yes, he has. the reality, however, is that he will not abide by the rules imposed with respect to what closing arguments are. you sum up the facts of the case relating to the law of the case using whatever spin you like, but it has to be relevant evidence that has come out during the trial. a news flash that the attorney general's perspective, her team, the perspective is going to differ from trump's team's issues in saying there's not fraud. this is fraud in a way that was comporting with rules and regulations argue the facts, argue what witnesses said, argue what those witnesses said, but you cannot campaign, you cannot attack the attorney general, you can cannot use this as a forum in which to air your grievances. simple rules. if you can't abide by those rules, you cannot speak.