you're onto a key issue here that's going to be playing out throughout the trial because the prosecutors have to prove that some part of donald trump's and ten and falsifying these records was to cover up for the campaign violation to silence stormy daniels and to help him win the 2016 election. but you're asking, well, how much of the intent does the campaign have to be and what if there's a mixed intent? what if part of donald trump's mind was, well, i want to cover up for the election, but part of it is i don't want to be personally humiliated. i don't want my wife to be humiliated. the latter of which would not be illegal at all. and you're going to see this battle plan hey, out the answer is prosecutors do not have to prove that the old way motive, the 100% motive was campaign related what the jury will likely be instructed that the prosecutors have to show that the campaign motivation was a substantial part of the motivation. now, i'm sure call your thinking like, what percentage is that? that's up to the jury. there's no mathematical formula. whatever the jury thinks is substantial is substantial are really important point. hey, ellie richard, thanks for helping to