Where do you go . I would go to the American Embassy and report it to their military terrorism staff member. All European Countries have fbi legal attaches that are accessible through the embassy. I would go through the u. S. System. To the u. S. Embassy. Yes. I would go through the u. S. System rather than trying to maneuver a criminal system through local. Every european country will have a rigorous international footprint. I think, just to add one thing, which is it behooves us all, as rational participants in our society, to have a scaled and honest sense of what the danger from terrorism is. It is it is thankfully, thanks in part to great work from Law Enforcement, it is a much, much, much smaller danger than being robbed or being shot in a driveby shooting thats accidental, being hit in a car accident. And so, when you see something, say something, yeah, thats a valuable thing. But one of the costs of that is it stokes up in all of us a disproportional sense of this threat. It is an important issue. Its an important problem. It is not in the top ten in terms of causes of death or injury in our country. And so, there is a kind of, you know, a guardedness we all feel when we see all those signs, in part because Law Enforcement does a good job, i think we can take a little more of a breath than we allow ourselves or that those signs sometimes signal to us that we can. It should be noted that one of the reasons Law Enforcement does such a good job is because of their work with nongovernmental organizations. Worked with adl, in our primary training for Law Enforcement. They have been leaders, the cling hoffer family. To go back to your original question, what can you do when you dont have voice necessarily in a courtroom. Here are two daughters who, through the work with adl, turned this tragedy into working for years and making sure that Law Enforcement is able to mitigate this threat moving forward. And so, thank you guys for doing that. [ applause ] i wanted to tell one funny story in closing. When i served on the u. N. Human rights committee, we sit in geneva twice a year and new york once a year. I had a lovely colleague who was about 82 years old. I think he was lying. Maybe 92 years old named mr. Halid. I took him to lunch. I had my interns from yale along. He would in a teasing voice, propose marriage to them, or ask if they might be interested. He would point out that in islam they recognized prior holy men. They recognized moses. They recognized jesus as well as mohammed. So in a proper interpretation, i think, the ethical content of islam is a measure of all of those religions in a kind of syncretic integration. I think one lesson has to be, for us as much as for others, that one should seek to capture in each religion what is deeply ethical, whats sort of natural law as well as normal human instinct. So thank you very much, judy siegel and the entire Jewish Historical Society and effort here. My wonderful panelists and the kling hoffer daughters and everybody who came out today. Nice meeting you