doubt, no, the prosecution had the burden to disprove that he actually was not reasonable or was thinking he was reasonable in this case. and so with all of that combined, it is not surprising that they were -- that an acquittal happened. but it came down to that jury instruction about looking through the eyes of kyle rittenhouse and also finally there is also the notion about provocation. remember, he was nott entitled o self-defense if he provoked around hi belief was not reasonable and he failed to exhaust all reasonable means of escape that he knew about. they tried so show that he was not reasonable and this presence alone was provocative in wisconsin where gun owner shich is not equated with criminal activity, they could not show that he failed to escape. they showed him running, the defense pointed at that and combined to leave this acquittal. i hate to vilify prosecutors.