approach to the power of the federal government to regulate health and safety. this is the first time we're seeing it dramatically come through and as joan suggested the three most conservative justices suggested they would strike down many, many other regulations in the future dramatically restricting the ability of the federal government to regulate health and safety. this may be the first salvo in a dramatic clash about different visions of the scope of the federal government and it came in a pretty important case involving vaccines and covid. >> the biden administration had asked if the court ruled against the vaccine mandate for large businesses, that it at least leave in place requirements for masking and frequent testing. why did the majority rule against that as well? what did they say? >> they really brushed off that option, really dismissed it as if it was even an option. the majority opinion referred to the fact that the administration's requirement says if you don't have a policy