>> absolutely. one of the things when we are lawyers, we know the rules of evidence. we know what's admissible and what's not going to be allowed in. it was not admissible. it was irrelevant. it was not brady rule evidence. it did nothing to support george zimmerman's guilt or innocence. it was done solely to try to persuade the jury and influence them. >> okay. it's clearly going to be a very contentious trial. thank you, gentlemen, for joining me. now we go to breaking news. hey, so uh... what's going on here?