They proceeded with this search, to r according to cohens own attorney, after they were contacted by the special counsel robert mule who are said this is not within my bailiwick but you mi might do this yourselves. Cohens attorney called it inappropriate and unnecessary. Because cohen has been cooperating with investigators so far. So they took records, my sources tell me, related to his legal clients and that includes the president and as well as his personal finances. One of my sources said, anderson, that when you look at this, the search warrant, and we have not read it, but my source said that it is largely related to Stormy Daniels and then there were subsets of it in which there was discussion of payments made to her, of communications with the president about the Stormy Daniels case, and potentially communications with the campaign about it. I mean, youll recall Michael Cohen was not a member of the campaign officially, but he did talk to a lot of people of the campaign about it. Now, people ive spoken with who were close to the president say he is incredibly upset by this. He is angry about this. He believes this has crossed a line for him. And the legal team, it seems to me, may not be playing nice with bob mueller anymore. And then, of course, the question that youve been raising all evening is does this mean that he would fire Rod Rosenstein or attorney general Jeff Sessions whom im told hes very mad at, or even bob mueller, himself . Yeah. Fascinating day, gloria borger, appreciate it. More on the president s reaction tonight at the white house. Cnns jim acosta is there. Joins us now. Jim, just if you can just refresh our viewers on what the president said about these fbi raids. Reporter well, anderson, before i do that, i just want to tell you, i just got off the phone with a source familiar with everything thats been going on at the white house today who said that the president did not hear about this as we all heard about this earlier today when the news broke, that according to the source familiar with the situation over here, the president was informed of this raid on Michael Cohens offices by one of his aides earlier on in the day, and that these conversations as to what the president should do and how he should respond, that those conversations have been going on all day long. That we can tell you just some new information coming in to us here at cnn. Now, in terms of what the president said earlier this evening, this was an extraordinary moment and it felt like, anderson, it felt like a turning of the page in the mueller investigation. And as gloria was saying, it may be no more mr. Nice guy when it comes to the president. In terms of how to handle this mueller investigation. According to one source i just spoke with a little while ago, the president is, as gloria said, furious over these developments, believes, as i talked to with one source earlier this evening, source close to the white house, that essentially mueller has gone rogue, hes overstepped the bounds of this investigation and thats essentially what you heard in the president s own words earlier this evening. Heres what he had to say. So i just heard that they broke into the office of one of my personal attorneys, good man, and its a disgraceful situation. Its a total witch hunt. Ive been saying it for a long time. Ive wanted to keep it down. Weve given, i believe, over a million pages worth of documents to the special counsel. They continue to just go forward and here we are talking about syr syria, were talking about a lot of serious things with the greatest fighting force ever and i have this witch hunt constantly going on for over 12 months now. And actually much more than that. You could say it was right after i won the nomination it started. And its a disgrace. Its, frankly, a real disgrace. Its an attack on our country in a true sense. Its an attack on what we all stand for. So when i saw this and when i heard it, i heard it like you did, i said that is really now in a whole new level of unfairness. So this has been going on. I saw one of the reporters who is not necessarily a fan of mine, not necessarily very good to me. He said in effect that this is ridiculous, this is now getting ridiculous. They found in collusion whatsoever with russia. The reason they found it is there was no collusion at all. No collusion. This is the most biased group of people. These people have the biggest conflicts of interest ive ever seen. Democrats all, or just about all, either democrats or a couple of republicans that worked for president obama, theyre not looking at the other side. Theyre not looking at the Hillary Clinton horrible things that she did and all of the crimes that were committed. Theyre not looking at all of the things that happened that everybody is very angry about. I can tell you from the republican side. And i think even the independent side. They only keep looking at us. So they find no collusion, and then they go from there and they say, well, lets keep going. And they raid an office of a personal attorney early in the morning. And i think its a disgrace. So well be talking about it more, but this is the most conflicted group of people ive ever seen. The attorney general made a terrible mistake when he did this and when he recused himself, or he should have certainly let us know if he was going to recuse himself and we would have used a put a different attorney general in. So he made what i consider to be a very terrible mistake for the country but youll figure that out. All i can say is after looking for a long period of time, even before the special counsel, because it really started just about from the time i won the nomination, and you look at what took place and what happened, and its a disgrace. Its a disgrace. Ive been president now for what seems like a lengthy period of time. Weve done a fantastic job. Weve beaten isis. We have just about 100 of the caliphate or the land. Our economy is incredible. The stock market dropped a lot today, as soon as they heard the noise of this nonsense thats going on. It dropped a lot. It was up, way up, and then it dropped quite a bit at the end. A lot. But that we have to go through that, weve had that hanging over us now from the very, very beginning and yet the other side, they dont even bother looking and the other side is where there are crimes and those crimes are obvious. Lies under oath, all over the place. Emails that are knocked out, that are acid washed and deleted. Nobodys ever seen. 33,000 emails are deleted after getting a subpoena for congress. And nobody bothers looking at that. And many h, ma, many other thin. So i just think its a disgrace that a thing like this can happen. Why dont you just fire mueller . Why dont i just fire mueller . Fire the guy. Well, i think its a disgrace whats going on. Well see what happens. I think its really a sad situation when you look at what happened. Many people have said, you should fire him. Again, they found nothing. And in finding nothing, thats a big statement. If you know the person whos in charge of the investigation, you know all about that, deputy rosenstein, Rod Rosenstein, he wrote the letter very critical of comey. One of the things they said, i fired comey. Well, i turned out to do the right thing because you look at all of the things hes done and the lies and you look at whats gone on at the fbi with the insurance policy and all of the things that happened. Turned out i did the right thing. But he signed, as you know, he also signed the fisa warrant. So Rod Rosenstein who was in charge of this signed a fisa warrant and he also he also signed a letter that was essentially saying to fire james comey. And he was right about that. He was absolutely right. So well see what happens. I think its disgraceful and so does a lot of other people. This is a pure and simple witch hunt. Thank you very much. Reporter now were also finding the president has been consulting with lawyers and advisers throughout the day like ty cobb, the white house attorney here whos been working on the mueller investigation. Of course, john kelly the chief of staff. Anderson, of course, the next step in all of this is really in the president s hands, what does he decide to do, does he decide to fire bob mueller or try to go through the Justice Department and push him out by firing rod rosenste rosenstein . Attorney general Jeff Sessions. All of that obviously is the question facing the president at this point. As i was talk to a source familiar with this, i put it to this person, are we essentially on the dark side of the moon here in in other words, we dont know whats going to happen yet. This source said, yeah, that pretty much sums it up, apdson, we dont know whats on the other side of the moon the a this point. Jim acosta, thanks very much. Being on the receiving end of legal action not a place Michael Cohen is accustom to. He is, if you havent noticed, known as and happy to be the more the dishing it out time. Detail the now from cnn Senior Investigative correspondent drew griffith. Reporter he has been with donald trump since 2007. Personal lawyer, 100 defender, and has made no apologies for h his unyielding support of donald trump. When cnn recently called cohen trumps fixer, cohen responded with this tweet. Thank you for your accurate depiction of me and my role for our president. My job is i protect mr. Trump. Thats what it is. If theres an issue that relates to mr. Trump that is of concern to him, its of course, concern to me. And i will use my legal skills within which to protect mr. Trump to the best of my ability. Reporter the skills have included threatening reporters, buying silence, bullying tactics to prevent the release of damaging information about the president. Hes the guy that you could call 3 00 in the morning when you have a problem. Do you know stories of donald trump calling him at 3 00 in the morning . Donald trump has called him at all hours of the night. Every dinner ive been at with michael the boss has called. Reporter it is with that background that makes the details about the Stormy Daniels deal somewhat incredulous. Cohen has explained he made the Stormy Daniels story disappear just 11 days before the november election when he and he, alone, withdrew 130,000 from a home equity line of credit and paid the porn actress to keep quiet. Both he and his famous client insist the president was never told. Do you know about the 130,000 payment to Stormy Daniels . No. Then why did Michael Cohen make it if there was no you have to ask Michael Cohen. Michaels my attorney and youll have to ask michael. Reporter cohen first became a person of special interest in the investigation of special Counsel Robert Mueller when his name came up in that controversial russian dossier on trump. Then during the 2016 campaign, it was revealed cohen tried to contact a kremlin official regarding potential plans for a trump tower moscow. Michael was the fixer. We all know mike. So it could be anything. Its not that this there were a ton of matters that took place that michael fixed and donald trump wasnt involved in every single matter. Reporter cohens own attorney called todays raids completely inappropriate and unnecessary. And confirmed that the new york action is in part a referral by the office of special Counsel Robert Mueller and added it resulted in the unnecessary seizure of protected Attorney Client communications between a lawyer and his clients. Cohen who left the Trump Organization last year still appears to have just one client. The president , donald trump. Drew griffin, cnn, atlanta. Michael cohen may have just one clichbent. David chalian, kristen powers, jeffrey toobin, paul begala, and mike shields. Jeff, you know, the president saying that basically linking all this to Robert Mueller, the person who actually authorized this raid would be the head of the Southern District whos an appointee of the president. Jeffrey berman. The u. S. Attorney. Appointed by donald trump. Not just that. Remember, he didnt have the authority to order a search warrant by himself. All a u. S. Attorney can do is make an application to a magistrate judge who decides whether theres enough evidence to grant a search warrant. So its not his complaint is not just with Robert Mueller. Its with his own appointee, jeff berman, and the judges who approved the search warrant. So the idea that this is somehow bob mueller off on a rogue tangent by himself is just completely belied by the facts its also interesting to hear them, the president talk about the fbi kind of breaking into his as if its like daniel elsburgs office, his psychiatrists office and theyre stealing documents. What hoops do the fbi, does the head of the Southern District, have is to jump through in order to get i mean, getting a search warrant is an extensive process. Its not and harder to get one on a lawyer . Yes. Absolutely. Theres a United States attorneys manual that the entire department of justice follows whether youre a main justice or local Attorneys Office and theres a special section on what happens when youre trying to get information, how you approach lawyers. It is incredibly sensitive because much of the communication is privileged. I want to say one thing on that, its an important thing for us to think about, communications are only privileged when youre requesting or receiving legal advice. It if theres a third party, the communication is not as privileged. He had no idea this was happening, thats not going to be privileged communications, right . If the president said i had no idea this was happening, then we have no reason to believe that the Stormy Daniels wait, so any communication between the president and Michael Cohen, thats not all covered by privilege . No. Every communication is not covered by privilege, right . Every time i talk to my attorney, thats not covered by maybe. Depends about what. Exactly. If you talk about, you know, luchb lunch, its not privilege. It has to be about the legal matter that is under consideration. So if by what youre saying is if the president has already claimed he wasnt part of this, then its hard for us to see any way in which the Stormy Daniels agreement if thats true and is the case. Now, lets say there are emails that the president is on, although i understand the president doesnt email and so that may not be the case but at this point if we take the president s word that he had no communications about it, theres no reason for us to believe he he wasnt involved in this agreement, theres no reason for us to believe anything will be privilege related to it. You can pierce privilege if theres illegality taking place between an attorney an client, corre correct . Thats called the crime fraud exception. If an attorney and a client are planning or covering up a crime together, that is not privilege, but a judge has to be persuaded that thats what theyre doing. All right. I want to bring in the rest of the panel in a moment. We got to get the nonlawyers on the panel on this. Also other subjects including one item that broke moments ago in the New York Times about a transaction that Robert Mueller is investigating. 150,000 from a ukrainian magnate to President Trumps town daig foundati foundation. More ahead. Behr premium plus, a top rated interior paint at a great price. Family friendly, disaster proof. Find it exclusively at the home depot. The commute is worth it. Me, the more you know you and that john deere tractor. You can keep dreaming up projects all the way home. Its a longer drive. But just like a john deere, its worth it. You wouldnt accept from any one else. Why accept it from your allergy pills . Flonase relieves your worst symptoms including nasal congestion, which most pills dont. Flonase helps block 6 key inflammatory substances. Most pills only block one. Flonase. Theres a new place with Daily Laundry Service a place with a day spa a place where seniors get the care they need in the comfort of home. Home instead senior care. Janice, mom told me you bought a house. Okay. [ buttons clicking ] [ camera shutter clicks ] so, now that you have a house, you can use homequote explorer. Quiet. Im blasting my quads. Janice, look. Im in a meeting. Janice, look. [ chuckles ] look, look. Im looking. Its easy. You just answer some simple questions online, and you get Coverage Options to choose from. Youre ruining my workout. Cycling is my passion. Youre ruining my workout. We know that when youre tspending time with thelass grandkids. Music tech . Every minute counts. And you dont have time for a cracked windshield. Thats why at safelite, well show you exactly when well be there. With a replacement you can trust. All done sir. Grandpa looks great tech thanks for choosing safelite. Grandpa thank you child bye tech bye saving you time. So you can keep saving the world. Kids safelite repair, safelite replace well, a remarkable day in politics. Focus of the breaking news tonight, Michael Cohen, the fbi raided his office, hotel room, reportedly his apartment or home. However, the case apparently at the center of it all is the one brought by mr. Cohens archen y archenemy, Stormy Daniels attorney michael avenatti. This is a serious matter. As i predicted last week, it appears the noose is tight reni around Michael Cohen. I think the president has considerable reason to be concerned. A lot of faith and confidence has been put in Michael Cohen. I think the expectation was that he was going to be the fall guy. This is a very, very serious matter. Theres no question that it stems from our case and the amount of attention that our case has attracted over the last six weeks. But make no mistake about it, theres going to be a lot of sleepless nights at the white house from here on out. And back now with our panel. Mike, how do you see this . I mean, given all the moving parts today. Well, look, think its a bet and they better find something because the public the president is saying im being attacked needlessly, now were even were raiding the president s personal lawyers office. And if you dont find something, then the weight of look at what a witch hunt this is, has nothing to do with collusion, theres been no evidence found, theyre now raiding my personal lawyer, almost like saying i cant have a lawyer without him being raided and you dont find anything . The credibility of the entire investigation is going to rest on that. I think Robert Mueller set this in motion, we can say it was somebody else that executed it. It started with him. If this doesnt work, this is a huge bet that hes making that somethings going to be found in this because its going to make him look terrible if nothing comes out of it. Mr. Mueller has public confidence. Across the spectrum. The president theres some kind of fox news freak shows that says hes horrible. The main the American People have confidence in this guy and they should. Hes a career prosecutor, decorated marine. A republican. The attorney general is a republican. The Deputy Attorney general who reports to mr. Mueller is a republican appointed by donald trump. The head of the fbi is a republican appointed by donald trump. The u. S. Attorney wheno appareny executed this warpt warrant is a republican appointed by donald trump. Its hard for him to make the case he has credibility now because he hasnt done something this aggressive and this risky with it going wrong. So they raided manafort, they seem to have something on him. If they raid the president s personal lawyer and send a signal to future president s that that can happen outside of the purview of the russian collusion mandate, and nothing is found, that is going to damage him devastatingly. When you heard the president talking today, what did you think . Well, i mean, i thought just a lot of what i thought he was doing what he always does which hes setting out the story line for conservatives and for his supporters which is im under attack, you know, breaking into the office, which is not what happened, of course, there was a warrant, and hes telling the story thats now going to be told throughout sort of the conservative world so that they can say hes being persecuted and hes, you know, theres and its unfair. I think a lot of what youre saying, mike, though, i think youre making a lot of speculation. We dont really know why mueller made this referral. And first, as you pointed out, when they this raid is pretty reminiscent, frankly, of the manafort raid and they did find something. All anyones doing is speculating. People have been speculating all day, hes going to fire mueller. Were all speculating here. None of us actually work in muellers operation. My point, my point is, if he did something illegal, he should go to jail. This is what were a law and order country. If he didnt, its a massive bet mueller is making. Hes betting thats the speculation. The bet. Youre saying hes betting on something. I dont know what a bet is. Okay, look hes doing his job. Maybe he doesnt know hes betting. Im tell you, maybe he didnt know it. Hes risked the credibility of his investigation by going this far and this aggressively and this dramatically because if he doesnt find something, the rest of what hes trying to do he may find something later. The president is going to be able to credibly say they went after my personal lawyer, tried to get into my privilege with my lawyer and they didnt find ta anything . Thats going to have credibility with the American People. Doesnt that negate what we were hearing earlier, it wasnt just mueller, he referred it, then there was the u. S. Attorney in the Southern District, there was a magistrate, a judge to look into is this. So it wasnt just mueller on his own deciding to do this tbut im talking about the political public which is ultimately what all these things come down to, right . Youre sort of i think up to this point muellers been very tight on this stuff. This is a dramatic move. Thats not speculation. We all believe this is dramatic. This is serious. If you dont find something, if you go to these lengths or find something thats not that big of a deal, and, you know, its been raised to this level, i believe the publics credibility starts to turn against mueller because theyre saying what are you doing . This has been going on for over a year, this has nothing to do with russian collusion, this has nothing to do with russians getting on facebook, youre going after the president s personal lawyer and not finding anything. I want to ask, though, he didnt refer and say you are to do x, y, and z with this. He just found something. And is referring it. This is why i think we have to hit pause. If it is the case that mueller saw evidence of criminal of potential criminal activity and referred it to someone else, i had hundreds of things referred to me when i was attorney general, some cases we filed, some we didnt. So it really does, you really are passing the baton to the next person to make an independent decision of do i have enough to execute a search warrant on . Because thats the person its your person whos then going to the judge. Youre also passing the baton to the person appointed by President Trump, himself. Exactly. Thats the person who goes before the magistrate judge and says i want a search warrant. Interviewed by donald trump, i cant think jeffrey may i cant think of a single u. S. Attorney in history who was personal will i interviewed by the president before he or she was hired. Its really rare. Historically inappropriate because of the extremely sensitive nature of what u. S. Attorneys do but he did it and picked jeff berman to be the u. S. Attorney and jeff berman is the person who authorized this search what you saw in the cabinet room today, donald trump, we talked a lot in the last year about him not respecting the traditional distance and independence of the Justice Department and the fbi, from the presiden presidency. I think he got a real lesson today on what that independence is. This is a moment where i think the president was and you see it in how angry he is, that it is this way, but theres a fullon display example of the independence from the executive of the Justice Department fulfilling its mission. And he sat there with his National Security team in the wake of a syrian chemical gas attack and he called the search warrant, while dramatic, perfectly legal. He called it, quote, an attack on our country. In that context, sitting around the table with men and women who are giving their live to protect our country from real attacks, thats pretty offensi offensive. Also you could argue given the lack of such verbiage on russias attack on the election which was an attack on our country much more to report tonight, breaking news from the New York Times, Robert Mueller is investigating a wealthy ukrai ukraini ukrainians payment to President Trumps foundation. Ill talk to one of the reporters on the story, maggie haberman, get the panels take as well. Introducing walkabout wednesdays. Its a great day for a great deal tender, centercut sirloin or chicken on the barbie, fries, a draft beer or a coke, all for just 9. 99. Only for a limited time. So dont walk, run to outback. If youd have told me three years ago. That wed be downloading in seconds, what used to take. Minutes. That guests would compliment our wifi. That we could video conference. And do it like that. snaps if youd have told me that i could afford. A gigspeed. A gigspeed network. Its like 20 times faster than what most people have. Id of said. Id of said youre dreaming. Dreaming definitely dreaming. Then again, dreaming is how i got this far. Now more businesses in more places can afford to dream gig. Comcast, building americas largest gigspeed network. Well, on a night full of breaking news, there is, wait for it, even more breaking news. In this case, it is the russia probe, specifically the money trail and where that trail is leading Robert Muellers team. Maggie haberman and Michael Schmidt broke the story in the New York Times this evening. Maggie joins us now by phone. So, maggie, explain what youve uncovered here. Sure. Thanks for having me. The special counsel is investigating by way of a is subpoena a payment to the president to go into his private foundation for a 20minute speech that he gave in september 2015 when he was already a candidate, to a yalta conference that was sponsored primarily by ukrainian oligarch named victor pinchuk, also donated quite heavily to the clinton foundation. Essentially, mueller is looking for payments to the president from nonu. S. People and the speech qualified. It has always been curious why the money went to the foundation in the first place as opposed to going directly to the president , but it is another instance of a deeper entanglement of the investigation into the president s finances and the first that im aware of of any kind of look at money involving the foundation which has raised its own questions over the last couple of years. So did thencandidate donald trump do anything in return for the donation . He gave a 20minute by skype speech, Something Like 2 00 in the morning, that anybody can google and watch because its online. Where he was asked about a couple of different issues related to Foreign Policy and it was one of the first times that he had done so. Possibly the very first time that he had done so as a candidate. This whole thing, not m particularly effective, because hes waiting for a translation to come through so that he can answer questions or he keeps sort of stopping and starting and, again, it was Something Like 2 00 in the morning in new york because he was skyping in and there was a time difference. But 20 minutes for 150,000 to the Charitable Foundation that he has often used for things like settling his personal legal dis his business legal disputes and so forth. How did muellers team find out about the money, do you know . They gave well, so its been reporting before that this payment took place, the payment was declared on the foundations own filings. Its, again, this payment has been controversial in the past because the foundation acknowledged in 2016 right after the president had won the election, that it may have violated prohibitions against socalled selfdealing, which means using a foundation to promote a personal business. And that payment was one of the newer ones that they had added that might be questionable. So the payments been known about but this subpoena that muellers folks issued to the Trump Organization, which Michael Schmidt and i wrote about a couple weeks ago, was pretty broad and pretty sweeping. It was downplayed to us by people at the time as, you know, very standard to make sure document compliance is taking place and so forth. This suggests a little more than that. I know you also have reporting on how the president is reacting to the fbi raids on Michael Cohens office, hotel room, apartment. What do you know . Not reacting calmly. I mean, that what you saw of that spray of him with the poolers where he was venting about this as an attack on our country was him at his rawest that weve seen in public related to this investigation. It is a fraction of what he is saying in private. Hes bouncing off the walls according to one source. And both he and cohen, according to two people i spoke to, see this as a clear violation of red line, quote unquote, that the president said in an interview with mike schmidt, peter baker and me, in the Oval Office Last summer about the scope of muellers inquiry, that if it went beyond russia and started tracking into the president s personal finances or his familys finances, that that would be a problem. This its not clear this goes directly to that, but, you know, this is the office of his personal attorney. Remember the president said last week, i believe it was when he came back on air force one, he told reporters who asked him about the Stormy Daniels payment, well, you know, youll have to talk to my attorney, Michael Cohen, thats my attorney. He stressed that. That is because their main defense on all of this was expected to be Attorney Client privilege and my understanding is the files were seized from k cohens either office or home who both that are client files that relate to trump. Maggie haberman, appreciate it. Thanks very much. Back now with the panel. In terms of if the president did decide to move against Robert Mueller, can you just explain how that would be done . Because he wovuldnt be able to directly fire Robert Mueller. No. I think what all of us suspect is he would try to fire first the Deputy Attorney general Rod Rosenstein. Rod rosenstein. Then someone else would come into that spot. Either i think its the office of Legal Counsel head associate attorney general first then the head of the Legal Counsel. And then expect that person would actually fire mueller because mueller reports not to the attorney general, but right now to the Deputy Attorney general so its not where the president would directly fire mueller but the president would have to put into effect a series of actions to fire someone else who would then fire mueller. What do you think would be the impact if mueller was fired . Lindsey graham woarned about this. Its obviously been in the ether a long time. I think it would obviously be just, like, a massive explosion in the political world. The question is what would anybody really do about it . The people who are in control right now, at least, are the republic republicans. Even though they say this is something that, you know, that would upset them, i dont know what they would really do about it. So im not sure ive never been one of these poem whos thought, oh, hes not going to do that, it seems like sthik something he would do to me. Mike, what do you think the reaction would be . Yeah, my advice would be not to do it, dont fire anybody. Let this play out and exonerate you. Thats what my political advice to the president would be. He should watch cnn. Always, of course. The last four hours theres been a lot of analysts that were almost giddy at the idea, maybe hell finally fire him and the joy with which a lot of people think that this would harm him to fire mueller is evident in people. So you do you think it would actually he shouldnt make them happy and do it. Do you think it would harm him . I think it would harm him. I think it would harm the party. I do. Especially because you can be exonerated. Let that play out. Let the facts come out and show every single thing weve seen up until now has nothing to do with russian collusion. Sure, theres been a manafort problem, a rick gates, people are getting things are happening. None of it is to do with collusion. Lets get to that conclusion and prove the rigyou were right all david chalian, some said i dont know that it would be a fullblown constitutional crisis with a current setup of congress with republicans in charge there. I do think, you have heard more republicans than just the occasional usual character just the ones that are leaving. Like lindsey graham. Not just the ones who are leaving. Actually beyond them who have expressed concern or talked about the notion of trying to protect mueller legislatively. I dont know i would not expect paul ryans majority to all of a sudden launch impeachment proceedings in the house. I do think he would survive politically that way. To mikes point, i do think there would be such damage, such political damage to the party, to the president , of course, but to the party, itself, that i think that would have some members who have rallied to his cause be very, very concerned about what that would mean for the what will they do . The check and the balance that our framers gave us in the constitution is article 1. The president s in article 2. Article 1 is supposed to check and balance him. Article 1 is run by paul ryan and mitch mcconnell. Okay . Guys who put their spines in a blind trust the day donald trump got inaugurated. They will do nothing. Lindsey graham will issue a stronglyworded tweet. And marco rubio will issue a squishy news release and nothing will happen. Theres another part of the constitution. This is whats going to happen. The first three words, we the people. You think the womens march was big . You think the march for our lives was big . They were warmups. They were practice sessions. The American People will not stand for this. The Republican Congress will. They have absolutely no spine. They have absolutely, i think theyre a disgrace to the constitution. I really do. I hope im wrong. I know the American People arent going to say, oh, well, paul ryan wont do anything, well sit her ae and let this g subvert the constitution. I think people are serious about this. I think mr. Trump is going to provoke a constitutional crisis because he doesnt care about normalcy. Frankly, he doesnt care about the party. Youre right, it will damage his party. He doesnt give a rip snort about your party. Hes a total narcissist. Look, i mean, these two split into partisan battles. The day president clinton was impeached, there was a rally on the white house lawn by the democrats in congress who i guess at that time were not a threat to the constitution. He had 71 of the American People behind him. Donald trump has 42 . A big difference. No, look, it is he hasnt fired anybody yet. Its certainly, to davids point, to your point, the public does matter, why i think he shouldnt do it. The idea that both sides are playing politics with this is absurd. Youre saying the republicans are playing bri ining politics protect him. The thats not true, mike. There hasnt been evidence of collusion including todays news. All right. I want to thank everybody. Coming up, a busy night at the white house to say the least. Not only is the president clearly upset about the raid on Michael Cohen, hes promising a forceful response to the deadly chemical attack in syria. Ill speak to david gergen and secretary leon panetta about all that next. Theres a lot on the white houses plate tonight to say the least. The raid on the president s attorney Michael Cohen clearly upset the president whos once again dangling the possibility of firing mueller with a well see. Based on all the president said tonight, would be easy to forget that the setting was a meeting with his National Security team, military top brass, a meeting about the suspected chemical attack in syria. And what the United States response should be. Theres a lot to get to. Joining me, cnn senior political analyst david gergen and former white house chief of staff, cia director, leon panetta. Senator john mccain said in a statement yesterday that assad and his russian and iranian backers were, quote, emboldened by President Trump intimating last week he wanted to pull u. S. Troops out of syria. Im wondering if you agree with that. Is that what happened . Its hard to say just exactly why the syrians did what they did. You could argue on one hand that if they thought that the United States, in fact, was going to leave syria, that it would be the stupidest thing in the world to suddenly conduct a chemical attack and challenge the United States. So its a little difficult to know that the syrians, in fact, were acting based on what President Trump said or didnt say. David, i mean, it is almost exactly a year ago that the president authorized those air strikes against syria when chemical weapons were used then. Does he have a choice now but to once again authorize some sort of military action here . Not much. His rhetoric, alone, has escalated the u. S. Commitment over the last 48 howevers so that i think now if he were to back down it would be considered worse than what obama did by not a bibiding by the re line he drew for syria and it was regarded as one of the mistakes he made in his presidency. I think the big question is whether hes going to do it in a limited way, perhaps, with international support. And then get out and stay to his original course of trying to get people out of there. U. S. Troops out of there. Or whether hes going to now get drawn in much more by this. Yeah. Secretary panetta, i want to ask you about what david just referenced, that red line. President trump tweeted this yesterday. Said, if president obama had crossed his stated red line in the sand, the syrian disaster would have ended long ago. An imal assad would have been history. He drew that red line over the use of chemical weapons which was crossed. Do you think President Trump has a point here, was that a mistake for president obama . Well, i dont think theres any question that it was a mistake to draw a red line and then not enforce it. As to whether or not it would have made a difference in terms of the course of the syrian war, thats very difficult to say. So i think President Trump has a has a tendency to always try to blame others for the responsibilities hes got to face. This is one hes got to call. Hes the one whos now drawn the line. That line has clearly been crossed. I think the challenge is now to see just exactly what this president will do to make clear that the United States will not tolerate this. David, i want to turn to another crisis of sorts for the white house. The president s personal lawyers office, hotel room, other locations associated with Michael Cohen, raided today by the fbi. Apparently now separate from special counsel muellers Russian Election meddling investigation, although its very early right now to know the exact details. How big of a problem do you think this is for the white house . Because the president came out very strongly critical of what happened today. Well, its hard to know how big a problem its going to be to the white house. The president s fury at this which seemed to be escalated way above what he said in other tweets in the past, does suggest this, indeed, could be a prelude to the president firing mueller if theres any connection at all or at least going after the fbi and maybe rosenstein or, you know, some other officials there. So i think were on were in pretty treacherous territory here. But the issue is i unprecedented, to my knowledge, to have a president s personal attorney raided like this. They must have had must have been able to present evidence that was usually compelling to take a step like this. Especially when you think this could be regarded by trump forces rightly so that this crosses the line of Attorney Client privilege. Secretary panetta, you heard President Trumps reaction to all this tonight. Do you believe hes ready to fire special counsel mueller or Jeff Sessions or Rod Rosenstein or, you know, some combination of all of the above . And if so, would that lead to a constitutional crisis . My recommendation to the white house would be before you take any precipitous action, you better find out just exactly what was the basis for the search warrants that allowed the fbi to do this from the u. S. Attorneys office. And normally, in my own experience, you dont get that kind of warrant unless youve established reasonable cause that a potential crime has been committed. What that crime is, you know, how extensive is the evidence here of a potential crime, i would suggest to the president and the people in the white house, take your time and look at that evidence before you take any precipitous action. Secretary panetta, david gergen, both of you, thanks so much. Thank you. Coming up tonight, a report on a republican strategy that seems to be taking off as a way to appeal to the president s supporters, warnings that if democrats take the house, theyll immediately move to impeach him. Now theres debate about whether that is true, warranted or wise. Thats next. Internet providers promise Business Owners a lot. Lets see who delivers more. Comcast business offers fast gigspeeds across our network. At t doesnt. We offer more complete reliability with up to 8 hours of 4g Wireless Network backup. At t, no way. We offer 35 voice features and solutions that grow with your business. At t, not so much. We give you 75 mbps for 59. 95. Thats more speed than at ts comparable bundle, for less. Call today. With republicans focused on trying to mitigate a democratic wave in november, democrats will immediately impeach the president in the house. David axelrod tweeted about it saying, dems should not commit to impeachment unless there is a case for one. If we normalize impeachment as a Political Tool, it will be another hammer blow to our democracy. Someone who does not agree with that is tom stire. You may have seen his tv ads calling for impeachment. He said, in david stires ad, defending democracy starts with doing whats right. Right now. Not waiting until things get worse. Appeasing mr. Trump and being polite is what whats wrong with the establishment. You seem to think that david stire thinks he should be impeached. Its only been done twice in the history of this republic, and each time theres been no conviction that followed. It ought to be proceeded with care so that half the country doesnt think that its a bloodless coup. And when you ask candidates in advance, will you vote for the impeachment of the president , and you say were going to make this the first order of business of a democratic congress, you are tainting that process of making it necessarily partisan, and i think that is very bad for the country. Tom, what about davids point . Could these calls to impeach the president dilute or somehow normalize impeachment as a Political Tool . I think that we do take the impeachment process extremely seriously, anderson. Because what david said is it is absolutely the final resort when you have a dangerous and lawless president , and you should take that process with the due solemni solemnity. But the fact of the matter is we do have a reckless and dangerous president , and its not a question of partisanship here, its a question of being patriots. This is a question about the safety of american democracy and the health and safety of the American People. And it cannot happen without Republican Voters and without the people of the United States thinking that its necessary. Tom, you do have all these impeachable offenses listed on your website including obstruction of justice. Why not just wait to see what muellers investigation concludes . Is it worth having this debate before all the facts are in . The funny thing is we did go to over 50 constitutional scholars five months ago and asked them had the criteria for impeachment been met. And they all said yes, its a laiddown hand. Were entirely supportive of mr. Muellers investigation. But in the normal course of an impeachment, before the impeachment happened, we would have a Senate Committee looking into the facts, which started but got squashed. We would have a Congressional Committee looking into the facts, which started but got squashed. So, in fact, weve done our homework and constitutional experts say that weve met the criteria for impeachment. Look, on the obstruction of justice charge, mr. Mueller hasnt even named the president as a target yet. So he hasnt reached that stage on a charge that they are investigating, and he has much more access to information than any of us and, in fact, a degree in the law. As you point out neither of us have that. And he hasnt named him as a target. I think it may come to the point at some point in the future that some of this will lead to impeachment. It could happen. But we ought to give the American People the confidence that its done on the basis of facts and on the basis of law, and so, you know, to list them and say you as a nonlawyer have polled some lawyers and youve concluded that these are impeachable offenses, why not let the authorities pursue these, let the courts pursue these issues, and then decide whether or not there should be impeachment . Well, thats a good question, david, and let me answer it, which is this. The American People and the american democracy are at great risk while we wait. The fact of the matter is, we are, at every single day, we are seeing lawless behavior out of this administration, and were seeing dangerous behavior out of this administration. So the longer we wait, the more that we decide to do nothing, the more risk the American People and the american democracy bear. So there is urgency to this that the assumption of waiting for further corroborating evidence the funny thing is we went back through your twitter account, and on may 17 of 2017, so a year ago, you said that if the president asked mr. Comey to quash an investigation that that would be the cause for impeachment. Youre absolutely right, and thats what mueller is evaluating, because all we have is what we know from the press reports on this, and well see what mueller concludes about that. But on the subject of democracy, my concern is this. If impeachment becomes a partisan tool and not an asiduous process, then you are damaging democracy. Its not about defending the president , its about defending democracy, and we cant take shortcuts because we have a reckless president. We have to leave it there for time. Tom steyer and david axelrod, thank you for the discussion. Well be right back. [phone ringing] need a change of scenery . The kayak price forecast tool tells you whether to wait or book your flight now. So you can be confident youre getting the best price. Giddyup kayak. Search one and done. Hey, im curious about your Social Security alerts. Oh well alert you if we find your Social Security number on any one of thousands of risky sites, so youll be in the know. Ewww being in the know is very good. Dont shake ahhh sign up online for free. Discover Social Security alerts. Thats all the time we have. I hand it over to don lemon. 360 will be back tomorrow. This is cnn tonight. Im don lemon. The magnitude of this day is unbelievable. It is historic. It is a moment when our country is on the brink. On the brink of what could turn into a constitutional crisis and potentially on the brink of military acts in syria. A furious President Trump surrounded by grimfaced military leaders in what was planned to be a meeting of syria, his arms folded, blasted the fbi raid today on his personal attorney Michael Cohen. I just heard that they broke into the office of one of my personal attorneys, good man,