Transcripts For CNNW Wolf 20180626

From the Supreme Court with details. Jessica, we may have to interrupt you. Were about to get the tape of the president at the white house. Once be we get the tape, well his reaction to all of this. Tell us how the Supreme Courts decision ruled in the president s favor. Quite simply, wolf, chief Justice John Roberts wrote the majority opinion, and he said the president has brought authority to protect National Security by enacting this particular travel ban. Justice john roberts, he put it quite simply, in fact, saying the proclamation is squarely in the scope of president ial authority. So the court ruling today that both under federal Immigration Law and the constitution, it was within the president s right to enact this wideranging travel ban that affects seven different countries. So while the lower courts and the challengers to this had seized upon the president s statements, calling for a muslim ban when he was the candidate, not yet president , the chief justice in his majority opinion said that it was not the courts job to denounce these statements, and instead since the proclamation and the travel ban was neutral on its face, the president s authority would stand. Of course, this was a 54 decision, and joining the majority was that crucial swing vote, Justice Anthony kennedy. He wrote a concurring opinion. He sent maybe a direct message to the president that words, in fact, matter. Then there were the four liberal justices who did dissent. In fact, justices breyer and sotomayor read theirs from the bench this morning, disagreeing with the justice opinion. In fact, Justice Sotomayor issued a very scathing dissent where this ruling hold on, jessica, the president was meeting with republican lawmakers and committees talking about border walls, amo other issues. Lets listen in. The fact that todays Supreme Court ruling just coming out a tremendous success, a tremendous victory for the american people, and for our constitution. This is a great victory for our constitution. We have to be tough and we have to be safe and we have to be secure. At a minimum, we have to make sure that we vet people coming into the country. We know who is coming in. We know where theyre coming from. We just have to know who is coming here. The ruling shows that all of the attacks from the media and the democrat politicians are wrong and theyve turned out to be very wrong. And what were looking for as republicans, i can tell you, is strong borders, no crime. What the democrats are looking at is open borders, which will bring tremendous crime. It will bring ms13 and lots of others that we dont want to have in our country. It will bring tremendous crime. So i will always be defending the sovereignty, the safety and the security of the american people. Thats why i was put here. Were discussing today the funding of the wall, which we very much need. We started the wall, were spending a lot of energy and a lot of time and started up in san diego and other places. Its under construction now. We have 1. 6 billion, but were going to ask for an increase in wall spending so we can finish it quicker. It stops the drugs, it stops people that we dont want to have, and it gives us security and safety. And with that, i think we might just take a quick spin around the room, talk to a couple of the folks, and maybe senator, ill ask you, do you want to say a couple words about why were here and what were doing . So were going to continue to monitor this tape by the president going around the room now, hearing from various republican lawmakers, members of the various congressional appropriations committees. He wants full funding for his border wall with mexico. Well continue to watch that. But i quickly want to go to our senior White House Correspondent jeff zeleny. Hes over at the white house. What else are you hearing . The president saying this is a tremendous victory despite Supreme Court decision. Going after democrats once again saying they simply want open borders which will lead to tremendous crime. What else are you hearing over there, jeff . Reporter wolf, there is no question the president doing this, in the words of a white house official, as vindication. They are going to use the Supreme Court ruling as essentially an anthem for their Midterm Election message on immigration. The president believes the simplest way, surefire way to fire up his base of supporters is through immigration. You hear it broken down there very simply. Democrats want open borders. Of course, democrats certainly would push back on that suggestion. But a key question, wolf, comes at the end of this long session, some 39 minutes. He was asked by reporters in the room, im told, if he is emboldened by the Supreme Court ruling. He said, yes, indeed, he is, and thats when he said its a tremendous victory. What were seeing here now, the president , of course, not really talking much about the nuance of that ruling, not talking about the fablct the travel ban went through three different versions and a long, winding road to this day. He is claiming victory on this. Indeed, it is a big victory for his administration, but hes going to try to par llay that io a Midterm Election subject. On the appropriations committee, he still has not gotten wall funding, some 25 billion. This is a republicancontrolled congress, of course, so thats what he is asking them for today. All the while, the immigration bills are still stuck in the house. Wolf . Well continue to monitor all of that. Jeff zeleny at the white house. Thank you. Lets get some insight into this Supreme Court ruling. Joining us, shan wu and joan. You heard all the arguments inside the white house. The republican appointed justices the majo. Thats why there was a 54 decision. They would say thats not why it was a 54 decision, but you have chief Justice Sotomayor talking down the travel ban. The chief brought up some examples of what the president had said as candidate, and then afterward, once he was sworn in. And he said, you know, were not turning our back on those. The chief wanted a signal that the court was not turning its back on those statements, but he was saying those statements dont matter in the larger scheme of things. Now, Justice Sotomayor, who you just referred to, she is an appointee of barack obamas, she said those statements matter. Those statements show what the government was really trying to do with a muslim ban. And to turn away from religious liberty and endorsed this executive order really turns away from the nationsromise of religious liberty. And as im sure youve heard all morning, wolf, she likened it to the decision in koramatsu in 1944 when the government took thousands of americans and put them in camps. This was the third version of the travel ban, as you well know, and it considerably changed from what the president originally said. We have the clip of what he originally said as a candidate back in 2015 about a ban on muslims coming the ud states. Listen to this. Were going to win it. Were going to win it. Were going to apply common sense. Were going to apply intelligence. And were never quitting and were never going away, and were never, ever giving up. The best way to keep Foreign Terrorists or, as some people would say in certain instances, radical islamic terrorists from attacking our country is to stop them from entering our country in the first place. Thats what he said as president of the United States. But earlier he had said he wanted a complete travel ban, complete ban on all muslims coming into the United States. And then also as a candidate, as president , by the way, on the 5th of june, 2017, he said in a tweet, the Justice Department should have stayed with the original travel ban, not the watereddown politically correct version they submitted to the Supreme Court. If they would have stayed with the original one, the Supreme Court wouldnt have said it was constitutional. Z thats exactly right, wolf. I think it took them three times, three times is the charm for them, to undo that damage he did for that legislative effort. Justice sotomayors reaction is the reaction of most americans, that there is clearly antimuslim bias here, but the court focused on a couple key points. First, they emphasized neutrality of this versions language. And of course the big difference here is that they expanded the list of countries to include some nonmuslim countries. Also, i think in 2. 0 version of the ban, they removed some language that clearly favored nonmuslims over muslims in the Refugee Status ach. A lot of changes had been made. Chief john roberts stressed the worldwide review, stressed the hand of the secretary of the Homeland Security again to say, its not what donald trump wanted, its what the administration wanted and it was vetted. I think youre exactly right. Whats the broad message the Supreme Court has now set as far as the president s powers involving immigration . Well, i think they have really doubled down on his that he won these core powers in immigration. I think one of the things that bodes some troubling views in the future is the president feels quite emboldened by this. I think thats right. Wolf, the Supreme Court historically have given president s wide latitude in this area. Thats why there was a lot of precedent that challenges were up against. What the challenges were saying was this is actually different. This is different what donald trump has done, and for the Supreme Court to say, no, its actually not different, and to say his executive order was actually more comprehensive than orders that president s reagan and president carter had done in the past was significant to these five justices in the majority. A very significant decision by the United States Supreme Court. Guys, thank you very much. Lets get some more reaction. Joining us from capitol hill right now, republican congressman francis rudy of florida. Whats your reaction, congressman, on the Supreme Courts ruling of the president s travel ban . I think that despite all the clumsiness and difficulties in getting this thing done which your people just described better than i could, the ban of vetting all people, including venezuela, is probably a decent idea. If you take a look at the 3. 0 version, this third version, as far as venezuela is concerned, the ban only includes, and im reading specifically from the law, entry of certain venezuelan government officials and their immediate family members as nonimmigrants on some business and tourist visa suspended. So its very limited as far as venezuela is concerned. As far as libya and syria, it basically says no one can come into the United States. So there are significant differences in this nuanced third version, right . There are, but that will help. Venezuela has been sending people back and forth to the United States, stashing money for ag time, and i think the individual sanctions that we put on as well as Something Like this ban should be helpful as far as venezuela goes. One of your democratic colleagues, Keith Ellison of minnesota, he issued a statement. Let me read in part to you what he said. He said, todays decision undermines the core values of religious tolerance on which america was founded. I am deeply disappointed that this ruling gives legitimacy to discrimination and islamophobia. Keith el ellison being one of t two muslims in this administration. It has a tred track record, but whe it is right now, the way i look at it, is the way to impede unvetted people particularly from syria from getting into the country. Weve heard from a lot of generals, a lot of intelligence officials, that its a real problem properly vetting people with no birth records, no historical family records, nobody knows who they are, in syria right now. Yeah, most of the syria ban involves syria, yemen, libya, somalia. To a lesser degree iran, but also some specifics there. Let me move to a sensitive issue unfolding today. I want to get your reaction, congressman, to the president s attacks on harleydavidson, the motorcycle manufacturer here in the United States following the companys decision to at least move some production out of the United States because of the new trade tariffs. The president tweeted this, and ill read it to you. The president hes been venting about his frustrations all morning, insisting harleydavidson is just using these tariffs as an excuse, andn making. Republican senator ben sass of nebraska fired back at the president s comments saying this. He said, this will go over like a vespa at sturgis. The problem isnt that harleydavidson is unpatriotic, its that tariffs are stupid. What do you say . Im not a proponent of tariffs. I think the wt system has worked very well concerning the global system of the economy and its lifted people out of poverty and its made our own grow as well. You look at mercedesbenz and bmw and alabama with a mercedesbenz plant. Thats no different than harleydavidson putting a plant in germany. Thats a fair point. There are a lot of Foreign Companies who built plants here in the United States to sell their vehicles, their automobiles, to americans. The president says harleydavidson is moving production over to europe. He says that, in his words, is the beginning of the end for them. He had welcomed them early on in his administration. There was an event at the white house on the south lawn with a lot of harleydavidson motorcycles, but now hes really going after them. Is that wise . I dont know what his motive is, but i know that were playing with fire to upset the interdependent trade relationships and supply chains that have been driving global growth. Because hes really going after them. They think these 30 tariffs are going to stop the ability of europeans to buy harleydavidson. They say they have no choice but to build a factory over there so they could avoid that 30 tariff. So from their business standpoint, that makes sense, right . It does. And see, it would be a real mistake to upset these relationships that exist all over the world just like youre talking about and like the two car instances i mentioned. The trade relationships have brought the world together, lowered cost, and a lot more people benefit from lower aluminum and steel prices than a few producers might benefit from higher ones. In fact, were seeing the same thing with newsprint right now. Ive had people from the media in to see me, that there is one mill in the United States thats hiding behind some very high tariffs that are being proposed for canada, and its just not right. What is also true is that all of these tariffs, if there is a fullscale trade war between the u. S. , lets say, and canada, mexico, the European Union, china, india, a whole bunch of other countries, japan, south korea, in the end its going to be a hidden tax on american consumers, because all these products, theres going to be a higher cost for all of them, and thats something the u. S. Economy is certainly not going to want. Congressman rooney, thanks as usual for joining us. Wolf, thank you again. Well have much more on the breaking news out of the u. S. Supreme court. Plus were getting word that President Trump just took another shot at senator john mccain over his health care vote. Were going to play it for you. Stand by for that. Also, migrant parents separated from their own children. An emotional mother says her fouryearold son thinks they deserted him. Well stand by for andrew cuomo. Home delivery on sleep number 360 smart beds. Ends june 30th. Directv gives you more for your thing. If youve been waiting for a sign to quit cable, then heres some signs. It came from the toaster. Now you can quit cable. Switch to directv and now get a 100 reward card. More for your quitting cable thing. Thats our thing. Call 1 800 directv. The nations largest seniorliving referral service. For the past five years, ive spoken with hundreds of families and visited seniorcare communities around the country. And ive got to tell you, todays seniorliving communities are better than ever. These days, there are amazing amenities, like movie theaters, exercise rooms and swimming pools, public cafes, bars, and bistros, even petcare services. And nobody understands your options like the advisers at a place for mom. These are local, expert advisers that will partner with you to find the Perfect Place and determine the right level of care, whether thats just a helping hand or fulltime memory care. Best of all, its a free service. There is never any cost to you. Senior living has never been better, and theres never been an easier way to get great advice. Call today. Place for mom at advice. You know your family, we know senior living. Together well make the right choice. You know your family, we know senior living. I saw my leg did not look right. I landed. I was just finishing a ride. I felt this awful pain in my chest. I had a pe blood clot in my lung. I was scared. I had a dvt blood clot. Having one really puts you in danger of having another. My doctor and i chose xarelto®. Xarelto®. To help keep me protected. Xarelto® is a latestgeneration blood thinner thats. Proven to treat and reduce the risk of dvt or pe blood clots from happening again. In clinical studies, almost 98 of patients on xarelto® did not experience another dvt or pe. Xarelto® works differently. Warfarin interferes with at least 6 of your bodys natural bloodclotting factors. Xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. Dont stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase risk of blood clots. While taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. President trump now answering questions from reporters. We got to get going. A lot of bad things are happening, and i think were doing it incredibly well. We have bad laws. We have the worst Immigration Laws in the history of the world. Its a joke. People cant believe it. Other countries look at us and they say, how is that possible . Somebody touches our land, we now take them to a court, to a judge. They want us to choose 5,000 judges. How do you choose 5,000 judges . Can you imagine the corruption just from a normal standpoint, just common sense. Can you imagine the corruption . Go to the barber shop, grab somebody, make him a judge. Everybody is being made a judge. They want 5,000 judges more. Its crazy. In other countries its called, im sorry, you cant come in. You have to leave. This one we have judges. If they step on our land, we have judges. Its insane. So were going to have to change our whole immigration policy. I was saying last night in south carolina, when i came in, i inherited some things. We inherited north korea. Thats going real well. We inherited hard trade deals. Thats going really well. Nobody knows whats happening behind the scenes, but these countries i dont blame them, i blame our people. But they have just been ripping us for years. They want to negotiate so badly, you have no idea. We inherited a lot of different things, but of all of them, immigration makes the least sense. It is a hodgepodge of laws that have been put together over the years and we have to change it. Its so simple. Its called, im sorry, you cant come in. You have to go through a legal process. You dont have to see a judge where the judge is going to take three years before you can come back. In the meantime, you never come back because youre already in the country. Youre someplace in the country. And that would be bad, but its really bad when its a criminal. And we have plenty of them coming into the country this way. And they use the children. They use these Young Children for their own benefit. So we have to change the whole immigration picture. Well be able to do it. We need the border wall, we need the border, we need border security. And we need modern equipment and well get it done, i have no doubt. Anybody else who would like to say something, anybody . We okay . Well let these guys go out and have lunch. On trade, there are some people who are saying that your tariff threats threatened to plunge the economy into a recession. Harleydavidson announced that its moving a plant to thailand. Youve been very critical about that. They announced it early this year. Harleydavidson is using that as an excuse, and i dont like that, because ive been very good to harleydavidson. They use it as an excuse. I think people who ride harleys arent happy with harleydavidson, and i wouldnt be, either. Mostly companies are coming back to our country. I was the one that explained to harley about 100 tax in india where they had a tariff of 100 , and i got it down to a much lower number. I think its 50 , which is far too much. But they were paying 100 tariff. Now Prime Minister modi brought it way down but its still way too high. I will say this, john. Other countries are negotiating. And without tariffs, you could never do that. If they dont want to negotiate, then well do the tariffs. Just remember, were the bank. Were the bank that everybody wants to steal from and plunder. And it cant be that way anymore. We lost 500 billion last year with china. We lost 151 billion with the European Union, which puts up trade barriers so that our farmers cant trade. We cant send Farm Products in, for the most part. Its very hard to send cars in. We have countries where, as an example, india, they charge as much as 100 tariff. We want the tariffs removed. What i would like to do and what i offered at the g7, you remember, i said, lets drop all tariffs and all barriers. Is everybody okay with that . And nobody said yes. I said, wait a minute, folks, youre complaining. No tariffs and no barriers. Youre on your own. Lets do it. It was like they couldnt leave the room fast enough. Wouldnt you say its a Risky Business here, you could tip the economy into recession . Were so high up, we picked up 40 if you look at the kind of numbers we have picked up, its up almost 40 , the market. And the real market is the overall, and the overall is up much more than that. But we picked up about 8 trillion in value doing what were doing. Now, weve got a little bit of uncertainty because of trade. To me there is no uncertainty, and to other people that happen to be smart, there is no uncertainty. But we cant allow the European Union to take out 151 billion out of the United States. We cant allow mexico to have a nafta deal that gives them over 100 billion. And i call it profit. You know, you can divide that up any way you want to do it. I call it profit. We cant allow mexico to take 100 billion. We cant give, john, anywhere from 375 to 100 to 500. Its 375. Some people, depending on your formula, 375 billion. It could be 504 billion. Its a tremendous amount of money being taken out of our economy. We have to straighten it out now. Whats happening, we put steel tariffs on. Our Steel Industry is going through the roof. U. S. Steel Just Announced theyre expanding or building six new facilities. Last night in south carolina, right go ahead, georgetown steel. The factory has been closed, the plant has been closed for how long, lindsey . About three years. But whats interesting, its a british company. A Steel Manufacturing company in britain bought georgetown steel to make steel here. Right . Solar panels, we put tariffs on solar panels, 30 . We had 52 dirchfferent factorie. Now theyre starting to open again. We had 32. We had two that were open. Everyone else was closed because of what came in from other places, in particular, china. Now we have seven that are opening and many more are considering and the two that were dying and they were going to close, theyre thriving right now. Washing machines. They were being dumped all over the country. Not good ones, by the way. Ones that didnt work really well. And now theyre opening up washing machines. We put a 30 tariff on them. So tariffs can be a very positive thing. In the old days when we had tear l tariffs, we didnt have income tax. When people wanted to come in, they had to pay a price. When they wanted to come in and raid our treasury, they had to pay a price. We didnt have income tax. You didnt need income tax. We didnt have debt. So were doing this, i will say, in every instance, in every country you can mention has been extremely nice, even less to the media probably, but extremely nice. They want to negotiate a deal. And were open to that. Were open to that. But its going to be very strong. We are putting on tariffs on certain industries. We cant lose our Steel Industry. Our Steel Industry was ready to go out of business. It was at the bottom. Our aluminum industry was ready to go out of business. Now the Steel Industry is thriving. Think of it. United states steel. First time in 35 years theyre actually expanding. Its going up. They are building new places. Georgetown steel closed for three or four years. They announced yesterday theyre opening up their plant. Its been closed for four years, i think they said, in south carolina. No, were doing the right thing, 100 . And you have them on both sides. Some people agree, some people dont agree. The bottom line is countries are coming back now to negotiate, including European Union wants to negotiate. Because if they dont, were going to tax their cars. They send mercedes in, they send bmws in. They pay almost no tax. When we send cars to the European Union, they charge us a tremendous tax. Five times greater than what we charge them. But more importantly, they dont want our cars. They have a barrier. We dont want your cars. But if you do get it in, youre going to pay a tax. With china, if we send a car to china, they charge us a 25 tax. So we make a car, we send it to china, we want to compete. Thats not free trade. Thats stupid trade. So we send 25 tax. When they make a car in china and they send it here, we charge them 2. 5 . So we get 2. 5 , china gets 25 . Thats not fair, thats not free, thats just stupid. Mr. President , where are we at in terms of Chinese Investment restrictions . Its not just chinese. Its we dont want people coming in hey, look, we are a very smart country. We have the most incredible people in silicon valley. We dont want china and other countries. Its not necessarily them in particular because they covered it incorrectly. They had either a leaker that didnt exist or a leaker that didnt know his business very well. They gave it to bloomberg and they gave it to, i believe, the wall street journal, and it was either a bad leak by somebody that didnt know, but probably they just made up the story and there was no leak. In the long term, im not sure my political friends would agree, but i think theyre leaks made up by the writers. They dont exist, the leak. But this was a leak that was just off. We want to have our jewels, those are our great jewels. Thats like the United States deal from 70 years ago. We have to protect these companies. We cant let people steal that technology. We have the greatest technology in the world. People copy it and they steal it. We have the great scientists, we have the great brains and we have to protect that. And were going to protect it. And thats what we were doing. And that can be done through siphius, we have a lot of things that can be done through. Were working that out. The bottom line is we have charged a very substantial tax to some people. They are coming back to negotiate, and frankly, if they dont negotiate, im okay with that because i would rather get the tax. What about the ban . The Supreme Court ruling was a significant victory for this country and the constitution. The Supreme Court ruling was a tremendous victory for our country. Will we go ahead with it, though . Of course. What do you think, i wouldnt go ahead with it . Its also the idea of deporting people without due process as well. We have to find a system where you dont need thousands of judges sitting at a border. Other countries look at us and they think were crazy. They say, what kind of a thing is that . They have countries where they have no problem with people pouring in, and you have countries where people do want to go in. And if you look at the European Union, theyre meeting right now to toughen up their immigration policies because theyve been overrun. They have been overrun. And frankly a lot of those countries are not the same places anymore. And im sad to say it, and i said that at the g7. They are not the same places. But we had a tremendous victory today, and we greatly appreciate it. We needed it as a country. That was a big victory for and i can tell you everyone at this table is very happy about it. But that was a big victory for our country, okay . Do you have a final word, sir . Well, i think its pretty much a final word. Its Supreme Court. We went up and we just waited for the Supreme Court. Thats the final word. Thats the Supreme Court. Now, do i want to go in with a different one and maybe a different variety . I dont think theres any reason. Its a strong victory. How much do you want forhe wall funding . Were spending 1. 6 billion now. There is a plan for another 1. 6 billion, but id like to ask this room if we can increase it. I think in light of whats happened with the drugs, with the human smuggling, with all of the problems, we have to have the wall. We have to have the wall. You know, in the walls you have ports of entry. You have ports of entry. Thats where people come through. And they can come through legally. And bit wy the way, i want peopo come into our country. Our country is doing so well, and we have Companies Moving into our country at numbers like nobody has seen in a long time. We need workers. So i want people to come in. They have to come in through the merit system, though. They have to come in so that they can help our country and these companies. In wisconsin, you have foxcon, one of the Great Companies of the world. They make the laptop for apple and iphones and a lot of theyre building a tremendous plant right now in wisconsin. They need workers. I to let people come in. But they have to come in through merit. They have to be people that can love our country and help our country, okay . Thank you all very much. All right, so the president , you heard him answering some questions from reporters. Hes been meeting with republican lawmakers over at the white house on three issues strongly defending the tariffs. Hes now opposing against imports coming into the United States from various countries including canada, mexico, the European Union, china. Also strongly defending his hard line views on immigration, including asking these members for a lot more money to build that border wall with mexico and saying that the u. S. Supreme Court Decision supporting his travel ban, 54 decision earlier in the day, is a tremendous victory, he says, for the american people. Lets bring in the governor of new york, andrew cuomo, and get his reaction to all of these issues. Governor, thank you so much for joining us. First leet talk about the president s views on immigration and specifically you have, what, about a thousand children who have been separated from their parents that are now being kept in your state, in new york state . How is that working out . Well, wolf, we have here thanks for having me. We have about 1200 unaccompanied alien children, as they refer to it, uac. We dont know the number that has actually been separated. Weve been trying to get it from hhs, but i think part of the chaos is they dont know, either. Look, when you put it all together, the president has been remarkably consistent. He started this in the campaign, he started a, frankly, tone of divisiveness in this country. Immigration is bad, whether its the muslim travel ban or its stopping people at the border and separating them from their families. This was his campae. He tried three times with the muslim travel ban, the Supreme Court which is his court made a political decision, a bad decision, i think a really shameful decision, but it was a political decision enabled, by the way, by a Republican Senate that made a political decision by not giving president barack obama an appointee. The president just said in that clip, i support the constitution. What he is doing with families on the border separating children violates the constitution. You cant support the constitution when it serves you and not when it gets in your way. Our position is it violates the constitution, it violates due process, violates equal protection and violates the administrative procedures act. New york and 15 other states are suing the federal government today on that basis. Talk about that. What is that lawsuit that you are now putting forward . Give us some specific details. Yeah. The president announced the zero tolerance policy april 7th with the department of justice. What that says is were arresting everyone, were detaining the parents. By law they cant put children in detention facilities, therefore they had to separate the children. That started this whole chaos. It was the president s political desire to do this, but the policy and the program didnt follow. So now you have the issue of separation of children. Hhs has to scramble and send them all over the country. That is viol ativ e of the current law. Noncitizens, undocumented people, still have rights in this country. One of the fundamental Due Process Rights is the care, custody and control of their children. That was violated by the family separation policy. Equal protection violation, because its primarily on the southern border. And third, an administrative procedures act violation laws they Just Announced it in an arbitrary and capricious way. And today, wolf, you cant even tell what the policy is. The custom and Border Patrol say that theyre suspending arrests of families with children. The department of justice says theyre not. The white house says they are, but only temporarily. So its total chaos, but it is illegal. So tell us what youre going to speckifically what are yo going to do about it . Explain this lawsuit. Where is it being filed . Its being filed in washington state, in new york and 15 other states, and were asking a Federal District court to stop the federal government from this policy of separating families. Separately, what were asking the federal government is, to the extent you have children in states, tell the states and let the states help provide services. I mean, put the politics aside, wolf, on a human level. You have children who have been taken from their parents. Theyre in a country they never heard of. Theyre sent to a state they cant find on a map. Some of these children are in foster care homes. Some of them are discharged to family members, extended family members. Some of them are put in private foster homes. They have no services, no followup care, no help with language, no help getting into schools. Let the states help. Instead the federal government has put a gag order on the facilities that are receiving these children. I mean, that makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. So were filing a lawsuit to stop the federal government from separating families, children from families, and second, were asking the federal government in the interim with the mess you created, at least let the states help rather than having these foster care agencies with a gag order. All right. I want you to stand by, governor. There is more i need to discuss with you, including the breaking news on the u. S. Supreme Court Decision ruling that the president s travel ban involving seven countries is constitutional. Well discuss that and more right after a quick break. Liberty mutual saved us almost 800 when we switched our auto and home insurance. Liberty did what . Yeah, they saved us a ton, which gave us a little wiggle room in our budget. I wish our insurance did that. Then we could get a real babysitter instead of your brother. Hey, welcome back. This guy, right . laughs yes. Ellen. Thats my robe. You could save 782 when liberty stands with you. Liberty mutual insurance. Im a small business, but i have. Big dreams. And big plans. So how do i make the efforts of 8 employees. Feel like 50 . How can i share new plans virtually . How can i download an efile . Virtual tours . Zipfile . Really big files . In seconds, not minutes. Just like that. Like everything. The answer is simple. Ill do what ive always done. Dream more, dream faster, and above all. Now, ill dream gig. Now more businesses, in more places, can afford to dream gig. Comcast, building americas largest gigspeed network. Were following our breaking newsment news. A major victory for President Trump. The Supreme Court has upheld a 54 decision of the travel ban from seven countries. Iran, north korea, syria, libya, yemen, somalia and venezuela. The governor of new york, andrew cuomo, still with us. Whats your reaction, governor . Wolf, its a bad decision on the law. Its a stain on this countrys history. This was clearly, in my opinion, a religious bias. It was camouflaged as National Security, but it was islamophobia. The court said we should look behind this act and look at the words. If you look at the three travel bans and what the president said, it was clearly a religious bias. Second, it was a political decision, and at this time of instability and gridlock where people dont trust institutions, the Supreme Court, you would have liked to think, was one institution that could be trusted. This was purely political, idealogical, 54 decision. And third, its more of the same. It is stopping muslims at airports, stopping latinos at borders. Its divisiveness. It is a cancer in the body politic. America is about diversity. When you make diversity an enemy, wolf, you turn one cell in the body politic against another cell in the body politic. And thats why its a cancer and it has to stop. Well, what, if anything, are you going to be able to do about this . Well, were bringing the lawsuit on the handling at the border. That lawsuit is going to be filed today on the separation of families. We want to stop that because thats not just illegal, that really violates our basic principles of humanity and compassion to be pulling children from their families. What about the travel ban . We want to stop that policy. The travel ban were going to, on an individual basis, offer Legal Services for people who want to contest it or who might be stuck in this country or get caught in between with family members, so well offer individual services. But look, this is a republican president and a republican congress, and if you want to change it, change is going to come in november. Governor cuomo, thanks as usual for joining us. Thanks for having me. Also new today, trump associate blackwater founder eric prince has provided the special Counsel Robert Mueller access to his phones and computers. We have new information. And israel asked britains Prince William to convey a message to the palestinians. We have details on that as well. With tripadvisor, finding your Perfect Hotel at the lowest price. Is as easy as dates, deals, done simply enter your destination and dates. And see all the hotels for your stay tripadvisor searches over 200 booking sites. To show you the lowest prices. So you can get the best deal on the right hotel for you. Dates, deals, done tripadvisor. Visit tripadvisor. Com i couldnt catch my breath. It was the last song of the night. It felt like my heart was skipping beats. They said i had afib. Whats afib . I knew that meant i was at a greater risk of stroke. I needed answers. My doctor and i chose xarelto® to help keep me protected from a stroke. Oncedaily xarelto®, a latestgeneration blood thinner significantly lowers the risk of stroke in people with afib not caused by a heart valve problem. Warfarin interres with at least 6 of your bodys natural bloodclotting factors. Xarelto® is selective, targeting just one critical factor. For afib patients well managed on warfarin, there is limited information on how xarelto® compares in reducing the risk of stroke. Dont stop taking xarelto® without talking to your doctor, as this may increase your risk of stroke. While taking, you may bruise more easily, or take longer for bleeding to stop. Xarelto® can cause serious, and in rare cases, fatal bleeding. It may increase your risk of bleeding if you take certain medicines. Get help right away for unexpected bleeding or unusual bruising. Do not take xarelto® if you have an artificial heart valve or abnormal bleeding. Before starting, tell your doctor about all planned medical or dental procedures and any kidney or liver problems. Learn all you can to help protect yourself from a stroke. Talk to your doctor about xarelto®. To help protect yourself from a stroke. No one thought much of itm at all. L people said it just made a mess until exxonmobil scientists put it to the test. They thought someday it could become fuel and power our cars wouldnt that be cool . And thats why exxonmobil scientists think its not small at all. Energy lives here. At this point in your life, youre looking ahead and planning for your financial needs. Sure, theres Social Security in your savings, but will it be enough . So consider a third part of every good financial plan. Your homes equity. If youre a homeowner 62 or older, you can turn that equity into a dependable money source. With a reverse mortgage line of credit from one reverse mortgage. Call today for information on how a reverse mortgage line of credit works. Its for people with, or without a current mortgage. It pays off your existing mortgage, if you have one, and any remaining funds can be accessed now or later. No monthly mortgage payments are required which frees up money every month. That could help delay dipping into your savings. Plus, you continue to own and live in your home. Together with savings and Social Security, a reverse mortgage could be your way to a more secure financial future. Make the smart move now. Call one reverse mortgage today. Prince william has unexpectedly landed right in the middle of middle east politics. During the First Official visit to israel, by a member of the British Royal family the president of israel asked the prince to pass on a message when he meets with the Palestinian Authority president mahmoud abbas. The message being its about time for peace. The duke of cambridge is on a fiveday visit to israel and the palestinian territories. Today he met with the Prime Minister benjamin netanyahu. Lets bring in one of the leaders of the israeli parties. Thanks for joining us. Good to be here. Any prospect that this Peace Process could get back off the ground because as you know, Jared Kushner, the president s special envoy, his soninlaw, he was there, but the palestinians didnt want to meet with him . Well, theyre going to put up a paper and were going to see whats in the paper. Nobody knows. The palestinians, the problem with the palestinians, they refuse every paper since the year of 2000 when the barack was Prime Minister and met with clinton at camp david. Somebody has to explain to them, this is not a zero sum game. Not that theyre going to get everything they want otherwise they wont talk to nobody. We need to go into negotiation and we need to talk to them about the prospect of peace. Does the Prime Minister, benjamin netanyahu, youre the opposition leader, you would like to be Prime Minister f theres new elections you might have a chance, does he support whats called a twostate solution . Israel living alongside a new state of palestine. Formerly he does. Do you believe he does . I think everybody in his right mind understand theres a big campaign in israel for people saying we are beyond the point of no return, two no twostate solution, but the majority of israel what do you i support the separation under the twostate solution. I think its necessary and right thing for our country and children. Because the middle east peace plan that Jared Kushner and the president supposedly are going to be putting forward in the coming weeks calls for a twostate solution, israel and palestine, and may even call for East Jerusalem to be the capital of the palestinian state. Would you support that . Well, i will never support anything which has to do with the division of jerusalem. We dont know whats in this paper, the ultimate deal as they call it. But we think you know what, its about time somebody will do Something Different. Because right now, the Peace Process is totally answering to einsteins famous definition of madness, doing over and over the same thing and expecting different results. Since there have been 11 rounds of bilateral talks its time to put Something Different on paper. Thats what the Trump Administration is about to do, supposedly. Its going to be very difficult, netanyahus government to say no to President Trump after movement of the embassy, after the cancellation of the Nuclear Agreement with iran, after the way the Trump Administration has helped this government. How much trouble is he in now, hes being investigated by the police and whats going on a few years and his wife charged . Wolf, you know better than that. Im not going to comment on this on american television. I wish the Prime Minister will be off everything. I want to fight him in the poll booth, not in court. But you suspect there will be early elections . Its not scheduled for what, next year or something. Next year. You think there could be earlier elections . Theres a strong possibility for earlier elections. Maybe the beginning of next year. What is the image of the president of the United States, donald trump, in israel right now . Well, hes very i guess he would be more popular in israel than here because hes been elected president of the United States here. Thats true. Im saying in israel its bipartisan, the support. Because of, as i was saying, move the embassy, the recognition of jerusalem as the capital of israel, the cancellation of the Nuclear Agreement, and you know what, because when he was in jerusalem he did everything right, emotionally right, going to the wall, going being emotional about this. Im a bit worried now that israel wont become a partisan issue. Its important for it to stay a bipartisan issue. Keep good contact with the democrats. This is part of the reason im in washington. Important for israel not to be identified with one side of the american political arena. The leader of the yesh atid. Thank you for joining us. Thank you. More on the breaking news out of the u. S. Supreme court and the president hurlingts at a wild rally as the white house preaches civility. Well discuss that. The president s new trade target isnt a foreign country, but an allamerican brand. Harley davidson. Why the president says the motorcycle maker is surrendering. Stay with us. Theres nothing more important than your health. So if youre on medicare or will be soon, you may want more than parts a and b heres why. Medicare only covers about 80 of your part b medical expenses. The rest is up to you. You might want to consider an aarp Medicare Supplement insurance plan, insured by unitedhealthcare insurance company. Like any Medicare Supplement insurance plan, these help pick up some of what medicare doesnt pay. And, these plans let you choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. You could stay with the doctor or specialist you trust. Or go with someone new. Youre not stuck in a network. Because there arent any. So dont wait. Call now to request your free decision guide and find the aarp Medicare Supplement plan that works for you. Theres a range to choose from, depending on your needs and your budget. Rates are competitive. And theyre the only plans of their kind endorsed by aarp. Like any of these types of plans, they let you apply whenever you want. Theres no enrollment window. No waiting to apply. So call now. Remember, Medicare Supplement plans help cover some of what medicare doesnt pay. Youll be able to choose any doctor or hospital that accepts medicare patients. Whether youre on medicare now or turning 65 soon, its a good time to get your ducks in a row. Duck quack call to request your free decision guide now. Because the time to think about tomorrow is today. This is cnn breaking news. You are watching cnn on as tuesday. Im brook baldwin. Heres the breaking news, the president says todays Supreme Court decision is, quote, a tremendous victory. The ruling effectively makes the president s controversial travel ban a part of u. S. Immigration law. So the Supreme Court ruling was a tremendous victory for this country and for the constitution. The Supreme Court ruling was a tremendous victory for our country. Will you go ahead with it, sir . Of course. What do you think, i wouldnt go ahead with it . Does it embolden you to the idea of deporting people without due process as well . Do you think we have to find