>> correct. >> how can they know what cases are coming down the pipe? >> it is all after the fact. >> we still have a bunch of cases to be adjudicated. >> again, that creates the problem. the judges can only decide based on what's before them at the time they have the case. usually, people sue once they have a sense of the scope of the damages. you put your finger on another complexity here. how long are these pictures out here? >> sadly, the internet is forever. the one line i threw in there, there is hardly any sympathy for people like that. does that play in with the nine justices, the kind of persons they are dealing with. >> they deal with criminal cases all the time, murderers, child pornography possessers, creators. they are used to dealing with bad people. even bad people have to have the rule of law applied to them. that's what this case is about. it is also worth pointing out that amy has already received