the violence taking place, the threat to democracy and he did not act. why is that not enough? >> well, it's certainly a dare ricks dereliction of duty. there's a lot of things that have been done in the past. that's an awful, awful, awful act by the president to sit silently and maybe gleefully as an attack is occurring on our capitol, but whether it's a crime in terms of charging him for the attack itself, we usually in this country, criminal law does not charge people who are merely passively watching as an attack is unfolding. now, he did -- the argument would have to be that he had some sort of duty -- for example, if a capitol police officer just stood by and smiled and waved as the attackers were