department looked at the criminal complaint and the referral from the inspector general for the intelligence community and did a very narrow review. they essentially looked at whether or not this represented a violation of campaign finance law and, look. that is what the inspector general did refer. but we've never known the justice department to limit itself to what people are asking them to investigate. they have the full panoply of u.s. law to look at and see whether or not there are any legal violations, any other legal violations. and so that is where the criticism is coming. the issue here is that the inspector general and the complaint, itself, from the whistle-blower, lay out other possible legal violations, legal issues including perhaps a counterintelligence risk for the president. the justice department instead decided to narrowly look at this from a campaign finance law violation and arrived at the conclusion there was no crime, no violation of campaign finance