having witnesses. he's going to say, i don't need to hear more. >> it doesn't rise to the level. >> that's not going to fly with everybody. 80% thinks there should be witnesses. >> this is not sufficient enough to remove the president. >> i want to know if we'll hear from rick's former colleagues on article 2. >> i think you'll find democrats on board with this one, personally. >> against it. >> voting no on article 2. >> really. >> i do. >> i thought you would see republicans voting yes on article 2. >> absolutely not. i think the idea that the democrats are saying, you know, we don't have time to go through the normal process of checks and balances and going to the third branch of government and getting the third branch of government to adjudicate this dispute. to me it completely eliminates the ability to control their privilege under the constitution. >> and then maybe you'll start