and so i'm limited in what i can say about them. i'm aware that there are cases. >> i'm not asking you to decide a case or predict how you would decide in the future. i'm just asking, isn't it apparent that when the supreme court decides that something that is not even in the constitution is a fundamental right and no state can pass any law that conflicts with the supreme court's edict, particularly in an area where people have sincerely held religious beliefs. doesn't that necessarily create a conflict between what people may believe is a matter of their religious doctrine or faith and what the federal government says is the law of the land? >> well, senator, that is the nature of a right, that when there is a right, it means that there are limitations on
Related Keywords
Supreme Court , Case , Take It Or Leave , Cases , Isn T , Law , Something , Constitution , Edict , Estate , Conflicts , People , Beliefs , United States Government , Conflict , Doctrine , Law Of The Land , Faith , Matter , Doesn T , Area , Senator , Unenumerated Fundamental Right , Nature , Limitations ,
comparemela.com © 2020. All Rights Reserved.