And allow me to be critical of this because the media is our gateway to express our opinions and share what we think and what we do with the world that ideally the media has been called into this competition and i believe that it leads into the community has been unfairly portrayed in the media and i believe the media should not help politicians who are trying to scapegoat the community to give them the attention they dont deserve i think they should criticize them and in a way the media did criticizing the challenge donald trump on his false accusations. He just did it to divide the public and he knows better. So despite being corrected several times, he was giving me a lot of platforms in the communities of the way that i believe the media is showed this as being silent and not doing anything or just focused as the problem lies in the Muslim Community when in fact we have come to violence all over the place and in 2015 we have more than 355 mass shootings. That means more than one mass shooting each day in the United States. More than three to five people have been told by a mass shooting at the hands of nonmuslims. We didnt see 24 accident coverage of the victims and perpetrators or the the perpetrators or the privileges were the political identity will. Those people have been told mercilessly but the focus of hasbeen mainly on a few acts in the community that had been condemned. So we all have to Work Together to put things in perspective. No one would deny the existence but also the exaggeration is that gives an oversight per trail of reality and i think the media plays a role in math. What might be your comment on the statement that mentioned donald trump is the best recruitment tool . [laughter] i happen to agree with her and i said similar stuff that the statements were helping isis because he is playing into their hands in helping isis. To scare the public and help the public to be scared like they are trying to do they couldnt defeat the United States but but they have to do is to divide them and scare us so my message to all candidates of donald trump in his life but all candidates stop being afraid of americas strong. I did want to bring this home. This is what it means for American Families here, a young woman that i know. Fullstop they spoke she went into her sixyearold daughters bedroom the other day and the child had packed up her belongings and said i heard that the donald trump wants to get muslims out of this country. Both the army come in the middle of the night and make us leave . This is the impact of this unbridled islamic phobia filtering through the tv to our children so i just wanted to contextualize that. Final question if you dont mind if we will leave it to you if. If you could explain a little bit more about the Voter Registration like where youre going to be doing this and how it will go supporting a particular candidate or will you be making it so you dont want a particular candidate . This initiative, Muslim Americans have been involved in political process and they have been for quite some time. This one becomes particularly important because first of all, we have the right to voice and take the traces. If they all the communities are at the through the country we recognize the community alone can i do a change or make a difference in one or another and we understand that also applies to other minorities so we are going to be doing alliances and coalitions. We are going to be reaching out. Politics are local and now we understand how the political system works. We are going to mobilize the community and we are going to do early voting and we both have buses and shuttles to the station. We will be doing Everything Possible to make the to be vibrant, active, energetic, understanding. This is their country and they have to make choices and they have to be a part of it and instead they are being taken to the attacks i think the involved citizenry is the way to explain yourself and we are not going to let anybody define who we are. It is an important factor. We worked with john lewis and others in the student nonviolent coordinating committee. We learned one thing that if we are team unbiased, if you are to become a victim of political bigotry, the best answer, the best response is to take your souls to the polls, so we are going to lose a ballot to fight bigotry and that is what we are going to do. So, let it be heard loud and clear to all political candidates be a donald trump or whoever else that can be if you engage in islam at the beginning beginning and if you engage in demagoguery and bigotry, you will pay a political price because we are going to use our ballot and we are going to take your souls to the polls and make sure that you are out of there. Just to clarify, none of our organizations including endorsing any candidate so there would be another organization that might be found in the committee that make the position we are going to be engaged as we said in november. [laughter] if you want to understand the red and blue politics you cant look at the state level you have to look at the county level because thats where you start seeing the decisions and you can see it right there in the maps. You can see them popping out and the western reserve of ohio, the west coast appearing into the deep in to the deep south and the tidewater. And no i havent messed with the colors. The blue really is democrat. This is the 1916 showdown between the Woodrow Wilson and charles hughes. Republicans for the First Century of their history theres a party founded almost exclusively the party of the yankee done in the First Century. But the parties come and go and all the eggs are gone and federalists and so on and so forth and the current parties have swapped over the last 40 years their constituencies and their program is just shifted around to understand in any kind of used record timeframe whats happened using parties on the red versus blue exercise in futility. The lasting differences that really matter in the broad tying scheme are there regional and cultural and the parties end up donning their garb and shifting their wardrobe depending on those kind of realities and have managed to completely reverse themselves. If the Public Affairs channel highlighted the issues during the last few question Time Sessions in december. In the final session australian Prime Minister malcolm and the cabinet trick questions on the Climate Change commitment to Health Legislation in combating terrorism. This is about 30 minutes. Hello. I am coming from you from the Parliament House for question time and we bring you the final fortnight of the australian parliamentary lead. The Prime Minister had just returned from a series of Global Summits held in the shadows of the terrorist attacks. And he was asked how the World Leaders plan to respond to the growing threats of islamic fundamentalism. Thank you mr. Speaker. My question is to the Prime Minister. While you mind the collective response of the Global Leaders to the attacks around the world . Prime minister. I think the member for his question. Mr. Speaker, the International Response to the terrorist attacks in paris and elsewhere were front and center in all of the discussions i had with Global Leaders at the chi 20 and the east asia summit. All of the leaders agreed the fight against terrorism is a major priority in the Global National security. We all be agreed at our resolve to Work Together to defeat terrorism to increase International Cooperation including tackling the channels of terrorism including the messaging challenge where despite the group in particular operates a barbaric and archaic version of islam on the scene they have been still for users if we are going to collaborate further how we combat that and the new messaging center is being established in malaysia to do that but i suspect the defeated and defeated and appealed. Australia has the second largest Foreign Military contribution of Coalition Partners on the battle against isis. More than any other country in the United States. We have six missions in the theater with 250 personnel 90 special forces and about 300 soldiers building the capacity of the army. Army. The servicemen and women are doing their jobs with the professionalism and commitment and courage. We are working with our allies and that is how it should be but we cannot and should not act unilaterally and not only because because that would be obviously unreasonable and unwise but because it would be in violation of our agreement in the government of iraq. I know many people have argued america and its allies should conquer and hold the controlled areas in much the same way that iraq was occupied in 2003 that was not a the policy of the United States government or any independent realistic in that region other than its partnership with our allies. Another threat featured as Climate Change. This australia doing enough to pull its weight. You said im happy to take the question on notice and will do the calculation laid that night. It would generate a high pollution needs in the european union. Before i called up the minister come if hes taking a question on notice the answer will come on the notice as the members well now you can answer the other parts of he wishes. I think the member for his question and we will send him some numbers if you would like us to do that but i would say to the honorable member gets taken to the paris conference of the Party Parties very credible and substantial 26 to 28 reduction from 2005 are very substantial and when they are measured on a per capita basis which is the only way they can be compared with other countries, they are second only to the emission cuts by brazil. They are very substantial cuts and i recognize as such in the global community. The honorable member, the reality is its part of the energy mix of the world today and will be for many decades to come. Some are building more renewable gas and clean coal plants to be used with less a mission and co2 per megawatt hour of energy generated. So although change is happening and im glad that the honorable members asked this question because it gives the opportunity to be part of the house but in our meetings with premier. Its only to permit a relatively low content to be burned. Now of course by and large it has a low content relative to so i recognize it will never be as clean as the honorable member would like it it is relatively clean. And i write write the problem that were administered and he gave an undertaking that he would look into that and ensure that problems are rectified and would be good for. Com weeks and will be good alike so thank you for allowing me to make the point today. We have already announced the climate and i expect the targets to continue. But the reports today that the minister will tell the paris conference that it will consider more ambitious targets. And that is exactly the position of the government. The minister for foreign affairs. But minister reiterated in paris and to the paper that the targets of 26 to 28 will not be negotiated in the paris Climate Change conference. I have a mandate from the Australian Government that was passed by the cabinet and endorsed 26 to 28 . That is the target for the pin minister was speaking about. He was not changing the government policy. The policy remains the same. But he was referring to is the member had bothered to read the article is that it is government policy to work in 2017 as the question of the use of International Units that has always been the policy and is also to consider reviews but all countries that signed onto reducing Greenhouse GasEmissions Reductions in five years time. In fact i said i set it up last week in the two questions here that each believe that countries should review the targets and if we are not meeting their targets then they can change the actions. So it can become a greater degree five years. This is the government policy since august. Thank you mr. Speaker. My question is to the minister of foreign affairs. You failed to mention the governments woefully inadequate 26 to 28 carbon pollution. One is in a Conference Room in paris and another entirely. The ministers of foreign affairs. I think the member for the question and the government announced its target for the paris conference last august. It was with the un and it is 26 to 28 reduction on the levels for 2030 and the targets were the subject of many. Its the same policy that we have had. But i do question the deputy leader of the opposition to make something of a public announcement by suggesting we say one thing but the deputy leaders were subject to detailed consideration and dare i say on the issue of Climate Change. I remember in 2011 [inaudible] by saying they were going to be subject for the Climate Change but this is rather interesting on the fourth of november and relates to the Climate Change the deputy leader of the opposition said on the radio on abc that she had visited the island because she went to see where it used to be. There are houses, lawns, gardens, and there are picnic tables. So it seems to me that when the deputy leader of the opposition makes a claim, people had better check it very carefully. Scaremongering, exaggerating, hyperbole. Thats news to the people. For investment in australia Agricultural Land has always been a sensitive topic in australia and the government has recently moved to increase scrutiny on Foreign Companies that are planning to do so. It was also rejection by the government of the sale of one property to foreign buyers. That was apparently on the advice of the Foreign Investment review board. Of the treasure was asked about that in parliament. Thank you very much, mr. Speaker. My question is to the treasurer. Why is the treasure willing unwilling to discuss to the house the information with the agriculture courts does the treasury stand by his previous claim that his decision to reject the application was based upon formal advice . The treasurer has the gall. Thank you, mr. Speaker. The further advice was exactly in accordance with the decision that i took and was ridden advice. So, you know, that was the decision taken, mr. Speaker, and ministers and as a former treasure he would know, doctors many people. I didnt lucky because i didnt think youd have much to offer. But i can this widely with colleagues about these issues. My ministry will colleagues, cabinet colleagues, that is part of the normal process, mr. Speaker. Thats, i talked my colleagues about many issues. Ive also been talking to a colleagues about the Foreign Investment changes that we have passed innocent last night, mr. Speaker. And those changes, for example, saw a reduction in the threshold for rural land and agribusinesses to ensure there was greater scrutiny we cant get Agricultural Land and agribusiness purchase. And you know who opposed that, those opposite of those opposite, the opposite, its quite okay to have the threshold but on this side of the house we think its quite necessary to have a close look at Foreign Investment in rural land and Agricultural Land of course, and, of course, and agribusiness. Weve made changes to achieve it but those opposite think it should be cut, mr. Speaker. They think it should go to the highest bidder and they can just do whatever they like. Thats what they think about Residential Real Estate two, mr. Speaker. But this government knows that you need to ensure your good strong laws to protect the National Interest and that you dont have and that you implement them into National Interest. And thats what we did on kidman. Thats we did on the loss the went to the senate last night, mr. Speaker, and thats what well do in relations to all of these investments. We will look after the National Interest. I dont know what youre looking at what youre looking out for. The government released its longawaited response to a review of Mental Health services and programs. And as such came to highlight what the government does in this space. The member for gilmore. Mr. Speaker, my question is to the Prime Minister. Will be Prime Minister inform the house of the final contribution that affected Mental HealthServices Made to australias social and Economic Future speak with the Prime Minister. Thank you, mr. Speaker, and i thank the honorable member for question. Mr. Speaker, australias richest assets are not under the ground. They are the men and women of australia. All of us and the rest of our 23 million brilliant australians. Our greatest assets is our Human Capital. And through their talent, their enterprise, the capacity to find new and better ways of doing things to their imagination. And that is why Mental Health is such a significant issue for the health and well being of australians and their families. But also for how we perform as an economy. That nothing diminishes the Human Capital of australia more than Mental Health. Nothing diminishes what professional he key called amid wealth of our nation. Than that. The debilitating impact of Mental Illness. Unlike other chronic antigenic diseases which we focus on with the billions, and compassion and great attention, Mental Illness often strikes at the prime, of the fron prime of a persons li. Often strikes before they had even properly commenced adulthood. Currently a cause of Mental Illness is estimated to be 4 of gdp in developed countries. The commonwealth alone spends 10 billion a year on Mental Health and safety of this is simple for support services. It is absolutely vital we deliver Mental Health services in a manner that is agile, flexible and modern, and juices 21st century technology. And so today with the minister for health we released the governments response to the national Mental Health commissions review of Mental Health programs and services. Our response is about delivering a modern 21st century Mental Health system. It puts the individual at the center of the Mental Health system. It provides real choice and contestability for Mental Health services. Our priority as the government is on jobs and growth. Its on ensuring that our children and our grandchildren have better jobs in the future, more jobs and better jobs, greater opportunities, more investment, more enterprise. We know that our economic output is a function of participation, population and productivity. Mental illness diminishes participation and it diminishes productivity. Its estimated that around 37 of people affected by Mental Ill Health are either unemployed or not in the labor force. This Mental Health program that weve announced today, these changes, these recommendations weve adopted will strongly contribute to ensuring that where the jobs and growth that australia deserves. Thank you, mr. Speaker. And a caution to the minister for health. What is the government doing to ensure that People Living with mental il