken a step right that we havent taken in the past because new step, we dont require courage. You cant be 100 percent. Sure that the success will come about immediately. But we know that and if we do not act in full solidarity and show ambition, even we will not be able to contain the Climate Crisis. And this is why even before this conference we have made clear that the topic of loss and damage needs to be set needs to be put on the agenda for this Climate Conference, but didnt know before the conference. And we still dont know how this process will go forward, but as we dont want to wait because for us it is a question of justice and not charity to speak about loss and damage. We my point for grants, i have made a proposal at this conference for how we can move forward without having to wait for everybody to agree on something. And that is why we created the global shield. We hope that this is also an offer that so i not only will lead to substantial outcomes for how we deal with life and damage, but also you know, something that others can take as an inspiration for us. This proposal is part of a mosaic law for loss and damage to things are important to us in this regard. We need solutions and you didnt. Were not all that immediately it help on the most vulnerable states. Now the most vulnerable state, suffering from climate impact. Now, and this is why we need a tool that is a, a little now and house and now, and not only helps them in some time, with the dramatic dimension of the climate prices. Time is a luxury we cannot afford. Also, in addition, the question, who helps with Financial Support must be reflected. Whats i by reality here, and now were living in this world. We are not living in the world of yesterday. We have a responsibility of one due to the decision that we have taken yesterday, but we have a responsibility path and foremost for our Common Future is us. And this is why it is so important for us that if we create a new tool today for life and damage that this tool is not shaped according to the reality of 40 years ago. But that it is designed for the reality of the 40 years to come and it is true we in europe and north america as industrialized nations have built our prosperity on fossil fuels. So we bear responsibility for the climate induced damage in my, of the recent past. And the present, but the big emitters off today, a bearing the responsibility for the climate induced damage in the future. All states can show now that they are willing to show more ambition and more solitary chevy. Thank you very much done. Thank you. In the minister has a follow up meeting, so we only have 5 minutes for questions and answers. I see one question over here. You can ask in german or english argument if the minister will answering german lumberman, we have some attendance interpreting available. Hello. And that was germanys for melissa alina babylon, addressing an audience that called 27 conference, and sean will shake and go straight to my colleague, julius, ideally, whos a standing by in sean. Ill shake that julia sweeping speech that by the German Foreign minister. What stood out for you . Well, if you elements or a significant at least to me, and one thing is how an a bad book pointed to the importance of the target of maintaining the rising Global Temperatures under 1. 5 degrees celsius. That was a target, sat in the International Treaty that was the paris agreement. And we had seen that some states weve heard that some states this year at the call were starting to maybe wanting to backtrack on that goal. But also thanks to countries here pushing for that goal to stay on the agenda weve seen in draft of the closing agreement of called that, that goal of 1. 5 degrees remains in the draft. And that is something that is important for many here. And also how other than a bad book pointed to the fact that germany wants to push for this course to be the call that a signal is a transition and a complete phase out away from all fossil fuels. Now this is also a contentious issue at the called this year in some countries including india and e u. Member states once the agreement in the end to contain a message of phase out of all fossil fuels, coal, gas, and oil. But it seems like in the draft right now that the agreement will remain only on phasing out coal. And this is something that obviously is a problem for a lot of countries. And there is still contention on this issue. And finally, the 3rd element is of the so called lawson damage the idea that rich countries that are also the biggest emitter of carbon dioxide, should compensate the polar and more Vulnerable Countries that are being hit. The hardest by Climate Change in germany has pushed for this issue to be on the agenda here at cobb. Now they are not convinced and not sure that there is going to be a decision as how this fund for loss or damage would work. But they have signaled that germany would be in favor for this funds to be created. And this again, the issue of lawson damage is one of the sticking points in negotiations at cob this year. And it is still unclear whether an agreement on this can actually be reached. Now, one of the many on resolve issues, apparently, as you said, one of which is financing the poorer countries wont support from wealthier industrialized nations to cope with the problems. So can there be a bit more hopeful after the speech