>> some people think the turin shroud was produced by radiation at the resurrection in which case that would be material evidence of the resurrection of jesus. there could be nothing more important than that. >> for millions, the shroud is not only proof of the death and resurrection of jesus but the only record of what he looked like. >> there are no physical descriptions of jesus in the gospel, none. we don't know what he looked like. we don't know how tall he was. we don't know what the set of his eyes was, but he had a face. he was a real person. >> it fulfills almost a temptation, a temptation to fixate on the face of christ, to fulfill that idea of the true likeness. what did the son of god look like?