Mandates and lowering premiums. So if more is required, senatort Lindsey Graham and i will add to in it will will return all conservative solutions which give power back to the states and in turn give power to the patients. What is the building . What we do is take the dollars the federal government would give to a state under obama care, we give the same dollars in the form of a block grant and allow the state to administer the money in his best way to fulfill president trumps pledges. We think it works. Its a tenth amendment solution in which that in which is not specifically given to the federal government is given to the state. T they say the conservative state might do something we dont think should be allowed to do. Another might say a liberal station be allowed to do it. Under our bill we go to the state so a blue steak into a blue thing and a red steak into a red thing and lets let the states teach each other the best way to ensure others. But we sail be the state which has the power and not the federal government. If you oppose this approach means used trust the washingtonf bureaucrat more for the needs of your state then you trust the people of your own state. We would still have theld protections which would allow folks to get the average adequate coverage they need. For example preexisting would be covered the philly president trumps from that of. Ill everybody who is ill or has a lot on her cell that has resources adequate to have that persons illness addressed and we have a precedent on how this is done. Dollars congress im told would address a temporary assistance for needy families program, give the dollars necessary with flexibility to the state and although at the time the solution criticized with too much money to the state the government has not had to put more money in because the flexibility of the state could use the dollars that allocated to meet the needs of the could population. So stay could help those patients who are at higher risk for higher cost purchase the coverage they need them perhaps a high risk pool that would allow premiums to be lower for those individuals and for all. It could maintain status quo to those folks getting tax credits who could have these a dollars fund their insurance. It could be used with senator cruises amendment. Which would allow a Health Savings account to be used to Purchase Health insurance. The individual who set up an account the state could fund it and then the dollars could be used to purchase insurance. Why like that personally it was in the Cassidy Collinsville and it dovetails very nicely with bringing these dollars back to the state to care for summer. It could directly contract providers to provide assistance with a specific population. N imagine you have an indian reservation which might be covered under another source ofe funding and another fairly isolated population that doesnt have access to healthcare. The state could say were going i to provide providers for that pe an where estimate that they have 700,000 people stretched over a landmass almost as big as lore 48. That might be a solution alaska comes up with. Te tha the solution would be specific to that state. Unlike obama care in which outio of washington d. C. , washingtonte bureaucrats dictate the same approach taken across the nation no matter how difficult the states are and then the money is given to the states on their asked to provide for their citizens in a way specific toss power. We think its his conservative solution which gives the patients more power. Som this does not replace the bill which is being offered up by senator mcconnell. There would be an amendment to e that. If it turns out some senators feel as if that particular bill is not adequate to fulfill the campaign promises, we feel this could take the build rest of the way. I yield the floor