0 >> andrew mccabe, thanks so much as always. thanks so much to all of you for joining us today on yet another busy news day. i'm jim sciutto. >> i'm erica hill. stay tuned. "at this hour" with kate bolduan starts right now. good morning, everyone. breaking news in the trial of three men accused of killing ahmaud arbery. we are moments away now from the defense beginning its closing arguments. the prosecution has just wrapped up its closing statements this morning, which lasted just over an hour. the jury could get the case and begin deliberating by the end of the day. over the last two weeks, jurors heard from more than 20 witnesses including the man who shot arbery, travis mcmichael. he testified that he shot the 25-year-old black man who was jogging. he shot him in self-defense, he said, after he claimed that arbery attacked him and grabbed his shotgun. now, travis mcmichael, his father, and a neighbor, they all face multiple felony counts including murder. let's head back into the courtroom now. the judge is getting just under way once again. >> -- the use of force continuum and here's the different levels because travis testified to that. there appears to be some sort of use of force diagram that no one testified to or authenticated. there seems to be a picture of the entrance to satilla shores, then a photograph of u.s. marine or -- the u.s. coast guard symbol, which is what i quickly saw. so right now, your honor, i don't know what mr. sheffield is putting up, but i have great concerns e he's about to show t jury a whole bunch of stuff that no one's authenticated to or testified to at all. >> these are demonstrative things, judge. this is closing arguments. we have a lot of testimony about the law enforcement training center. we've had testimony about use of force. these are just demonstrative things. >> the only thing that caught my eye is the argument that this is what he received, not wa he testified to? >> right. these are just demonstrative -- >> there's nothing on those that show the coast guard manual or anything like that that would be -- for example, i know that the state presented a few of the pages from the actual manuals themselves. >> the only thing that i have is what i've created that shows he testified about officer presence, verbal commands, aggressive response techniques, weapons retention. >> and what is that? is that something you put together or -- >> yeah. i've clipped it and cut it from things that i found. >> well, what's behind it is an orange thing that has physical fitness standards and search and it says objectives completed. travis mcmichael never testified to any of those things. >> he testified to his training and did those things. >> at the top, maritime law enforcement academy student profile report. that wasn't entered in. then we have that next to it. >> for official use only. >> i just intend to talk about the course that he took, the courses that he took that he testified to. >> there's more to it. that says student profile report. that was not testified to. that was not tendered in . i don't have any problem of argument what he testified to, but once we start getting into what the curriculum was or an individual report -- >> all right. how how's that? >> that looks a lot better. can you just go back. >> sure. >> can i just digest it? >> sure. >> i object to the heading on that since it attempts to have a photo of something that was never testified to. >> what photo? >> it has an image of some coast guard thing. >> it's what he went to school. he testified to it. what is so objectionable about that? >> he testified where he went to school and what he did in the training and testified to his rank, which i think is the other thing shown on there. >> right. >> if we can get back to it. than removes that part. the objection is granted in part. as that slide has been amended, i don't have any issue with that. >> okay. >> but the use of that -- what he's talked about. >> then the satilla shores -- >> please back up one more. >> this was his testimony at trial. >> well, wait a second. handwritten note base the attorney as to his testimony at trial? we're going to show this to the jury? >> of course we are. i wrote them right in front of him as he was testifying. these are the notes i took at trial, the same way i can show this one, judge -- >> those are your notes. >> yes, based on his testimony. i did it in front of the jury, just like i did this one. >> they're just what you're referring to. >> yeah. you saw him testify. >> so the unfortunate thing is when everyone is talking about and work through things, i can't think it through. so went you are using the slide to show is what his testimony was at the time. >> the state has chosen to type it up, type up what was said. you heard greg mcmichael say, you heard travis mcmichael say. this is my notes as i was writing as he was talking in front of the jury with the state present during trial. i do this because it captures what's said on the stand in a visual way and the jury can understand it. i don't see what the objection is. the state can talk about and type up, but i can't show what i wrote down during the testimony? that doesn't make any sense. >> i understand now what that was. i agree, mr. sheffield did write those things down on a big piece of paper and he chooses now to show it this way. the state is okay with that. the problem becomes the next photo of satilla shores, no one testified to that photo. >> are you objecting satilla shores is a neighborhood with a neighborhood sign out front? what's objectionable about that? it's just a chapter heading of what i'm going to be presenting. >> judge, my fear here is just that i'm going to have to october to every single slide when it comes up where no one's testified to i want or information no one testified to. >> i think we've just seen a number of things -- the state has a continuing objection to the satilla shores sign. i understand that's not in evidence. but it's the sign itself. if it's simply being used as indicated, as sort of a chapter marker, then i'll permit the defense to use that. the changes that have been made now to the slide that showed the training, what i understand now is limited to what was actually testified to. >> correct. >> and it will be referred to that way as opposed to here's the name, here's what the coast guard instructed him -- i will limit you exactly how prow yao present that. as long as it's not a presentation as if it was evidence separate from testimony that was provided by mr. mcmichael from the witness stand. and the use of force continuum is what you're using to demonstrate the argument as opposed to relying on that as a training device or something that was actually presented in training. >> right. >> okay. >> so, judge, i'm asking for a little direction from the court. these are just the first couple, so if there's some photos that no one's ever testified to that are in this, i'm going to october if there are other things. like, for instance, there's picture of the neighborhood and somehow they've marked every time a 911 call came in. no one temped to all the 911 calls in the neighborhood. but there shows all this. i don't know what kind of grafshg he'll show. i'm going to object. if it happens more than twice in this power point, i'm going to ask we stop, unfortunately, and have him go through every single slide, because at that point i'll be constantly objecting to his closing because its contains nothing that was testified to. that is my concern. >> i have a slide of the neighborhood that i've cree yay v year -- created and put circles on and things on it that are representative of the testimony of officer rash and the gbi and going door to door and neighbors who have been complaining about things. i'm not going to say the neighbor at this address called 911 on this date or that date. it's argument. it's demonstrated of my argument. i don't see any basis for the state to object. and i don't have anything else that's a photograph. >> i understand the issue. we'll see where it goes. >> thank you, judge. >> okay. if the state wants to object, that's fine. we'll doo with it as it comes, i don't think. i don't think it's objectionable. >> juror 219, ticktock videos. >> let's take care of that. >> it's available. >> okay. okay. let's go get the panel . >> is it on?