intentional, or had knowledge? there's no evidence of knowledge. so what i'm saying is this, judge, it's not even criminal negligence enough to support a misdemeanor. just a couple of cases i want to mention to the court, that specifically involve criminal negligence involving a child, and in each of these cases, it explains very clearly, there's got to be some knowledge or appreciation of the potential harm. johnson versus the state, 292 georgia at 856, that was a felony murder based on cruelty in the second, the court did find criminal negligence whereby the defendant left her methadone out for her child to get into, and then when the child went comatose, she just didn't seek medical care for a couple of hours. that was criminal negligence because her actions were done with knowledge.