comparemela.com

so i think there's some very strong national security argument. >> richardson clearly supporting the president on this issue. a lot of military planners, i've covered the military for a long time. they know there are all these strategies going into warfare. you don't know what's going to happen. there are going to be a lot of unintended consequences. it continues to this day in afghanistan. are you afraid that even a limited strike could drag the united states into prolonged conflict inside that syrian civil war? >> i think the risk of that is relatively low. i think it's very important that the united states takes a firm stand, underscores that stand. not only with a strike, or with the support of the united states congress behind the strike. saying, no use of chemical weapons. some weapons are too inhumane to be used. the united states set up this

Related Keywords

Debbie Wasserman Schultz ,Lot ,Military ,Argument ,Issue ,Security ,Bill Richardson ,Military Planners ,Afghanistan ,Strike ,Unintended Consequences ,Strategies ,Warfare ,Risk ,Stand ,Conflict ,The United States Of America ,Syrian Civil War ,United States Congress ,Weapons Of Mass Destruction ,Tomahawk Cruise Missile ,Saying ,Chemical Weapons ,Support ,Use ,

© 2025 Vimarsana

comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.