company that backed it, is not actually financially stable. >> this is yet another salvo in this whole thing. >> what do you think, judge engoron is going to do about that? >> yeah. i mean, the bond is a little weird, right let's let's be on it. it's weird and you can contrast it even with the ball on the in the carroll case, that is a bond that has backed by chubb accompany everybody knows and trusts this bond coming from a company. nobody event that is not new york, that nobody really knows. there was some questions whether there was any money behind it. it's it's structured weird as though as though it's actually trump's money as opposed to the surety company's money. there's a lot of reasons to be worried about this bond. >> it's $175 million. so it's not chump change maybe maybe compared to what it could have been. it's jumped change, but it is not chump change. >> and by the way, the reason you want a bond is because on the one hand, you don't want the defendant who's responsible