Clinicians but raise standards at our hospital . I am very happy to join my honorable friend in doing that. Making sure that we educate the next generation of doctors nurses and clinicians is vital. Under this government, we have 9,000 more doctors and 3,300 more nurses. We are treating 1. 3 million more people in a and e, and there are 6 million more outpatient appointments. That is what is happening in our nhs, and all credit to the hardworking staff who are carrying out that vital work. Welfare benefit recipients are often demonized as a burden on our taxpayers, but does the Prime Minister agree that the real burden on taxpayers are those employers who can afford to pay well above the minimum wage, thereby lifting hardworking families out of state dependency and food banks . I am in favor of the living wage. Those organizations that can pay the living wage should pay the living wage. It is something that should happen. But in addition to that, what we can help with i hear the leader of the opposition. Doncaster council does not pay the living wage, so perhaps he should start with his own backyard. That shut him up. In addition to that and to seeing the minimum wage rise, we should be taking the lowestpaid people out of tax. Under this government, we have taken 3 million of the lowest paid people out of tax. Order. You have been watching Prime Ministers questions. Question time airs live on cspan2 at 7 a. M. Eastern. Watch any time at cspan. Org, where you can find videos of past Prime Ministers questions and other British Affairs programming. In response to the recent terror attacks in paris, british home secretary theresa may told members of the house of congress the changes to the data bill will not allow the government to snoop on emails, but added the government should have access to phone records to combat terrorism. She took questions from members about additional antiterrorism measures combating antisemitism, and securing the borders. This is just over an hour. Order. Statement by home secretary theresa may. With permission, mr. Speaker, i would like to make a statement about the terrorist attacks in paris, and the threat we face from terrorism in the United Kingdom. It will take some time for us to learn the full details of the attacks last week, but the basic facts are now clear. 17 innocent people were murdered in cold blood, and a number of others were injured. Amedy coulibaly, the terrorist who attacked the jewish supermarket, claimed his actions were carried out in the name of isil. Unconfirmed reports suggest that cherif and said kouachi, the two brothers who attacked the office of Charlie Hebdo, were associated with alqaeda in the Arabian Peninsula in yemen, the same alqaeda affiliate that had been in contact with the men who murdered Fusilier Lee Rigby in 2013. As the appalling events in paris were unfolding, this house was debating the governments counterterrorism and security bill, and the threat level in the United Kingdom, which is set by the independent joint terrorism analysis centre, remains at severe. This means that a terrorist attack in our country is highly likely and could occur without warning. Three serious terrorist plots have been disrupted in recent months alone. Nearly 600 people from this country have travelled to syria and iraq to fight, around half of them have returned, and there are thousands of people from across europe who have done the same. As i said during the passage of the counterterrorism and security bill and have said on many, repeated occasions, the government will do everything they can to keep the public safe. As soon as the attacks in france took place, the government increased security at the uk border. Officers from border force, the police and other organizations intensified checks on passengers, vehicles and goods entering the uk, and we offered the french government all assistance necessary, including the full cooperation of our police and security and intelligence agencies. On sunday, before i attended the peace rally in paris, i held talks with my counterparts from europe, the United States and canada to discuss what action we can take together. There was firm support from all the countries present for new action to share intelligence, track the movement of terrorists and defeat the ideology that lies behind the threat. It is important that we now deliver on those talks, and my officials, the security minister and i will keep up the pace, in particular when it comes to passenger name records, with other european Member States. On monday, the Prime Minister, the defense secretary and i held a security meeting with senior officials to review the paris attacks and the risks to the uk of a similar attack. Of course, we have long had detailed plans for dealing with these kinds of attacks. The house will recall the attacks in mumbai in 2008 when terrorists armed with assault weapons and explosives took the lives of more than 150 people. Since 2010, and learning the lessons of that attack, we have improved our Police Firearms capability and the speed of our military response, and we have enhanced protective security where possible through a range of other measures. We have improved joint working between the Emergency Services to deal specifically with marauding gun attacks. Specialist joint police, ambulance and fire teams are now in place in key areas across england, with equivalents in scotland and wales, and they are trained and equipped to manage casualties in the event of that kind of an attack. The police and other agencies regularly carry out exercises to test the response to a terrorist attack, and these exercises include scenarios that are similar to the events in paris. We will ensure that future exercises reflect specific elements of the paris attacks, so we can learn from them and be ready for them should they ever occur in the United Kingdom. In addition, i should tell the house that the police can call on appropriate military assistance when required across the country. The attacks in paris were enabled by the availability of assault weapons. Although there are obviously a number of illegal weapons in the uk, we have some of the toughest gun laws in the world, and as a result firearms offences make up only a small proportion of overall recorded crime. The types of firearms used in the attacks in paris are not unknown in the uk, but they are extremely uncommon. However, as the Prime Minister has said, we must step up our efforts with other countries to crack down on the illegal smuggling of weapons across borders. In particular, the Member States of the European Union need to Work Together to put beyond use the vast numbers of weapons in the countries of the former yugoslavia and disrupt the supply of weapons from other parts of the world, especially north africa. The measures we have taken following events in paris are in addition to the substantial work that the government have undertaken, and continue to undertake, to counter the threat from terrorism. Last summer, parliament approved emergency legislation to prevent the sudden and rapid loss of access to Communications Data and to provide for the ability to intercept communications where it is necessary and proportionate to do so. Parliament is of course scrutinizing the proposals in the counterterrorism and security bill as we speak. This important legislation will strengthen our powers to disrupt the ability of people to travel abroad to fight, and control their ability to return here. It will also enhance our ability to deal with those in the uk who pose a risk. In particular, it will allow the relocation of people subject to terrorism prevention and investigation measures to other parts of the country. In addition, the Prime Minister has announced funding of £130 million over the next two years for the agencies, police and others, on top of the more than £500 million spent on counterterrorism policing every year. This government have done more to confront the ideology that lies behind the threat we face. I have excluded more foreign hate preachers than any home secretary before me. We have deported abu qatada and extradited abu hamza. We have reformed the prevent strategy so that it tackles nonviolent extremism as well as violent extremism. And we have invested more Time Resources and money in counternarrative operations. We have always been clear that the police and the security agencies must have the capabilities and powers they need to do their job, and following the attacks in paris the Prime Minister has reiterated that commitment. Unfortunately, when it comes to Communications Data and the intercept of communications, there is no crossparty consensus and therefore no parliamentary majority to pass the legislation to give the police and Security Services the capabilities they need. Let me be absolutely clear. Every day that passes without the proposals in the draft Communications Data bill, the capabilities of the people who keep us safe diminish; and as those capabilities diminish, more people find themselves in danger and crimes will go unpunished and innocent lives will be put at risk. This is not, as i have heard it said, letting the government snoop on your emails. It is allowing the police and the Security Services, under a tightly regulated and controlled regime, to find out the who, where, when and how of a communication but not its content, so that they can prove and disprove alibis, identify associations between suspects, and tie suspects and victims to specific locations. It is too soon to say for certain, but it is highly probable that Communications Data were used in the paris attacks to locate the suspects and establish the links between the two attacks. Quite simply, if we want the police and the Security Services to protect the public and save lives, they need this capability. Last weekend people of all nationalities, faiths and backgrounds came out on to the streets of france and other countries to demonstrate their opposition to terror, and to stand for democracy and freedom. We must stand in solidarity with them, and do all that we can to confront extremism and terrorism in all its forms. The attacks last week in paris demonstrated the savagery with which terrorists seek to divide us. The murderous intolerance and the bigotry that they pursue aim to spread fear and also to sow division, which they believe exists, us against them. Paris has not let the terrorists win and we must not do so either. The French Police have been praised for the actions that they took. Charlie hebdo is being published today. Faiths have united, abhorring the antisemitism and grieving for the victims of the attack on the kosher supermarket. Muslims across the world have condemned an attack which is not islamic and is not in the name of their religion, and the brother of the french Muslim Police officer, ahmed merabet, said, my brother was killed by people who pretend to be muslims. They are terrorists. Thats it. the leader of the opposition rightly attended the unity rally in paris along with the Prime Minister, and on saturday i joined people in Trafalgar Square raising pens in solidarity with the je suis charlie cause. In the attack, the terrorists targeted other peaceful religions, they targeted writers, and they targeted those whose job it is to keep us safe. In other words, they targeted both liberty and security, and the response of democratic governments everywhere to these sorts of attacks must be to defend both. Governments need to keep our people safe so that we can enjoy the very freedoms that our democracy depends on. Let me turn to the specific issues in the home secretarys statement. I am concerned about the rushed way that she has made this statement today. I did not see it before coming into the house. I hope that she can set out what the reasons were and what has changed in the home offices position this morning that meant that the statement was changed at late notice. I welcome the action taken by the intelligence agencies and police to support their counterparts in paris. I think the whole house will want to pay tribute to the work of our security and Intelligence Services and the counterterror police, who do so much to keep us safe. It is important that they have the resources they need, and i welcome the resources that the home secretary referred to today. As the home secretary said, the government have going through parliament right now the counterterrorism and security bill, which we have supported and continue to support, and which includes restoring the relocation powers for serious terror suspects that she abolished four years ago and for whose reinstatement we have called. She will know that the agencies have pointed to the ongoing threat in this country posed by the estimated 300 people returning from the conflict in syria. Have any of those estimated 300 been prosecuted . Can she confirm that none of them is currently subject to terrorism prevention and investigation measures, even though these powers are supposed to be for dangerous suspects whose activity needs to be restricted to keep us safe . Are the Security Service and the police now reviewing all those cases to see whether tpims could help, especially with relocation powers restored, or whether there needs to be any further change to the tpims powers, which are different from the previous control orders . How many of the estimated 300 have engaged with the Channel Program . Does she agree that we should now make that compulsory for those returning, for which the current bill does not yet do . On access to dangerous weapons the home secretary will know that there has been concern about reduced customs and border checks. What action is she taking to increase border checks for dangerous weapons . The home secretary raised the issue of Communications Data. Technology is changing all the time, and that means that the law needs to keep up, in the capabilities of the agencies to get the vital intelligence we need and in the oversight that we need. In july, parliament supported emergency legislation to ensure that the agencies and police could maintain vital capabilities. This month, the commons supported extending those powers to ensure that ip addresses are covered in the same way as telephone numbers. In july, all parties agreed to support a review by david anderson, the independent reviewer of terrorism, into the powers and the oversight needed to keep up with changing technology. The home secretary referred to the Previous DataCommunications Bill. That was rejected three years ago by the joint committee that the government established to scrutinize it because, the committee said, it was too vague, too widely drawn, and put too much power directly in the hands of the home secretary. They recommended that the new legislation needed should be drawn up in a far more limited way, and that the government should provide more evidence and clarity about what they wanted to achieve. Since then, the home secretary has not come forward with any revised proposals. She has not come to me to discuss them or put them to parliament, even though we have said that we were happy to discuss details with her. Given the urgency she says there now is, why did she not come forward with revised proposals after the conclusions of the joint committee three years ago . She was happy to agree to the statutory review by david anderson, which is due to report before the election. Today she has not mentioned that review. Has she now discarded it, or will she be waiting for its conclusions . This is an extremely important issue, and the detail, about the powers and capabilities that our intelligence agencies need, as well as about the safeguards and that are also needed. We agree that the police and the agencies need to get the intelligence to keep us safe and that they need updated legislation, and we also need safeguards and stronger oversight to make sure that powers are effectively and appropriately used. I strongly caution the home secretary and the liberal democrats against setting up a caricatured argument between them about security on the one hand and liberty on the other, because we need to protect both in our democracy and we need a responsible debate on getting the detail right. The terrorists targeted both writers and Police Officers on that first day. The editor of Charlie Hebdo had Police Protection to protect his freedom of speech. That shows the strong link between our security and our liberty in any democracy. We know that the most important thing to keep us safe in any democracy is making sure that we have the cohesive communities that can prevent hatred from spreading. We have supported extending prevent by putting it on to a statutory footing. I hope that the home secretary will now listen to the concerns we have expressed over some years about more needing to be done to have communityled programs to tackle the hatred and to challenge the spread of extremism, including through social media, as well as in local communities and organizations. I hope that she will work with local government to that effect. Cannot also ask her a she is working with the Community Security trust on tackling antisemitism, because we need to tackle all forms of extremism . Terrorists try to silence us, to cow us and to divide us. Paris has shown, as millions marched and as we stood in solidarity with them, that we will not be silenced, and that we will not give into fear and into division as we defend our democracy. Although some were targeted in paris, we know that this is about all of us je suis juif, je suis flic, je suis ahmed, and je suis charlie. first, i apologize to the shadow home secretary for her late receipt of the statement. I apologized to her privately when we came into the chamber, but i am happy to reiterate that apology on the floor of the house. I also join her in paying tribute to our counterterrorist police, and, indeed, all our police, and our security and intelligence agencies. We cannot say often enough that these people are working day and night to keep us safe and to protect us. For obvious reasons, as members of our security and intelligence agencies, many of them are unseen and unknown. We are grateful to them for the work they do, and we should publicly recognize their important role. She asked a number of questions covering a number of issues. There is no suggestion, simply because a review was not mentioned in my statement, that we have in any way sidetracked it. David anderson is doing his work. As far as i am aware, he is undertaking discussions with relevant parties about the issues that he is looking at. Alongside that, our own intelligence and Security Committee is conducting its work on questions of privacy, Civil Liberties and security. Those key reviews will be brought before the house in time to enable it to take account of them when it does the necessary job of looking at least at the dripa legislation which is under a sunset clause to 2016. The government publishes the number of people under tpims every quarter. On the question of whether somebody should be put on a tpim, it is for the Security Service to initiate a request to me as home secretary. I of course look at the request, and if i agree to it, a Court Process is then gone through to ensure that such a decision is reasonable. As i say, it is for the Security Service to come forward with any proposals. The right honorable lady asked about making channel compulsory, and the leader of the opposition raised that during Prime Ministers questions. We believe that channel does important work, as does prevent, which works with community groups. On relation to channel, the decision as to whether an individual should be put in a a Channel Program should be taken case by case. We are very clear, as we have been in discussions on the security bill that people returning from syria are returning on our terms. It may be that action may be saw in relation to those individuals and the u. K. But that needs to be on a casebycase basis as what is appropriate to the individual concerned. In relation to the question of firearms, i think there is an issue for us working with the European Union to look at the threat of firearms across the European Union. We have some of the toughest gun laws in the United Kingdom. But we have already seen major exercise being undertaken by the National Crime agency, in looking at the question of availability of firearms in the u. K. That started before we saw these terrible attacks take place in paris. On the Communications Data bill, there is a difference of opinion among parties and house about what power should be taken by government. We did in fact, responding to proposals from joint committee. And we did provide proposals in relation to those measures. I am clear, the Prime Minister is clear that this is an issue that needs to be returned to. It is important, i believe, that we have the right powers available to deal with these issues. Finally, she asked me if we speak to cst. We speak to them on a regular basis. I have had a number of meetings with them. And also the police have meetings with them to discuss the whole question of protective security that is available. And protective security has been stepped up when the threat level was raised, which has been stepped up further. There have been various press reports that the director general of mi five, in his speech on the eighth of january, full called for wider powers for the surveillance agencies. Will the home secretary confirmed that is not the case . In that speech, which we attended in person, the main concern expressed by the director general was the changes in technology that people are using to communicate are making it harder for the agencies to maintain capability to intercept communications of terrorist. Is that not indeed the prime requirement at the present time to ensure that agencies are continuing to be able to exercise the capability they have enjoyed for a number of years, but which, because of new my friend is correct in his description of what mi5 said that speech. It is unfortunate some mix that aspects and sometimes people believe that what the government was trying to do the Communications Bill was to expand the powers of the agency. That is not the case. The general said the ability to Access Communication data is likewise vital unless we maintain this ability, or ability to protect the come country would be that is what the bill was about. That is why we see it as important. Thank you, mr. Speaker. There has been a revolution in communication in the 16 years since i introduced a proposal. There has been beyond argument that it has to be revised. A series debate about the extent of the powers is not remotely help by the parity that these powers are some distinct charter. Since i believe the distance between the2 main two main parties on this is narrow. We can resolve these issues as soon as possible and can ensure that the Intelligence Association and the police capabilities for today and tomorrow which have had in the past under legislation that has been freely agreed by this house. The gentleman is right. The facts of really represented your arguments are accurately represented. Sadly the terminology about that medication bill has set which are not accurate or reflect what were seeing opposed. He is right here it is in horton of all of us important of all is to look at this matter calmly and carefully you consider the powers our agencies need to maintain capabilities. The Prime Minister rate proposal not to allow medications that could not be intercepted. This could cause problems for those who do Online Transactions for banking or shop. Is this genuinely what the home secretary wants to do . [grumbling] we are determined as far as possible this should be no safe spaces for terrorist to communicate. I would have thought that should be a principal that the Prime Minister reiterated in the questioning today. I oppose that would have been rentable, but couldve been held by everybody in this house of commons. As far as i am concerned, the conservative party, our manifesto will make it clear. And that we would use all of the legal powers available to us. Dishy except that the priority does she accept that the priority is to address phobia summit racism, and fascist groups address phobia, racism, and fascist groups . And about prejudices of far too many members . The gentleman is right, but we need to stand up and sent a clear message from everyone in this house that we stand for freedom of the press and our democracy and we oppose the file views that need to we must recognize in this country that we had seen a number of terrorist attacks in this country over the years. The most recent in 2013. We saw the [indiscernible] murder and another murder that was taken by far right extremists here we must fight terrorism and extremism in all its form. [indiscernible] 1 one thing that has come out is the affection of the british people for france. May i just say as chairman of the group between the two parliament that on behalf of i would like to extend our support for our french colleagues and to say that over the last 100 years, our two nations have stood soldiers shoulder to shoulder against tierney. We agree with the comments my honorable friend has made pete we stand with france against terror and standing up for freedom and democracy. I have to say it was a moving experience to be part of the march that to face in paris. To see so many people come it was nearly 4 million people. But also the reaction of the people alongside the march were expressing confidently their support for all those who are standing for freedom, freedom the press, but also freedom of our democracy. I would like to join the home sector and members of all side of housing combination of the terrorist attacks in paris and put in our appreciation for those who work hard to keep our society safe. They went into great detail. Safety is important for all of us. Could you update the house of what was discussed . How does the u. K. Plan to cooperate with the scottish and Irish Government . The official talks are taking place about the preparedness for an attack similar to that which took place in paris. We worked closely with administrations. We had close work with the Scottish Government last year in preparation and joint exercises. I have to say the cooperation and interaction between scotland and forces in england is very good. Obviously the thoughts of cooperation that has taken place is important. We will continue to talk at every level. Is the speaker where the prophet mohammed moved to medina , he did not set up a set. Counter face you do not set up a counter face . He created a multifaceted society where jews and christians have the right to worship maintain their faith . Im grateful to my honorable friend for pointing that out and elucidating that. But i think that is very clear and everyone is clear that this that talks are not about islam. It is clear that these attacks were not undertaken in their name. That is a clear message we should reiterate. The home secretary satisfied with the capacity of the london fire and rescue service to respond to terror outbreaks that may occur . And the closure of fire stations including one particular for a station, which includes major hospitals airway stations, a major tourist attractions, which may there will be the target of terrorism . Work has been done as i indicated. Weve also introduce the joint Emergency Services in the program. Obviously we continue to update and revise where necessary. We could ensure that our services could do the jobs we all want them to do. Is abundantly clear from numerous sources that this Communications Data is crucial. It would save those who threaten suicide. It would change told jeanette risk and other types of incidents and crimes as well as terrorist. They said there was a gap. I dont wish to be unkind to the honorable gentleman. Come on. Cut to the chase. [laughter] i want to get to everyone. Sure question. Sit down. Short question. Then sit down. With a support Communications Data . And grateful to my honorable friend pointing out the significant number of people in positions where they are aware of the impact of Communications Data. I hope everyone in this house will understand and appreciate the importance of ensuring that as far as possible are no safe spaces for terrorist to communicate. They would be aware in the case of the bombings in the brutal murder in [indiscernible] and now they are responsible for what happened in paris last week here. How can we get smarter to review cases that appears as if those individuals or networks clearly do pose a threat . The gentleman is correct. It was an aspect the committee referred to in the report they wrote on the murders. It is a matter which i had discussions with the security. The number of issues that we need to continue to account. But also the question of the potential terrorist and criminal activity. Mr. Speaker, can add my voice to those updating the communication ability merely to keep up with changes in technology . I also invite the home secretary to use this latest incident as a case study to study what the journey is. What is a psychological journey . It is of course important. Preventing people from being radicalized, we look at the factors that determine or the factors in play when someone does become a terrorist or indeed is radicalized. So we can better ensure we can prevent that radicalization. But i also say to my honorable friends this would be complex. There would be many involved. Is good a gap amongst Police Forces across to europe and china tracked on online terrorist, tears and has no national foundrys appeared is she confident that the structures that currently exist and the sharing of information across to europe and across the atlantic . What sorts of actions can be taken by the internet companies. She would not be looking at the organization like the Internet Watch Foundation that would yield specifically deal specifically with counterterrorism . As appropriate to do so across and between countries is a matter we discussed at that meeting that was held convened by the French Interior minister on sunday. We will be working with other countries, but also organizations, to make sure we can get the maximum benefit from the sharing of information. I would amount how citizen opposition i would remind the house the opposition. Mr. Timothy . It led to the iraq war. Which agree that the outrage may be wrought out of wisdom and not [indiscernible] i think it is entirely right that we should respond in a sober and careful way. I say to my friend that is precisely what i in the Prime Minister have done in the comments i have made. Im sure the whole house is pleased that islam had nothing to do with the attacks in paris. Decrying of who could murder . These that all muslims were to blame for it he asked him to get a grip of fox news and the socalled terrorist experts. He said around insulting everyone with their silly comments. I agree with honorable lady. It is important that we do reiterate the message that this is not about islam. It is about a perversion of islam. There are muslims in this country in other countries around the world who condemned these acts of violence and acts of terrorism. As i said earlier, they are sending a clear message. This is not in their name. Freedom of the press means feed him that freedom of the press. With the home secretary considers, spoken english to be part of the british associate, i believe shared values and shared language are the underpinnings of a strong society. Particularly women in communities. It might pacify young men who might try to copy extreme behavior seen in paris last week. I say to my honorable friend that the government has increased a requirement in relation to english capabilities. The ability to speak english and understand english. He mentions the role of women. Can i commend sarah who has once again stood up and spoken about this issue . I attended last year and inspirational event that she held. Taking a stand campaign that she was running with muslim women around the country. They wish to take a stand for those not analyzing who wish to radicalized young people in the community. Speaker with the secretary join in rejecting the new imperialism that we hear after incidents like this which seeks to condemn the killings, but somehow excuses the actions by blaming ourselves and in this case by saying that it was somehow unnecessarily provocative . Disagree we cannot continue and we must agree that responsibility for these actions lies squarely with those who kill innocent people . [grumbling agreements] they are criminals. We shouldnt ever let anyone forget that. Can i welcomed the statement and oppress upon my friend that i welcomed her words but ask her to be mindful places of worship were often mainstream tolerant, open opinion is often marginalized and create a vacuum and allow extremism to thrive . I share concerned to ensure that we are dealing with extremism in all its forms and where it appears and to be mindful of issues that he has raised. I wanted to put the record straight. These people are totally condemned on the attack. She said after the joint committee bill, she had proposals. What are they . Where are they . When will we see them . Can i first of all commend the honorable gentleman for the comment he had just made. It is important i would summit like a substance up in this chamber and makes a a clear message about terrorism, none of the support terrorism in this chamber, we condemn it absolutely. We did prepare and indeed indicate to people the areas where we were willing to make changes. Thank you mr. Speaker. It is important that security is maintained. The Immediate Response to the attack in paris increase security and the checks that were taking place. It is also important i think that we recognize within this United Kingdom there are people and friday of faith and no faith. What isnt and a variety of faith and no faith. What is important that we accept that there are people who have different beliefs. If we disagree, a way to discuss that is through discussion. People should be able to worship through the way they wish to. The scenes in paris were not just the attack on france, but an attack on peace freedom and islam. This is a clash of civilizations. It is a street fight the between right and wrong between humanity and insanity. On that basis, could i urge a caution . It was time to react is when it is wrong. You cannot defeat extremism with extreme reactions. Family, the true muslim with the policeman who lost his own life protecting the freedom of the publication to ridicule his own faith and in his tragic story received the obvious truth freedom is the right to be wrong. It is never the right to do wrong. [grumbling agreements] i commend the arguments the gentleman has made. The brother of the policeman murdered gave a dignified response. One that we could all recognize and support. It is important that we do recognize that these people who carry out these attacks are criminal, terrorists. Theyre not doing this in the name of any religion and we should be clear about the message we get. Julian smith. Will the home secretary confirm she will be inspired by the patriotism of the noble head of mi5 and avoid any consultation with the deputy Prime Minister is on these issues who during this Program Interview and put parties over National Security . I believe it is important that we maintain those capabilities. At that. Abbott. The slaughter we saw in paris last week, security measures must be paramount. Reach out to the marginalized in the country that mirror the marginalized from which those killers came. People pedal violent hatred. Is is important that we are looking at the issues that matter to people. I think everyone around the country like the issues of availability of jobs edging tatian, of services education, services. The Muslim Community has been quick to condemn the goingson in paris they will be commemorating this year. To they agree the survival of recent events demonstrate if properly defended the pen can be mightier than the sword . I pay tribute to my honorable friend and the constituencies he represents. It is right that we celebrate the anniversary of that document this year. It has survived on those principles. It is testament to the fact and also to the response to the attacks and the murders of those cartoonists and journalists to make absolutely clear that the pen is mightier than the sword. The lessons of paris over this isnt unity and indeed in fraternity that we should keep together on this. We must keep together across the parties and we must have a dialogue and colonization with the vast majority with the muslim people the country who are law abiding and want to help us defeat terrorists. He is indeed right. Many want to help defeat terrorism as well and want to ensure that they are plentiful part in our society and it is rightly make every link we can with them in doing that. Some undoubtedly would view this as being intimidating and censoring. That is reason enough to reprint. To my friends agree that true free speech includes the right to insult and a friend offend . If we dont defend free speech cast aside those who push the boundaries of free speech . I absolutely agree with my honorable friend. It should be the case. Freedom of the press meets the press should be free to publish what they choose to publish within the law of course. As the Prime Minister reiterated, freedom of the press means that we should accept that they can publish what they wish to publish within the law you we shouldnt set artificial boundaries on that. Speaker, conducted the house on how theyre are working to reach people of the grassroots to work with young people . Whatever they do through new legislation, the Security Service cannot be everywhere at the network on the ground is the most important. And happy to give the honorable lady some configurations. Some are classified as priority areas. Our more supported areas. All of which are eligible for funding for projects. Help it is ensuring its job to do better. On monday, we met with parents at a school in my constituency. Can you take this opportunity about the rise of antisomatic antisemite attacks . I think this is important. I have met on a number of occasions with many leaders. We are committed to ensuring that the work in the trust of others is supported in keeping jewish communities safe. I have also the police have talked with others and with individual institutions about the detective securities that could be provided and have been provided in certain areas to ensure that the is that greater support that is given. Im very clear that nobody should feel that there are likely to be subject to the tax we have been seeing too much of in the United Kingdom. It is very court and that people are able to live in this country to follow important that people could follow their faith and live free of fear. A leading of them spokesperson was telling bbc that the west brought this on themselves with the foreign policy. Would you join with me in calling for all those within leadership in the Muslim Community to say and do nothing which would give justification for people to believe that terrorism is justified and to realize that this only creates it is absolutely right that it is important for those to make it very clear that the terrorist attacks are not about the religion or faith. They are not in their name. It is also important that we ensure that a clear message is sent and that the only people responsible for terrorist attacks are the terrorist themselves. Interception of the Communications Data is critical. If the liberal democrats will not support what is needed or the defense of our nation, with my friend from that necessary legislation to fill the latest gaps will feature manifesto and the next parliament . We are very clear we would take that legislation forward. Could they stop attacks on israeli and jewish property . Yes. Im very happy to have had a number of meetings myself, but please have also been meeting with Jewish Police have also been meeting with jewish officials to provide security for synagogues and so forth. And where prosecution is possible, taken forward. A new term for terrorist would undermine democracy. Could the home secretary confirm whether those are because they have been blocked by the little democrats question given so, given the comments and in light of recent events, it has not been possible to take those particular proposals forward on a government basis. I was also very clear and i have said so in the speeches i gave that it is the conservative partys intention to take that forward. Thank you. The strategy is keyed to prevent radicalization. Given the new responsibilities of school and colleges and universities, would it be allocated and what training and supporting is being provided . The funding has increased over recent years. It is part of the 130 Million Pounds that the Prime Minister announced. The majority that will be for agencies and other funding for the home office. Like a couple of earlier speakers come in 2012i was a member of the joint committee looking for the community patience. Communications. Without we could improve the bill. Were my friend confirm that in future legislation those safeguards would be considered and hopefully included . Id be very happy to confirm that. That continues to be my view. For the capabilities of the people and the security of the entire United Kingdom, how safe dish you think the prime agency is in how important is it that it is fully operational and all other United Kingdom particularly Northern Ireland . I believe it does play an important role. I think it is a valuable agency did think it shows the benefit of having set up a National Crime agency