limited resources. while it would be nice to have the option to look over every case of excessive force with a fine-toothed comb and scrutinize it, we don't have those decisions in law enforcement and decisions have to be made. even if there is a claim of excessive force, if a grand jury doesn't indict in another case, maybe the resources aren't available to have a second look at each and every instance of excessive force, but that is why we have the civil system of justice because if you believe that you've been the victim of excessive force and the government will not investigate it, then you can get a private attorney and pursue those claims. it may not satisfy that need for arresting the people that people believe are responsible, but it's all they have. >> may not fit their definition of justice in this case. but in the garner case, are you saying that it's specifically based on resources, or that they have exhausted the system when the grand jury came back without