Youre looking at a live shot. Were expecting him to come out shortly and possibly speak to reporters. Well bring you that when he does. There is also fallout from the summary of the attorney generals. Robert mueller told attorney general barr he would not reach a conclusion in an obstruction of justice case against the president. That would be left up to barr. Also, the latest on efforts by democrats to make the full report public. But senator Mitch Mcconnell blocked a move. So theres that. And we have key answers, but a lot of questions remain. The first big answer being this. Taken from attorney general barrs release, the investigation did not establish that members of the Trump Campaign conspired or coordinated with the russian government in its election interference activities. That is both legally and politically enormous. Insufficient evidence to make a case against the president or people close to him for criminal conspiracy with the russian government during the 2016 election. Effectively, no collusion, as the president has said all along. At least none that the special counsel believes can be prosecuted. Theres good news for the president and arguably better for the country that the president of the United States did not criminally conspire with a foreign adversary to get elected. Now, democrats and those who dislike the president may be disappointed, but for the country having a president that hasnt conspired with an enemy is good news. That said, the barr letter is not saying what the president is saying it says. There was no obstruction and none whatsoever. And it was a complete and total exoneration. Well, in fact, the attorney general who cited very few passages from Robert Muellers report specifically cited this one with respect to obstruction of justice. Quoting now, while this report does not conclude that the president committed a crime, it also does not exonerate him. Those were muellers words. According to the attorney general, the special counsel did not draw a conclusion one way or the other as to whether the examined conduct constituted obstruction. He deferred to the attorney general, who decided along with Deputy Attorney general Rod Rosenstein that it did not, which leaves the question just what did Robert Mueller say about it in the body of his report . John dean, certainly no stranger to moments like these, had this to say to don lemon last night. We havent really seen the underlying report, but i have some suspicions that the reason that he boiled this down the way he did is because its not very attractive, don. While he didnt find his words are very different than barrs, i suspect. He suspects. And so do plenty of democratic lawmakers. In truth, we dont know one way or another. Democrats have made releasing the full Mueller Report to the public their top priority. Something the president today said hes also okay with. As it stands, we dont really know the underlying facts that went into the attorney generals decision not to pursue obstruction charges. On the collusion front, we dont know if the mueller investigators reached any investigation about why so many people lied about their contacts with russians. Michael flynn, paul manafort, george papadopoulos. All charged with lying. People involved in the trump tower meeting were caught in multiple lies. We still dont know why. And we dont know if Robert Mueller knows. We still dont know as Carl Bernstein points out, a simple factual account of what happened in all of this. Nor do we know whats behind the president s willingness to give Vladimir Putin the benefit of the doubt time after time on russias election interference. Did Robert Mueller have a theory or provide any facts that bear on the question . Again, we dont know. And that should be pointed out. Nor do we know what, if anything, the Mueller Investigation uncovered that potentially sheds light on any of these other investigations into the president and his dealings. What we do know, however, is that the report, if accurately summarized by the attorney general, dispels some of the harsher allegations against the president by democrats, by former intelligence officials and others over the years. We have a senator on the program whos said hes seen evidence himself of collusion. He said it before the barr summary came out. Tonight, well ask him whether he still maintains that. Does the Mueller Report contain any evidence that supports the senators claim . Even if it might not rise to the level of criminality . Another unanswered question. As is the president s reaction to it all, which asked today whether the special counsel acted honorably in the investigation, the president replied, yes, he did. If thats really what he believes, its certainly a far cry from what hes been saying for months and months, saying things like this about the special counsel. The problem with the Mueller Investigation is everybody has got massive conflicts. Mr. Mueller is highly conflicted. In fact, comey is like his best friend. These people have the biggest conflicts of interest ive ever seen. I call them the 13 angry democrats. I could go into conflict after conflict. But sadly, mr. Mueller is conflicted. Mueller was not senate confirmed. Because of all the conflicts, they didnt want to bring him before the senate because hes very conflicted. Hes conflicted, and i know that his best friend is comey, whos a bad cop. He put 13 highly conflicted and, you know, very angry i call them angry democrats in. More now on the president s reaction. Jim acosta is at the white house for us tonight. Has the white house seen the full report yet . According to a white house official i spoke with earlier this evening, anderson, no, they have not seen the full report. As to this notion that Robert Mueller, the special counsel, informed the attorney general, william barr, three weeks ago that he would not be bringing an obstruction case, i asked the white house just a short while ago and got an answer to this. They say the president , the white house did not know about that, that mueller informed barr he would not be seeking any obstruction charges. Over here they seem to be as much in the dark as to whats contained in the full Mueller Report as everybody else. Its in the dark as to whether or not theyll push for a full release of that report. We still dont have a straight answer on that. The president said in the oval office earlier today hes okay with that idea of releasing the report, but hes leaving it to the attorney general to decide what ultimately to do about that. In terms of the president declaring full exoneration, obviously the vast majority of the summary was a huge victory for him, no doubt about it, full stop. Is there any concern about that narrow bit of nuance between mueller and barr on obstruction . Not at this point, anderson. Honestly they were too busy celebrating to appreciate the nuances of just about anything. I will say at one point in the driveway of the north lawn of the white house, i saw the white house counselor, kellyanne conway, almost dancing in the driveway as i approached her. She was beaming. Multiple officials behind the scenes were jubilant over this news because they see this cloud being lifted over the president thats been there since the 2016 campaign, anderson. Who can blame them . That cloud has been there for some time. As you mentioned just a few moments ago, there are all of these other investigations looming. The question is, how the white house, how the president responds to all of that. But obviously the question moving forward, you know, is still why is the president why does he have this situation where every time we go out on a foreign trip, he seems to align himself with Vladimir Putin when it comes to this issue of interference in the 2016 election. That obviously is a question that we may have some answers to in the full Mueller Report. Its hard to imagine a situation, anderson, where the public never gets a full understanding of the answer to that question. But as you were just saying a few moments ago, we just dont know the answer to a lot of questions around here with the exception of the answers that the president and his team have been desperately seeking for the last two years now. Jim acosta, jim, thanks very much. Just moments ago we learned where the top democrat stands. What is Speaker Pelosi saying tonight . Well, Speaker Pelosi had a private meeting with her Leadership Team earlier this evening and she made it pretty clear that she believes the focus of her caucus Going Forward should not be on the russia investigation, should not be on the Mueller Probe, but should be instead on these economic issues, pocketbook issues, on their agenda. She believes thats how the party should focus Going Forward. Its in line with what shes been saying for some time but in the aftermath of the bill barr letter, she wants to make it pretty clear to her caucus that it makes sense not to focus on all the fallout and the messy fallout from this, particularly in light of the finding that the Trump Campaign, according to bob mueller, he could not find could not establish that the Trump Campaign was involved in a conspiracy with the russian government. Now, i asked nancy pelosi about this, leaving a meeting earlier this evening, whether she believes theres still collusion, and she didnt want to engage. Speaker pelosi, are you ready to say there was no collusion between the Trump Campaign and russia in light of the mueller finding . Does this exonerate the president . I think that the Mueller Report was clear. She said i think the Mueller Report was clear, he was not exonerated. We tried to press her a little further. She said im not going to be having a press conference about the soul of our democracy in the hallway of the basement in the capitol. So it shows you, anderson, where she wants to keep her focus. But still, several of her committees plan to push forward. Of course theyre demanding by next week to provide the report to the house and the senate. Also adam schiff told me earlier this evening he still plans to investigate russia interference. He said the criminal investigation that mueller launched is much different than a counterintelligence investigation that hes launching. He still wants to know if trump has been compromised by the russians, by financial interests at all. Thats going to be still a focus for adam schiff. While pelosi wants to move forward and to talk about these issues, at least some of her committees still plan to probe these russia matters and will keep it still in the news, anderson. Manu, thanks. Joining us is senator richard blumenthal. Senator blumenthal, do you agree that the democrats should focus on their message and move on . We should definitely focus, anderson, on the challenges ahead to our country. Infrastructure, that is rebuilding our roads and bridges, health care, making it more widely available and reducing the costs of pharmaceutical drugs. Veterans issues and our national defense, which is increasingly complex and challenging. But at the same time, we need to protect our nation against the continuing russian threat of meddling in our election. That was the purpose of the Mueller Probe at the very outset. It began as a counterintelligence investigation, and we need to know and see that Mueller Report. All we have right now is the barr summary. So we can establish how close the wrongdoing came to proof beyond a reasonable doubt, whether there was noncriminal wrongdoing by the Trump Campaign. Clearly there is evidence of some cooperation there. And also very, very importantly, the statement by mueller, one of the few statements quoted in the barr summary, that the president is not exonerated on the issue of obstruction of justice. You said earlier today that, quote, there is evidence of collusion, no question. Do you stand by that claim . Because it sure seems like Robert Muellers conclusion is very different. We dont know what Robert Muellers conclusion is because we havent seen it. All weve seen is the barr summary. But even if the Mueller Report says that he could not establish, thats his word, proof beyond a reasonable doubt, thats a very high bar. There may still be evidence. In fact there is already in the public realm. And that evidence is what i was citing. For example, the president s encouragement of the russians to provide more hacked information. His knowledge of the wikileaks release and his encouragement there, his negotiations on the trump tower moscow at the same time that he was praising Vladimir Putin. A string of highly significant public evidence of cooperation that may have only been tacit, without criminal intent, but his own Campaign Manager shared polling data, sensitive, private polling data with the russians while they were attacking this country through a campaign of misinformation. But that is all things that Robert Mueller likely looked at, and yet still came away i mean, its one thing, yes, the president said in a press conference, you know, russia, if youre listening, i cant remember the exact quote, find the emails. But mueller knew that, looked at it and still said no crime here. And thats why we need to see the report. I cant emphasize enough how important transparency is. We have the barr summary. We do not have the Mueller Report. We have no idea what his reasoning was. Absence of criminal intent on the part of some or all of the trump operatives who engaged in cooperation and what looks like conspiracy but maybe not, without that culpable intent, but also on the issue of obstruction. After all, obstruction is an effort to hinder an investigation. The fact that there was insufficient evidence of conspiracy may be due to the hindering of the investigation, and thats the essence of obstruction. Thats the crime where mueller did not exonerate the president. The Trump Campaign, as you know, sent out a memo to the media today accusing you and others of lying to the American People about claims of collusion. They clearly see you as ripe for attack. What about that . Are you worried your credibility has taken a hit . Do you feel you have anything to apologize for . Well, in that letter, apparently, i havent actually seen it, but they took a part of a quotation without the whole of it. The second part of it said in effect whether there are going to be criminal charges remains to be seen. So i stand by the contention that there is evidence. It may not rise to the level of proof beyond a reasonable doubt. I know as a former prosecutor that sometimes that proof comes very close but it has to be beyond a reasonable doubt, and particularly when its the president. Its a very, very high bar. So the effort to discredit critics is certainly not a new phenomenon for this administration. Im going to continue to speak out. I wont be deterred or silenced. But shouldnt the bar be high . I know in a court of law, its beyond a reasonable doubt. Given the seriousness of this, given its the president of the United States and its as serious as it gets, shouldnt the bar be that high . Absolutely. It is under the law. I respect the proof beyond a reasonable doubt standard. But at the same time in order to prevent wrongdoing of this kind in the future, Congress Continues to have an oversight function. We have a responsibility, independent of the special counsel, to devise new legislative reforms that will safeguard against this kind of russian interference in the future. Thats where there is bipartisan agreement, as well as on the need for transparency. After all, the president himself said today that hes in favor of transparency. If hes serious about it, hell back the bipartisan bill that ive introduced with senator grassley to require it. Senator blumenthal, appreciate your time. Thank you. Well get a pair of legal opinions now. Carrie cordero and robert ray. Carrie, what do you make of senator blumenthals claim that there was collusion but it didnt rise to the level of a crime . Well, i think theres probably something to it. Senator blumenthal should be in a position to know some information that perhaps is not available to the public. And the crime of conspiracy, which is what the theory of collusion is, would be a high level. That would be a high bar to meet to be able to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that there is evidence supporting a prosecution. So i think that there probably there could be some Information Available to those in a position of access that is something below a criminal prosecution standard and above nothing there. Robert, do you agree with that . I think that might be trying to parse things too finely. The more important distinction is that what senator blumenthal is talking about would be what standard he might consider appropriate to pass upon an article of impeachment. Obviously there, as gerald ford famously said, impeachment is whatever a majority of the house of representatives says by way of an article of impeachment. I do think, though, that the standard still would be, is it a high crime, emphasis on the word crime. And the Justice Department now, through the office of special counsel, has made a determination both with regard to collusion and with regard to obstruction that theres not sufficient evidence that a crime was committed. It seems to me by the president. It seems to me that that finding has consequence, and it not only has consequence insofar as the criminal law is concerned, but its certainly, although its not determinative, it does bear upon the question of what the congress intends to do about it, if anything. Carrie, last night you accurately guessed that attorney general barr did not take only 48 hours to reach his decision regarding obstruction. I wonder what you made of the news that barr had roughly three weeks headsup from mueller that mueller wasnt going to make a decision on obstruction, that it was going to be up to barr. Im glad that we were able to get that reporting today and i think it makes a lot more sense than the narrative that appeared to some over the weekend, which was that perhaps he decided within 48 hours. That just didnt make sense to me. I think the reporting today indicating that he had been briefed on it, that he had some time to think about it, im sure he was briefed on what the special counsel was going to put in the report before it was delivered, and so i think that reporting made a lot more sense and is consistent with how an attorney general would handle a significant decision like this one. Robert, do the American People have the right to know what the facts are that led mueller to not exonerate the president on obstruction . I think theyre entitled to context, and that would include facts, obviously, to understand the prosecutorial decisionmaking. I dont believe it is correct as some democrats have suggested that that means that the congress is entitled to what amounts to the entire investigative file. Underlying documents, not just the report by mueller. But, anderson, i think as a practical matter, its incumbent by way of disclosure of the final report in some fashion to provide the American People with context in connection with the facts that were gathered during the course of the investigation, to understand the basis of the prosecutorial decision that was made. Just for learning the actual narrative of what occurred in terms of russias involvement in trying to influence the election, the Mueller Report would have more details in that that would be beneficial for everybody to learn, democrats, republicans. I think in order for the public to be able to put together the entire narrative of what transpired around 2016 election, its going to take piecing together several parts. Part of that is looking at the charges that the special counsel brought already in terms of particularly the indictments of the russian Intelligence Officers and their activities, part of it will come from the special counsels report, whichever portion of it, however much of it is able to become public, part of it will come from the Senate Intelligence committees investigation, which is ongoing, in which they presumably will wrap this year, and then there may be another part that will come from other investigations perhaps out of the house. I dont think that theres going to be one document that summarizes it all. I think it will have to be an assimilation of all of those different inquiries and investigations. I might add also, that i think its going to be amplified in part by testimony that youre likely going to see from the attorney general, if not from bob mueller himself. I imagine sometime probably as soon as april. Robert, if you believe the Mueller Report should be released to the extent possible, what is the extent possible . Obviously anything classified would have to be scrubbed. Right. Or redacted. Anything about directly grand jury related i guess would also have to be redacted. Maybe not. I can also imagine insofar as the president is concerned that if theres a question about disclosure of necessary grand jury material in order to provide appropriate context for the congress and the American People, i can imagine the department of justice going to a court to get a court order to open up some of that. I think where youre going to see the department resist too much disclosure is with regard to uncharged other individuals. Fascinating. Robert ray, thank you so much. Carrie cordero as well. Thank you. Youre quite welcome. Thank you. Michael avenatti has just stepped out after being charged. Lets take a look. I will make a brief statement but will not be accepting any questions. First of all, i want to thank the federal agents for their professionalism and courtesy today. They were outstanding throughout the process, and i wish to thank them for everything they did today in connection with this matter. As all of you know, for the entirety of my career i have fought against the powerful. Powerful people and powerful corporations. I will never stop fighting that good fight. I am highly confident that when all of the evidence is laid bare in connection with these cases, when it is all known, when due process occurs, that i will be fully exonerated and justice will be done. Thank you. Thats Michael Avenatti appearing live in downtown new york after spending at least several hours in court. Were going to have more on the charges against him on both coasts in new york and california as well by different prosecutors. Well have that in just a moment. Also later, the president saying people did evil things, treasonous things that launched the russia probe. He seems to be talking about top intelligence officials at the end of the obama administration. Just ahead, well talk to one of them, former director of national intelligence, James Clapper. Each day justin chooses to walk. At work. And after work. He does it all with dr. Scholls. Only dr. Scholls has massaging gel insoles that provide allday comfort. To keep him feeling more energized. Dr. Scholls. Born to move. Woman ahh need a change of scenery . Kayak searches hundreds of travel sites and lets you see how your baggage will affect the cost of your flight, so you can be confident youre getting the right flight at the best price. Kayak. Search one and done. Youre getting the right flight at the best price. Yeah, i thought doing some hibachi grilling would help take my mind off it all. Maybe you could relieve some stress by calling geico for help with our Homeowners Insurance. Geico helps with Homeowners Insurance . They sure do. And they could save us a bundle of money too. Im calling geico right now. Cell phone . Its ringing. Get to know geico and see how much you could save on homeowners and condo insurance. Get to know geico and see how much you could im a fighter. Always have been. When i found out i had agerelated macular degeneration, amd, i wanted to fight back. My doctor and i came up with a plan. It includes preservision. Only Preservision Areds 2 has the exact nutrient formula recommended by the National Eye Institute to help reduce the risk of progression of moderate to advanced amd. Thats why i fight. Because its my vision. Preservision. Also, in a greattasting chewable. As you saw just before the break, attorney Michael Avenatti has just left the federal courthouse charged as a defendant. With one case in new york, and another in california. Here is the latest on both. Can you just explain what these cases are . Thats right, anderson. So, the u. S. Attorneys office in manhattan charged Michael Avenatti with extortion saying that he and an unnamed coconspirator tried to shake down nike, alleging telling nike they were going to release damaging information about the company at a sensitive time just ahead of its Quarterly Earnings announcement unless they were paid as much as 25 million. Now, prosecutors said that when nike learned of this and the lawyers from nike, they immediately brought it to the authorities attention. They worked together and had audio and video recordings capturing some of Michael Avenattis threats. In one of these threats, avenatti said ill go take 10 billion off your clients market cap. Im not fing around. Avenatti told nikes attorneys, im not continuing to play games. You guys know you have a serious problem and its worth more in exposure to me to just blow the lid on this thing. In los angeles at about the same time, avenatti was charged by prosecutors with wire and bank fraud. In that case prosecutors allege that avenatti tried to embezzle more than 1 million from one of his clients to pay his expenses. They also allege that he submitted phony tax returns to a bank in order to get more than 4 million in loans. Anderson . How does mark geragos fit into this . He was a cnn contributor up until today. A source familiar with the investigation tells me that mark geragos was the unnamed, unindicted coconspirator in this case. Geragos has not been charged with any wrongdoing so far. He was a cnn contributor until today. All right, appreciate it. I want to go deeper on this. Paul callan joins us and shan wu as well. Shan, looking at the new york case first, what do you make of these charges . Very unusual. I expect a very robust defense by avenatti claiming that he was just zealously representing his client and trying to get a settlement. It sounds like he is asking for hush money, not necessarily illegal, and hes familiar with that kind of case. So its not illegal to ask for hush money . Well, when we talk about it as hush money it sounds more illegal. But when you reach a settlement, theres usually a nondisclosure clause and a nondisparagement clause and thats the equivalent of being paid to be quiet in the future. Paul, how strong do you think these charges are . The federal prosecutors case, the new york case, does avenatti saying things like ill go take 10 billion off your clients market cap, does that go beyond a normal lawyer in a tough negotiation . Well, the u. S. Attorney for manhattan, anderson, called this the use of a law license as a weapon of extortion. The claim is that avenatti was claiming that he had to be paid as much as 25 million not to give a press conference, which would have embarrassed nike. But its it is an unusual set of charges in new york. I have to think, by the way, that his california case might be even more serious and possess a greater danger to avenatti. Why is that . Well, the california charges allege that he embezzled 1. 6 million from one of his clients and he took that money and used it to fund his law firm and a Coffee Company that apparently was having financial problems during that time period. In addition, he borrowed 4. 1 million from a Mississippi Bank using fraudulent copies of tax returns. Now, in these tax returns, he claimed that he had made multimillions of dollars per year. In fact, federal prosecutors say for several years he didnt even file federal tax returns and he never made the amount of money that he claimed. When you put all those things together, federal prosecutors say he faces 50 years in prison as a maximum sentence in california. So those are dangerous charges for him. Shan, the unnamed coconspirator referred to in the complaint, said to be mark geragos, who again was a cnn contributor, no longer is as of today, what role do you think he could have had in all of this . At this point he hasnt been charged with any crime. Very interesting he was not charged. Thats generally frowned upon to use this unindicted coconspirator idea. Were familiar with it with nixon and President Trump has been talked about in that realm as well because the person doesnt get a chance to defend themselves in court, theyre not actually indicted. It sounds like geragos might have been a cocounsel or also working on the matter legally with avenatti. The question is, why is he not indicted . Immunity is a possibility or maybe the evidence against him is a little more ambiguous. Very extraordinary to have two attorneys are charged in a case where they could argue theyre representing clients. If youve got immunity, and we dont know, what would that indicate, that he was cooperating . Yes, that he was cooperating and the prosecutors would value that cooperation in order to give him immunity. Cooperating, would that be afterward or while the investigation was going on or both . It could be both. Its hard to know right now. Paul, if obviously its a remarkable turn of events, given sort of how Michael Avenatti came into the spotlight, the allegations that he was making against Michael Cohen and others. If true, you said this is for both, is it 50 years for both if youre adding up both indictments . No, actually, anderson, the california federal prosecutor said the statutory maximum for the charges he was facing in california was 50 years. Now, of course, that doesnt mean hell get 50 years. However, on top of that, you would have the new york charges. So thats the maximum sentence he would face. He wouldnt get a sentence that high, but this is a very serious charge that if convicted he would go to prison for these charges almost certainly. Well obviously continue to follow it. Paul, thank you. Shan wu as well. Just ahead, the president blaming former intelligence chiefs for the russia investigation. Former director of intelligence James Clapper will join us. [music playing] vo this is the averys. This is the averys trying the hottest new bistro. Wait. And the hottest taqueria . And the hottest. What are those . Oh, pierogis . And this is the averys wondering if eating out is eating into saving for their first home. This is jc. team member welcome to wells fargo, how may i help . vo whos here to help with a free Financial Health conversation, no strings attached. This is the averys with the support they needed to get back on track. Well done guys. team member this is wells fargo. About 50 of people with evesevere asthma k . Have too many cells called eosinophils in their lungs. Eosinophils are a key cause of severe asthma. Fasenra is designed to target and remove these cells. Fasenra is an addon injection for people 12 and up with asthma driven by eosinophils. Fasenra is not a rescue medicine or for other eosinophilic conditions. Fasenra is proven to help prevent severe asthma attacks, improve breathing, and can lower oral steroid use. Fasenra may cause allergic reactions. Get help right away if you have swelling of your face, mouth, and tongue, or trouble breathing. Dont stop your asthma treatments unless your doctor tells you to. Tell your doctor if you have a parasitic infection or your asthma worsens. Headache and sore throat may occur. Havent you missed enough . Ask an asthma specialist about fasenra. If you cant afford your medication, astrazeneca may be able to help. Ohh yeah ohh yeah ohh we hide hotel names, so you can find four star hotels at two star prices. Hotwire [dophin making] eeee hotwire book now and enjoy free unlimited open bar and more. Norwegian cruise line. Feel free. The latest inisnt just a store. Ty its a save more with a new kind of Wireless Network store. Its a look what your wifi can do now store. A get your questions answered by awesome experts store. Its a now theres one store that connects your life like never before store. The xfinity store is here. And its simple, easy, awesome. A book that youre ready to share with the world . Get published now, call for your free publisher kit today now that Robert Mueller is done investigating the president , White House Press secretary Sarah Sanders is calling for congress to investigate former top u. S. Intelligence officials. If congress is so gungho to call people up to the hill id start with comey, clapper, brennan, and other people in the fbi who perpetuated this absurd lie and this absurd idea that the president of the United States was somehow a Foreign Agent and colluding with another government. Joining us now is former director of national intelligence, James Clapper, author of facts and fears, hard truths from a life of intelligence and was named there by Sarah Sanders. Director clapper, what is your reaction to what sanders said . First, i wonder if she was conflating or confusing collusion, whatever that is, with the russian interference. Certainly those of us that she named, john brennan and jim comey and i, are part of the group that were tasked by president obama to put together all the reporting we had on the russian interference. Which we did. President obama directly and personally confronted putin about the russian interference in september, and did not accept at face value putins protestations. John brennan directly did the same thing with his counterpart on october 7th of 16. We put out a statement. I say we, jeh johnson and i put out a statement, pretty forthright one, warning of the russian interference in our election. This is a month before the election, which unfortunately got drowned out by the access Hollywood Tape revelation. On december 29th, the administration issued a series of sanctions. 35 russian operatives, et cetera. And then on january 6th we issued our Intelligence Community assessment documenting the russian interference in which we had very high confidence in the evidence that we presented to then president elect trump at trump tower. I think what gives rise now, i will once again emphasize that in that Intelligence Community assessment there was nothing about collusion because we didnt have sufficient evidence of that to include it. And i have so stated publicly, starting with march 4th of 2017 when i appeared on meet the press. And i consistently said we didnt have the evidence at the time contemporaneously and it was my great hope that the Mueller Investigation would resolve that once and for all, and apparently it did. Regardless of your political stripes, whether youre an opponent or proponent of President Trump, thats a good thing for all of america. I would just note that my former general counsel, robert lid, has written an excellent treatise on the nuances of the language in the barr memorandum, which without going into it, will just say emphasizes the importance of transparency and having access, Public Access to the entire report. In terms of things you have said on television subsequently, over however long youve been talking on television, do you regret anything you have said in terms of raising questions about the president s behavior or some of the things the president has done or said . No, i dont. And i have put that in writing in my book as well. I have concerns, as do others, and i have tried to be factual and temperate and moderate about it, but i do have concerns. No, i dont have any regrets. And do you still have the same concerns about, you know, the president , his relationship with Vladimir Putin, his tendency to side with Vladimir Putin against, you know, former intelligence officials or even his current intelligence officials . I do have concerns about the president s unwillingness or inability or whatever to call out the russian interference in the election. I would just point out that one of president obamas objectives in tasking us to do that report on the russian interference was to hand it off to the next administration. So the Trump Administration would have that as a basis for taking action against russia, which sort of hasnt happened in some ways. So, just lastly, youve said before that you dont understand what you say are the strange personal deference to putin by the president. Does barrs summary of muellers findings, because thats all weve seen, clear that up for you at all, or you certainly want to see the full report . Well, like everyone else, i would very much like to see what mueller actually said in his report. And hopefully answer some of the Unanswered Questions that i think still linger. The 3 1 2page summary that the attorney general provided, which was, you know, its kind of like headlines, details at 11 00 sort of thing, doesnt cut it. Director clapper, appreciate you being with us. Thanks. Thanks, anderson. Up next, new reporting from the Washington Post says President Trump asked some of his top aides for ways to limit federal funding from going to puerto rico, still struggling from the hurricane back in the fall of 2017. Well have details, ahead. Anks e working with top airlines to turn their unsold seats into amazing deals, Family Reunion attendance is up. Were all related yeah, i see it. And because priceline offers great deals by comparing thousands of prices in real time, sports fans are seeing more away games. Various yeahhh is that safe . Oh, y. Ahh not at all. No, maam. Nope. And more people than ever are enjoying romantic getaways. romantic music thats gross priceline. Every trip is a big deal. Thats gross need a change of scenery . Kayak searches hundreds of travel sites even our competitors so you can be confident youre getting the right flight at the best price. Kayak. Search one and done. The Big Drug Companies dont see they see us as profits. Were paying the highest Prescription Drug prices in the world so they can make billions . Americans shouldnt have to choose between buying medication and buying food for our families. Its time for someone to look out for us. Congress, stop the greed. Cut drug prices now. [laughter] im okay. So recently my sons band was signed by a record label. A record deal . Unbelievable. Whenever were about to get on a stage for a huge audience, i always give my dad like a facetime kinda moment. You see the crowd, you see the emotion. You know, he has that experience for the first time with me, and thats really important to me. I created a rockstar. both laughing vo there for you when it matters most. Get iphone xr on us when you buy the latest iphone. And apple music on us with unlimited. Only on verizon. Ever since Hurricane Maria struck puerto rico back in the fall of 2017, the Trump Administrations response to the disaster has been controversial, certainly. You might recall these images, President Trump tossing paper towels into a crowd after he visited the island, while the mayor of san juan was criticizing the administrations relief efforts. Today the Washington Post says the president asked top advisers for ways he could limit federal funds to a still struggling puerto rico during an Oval Office Meeting earlier this year. On the byline is josh dawsey. Josh, can you explain your story about what the president is saying about puerto rico . The president has been frustrated with puerto rico aid. He is wanting to limit the housing and urban development grants, known as hud grants that go there as well as food stamp assistance to the island. Obviously the island was racked by Hurricane Maria and has struggled to get back on the grid. People still without power. Lots of folks there in desperate need of government assistance. The president has instead said that he prefers money to go towards other disasters in the continental United States. He thinks that puerto ricos officials are misusing the money, are not giving it to their citizens properly. He really doesnt want any more money to go there and told his aides that. Theres currently a battle over the next round of disaster funding and food stamp money. The president is putting his finger on the scale to say he thinks puerto rico has received enough and doesnt need anymore. Is it is there anger toward puerto rico on the president s part . Or is it, as you say, that he just feels like theyre misusing the funds . Do we know how its going to affect any federal aid headed to the island . Well, its an amalgamation of both. The president grew frustrated with political leaders after the storm. You remember his public tiffs with the mayor of san juan and kind of grew to believe that puerto ricos officials on the ground were not particularly competent. He also has been concerned that he doesnt think puerto rico is spending its money correctly. He read a wall street journal story from late 2018 that shows how some bondholders and folks in the private industry were benefitting from federal Government Funds and that really set him off, by the accounts of several Different Administration officials weve spoken to. Since then theres been a desire to really cut back on the funding that goes to puerto rico. The cuts in food stamp benefits, how much has that impacted residents of the island . Well, my colleague went to puerto rico last weekend and spent several days on the ground and found there were a lot of people in desperate need. More than a 40 cut. People that run social safety net programs, nursing homes, People Living on the cusp of just trying to even get back to where they were near before the storm, really still struggling in puerto rico and the portrait he painted there was pretty grim and its a place where all the elected Officials Say they need more government assistance, not a slash in government assistance. What role is congress playing in this . Any that could be passed or signed into law . Theres legislation that could come up as early as this week on puerto rico assistance and a number are pushing heavily for it. You have some republicans that are pushing for the country to get more and hurricanes, tornadoes, fires that are part of the package and its a melting pot of money that goes and what the president and the white house wants matters quite a bit in these discussions. Appreciate it. Thank you very much. Thank you. All right. Chris is back. Lets see what hes working on for cuomo primetime at the top of the hour. Welcome back. Its good to see you, my friend. Some things are simple. Some things are complex. Puerto rico, simple. They got the numbers wrong there and they got the importance wrong there and they have been carrying it through as some type of vendetta. I was there on vacation with my family. The help is real. The need is real. Its that simple. Complex is why im here in washington, d. C. I came here to get the president s two main lawyers. Jay sekulow and rudy giuliani. Well have them both on tonight. Listen to this, i never heard of this before, theyre tag teaming my show with Sean Hannitys show tonight. Its such a statement that where we are as a culture that theyll be switching midshow, going back and forth on the two shows preaching to the converted on one and preaching to open minds on the other. Its a really weird time but we need to have an understanding of what this report means and what we still need to know and well get deep on that tonight. All right. About seven minutes from now. Looking forward to it. Chris, thanks very much. Still ahead, the father of a first grader killed in the sandy hook massacre died of suicide. Sadly, hes just one of three apparent suicides in the past week or so with possible ties to school shootings. More ahead. So even when she grows up, shell never outgrow the memory of our adventure. Unlock savings when you add select hotels to your existing trip. Only with expedia. Select hotels to your existing trip. Guys, ive got an idea oooh, what is it . So people love iphone xr, right . Well, it does have an incredible camera. And it comes in all those amazing colors. Uh huh. What if we give the people iphone xr, when they join tmobile . Iphone xr on us . Yeah, iphone xr on us whats not to love about that . For a limited time, join tmobile and get the awesome iphone xr on us. Behr presents tough as walls. Thats some great paint. Thats some great paint. Thats some great paint. Behr ultra, a toprated interior and exterior paint. Paint, prime, protect all in one. Now thats some great paint find it exclusively at the home depot. I switched to geico and saved hundreds. Thats a win. But its not the only reason i switched. Geicos a company i can trust, with over 75 years of great savings and service. Now thats a winwin. Switch to geico. Its a winwin. Sad and difficult news to report tonight thats a reminder to us all about how fragile human life is and how important it is to reach out to help or those in need. The father of a little girl who was murdered in the newtown massacre was found this morning. His daughter was six when she was killed along with 19 other children and six adults at sandy hook elementary in 2012. He cofounded a nonprofit that focused on violence prevention through research. I spoke to him and his wife about their daughter in 2013 for a cnn documentary. She was such a wonderfully fun child and she would light up. I wish that you got to meet her. You would have been blown away. She was fun and funny. She would have made you smile. Every day we need to get out of bed and jen came up with just a beautiful idea to get us out of bed and every day we try to find something of beauty. Something that makes you feel the world is a good place. And then every day we want to make sure that we try to, really strive to give back something of beauty. Something to the world. Striving to give back something of beauty to the world. He was 49 years old and the cause of death is an apparent suicide. Its often impossible to know for sure what may be in someones head or heart that leads to depression and sometimes to death by suicide but there have been several other recent deaths we want to make you away of. In florida, mourners are grieving the death of a 2018 graduate of Marjorie Stoneman douglas high school. She survived the attack last year. Her mom told cnn affiliate wfor that she suffered from survivors guilt and was diagnosed with posttraumatic stress disorder. On saturday night, another Parkland Student also apparently died by suicide. The student is a sophomore according to the miami herald. We dont know what caused these people to have these thoughts and act on them. It is important to know that help is available. Reaching out for it can be hard and its made harder by the stigma that still surrounds suicide and is made harder by the silence that also surrounds suicide. Its not easy to talk about it if youre having thoughts of suicide and its certainly not easy to talk about if someone you know is suffering and you want to help them. Its often hard to know what to say or how to help, but reaching out in both cases and talking, that is essential. Theres help out there and its just a phone call away. If you or someone you know might be at risk of suicide, you can call the National Suicide prevention lifeline. Were showing you the number at the bottom of your screen. 18002738255. 18002738255. Theres also a text line and you can text home to 741741 to have a confidential text conversation with a trained crisis counselor from an Organization Called crisis text line. Its very Popular Among Young People in particular or anybody that may be more used to or comfortable with texting than on the phone. Counselors are available 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. We had an important and extensive conversation with the chief medical officer earlier on our show on full circle. Its our daily interactive