>> absolutely. it's actually a no-brainer on so many levels. for one, this is a strong case so why would you abandon the sort of normal system of criminal justice? but for symbolic reasons. >> that. but also, as for the same reason they held off on mirandized him, to get as much information from him in case there are other plots. >> so this is where the question of what they can get out of him and what they can use in court are sort of different questions at this stage. they can ask him a lot of questions without mirandizing him, although we believe that he has been mirandized at this stage. and get information about him, about either impending threats or what hatched to his brother and what happened over the last week or years even. that doesn't need to be used against him in a court of law. that's what's so amazing about this complaint. the charge is not a terrorism charge. >> use of one weapon of mass destruction presumably because his brother used the other one. >> right. which is broadly defined in the law. it actually means any weapon that's not a firearm or firework. that's just a sort of way to