0 aid to equipment. in egypt many believe the u.s. is not call it a coup because the u.s. wants to pump the money. mali needs all the help it can get. it's not a place america deals with because of national security, a place we need to care about because al qaeda spread is caused serious suffering and ending that is what americans should stand for above all else. have a great weekend. have a great weekend. "ac 360" starts now. -- captions by vitac -- www.vitac.com erin thanks. martin family attorney benjamin crump reacts here tonight and also, an american passenger talks about what it was like aboard a train out of control and off the rails. plus, for the very first time you'll hear the voice of a monster. what ariel castro who held three women captive for years had to say for himself and the plea deal that spared him a death sentence. we begin with a striking admission from zimmerman juror b-29, in a tearful plea from trayvon martin's mother not to let her son's death be in vain. juror b-29 known as maddy says she feels like she killed the teenager. a reminder today of what she and trayvon's father are living with. >> i just ask you as a mother, as a grandmother, as an aunt, an uncle, a grandfather to wrap your mind around what has happened. because i speak to you as trayvon's mother. i speak to you as a parent in the absolutely worst telephone call you can receive as a parent is to know that your son, your son you will never kiss again. i'm just asking you to wrap your mind around that. wrap your mind around no prom for trayvon. no high school graduation for trayvon. no college for trayvon. no grandkids coming from trayvon. all because of a law, a law that has prevented the person that shot and killed my son to be held accountable and to pay for this awful crime. >> sabriybrina fulton is talkin about florida's stand your ground law. speaking today she called for an end to it and others like it around the country. >> my message to you is, please use my story, please use my tragedy, please use my broken heart to say to yourself, we cannot let this happen to anybody else's child. [ applause ] >> at times, i feel like i'm a broken vessel. at times i don't know if i'm going or coming. but i know beyond a shadow of a doubt that god is using me and god is using my family to make a change, to make a difference. [ applause ] >> in the meantime, we heard more today from b-29. she's the one that went into the jury room wanting to convict of the highest charge, second-degree murder and came out having voted to acquit on all charges. as you'll hear shortly, she seemed to think the jury instructions and the law itself boxed her in. talking with abc news's robin roberts, she talked about the now famous 911 call. you'll remember in her exclusive interview with anderson b-27 thought it was zimmerman screaming for help. b-29 wasn't quite so clear. >> whose voice did you think it was on the 911 call? >> i never really, really paid mind to whose voice it was, because the evidence shows that people's voices change when you're in extreme motion. >> when you-all sent that note to the judge asking for an explanation on manslaughter, what was that about? >> what we were trying to figure out was manslaughter in order to be charged, we had to prove that when he left home, he said i'm going to go kill trayvon martin. i literally fell down on my knees. i broke down. my husband was holding me and i was screaming and crying and i kept saying to myself i feel that i killed him. i feel maybe if they would put the law and a lot of people would read it, they would understand the choices they gave us. >> juror b-29 obviously torn by the choice he made, which she believes is the only choice she had to vote for acquittal, but was it? let's ask the legal panel, benjamin crump, mark car -- mark geragos, sunny hostin, jeffrey toobin. >> you observed this juror in the courtroom every single day, and apparently, you were pretty surprised as she was the holdout juror. why was that? >> i wasn't surprised necessarily she was the holdout juror, i was surprised she basically, wolf, said that her understanding of the law was that she had to determine that george zimmerman, when he left his home, intended to kill trayvon martin. that was shocking to me because all along during the state's case, she seemed to be listening so intently. she seemed to understand the arguments so well, and she in particular when listening to the jury instructions was so attentive. so i was very surprised that she seemed to have just a misunderstanding of the law. that really surprised me. >> i'm sure it surprised a lot of people. caroline, you're a jury consultant. let me play sound from this juror 29 talking about those specific jury instructions. listen to this. >> for myself, he's guilty because the evidence shows he's guilty. >> he's guilty of? >> killing trayvon martin. but as the law was read to me, if you have no proof that he killed him intentionally, you can't find -- you can't say he's guilty. >> so caroline, you have a lot of experience, obviously, with jury instructions and jurors. are you surprised that she appears to be, well, if you believe what sunny says, a little confused about what the law is? >> you know, i'm not surprised at all. what we do is we give them jury instructions. the judge reads it, which is not the best way for anybody to comprehend something that's full of legal jargon, a double speak, compound sentences, double negatives and then we tell them to go off and do a good job. it's like reading your tax form. you try and understand it, but you're not necessarily equipped to do it in the manner we give jurors -- the way we deliver it. and when the prosecution doesn't explain, and i even blew it up. the wording is it's not necessary for the state to prove that george zimmerman had an intent to cause death. so what she needed, this juror needed to be armed with or supplied with this instruction but again, just because we read it and just because we give them a set, doesn't mean they understand. they often don't. >> because there were verbal instructions from the judge, but also, the 27-page document that apparently they all had they could study inside that jury room. mark, you know, is this the fault of prosecution for the confusion, shall we say, that the jury would go away not completely understanding of the role of intent in a possible verdict? >> well, the jury, frankly, reached the right verdict based on what they were presented with. the fault here lies with the prosecution because the prosecution did not do their job. the prosecution failed miserably in this case for a number of reasons. number one, they did not explain the jury instructions, instead, they decided to act like first year public defenders and get engaging in drama and think that was going to bring home a verdict for them, which was just none sense. anybody whose been in a courtroom and tried cases will tell you what jurors want -- first of all, during jury selection the case is over. then you arm the jurors with the jurors that you at least think will be with you. you arm them with the arguments and the law in your closing so that when they go back into that jury room, they are going to be able to convince the others of what your position is. that's what the defense did. that's why what the defense did was so masterful. that's why this prosecution, frankly, was abismil. >> mark was half right, better than his average. the prosecution did make a mistake -- >> just remember, jeff, you were 100% wrong all the way during this trial. so i'll give you -- >> that's not true, anyway. >> that's true, you were better than sunny was. >> thanks, thank, mark. >> the prosecution did make a big mistake in closing about not addressing the jury instructions in a more direct way, however, the fact is the evidence matters, and there was not a lot of evidence here where the prosecution could point to saying that george zimmerman committed this crime. >> i want to bring ben crump into this conversation, and benjamin, you spoke about how frustrating it's been to hear from two jurors now, who have both said basically they were confused by the jury instructions. let me play a little bit more from the juror on that. listen to this. >> i was the juror that was going to give them the hung jury. i was. i fought until the end. >> do you have regrets that you didn't? >> kind of. i mean, i'm the only minority and i felt like i let a lot of people down. >> all right. what's your reaction to that benjamin? >> we can't do anything, unfortunately, now to sybrina and tracy's terrible disappointment and hold the killer of their son responsible but change the stand your ground laws so nobody else will reach the verdict in these matters. i respectfully disagree. i do think there was evidence there to hold george zimmerman accountable. it was very clear when you looked at the evidence and you took away any of the rhetoric from the prosecutor or defense and look at trayvon martin was running away from him and minutes later he has a bullet in his heart. that's why people are so troubled by this finding because it set a precedence that you can but the pursuer, aggressor and say you stood your ground. it was self-defense. it makes no sense to us and if you try to divorce yourself of passion, but the prosecutor said it right, you reverse the roles, nobody is going to stay -- this is where i agree with mark. it was jury selection that the case was won or lost, unfortunately, because nobody took the perspective of trayvon martin that he was fighting for his life, that he went to his grave not knowing who was this strange, creepy man following him. >> the jurors near the end of the dell ratia liberations aske clarification on manslaughter and the judge said read the document again. if you want clarification, you got to ask specific questions. the jurors apparently never came back with a specific question and as a result may have been confused. jeffrey, go ahead. >> this under lines a real problem with the legal system, which is that jury instructions as a rule are often incomprehensible to ordinary people. i mean, you read these words, the reasonable, intention, you know, double triple negatives in the same sentence. it's very hard to understand. but appeals courts are very sensitive to mistakes in jury instructions. that's why they are so piled in leg lees. so what the trial judge did, what happens often. the trial judge didn't want to try to explain the instructions in a way that might be become an error, so she just said read them again. i am very sympathetic to maddy for not understanding them but unfortunately, she really didn't understand them because she seems to be wrong about a lot of the things on the jury instructions but unfortunately, this happens often. >> jeff, hold that thought. everyone stay there. i want to pick up the conversation after a short break. also coming up, why authorities detained the man at the controls of this train as it left the tracks. what it was like for one of the passengers on board. you make a great team. it's been that way since the day you met. but your erectile dysfunction - it could be a question of blood flow. cialis tadalafil for daily use helps you be ready anytime the moment's right. you can be more confident in your ability to be ready. and the same cialis is the only daily ed tablet approved to treat ed and symptoms of bph like needing to go frequently or urgently. tell your doctor about all your medical conditions and medications, and ask if your heart is healthy enough for sexual activity. do not take cialis if you take nitrates for chest pain, as this may cause an unsafe drop in blood pressure. do not drink alcohol in excess with cialis. side effects may include headache, upset stomach, delayed backache or muscle ache. to avoid long-term injury, seek immediate medical help for an erection lasting more than 4 hours. if you have any sudden decrease or loss in hearing or vision, or if you have any allergic reactions such as rash, hives, swelling of the lips, tongue or throat, or difficulty breathing or swallowing, stop taking cialis and get medical help right away. ask your doctor about cialis for daily use and a 30-tablet free trial. wi drive a ford fusion. who is healthier, you or your car? i would say my car. probably the car. cause as you get older you start breaking down. i love my car. i want to take care of it. i have a bad wheel - i must say. my car is running quite well. keep your car healthy with the works. $29.95 or less after $10 mail-in rebate at your participating ford dealer. so you gotta take care of yourself? yes you do. you gotta take care of your baby? oh yeah!