>> i've been speaking a lot with colleagues and with david. this is tib call. we have to be careful that we don't now throw out everything we've been looking at. this is collection at its finest. this is intelligence analysis and bringing in all the sources we can to help get the best possible area. >> to that end, i want to ask is this still potentially in playing -- because we've seen all the debris. in fact, let's go there. all of this debris is it just sea junk because we know that area collects sea junk because the current's really aggressive in that area, or could that still be debris even though the new search area could be a point of impact? >> bottom line, we don't know. >> it's possible. >> it is possible. we still need more positive identification. we spoke a lot about it in the past couple days, the problem with satellite imagery in a case