>> no, what we had is a violent incident. what happened is -- well, every individual has a right. this law would protect any person from the right of somebody attacking them. you know, if the scenario that some critics are playing was true that he had traced down an innocent child and shot them, he would be in prison. that's not what happened. there was an observation. clearly, the jury saw what happened is he returned and attacked and was the aggressor against mr. zimmerman. and that's the facts of the case. and they spent hours and hours and hours sorting that out. we have been waiting for this jury trial for them to sort out what happened. and that's what happened. we need to accept that as tragic as it is, that's what happened. >> we need to accept it and move on and not talk about it?