this is because this is the part of the story that both sides say the same thing. but with regard to the crucial part of the story, that being the moments that he shot her and what he was thinking in those moments, the reason now so many discrepancies there, and therefore, cause for cross examination, is because mr. nel asserts he is not telling the truth. so, clearly, he was trying to tie up this very long process of cross examination by emphasizing the core contention that he has been maintaining the whole way through, that the only reasonable inference the judge can draw is that mr. pistorius must be guilty. >> so, what happens next? seven days, some of these very intense days, on the stand. the cross examination is over. what happens next in this trial? >> reporter: well, now mr. pistorius's legal team, barry roux in particular, has the opportunity to re-examine mr. pistorius. and i would expect him to take quite a different approach to