does he have a point? >> well, one of the themes of his argument is that the only way you can take away a franchise is if there is some financial misconduct, if you don't pay the bills, don't pay the players. so the moral clauses, the statements to his girlfriend, what ever she was, certainly are not financial impropriety. again, i don't think it's a winning argument because the nba can decide what's financially damaging to the league and they have filed extensive affidavits with the league saying, look at all of the sponsors who have left. look at all of the players who won't play. that is a financial implication of sterling's comments. >> all right. let's go to page 8 now of the document, jeffrey, where he references anderson cooper's interview here, cnn. he says the interview does not violate the constitution and talks about v. stiviano's