objection raised by the athlete and russian olympic committee. in this regard. then the well aware of the rule on mandatory suspension. but as determined the athlete should benefit from the following exceptional circumstances. first the athlete is under 16. and is a protected person under the world antidoping code. the antidoping rules of and the world antidoping code are silent with respect to provisional suspension imposed on protected persons. why these rules have specific provisions for evidence of for different standard of evidence and lower sanctions in case of protected persons. the panel was therefore concerned that if a preventive suspension would be imposed on the athlete. and later the end of the day