one solid view of him. it was a more nuanced view. again probably for most of the jury. >> now, if you are in the appellate world trying to look at this and put possibly appeal the process specs of whether there's an impartial jury or not go through been struck for cause or otherwise remember, at the very beginning of this, the judge that he would distinguish those who said they could not be in part partial and a different category without asking follow-up questions compared to those who explained later in the wider your process, those now in florida seemingly impartial jurors might be problematic or an appeal you're trump. let's look ahead to the opening statements here, but that's a very important point now that you've got from the spectrum of jurors on this panel. if you're the prosecutor if you're the defense attorney, you're going to now try to tailor your presentation of the evidence was for the audience as before you today, and that includes those who might be leaning in favor we're i'm trump and those who might be leaning away. but all ultimately impartial right? i mean, that's the that's what all the juror said. they would be able to look at this based on the evidence in the court room and put aside anything