enough for those to sit in deliberate look, it may it may not. >> i mean, i think you're probably will. i don't think the trial is going to go as long as they are predicting. i think they're predicting another five weeks. it probably won't go another five weeks. i don't think it's that complicated, but for sure the alternates are going to come come into play because in a case like this, you're going to lose some of the regular jurors is really unbelievable to think about where we are. and by the way, who is on his jury is gonna be very important. you and i both know that the prosecution, the defense are going to add the tailoring, their arguments, not only with a nod towards what burden of proof path, but now who the audience is going to be, and you've got at least two lawyers who are empaneled on the jury. many people think what a lawyer on a jury that's a bad a deal. what do you think it is very unusual for either side to really want lawyers on the jury that's because you're wrong about that person.